Orbit Post Sitemap
#Anthropic still plans an IPO in November, investors lower valuation expectations With non-farm payrolls approaching, can employment data strengthen December rate hike expectations?
My US stock pre-market diary (November 5, 2026): Major players are dumping SNDK, SpaceX, SOXL — should you short or lay low?
Looking at the pre-market volume leaderboard, don’t be fooled by the “slight dip in the three major indexes.” S&P futures only fell 0.06%, but SOXL pre-market is down 6.93%, SNDK down 2.93%, SpaceX down 1.06%. This is not a broad decline; funds are concentrated on suppressing AI hardware stocks.
The reasons for the declines in these three stocks are completely different.
SND’s revenue surged 372% last quarter, but next quarter guidance of 10.3-10.8 billion is below the expected 11.148 billion, with gross margin flat, showing signs of peaking.
Texas policy shift: the governor proposes suspending new data center construction; Goldman Sachs estimates this affects about 45% of expansion capacity nationwide.
SOXL is a 3x leveraged ETF, dropping from 79 to 62.36, triggering stop-losses and passive liquidations leading to concentrated exits.
SpaceX’s mission delayed due to oxidizer leak; related government contracts are under review.
Software giants did not sell off simultaneously; funds are shifting from compute power narratives to cash flow certainty, not exiting. Open your positions and check stop-loss levels on compute power orders.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC CPI Preview, December Interest Rate Direction Faces a Critical Test $BTC, $ETH Are About to Face a Big Test Again? The most important event in the market this week is the upcoming US CPI inflation data release! The previous non-farm payrolls already dealt a heavy blow to the market, with October adding 165,000 jobs, far exceeding the expected 65,000, and the unemployment rate dropping to 4.1%. Strong employment data has led the market to re-bet on a Fed rate hike in December, with the probability once rising close to 80%. Now everyone's attention is focused on the CPI! Why is this CPI so important? Because it may directly affect the Fed's interest rate decision in December. Currently, the market is in a somewhat awkward position: If CPI continues to rise: Inflation pressure will be hard to ease, expectations for a December rate hike may further heat up, the dollar and US Treasury yields may strengthen, and BTC, ETH, as well as US tech stocks, will face greater pressure. If CPI is below expectations: Signs of cooling inflation may appear, market tightening expectations may ease, and risk assets may see a wave of recovery rebound. If CPI meets expectations: The market may not immediately choose a direction, and subsequent judgments will need to combine employment, consumption, and Fed officials' speeches. My personal view: We cannot simply assume the market will continue to fall just because non-farm payrolls are strong, nor can we prematurely bet on a rebound just because CPI may cool down. What really needs attention is whether the inflation and employment data sets can resonate, and whether the Fed will further release hawkish signals. For BTC, ETOn the same day, for the same type of product, BlackRock's IBIT saw an outflow of $403 million, while Fidelity's FBTC had an inflow of $42.8 million.
SoSoValue recorded a net outflow of about $412 million for the US stock spot Bitcoin ETFs on November 6, with Ethereum ETFs also seeing an outflow of $93.19 million. Two consecutive days of withdrawals, with IBIT almost entirely responsible for the red figures, while FBTC alone turned green. The price is still hovering around 76,117, but the funds have already cast their votes.
If institutions really act as a whole, why can the two largest funds move in completely opposite directions?$SNDK
Storage stock volatility amplifies, how will SanDisk differentiate itself from sector trading?
This week, AI and semiconductors experienced significant pullbacks, and the storage industry chain is also undergoing a capital reassessment. Price changes have amplified market disagreements on demand and supply rhythms.
Flash memory needs to be viewed separately for data centers and consumer ends. Enterprise-level demand growth is more likely to improve overall profitability only if it exceeds the impact of new capacity additions and weak consumption.
I focus on unit price, inventory reduction, and cash expenditure. If the product mix improves and inventory decreases, it can raise expectations for profit recovery; if demand is merely customers stocking up in advance and orders subsequently decline, the judgment on the cycle duration should be lowered.I thought the miners' motto was "just mine one more," but Bitdeer seems more like a self-disciplined canteen in the crypto circle: they cook their own meals and leave not a single bite. 😂
According to PANews, Bitdeer posted a weekly update on X: as of November 6, this week they produced 258.6 $BTC, all sold, with a net holding increase of 0, holding zero inventory excluding customer deposits. I see this more as a shift in managing risk rather than a vote against the market.
Selling the output reduces exposure to price fluctuations of their own inventory, but future mining income is still affected by coin prices; zero holdings do not mean zero risk. Selling coins can bring in cash flow but does not directly prove profitability; profits still depend on costs. So I think judging the operational quality of mining companies is more important than bullish or bearish interpretations. I continue to focus on unit production costs because whether the canteen is profitable cannot be judged by just counting empty plates.🔍 What I'm stuck on isn't the amount of coins sold, but the timeframe of "this week": is one week's activity enough to label mining companies as bearish? Let's not rush to conclusions.
According to Bitdeer's weekly report posted on X, as of November 6, all 258.6 $BTC produced this week have been sold, with net holdings at zero and positions also at zero (excluding customer deposits). What is certain is that coins were sold; what is uncertain is why they were sold.
An interesting detail here: selling the output can convert it back to cash, but it doesn't directly prove a judgment that the coin price will fall. This is my speculation: they may prioritize cash turnover over holding coin exposure. I believe treating this news as an industry bearish signal is weak evidence; the material lacks cost and fund usage details, and the motive isn't confirmed. I will continue to compare subsequent weekly reports and cash expenditures, and won't write a complete narrative for the company based on a single disclosure.Oklo's $3.1B cash position gives its buildout time, but the ~$123M nine-month loss shows why execution discipline still matters. Steel installation at Aurora is tangible progress; the 2030 target for up to 1.2GW in Ohio leaves a long window in which financing, construction and delivery milestones must earn confidence.
#OkloNuclearBuildout The most dangerous moment for a short seller is not the slide that pays the position. It is the bounce that does not. The recent rout in US equities, which drove the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index to its steepest one-day fall since March 2020, has handed bearish traders a tempting narrative: storage names look vulnerable, and $SNDK has become a favoured expression of that view. But the mechanics of shorting invert the usual psychology. Falling prices invite conviction and size; rising prices tETF funds have started to run together
From running in turns to running together. Confidence in ETH hasn't stabilized; once the leading ETF expands, the turning point arrives
Yesterday, the US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net outflow of 411.9 million USD, marking two consecutive trading days of large withdrawals; the Ethereum ETF had a net outflow of 93.3 million USD during the same period, also for two consecutive days.
This year, funds have been switching back and forth between BTC and ETH, but this time they flowed out simultaneously—the selling pressure has spread from a single asset to the entire spot ETF channel.
ETH is even more worth watching: 93.3 million USD is not a large absolute amount, but after October 8, there were 8 consecutive days of outflows, with an inflow of only 4.4 million on October 23, and now two consecutive days of giving back. This indicates that institutional demand for ETH allocation has not yet stabilized.
The issuer breakdown was not disclosed, but in similar outflows in June, IBIT had a single-day outflow of 388.6 million, accounting for about 75%. When leading products move, the capital turning point is amplified.
$BTC and $ETH have shifted from running in turns to running together
#BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 I'll teach everyone a trick to determine if an exchange is safe! Watch carefully!
My view is that to judge whether a platform is safe, you can first look at the K-line trend of its platform token. K-lines often reflect some future events in advance. Previously, the platform tokens of collapsed exchanges showed signs of frantic cashing out early on the K-line.
Now look at BNB: its current market cap is still as high as $90 billion, and the K-line trend remains within a normal correction range, even more resilient than most major coins. For example, BNB dropped 5.1% yesterday, while most major coins fell more than 9%.
So, judging only from the platform token K-line perspective, my conclusion is just two words: rest assured, very safe.
Not an advertisement, analyzed with conscience! $BNB Net increase of 0 coins, I think this goes against the narrative of hoarding coins, weakening bullish sentiment, but this alone cannot determine that the $BTC trend has turned bearish. Bitdeer has sold all its output this week; the selling pressure is real, and whether the market can absorb it is the key.
I follow three rules for trend tracking: look at price for direction, not the attitude of mining companies; assess strength by absorption, not just the volume of coins sold; confirm continuation by verification, not by guessing the top from single-week disclosures.
The trend is the best friend, I wait for the movement to be verified. After such mining company news comes out, do you use moving averages or volume-price relationships to judge if the trend has changed?Let's do the math: Bitcoin at 76046.7, ranging from 74887.9 to 76378.7, fluctuating 1490 points in one day, finally settling in the middle, up 0.49%.
If you chase back and forth within this 1500-point range, fees plus slippage easily eat up two to three hundred points, leaving less than enough for a single stop loss. So I simply haven't made any moves these past few days, just watching it grind.
The details are actually deteriorating: six candles in one hour, closing at 76042.9, 76039, 75897.4, 75908.1, 76034.6, 76056.6; the highest candle had a volume of 110, surging high then falling back; the volumes climbing back afterward were only 64 and 79, and the last one just over 5 points. The rise is on shrinking volume, the fall on expanding volume—this structure is unhealthy.
Looking at the 4-hour mid-term line at 76622, the price has been below it; the funding rate is 0.00000397, down again from a few hours ago, indicating bulls are losing the willingness to pay.
The conclusion is straightforward: don't chase above 76000; if you really want to act, wait around 75500 to see the reaction; if it breaks 74887, then it's no longer a pullback. Those who wait don't lose money; those who chase get hit every day.#US October Nonfarm Payrolls Exceed Expectations, December Rate Hike Bets Heat Up Nonfarm Payrolls Explode! BTC keeps hovering around 75,000, which of the three scenarios in Orbit do you support? 📉👀$BTC
Last night, the US October nonfarm payroll data was released, showing an increase of 165,000 jobs, far exceeding the expected 65,000, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%. Once the data came out, bets on a December rate hike instantly heated up, and the US dollar index surged sharply. Normally, strong nonfarm payrolls suppress risk assets, so BTC should have crashed directly, but the market kept grinding near 75,000 and even showed a counter-trend rebound.
Looking at community opinions, there are currently three main scenarios:
Scenario A (Oversold Rebound): Under strong nonfarm pressure, the counter-trend rebound of risk assets is mostly a technical oversold bounce, with no logic for a trend reversal, and its sustainability is doubtful, so don't jump in lightly.
Scenario B (Betting on Short Covering): The market had already fallen deeply before the nonfarm data release, so the better-than-expected data became a reason for shorts to cover positions. With the bad news out, the market has now shifted to short-term speculation.
Scenario C (Prudent Macro): A single month of strong nonfarm payrolls is not enough to set the path; the real watershed will be the upcoming CPI and dot plot guidance. The current rise in rate hike bets is just short-term noise.
My personal view:
In the short term, I lean towards Scenario B; the short covering at the moment the data landed is definitely a trading opportunity; but in the medium term, I support Scenario C.
Macro data noise is too high; rather than guessing the Fed, it's better to wait for CPI data to do right-side trading.
Do you think this is a "dead cat bounce" or that the bad news is fully priced in? Are you bullish or bearish today? Come discuss in the comments.$QQQ has plummeted more than 6%, even breaking below the 50-week moving average! This is a risk for short-term investors but could be an opportunity for long-term investors!
I strongly agree with wander's observation! I pulled up the weekly chart of QQQ for nearly 10 years and found a phenomenon that long-term investors should seriously consider. Currently, QQQ is around $647, having broken below the 200-day moving average of $680 and the 50-week moving average of $669, but it is still far from the 200-week moving average of $504.
What does this mean? The short-term trend has clearly weakened, but the long-term upward structure has not been completely destroyed! Looking back at the major corrections in 2018, 2020, and 2022, after QQQ broke below the 50-week moving average, it often experienced painful volatility or further declines, but over a longer period, it also provided good opportunities for phased accumulation.
I have always believed that when investing in the Nasdaq 100, the most important thing is not to guess the lowest point but to accumulate quality assets with discipline during market panic. Of course, breaking below the 50-week moving average does not mean it is cheap enough yet, nor can it rule out the risk of further approaching the 200-week moving average. My strategy is simple: respect the short-term trend, focus on long-term opportunities, build positions in phases, keep cash on hand, and avoid rushing to bottom fish all at once.
True long-term investors should learn to study opportunities when others are fearful, rather than panic along with market sentiment!AI stocks rebounded, but the gains shrank by half, did the bottom-fishers end up taking the hit again?
Not necessarily. A single day of a rise followed by a fall is not enough to declare the rebound dead.
Last night, Nvidia rose about 7% intraday but closed with only 2.8%; the Nasdaq narrowed from 1.7% to 1.1%. There were buyers at the low, but once the price went up, sell orders pushed it down.
Three points to clarify:
1. Panic easing ≠ confidence restored
The rebound includes both bottom-fishers and short-covering. Just because some dare to bet doesn’t mean others dare to chase the highs.
2. After a big drop, a rebound is possible; to keep rising requires worries to cool down
The market fears tighter AI regulation and a slowdown in data centers. One day of price increase won’t make these issues disappear; we still need to watch policy details and capital expenditure guidance.
3. The sector is diverging
AMD and Intel closed up about 11% and 8%, clearly stronger than Nvidia; capital is starting to pick selectively.
Next week, watch three things: whether the pullback can hold Friday’s low, whether the leading stocks can continue to be strong, and whether the price can hold above Friday’s high on another rally.
Repeated high opens and low closes mean using the rebound to exit; a pullback with shrinking volume followed by expanding volume breakout means the rebound is solid.
Panic is retreating, but there aren’t enough buyers chasing the rise yet. The first bullish candle only shows the downtrend is easing; whether the bottom is solid depends on subsequent support.Last night's Non-Farm Payrolls release triggered another market pullback and liquidation wave. Fortunately, my previously placed large $BTC buy order at $75,000 was finally filled! $BTC : Bitcoin currently lacks independent bullish catalysts and remains heavily influenced by interest-rate expectations. The stronger-than-expected employment data pushed the market to price in a 20bp rate hike in December, while the US Dollar Index and Treasury yields moved higher. Under these circumstances, $BTC #BTC spot ETF has seen a net outflow of about $416 million this year. The 24-hour increase is 6%, approaching 2450, but incremental spot funds have not entered the market.
This recent rise near 2450 comes from concentrated short position liquidations; the previous outflow of ETF funds has not been reversed or absorbed. The market only recorded a slight continuation of 1.14%, with very faint signs of buying momentum.
A large number of orders are stacked between 2440 and 2450. The 2500 level is the dividing line for the market trend. Only by holding the 2350 support on a pullback and then breaking through 2450 with volume can the trend repair and continue.
Compare with your position list and check the distance between your take-profit orders and the 2450 resistance line.
$ETH $BTC $SOL $FET
Artificial intelligence and blockchain are often discussed together, but combining two technologies does not automatically create a useful product. Fetch.ai's vision around autonomous agents and decentralized machine intelligence offers an interesting direction. The important distinction is between speculative interest and functioning applications. Real agent activity, developer participation, and practical utility will ultimately matter more than AI narratives.$ONE rose 57%, but no one can clearly explain why it surged
ONE directly surged 57% today, jumping from 0.0011 to 0.00198, nearly doubling in one day. Trading volume expanded 21 times, from a few million to over twenty million dollars.
Interestingly, after the rise, mainstream media only gave one sentence as the reason, with no confirmed catalyst. So what is the market speculating on? After some research, two explanations were found.
First is transformation. Harmony is preparing to shift from a Layer 1 public chain to the "AI video" sector, creating a platform called The Remix Economy for AI Video. Second is migration. It plans to migrate the chain to Ethereum and will distribute tokens to eligible wallets.
Both explanations are "stories," not "progress." The transformation has no timeline, the migration lacks a technical plan, and the token distribution ratio hasn't even been disclosed. More importantly, this project suffered a vulnerability attack in August, causing the chain to roll back, so its trust foundation is weak.
Therefore, the judgment is: this wave is driven by funds speculating on stories, not value reassessment. Do not chase; you can short lightly around 0.00195, set a stop loss at 0.00215, and target 0.0017 first! #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 Last night, the October nonfarm payrolls were released, completely smashing expectations.
Added 165,000 jobs, expected 65,000, with the previous two months revised up by 84,000; unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%.
As soon as the data came out, the market immediately changed its tune: the probability of a rate hike in December surged from about 75% to around 80%.
#FederalReserve observations show the probability of keeping rates unchanged in December is only 22.3%, while the probability of a 25 basis point hike is 77.7%. Short-term interest rate futures fell, with traders increasing bets on another hike in December.
Employment growth is broad-based, led by professional business services and healthcare.
But one detail is worth noting: the initial one-year inflation expectation for November is 4.3%, lower than the expected 4.7%. Inflation expectations are falling, yet employment is so strong, giving the Federal Reserve more room to refocus policy on inflation pressures.
Additionally, the #US economy now only needs to create about 40,000 jobs per month to keep up with the growth of the working-age population — this breakeven level has dropped from about 150,000 in 2024. Labor supply is shrinking due to tighter immigration and increased retirements, which is the main reason for the low unemployment rate. Economists and Federal Reserve officials have consistently believed that the labor market itself does not pose an inflation risk.
Employment is strong enough to revive #ratehike bets, and the low unemployment rate keeps the Federal Reserve calm. Whether to hike in December or not, this report has tipped the scales toward "hike" again.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 If the bulls were to hold a homeowners' meeting and saw this ratio of participants, they might think they should have full control over the elevator ads. But the market isn't like property management; even if more people raise their hands, it doesn't necessarily decide which floor to go to. 😂
According to OKEx futures trading data, the current $BTC long-to-short ratio is 2.98, compared to 2.96 24 hours ago. That means for every 1 short position account, there are 2.98 long position accounts. What I care more about is the usage boundary of this "roster": it's suitable for warning about crowding risk, but not for comparing the capital strength between longs and shorts.
The reason is straightforward: the ratio of participants doesn't consider position size; having more accounts doesn't equal more capital, as a few large positions can shift the power balance. Also, the change from 2.96 to 2.98 is only 0.02, so you can't say that a state already biased toward longs suddenly saw a flood of people entering. As for extreme situations that tend to reverse, I treat that as a risk warning, not an automatic short trigger—the data doesn't provide a specific threshold to define "extreme."
If the ratio continues to rise, I'll pay more attention to crowding risk. This is my speculation, not a market forecast. When you see a ratio close to 3 to 1, which mistake are you more likely to make: feeling safe following the majority, or rushing to join the minority? Pick one—the market doesn't hand out awards for best conformity or best contrarian.ETF turned to net outflow, let's first pour some cold water: I am bearish, but I don't agree with directly translating this news as "funds continuously fleeing crypto." This daily report also mentioned pressure on tech stocks and rising US Treasury yields, indicating poor risk appetite, but a pessimistic narrative still needs evidence to support it.
I'm stuck on two points: the report doesn't provide the scale or persistence of the ETF outflow, so based on direction alone, it's hard to tell if it's a short-term portfolio adjustment or a trend withdrawal; rising US Treasury yields increase the opportunity cost of holding risky assets, which could be a reason for funds to withdraw, but it's not proof of continuous outflows. Mixing the two can easily exaggerate the signal.
Of course, the bearish view could also be correct. If ETFs continue to have net outflows and interest rate pressure doesn't ease, I would lean more toward the judgment that capital demand is weakening. Next, I will focus on the persistence of capital flows and won't use a single "net outflow" to stamp the entire trend.The risk-reward of this matter is asymmetric: changing the billing incurs costs, but the returns can only be seen after the rules are finalized. CryptoSlate states that the EIP-8037 state gas rules force Ethereum applications to rewrite billing; the call on November 6 urges projects to test gas assumptions and report fixes, which may affect the Glamsterdam specification.
I tend to see this as adaptation pressure rather than a market positive. Old billing assumptions need retesting, and applications relying on gas sponsorship or fixed pricing may be more sensitive—this is my speculation. Fix feedback can also impact the specification, meaning timely testing could reduce rework later, but it doesn't necessarily mean user fees will decrease.
If testing can reveal cost boundaries, the investment is worthwhile; if the rules are not finalized and a full rewrite is done, the risk of rework may lower expectations. I will watch the test results and specification changes closely and will not give technical proposals extra weight in price odds.#马斯克预计SpaceX年底年化营收突破1000亿美元
The boss has something to say
I came across Musk's post and first noticed a detail: he said SpaceX's annualized revenue will hit $100 billion by the end of 2026, with Q4 quarter-on-quarter growth of 70%, but he specifically emphasized this is an annualized run rate, not full-year revenue; the target for the end of 2027 is $500 billion annualized. The growth focus shifts from rockets and Starlink to AI computing power, with government orders dropping from 16.6% in Q3 to below 10% in Q4. Meanwhile, Tesla plans to stop Cybertruck production at the Texas factory by mid-2027 to free up capacity for the Cybercab autonomous taxi.
My interpretation is: Musk is telling the market a bigger story — transforming from a space company into an AI and robotics company. But the current macro environment is not buying it: non-farm payrolls disappointed, December rate hike probability is 79%, and the whole market is killing high-valuation narratives. The $100 billion annualized projection he painted can't support the stock price in the short term. For the crypto space, SPCX-related coins have weak correlation with BTC, mostly sentiment-driven, and do not constitute trading signals.
BTC is currently around 74,800, consolidating on Saturday. My approach: I listen to Musk's story but keep my position unchanged; 75,000 remains resistance, looking down to 73,000. For weekend news like this, just take a look, don't chase it with real money.
The above analysis is time-sensitive, please stay safe. $BTC $ETH $SNDK #RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？ RKLB is about to release its Q3 earnings! Could this be the catalyst for a stock price rebound?
Rocket Lab (RKLB) will announce its Q3 2026 earnings after the U.S. market close on November 9. After recent intense volatility in tech growth stocks, this earnings report could be a crucial turning point for RKLB's next phase.
The market currently expects Q3 revenue of about $257 million, a year-over-year increase of approximately 66%, with a loss per share of about $0.07. Previously, Q2 revenue set a record at $234 million, with a backlog of $2.36 billion, indicating that demand in commercial space remains strong.
I believe there are three key points to watch in this earnings report:
① Can revenue continue to exceed expectations? The market already anticipates rapid growth, so merely meeting expectations may not be enough to sustain a stock price rise.
② Progress of the Neutron rocket. Compared to short-term profits, the development progress, first flight timing, and commercial orders of Neutron may more directly impact long-term valuation. The project timeline has been adjusted before, so the latest guidance from management is especially critical.
③ Growth expectations for 2027. Whether the Space Systems business, defense orders, and satellite business integration can bring higher revenue and profit growth will determine if the market is willing to continue granting RKLB a growth premium.
#RKLB #RocketLab #USStocks #EarningsSeason #CommercialSpace #Neutron$ATOM
Cosmos has an interesting challenge: its technology supports an interconnected blockchain ecosystem, but that does not automatically guarantee value accrual to ATOM. The relationship between ecosystem expansion, interchain security, and token demand deserves closer attention. A growing network of independent chains is promising, but the economic benefits must reach the core ecosystem.$MU
Micron rebounds with chips; what is the validation point for the memory cycle?
On November 6 intraday, Micron and the semiconductor sector rebounded together. This reflects a change in risk appetite but cannot alone prove that memory supply and demand are tightening again.
Memory companies' profits are sensitive to price and utilization. Strong AI memory demand does not mean all product lines can raise prices simultaneously; weak consumer demand may also drag down the mix.
I am more focused on subsequent contract prices, inventory, and capital expenditures. If high value-added products ramp up while ordinary product inventory declines, the recovery is more comprehensive; if capacity expansion outpaces demand and customers rebuild inventory, a single-day rebound cannot eliminate cycle risks.Last night, the October nonfarm payroll data significantly exceeded market expectations: 165,000 new jobs added, expected 65,000, with the previous two months revised upward by a total of 84,000, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%.
After the data release, the probability of a rate hike in December rose from about 75% to around 80%; the probability of maintaining the rate in December is 22.3%, and the probability of a 25 basis point hike is 77.7%. Short-term interest rate futures fell as traders increased their bets on a December rate hike. Job growth was broad-based, with professional business services and healthcare leading.
Notably, the initial one-year inflation expectation for November was 4.3%, below the expected 4.7%. Inflation expectations have declined, but employment remains strong, giving the Federal Reserve more room to focus on inflation pressures.
The economy keeps pace with labor force growth, requiring only about 40,000 new jobs per month, a breakeven value that has fallen from about 150,000 in 2024. Labor supply contraction, tighter immigration, and increased retirements are the main reasons for the lower unemployment rate. The Federal Reserve and economists believe the labor market itself does not pose inflation risks.
Strong employment data has reignited rate hike expectations, and the low unemployment rate also makes the Federal Reserve's stance more hawkish. This report further tilts the direction toward a rate hike in December.$TON
TON has an interesting distribution advantage through its connection with Telegram's ecosystem. Yet access to a large communication platform does not automatically create sustainable blockchain adoption. The important distinction is between users discovering crypto applications and users consistently finding value in them. Developer quality, user retention, and application utility will determine how far this opportunity develops.Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), and SOL ($SOL) simultaneously experienced a downward trend, but their liquidation structures in the derivatives market have taken completely different paths. Bitcoin's current price is near 76154, down 5.69% in 24 hours. Although the overall market still leans bullish, the main liquidations during this downturn were shorts, with the squeeze from the rebound causing losses for the short side. Ethereum ($ETH) is in a tighter situation, down 7.81%, with the long-short ratio further rising. The long position crowding is the highest among the three major coins, and many long orders have been forced to close recently. SOL ($SOL) fell 6.28%, with a relatively milder trend. The long-short ratio slightly declined, but the liquidation pressure is also borne by the longs. This round of declines in $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL belongs to an ongoing downtrend, but internal forces have already split. The crowded long positions in $ETH and $SOL still face the risk of forced selling, while Bitcoin's long-short structure is relatively balanced, allowing for greater two-way volatility. The key next point to watch is whether the 75000 level can hold. If the support fails, Ethereum and SOL may face even more intense sell-offs than Bitcoin.Burning is not fireworks, it's a pump🔒(๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
The crypto world is never short of "burn announcements," but the chain won't play along. The real issue isn't how much is burned, but whether the chips are continuously taken away and locked.
$BNB: The solid feeling from the big brother🤔
37 rounds have cumulatively burned 1.646 million tokens, with the target reduced to 100 million. The mechanism is solidly implemented. But after the trust shock, daily active users dropped 14%, with 700 as the core defense level. Only by holding this can there be a recovery scenario; if broken, don't stubbornly preach faith📉.
$HYPE: Hard rules, hard valuation😅
Burn and buyback rules are strict, and reserve income is still rising. But FDV is pulled up to 99x, so the good news has long been priced in. Chasing above 83? First ask if the odds agree👀.
$UNI: Rising against the trend, but don't rush to get hyped
On the day of the market bloodbath, burns actually increased in volume; yesterday burned 62,000 tokens, more than twice the median of the past 30 days, totaling 113.8 million tokens. Looks fierce, but it's more like fees rising with volatility, not an independent positive. When the coin price doesn't follow the burn, don't mistake volume increase for a reversal (￣▽￣)ノ.
In short: Who is really moving chips? Look at whether the chain can continuously take them away and lock them long-term. Only if the pump keeps running can the premium stand firm🔒✨
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 🔍A number that looks bullish, can it really be taken directly as a market signal? OKEx data shows that the BTC contract long-short ratio is currently 2.98, compared to 2.96 24 hours ago, meaning for every 1 short account, there are 2.98 long accounts. The data is updated hourly, but here only the number of accounts is counted, not the position size.
An interesting detail here: the ratio only slightly increased from 2.96 to 2.98, indicating a slight increase in the proportion of long accounts, but it does not prove that long capital has simultaneously strengthened. It could just be more retail traders siding with the bulls, or a few large short positions on the other side holding down the market; the number of accounts and actual capital are not the same.
My judgment is: this data is more like a "bullish sentiment reminder" rather than a confirmed trend, and we should even be cautious of a reverse swing after a one-sided move. Because the higher the value, the more crowded the market tends to be; but the source only says extreme values may reverse, and does not indicate that 2.98 is already extreme. Interpreting it directly as bullish or bearish is somewhat premature.
This is my speculation: if the ratio continues to rise but the price does not strengthen accordingly, the divergence between sentiment and price is worth watching; if the ratio falls back but the price remains stable, it may indicate that the bulls have not completely lost support. Going forward, will everyone focus more on changes in the ratio, or on whether it diverges from price movement?$ONE surged 50% yesterday and continues to soar 23% today. Even though it's about to exit the crypto space, it just won't calm down! Recently, the project team Harmony announced the shutdown of the mainnet and pivoted to the AI remix industry. The blockchain explorer is also about to close. $ONE will become an air coin without a project team. It's uncertain if major exchanges will delist it. Chasing longs now is basically courting death. After this surge, short it until it gets delisted!A post about a mistaken transfer brought the "UID" into the spotlight.
A user wanted to transfer assets from Binance main site to Binance Thailand, but instead of filling in the address, they directly entered a string of UID. When the confirmation page popped up, they didn't verify and just clicked continue, and the money went into someone else's account. He Yi responded that Binance UIDs are unique and there are no duplicates — it wasn't the system giving the wrong number, but this string corresponds to another person in a different system.
Here is a structural issue that is easy to overlook. UID is an internal sequence number, only valid within the ledger that issued it. He Yi clearly stated that the account systems of local fiat platforms like Binance Thailand, Binance Turkey, and Binance US are independent. What does independence mean? The same number can represent four different people in four places.
The significance of the second confirmation is therefore clear: it is the only chance to align what "I think" with the "actual." Address, UID, network, amount — read them one by one. This user skipped it, effectively leaving the verification to luck. Transfers of $BTC and $USDT are irreversible once sent.
Afterwards, He Yi and 4 employees assisted in freezing the related funds and are contacting the recipient user for negotiation. The response is considered proactive, but essentially it is a goodwill remedy, not a system guarantee: whether the freeze succeeds depends on the recipient's cooperation.
So the issue is not "whether Binance compensates," but that the only reliable credential for cross-platform transfers is the address; UID can only be used within the same system. Treating internal sequence numbers as universal credentials is treating two ledgers as one.$ZEC has just completed a major upgrade, reducing block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, effectively tripling the speed. However, the upgrade temporarily locked about 12,200 ZEC, worth over $15 million, from being transferred.
Zcash's NU7 upgrade was officially activated at block height 3,543,405. Besides speeding up transaction confirmations, it also adjusted fee distribution: 40% to miners and 60% into a network security reserve, planned to be gradually reissued starting in 2031.
Interestingly, this upgrade did not increase ZEC's daily issuance rate, nor did it change the 21 million supply cap.
ZEC is currently around $1,330, up about 5% in 24 hours, with trading volume still in the billion-dollar range. When the upgrade news broke the day before, the price actually dropped temporarily.
I think Zcash is addressing the practical experience of privacy payments this time, rather than just hyping concepts. It competes with Monero for privacy demand but also faces speed competition from regular payment chains.
However, the fee reserve is not a permanent burn and should not be directly interpreted as deflationary. The inability to transfer old privacy pool assets may also affect user confidence.
I am not chasing the price increase of ZEC for now; I want to see if the real private transaction volume can sustain growth after the upgrade.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 Oversold recovery ≠ trend reversal
After a "night of terror" in the crypto market, selling pressure has temporarily eased, but the market looks more like it's catching its breath rather than reversing trend. On the macro side, after the midterm elections, the Democratic Party controls Congress, expectations for tighter AI regulation are rising, combined with stronger-than-expected nonfarm payrolls fueling rate hike concerns, putting risk assets under synchronized pressure.
🔸$BTC is at $75,832, dipping intraday to $74,762; $75,500 is the short-term defense line, and if broken, $69,000 will come into view.
🔸$ETH is at $2,234, down 7% in a day, erasing all post-election gains, with weakening moving averages and RSI at only 40; failure to reclaim $2,251 may test $2,204.
🔸$SOL is at $90.02, with last week's ETF net outflow hitting a record $71.47 million, futures long liquidation accounting for 92%, price at a two-month low, 50-day and 200-day EMAs approaching a death cross, showing significant technical pressure.
Overall, regulatory uncertainty, tech stock sell-offs, and crypto capital outflows are resonating. The current rebound mainly comes from oversold recovery and is insufficient to confirm a bottom; short-term focus should remain on risk prevention.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 ☀️ Uncle's Weekly Report｜2026.11.02—11.06 One-sentence summary This week the market didn't change direction, it changed the algorithm: from "telling stories" to "calculating returns." 1. This Week's Market｜Buy the outcome first, then sell the cost The US stock market experienced a full emotional reversal. On November 4, the Democratic Party achieved an overwhelming victory in the midterm elections, and the market initially bought in on the "elimination of uncertainty" as a positive. The Dow Jones rose 3.03% in a single day, closing at 53,356 points; the Nasdaq rose 1.44%, and the S&P 500 rose 1.59%. But just one day later, the market began recalculating the cost of policies and investments. On November 5, the Dow fell 3.44%, the Nasdaq fell 5.52%, the S&P fell 4.36%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plummeted about 12.25%, marking the second-largest single-day drop in history. The Nasdaq 100 dropped over 6%, with related component stocks losing about $2.5 trillion in market value in one day. On November 6, tech stocks staged a retaliatory rebound: the Nasdaq rose 1.09%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 4.21%, but the Dow still fell about 0.5%. The rebound couldn't recover the week's losses: the Nasdaq fell 3.4% for the week, the S&P fell 2.7%, and the Dow fell about 0.9%. The weekly index looks not too bad, but the process was a violent valuation recalculation. The A-shares closed higher for the week but cooled noticeably on Friday. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.39% for the week, closing at 3,649 points; the Shenzhen Component Index rose 3.16%, the ChiNext Index rose 2.14%, and the STAR Market Composite Index rose 5.28%. But on Friday, the Shanghai Composite Index fell 1. #US Crypto Regulation: "CLARITY Act" Progress Stalled, 401(k) Rules Enter Final Review Employment range between 50,000 and 100,000, abnormal ETH fund positioning before Nonfarm Payrolls
ADP figures remain flat compared to previous values, employment status stuck at a vague boundary, unable to lock in market direction in advance. Traditionally, funds tend to move to safety before Nonfarm Payrolls, but now both longs and shorts are continuously building positions in the ETH market.
Only when the range falls between 50,000 and 100,000 does the market have room for recovery; below 50,000 or breaking through 100,000 will directly disrupt the previous market rhythm.
Review your ETH holdings and check if stop-loss positions can withstand the data impact.
$ETH $BTC $SOL 【CYBER repurchased $13 million in one year, can it really support the token price?】
Over the past year, Cyber has cumulatively repurchased about $13 million worth of $CYBER, with the team indeed putting real money behind supporting the token. Compared to the current circulating market cap of CYBER, which is about $20 million to $25 million, this amount is quite significant, nearly half of its circulating market cap.
However, the repurchase amount cannot be directly considered as permanently burned tokens, nor should it be understood that the team still holds this buying position. The official announcement did not specify the exact number of tokens repurchased, the average cost, or the subsequent handling method, which are the factors that determine its actual impact on circulating supply.
Currently, CYBER has rebounded from the low of about $0.23 on November 5, with the price once rising above $0.32, an increase of about 20% in the past 7 days. But on November 14, about 1.76 million tokens will be unlocked, accounting for about 2.9% of the current circulating supply.
The $13 million repurchase has indeed given holders some confidence, but what truly determines whether CYBER can sustain a continuous trend is whether the ecosystem has real demand and whether the repurchase can continuously translate into supply contraction. TRX as a whole remains in a sideways and relatively stable state, with very little intraday volatility, indicating that there is no obvious chasing or panic selling of funds. TRON's core advantages remain stablecoin transfers, on-chain payments, and a relatively high actual usage frequency. This kind of "cash flow-type public chain" tends to be more resistant to volatility than purely narrative assets during market fluctuations. However, TRX's explosive potential is usually limited, with more focus on the circulation of on-chain USDT, ecosystem data, and whether large funds continue to settle. The current trend's key point is not how high a single candlestick can pull up, but whether it can maintain a stable center of gravity and continuously attract incremental funds. $TRXThree things this week: money got expensive, dragged down by the stock market, and the backing changed.
① US October employment at 165,000, expected only 65,000, rate cut hopes dashed, interest rates remain high, both the dollar and US Treasury yields rise. Money becomes expensive, non-yielding assets get drained first—Friday's US stock rebound, BTC didn't follow, more important to watch than the candlestick.
② The big drop on the 5th wasn't an internal collapse, but a spillover. First, BTC was pushed up to 80,000 on policy friendliness, then AI returns became doubtful, Nasdaq fell 5.52%, chips dropped 12%, panic index soared to 70%. Once leverage broke, 1.24 billion liquidated in one day, 230,000 people wiped out, ETF outflows of 870 million over four days.
③ Valuation anchors recalculated: Democrats took both chambers, plan to expand SEC powers and restrict officials from touching crypto, loosening expectations pushed to 2028; Binance's 6.3 billion theft aftermath not over, 3.64 billion ran on first withdrawal day; Mainland also investigating Solana's illegal marketing in Shanghai.
In a nutshell: past price support relied on "easy money + relaxed regulation," now both have reversed. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% $SNDK is pressured by midterm election bearish factors. SanDisk had been falling all along, so why did it suddenly surge yesterday and then drop back today, stuck at 835 in a sideways pattern?
First, let's answer the first question: why the rise?
1. The short-term drop was too steep, triggering a technical rebound demand [oversold rebound].
Also, after the price dropped near 800, a large number of shorts chose to close positions and take profits, which is [short covering].
At the same time, short-term [bottom-fishing funds] entered the market to speculate on a rebound, pushing the price up.
2. [Panic sentiment temporarily eased], and the market is testing the strength of policy implementation.
Because the policy proposals still have a long way to go before landing, execution, and taking effect—not an immediate cut—this gave a rebound window.
3. Cloud stocks like Microsoft $MSFT strengthened, boosting sentiment across the AI sector.
To add, Microsoft’s strength is because the Democrats restrict new data center construction, making existing computing power scarce, while cloud providers like Microsoft, Amazon, and $GOOGL have already built data centers, so they benefit.
Therefore, this rise has no new fundamental positive news, no order increases, no institutional target price upgrades—purely sentiment and capital speculation❗
Second, why did it fall back today and now move sideways?
1. The core bearish logic remains unchanged; the Democrats’ restrictions on the AI industry have not been lifted.
2. After rebounding to a high level, bulls concentrated on taking profits and exiting, while overhead trapped positions also reduced holdings at highs.
3. Bulls and bears entered a divergence phase, leading to sideways consolidation.
Due to limited space, the next article will discuss how to operate going forward👇$BTC has returned to just above 75,000, ETH dropped to 2226, and SOL is holding the 90 mark. The voices of bottom-fishing in the background are intensifying again, but I still say: no rush.
Look at a more honest indicator than price, the funding rate. A true oversold rebound rally is often accompanied by the funding rate being pushed to deep negative values, with shorts extremely crowded and a short squeeze providing the fuel. But the current #CircleQ3USDCVolumeUp49% Goldman Sachs lowers gold price forecast? That familiar feeling is back 😂
Whenever this kind of news comes out, it's actually a signal to pay more attention; the opportunity for gold might be coming soon.
Goldman Sachs is basically recognized in the industry as a contrarian indicator. A few months ago, it kept raising the $XAU target, but the market kept going down. Now it’s directly cutting the gold price forecast. Usually, this happens near the end of a market move, when forecasts are adjusted to align with current prices.
By the time they massively lower targets, a lot of bearish sentiment has already been fully released. Of course, this signal is worth watching. The Fed’s hawkish narrative has been priced in repeatedly by the market. If expectations ease even slightly afterward, the space for gold to rebound could open up quickly.
Gold’s volatility also transmits to $BTC; the two have always been linked as safe havens. If you want to track the rhythm of the linkage between precious metals and crypto, you can come to the homepage study group.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 I think connecting prediction markets with cryptocurrency is like installing a cash register for the "I'm sure" comments in group chats. Priced in stablecoins and settled through contracts, verbal judgments suddenly have a price.
While buying coins focuses on price fluctuations, this focuses on whether a certain event will happen. But the odds are just opinions backed by funds; with a shallow pool, large orders can easily drown out other voices.
I'm more curious about who ultimately determines the outcome. The money is on-chain, but whether the event actually happened in reality still depends on the interpretation of the judgment clauses. How come watching the fun also requires reading comprehension?#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温
October nonfarm payrolls added 165,000 jobs, well above the expected 70,000, with the unemployment rate dropping to 4.1%. Once the data came out, the probability of a rate hike in December surged to over 68%, making rate cuts basically off the table. The market is moving in a very conflicted way: the Nasdaq rose 1.09%, the Dow Jones actually fell 0.46%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumped 4.2%, but the Nasdaq's weekly chart shows a cumulative drop of 3.37%, marking four consecutive weeks of decline. The gainers are the chip stocks that had previously fallen sharply and are now recovering, not new money coming in.
Next Tuesday's CPI is the real bombshell. Citi and Morgan Stanley both forecast core month-over-month CPI at 0.19%, significantly cooler than September's 0.33%, which looks like good news. But the 10-year US Treasury yield is still hanging above 4.85%, the dollar index is at 102.3, and the VIX is 25.6; financial conditions have not eased at all. Even if CPI meets expectations, interest rate expectations may not decline.
The crypto side is even more direct. BTC is stuck between 75,000 and 76,000, with nearly $300 million in leverage liquidated in 24 hours, bulls accounting for 80%. The batch at 80,000 was just liquidated, and ETF inflows have not yet returned.
My approach is simple: before the CPI release, I won't add positions in US stocks or crypto. Chasing highs at this level has too poor odds. I'll wait for the data to land and see whether the market kills expectations first or facts first, then decide which side to take. Moderna’s move from a roughly $200M Q3 loss to $162M in GAAP net income gives its raised 2026 revenue-growth outlook more weight than a simple beat would. Revenue grew 29% to $1.313B, suggesting the business is regaining operating leverage. Still, one quarter does not establish durability; the updated 15%-25% range leaves a wide execution band.
#ModernaQ3ReturnsToProfit The increase is in leverage, not spot.
Three-line table, any contract can be filled.
① Position ÷ Volume: HYPE position $126.0M, 24h volume $26.5M, ratio 4.8x, exceeding 3x means position pushing price.
② Funding rate: HYPE +0.0045%, XRP +0.0072% longs pay, BTC -0.0004% shorts pay, both directions, money doesn't uniformly favor bulls.
③ Increase × volume: HYPE +2.06%, volume less than 6% of BTC, increase because no one is selling.
How to use: all three lines point to leverage, don't mistake weekend red K for a trend. I won't chase, will reconsider when volume returns to $60M.
On weekends, are you more afraid of a spike or missing out?
Not investment advice, DYOR.
$HYPE $BTC $XRP #Hyperliquid #欧意星球 #OKXOrbit #CryptoAt 23:17 last night, I placed a BTC long order at $75,900, with a stop loss at $74,800 and a take profit at $78,200. It is now $76,118 — an unrealized profit of less than 0.3%, but the position size, stop loss, and target price are all public. Whether this trade ends in profit or loss, I will post the transaction record as is. The reason to follow me is simple: this account has posted a real-time position screenshot every day since November last year, with a win rate below 50%, but a profit-loss ratio maintained at 2.1.
What I want to say today is that the macroeconomic line is being ignored too much. #JobsReportRaisesHikeOdds and #OilPlungesBelow$100 are both on the market — crude oil falling below 100 means inflationary pressure is easing, but employment data pushes up the probability of rate hikes. These two signals contradict each other. The market’s current approach is to ignore macro and only trade small coins: ONE rose 60% in one day, while BTC only rose 0.7%, and ETH barely followed with 1%. I’ve seen this structure too many times; funds flowing out of mainstream coins into small-cap fringe coins usually do not mark the start of a new cycle but rather the end of rotation.
My judgment is: do not chase BTC above $78,200; instead, it is a zone to reduce positions. If this rate hike expectation continues to heat up, the stop loss at $74,800 will most likely not be triggered in vain.
#OKX Prophet The excitement belongs to them, but the account is mine 🫧 So who is really making money this round? Watching the market these past two days gives a very subtle feeling: on social platforms, there are cries of "liquidation," "zeroing out," and "never touching it again," yet BTC's candlestick chart is still there, moving steadily with a 5,000-point amplitude up and down, as if nothing has happened. On the surface, retail investors are crying, but the underlying structure is telling a different story—this round is not a one-sided crash, but a volatile market repeatedly harvesting high leverage. I've long since used up my bullets and thus avoided this sharp drop in global risk assets. But honestly, watching others get liquidated doesn't bring relief, it brings familiarity. For those with high leverage and large positions, BTC's 5,000-point swings are not a market, but torture. You can withstand direction, but not volatility. Emotionally, the market is no longer trading "up or down," but "who breaks first." With stronger-than-expected non-farm payrolls and rising bets on December rate hikes, these macro signals cause risk appetite to first contract then probe. BTC, as the leader of risk assets, loses its elasticity first; ETH and altcoins follow more slowly but fall more sharply. What is truly priced in advance is the expectation that "easing will return," not that "tightening has ended." The more bullish path is: the more thoroughly leverage is cleaned out, the lighter the subsequent rebound. Liquidation waves often mark emotional bottoms in phases, not tops. But the risk is clear—if macro pressure continues, capital preference will shift from "daring to bet" back to "survival mode," and altcoin rotations will become shorter and more superficial, making it easy for those chasing to get caught in a trap