Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC Many people are still focused on ETFs, thinking that as long as funds enter the market, a rally will immediately follow. But the current problem is that inflows lack sustainability; much of it is arbitrage capital that cashes out as soon as prices rise a bit. Institutions are slowly buying on one side, while on the other side, huge whales sell during rebounds. The trapped positions above are heavily suppressed, and sell orders hit hard as soon as resistance levels are reached.
Bulls want to break upward but lack continuous incremental buying; bears want to break support, but there is also a batch of funds waiting to catch the fall. The tug-of-war causes the market to constantly sweep stop losses back and forth. Whether you chase longs or bottom-fish, it’s easy to get hit from both sides.
In short, this is a zero-sum game now. Outside money is unwilling to enter, so everyone is cutting each other within the range. Whenever the Nasdaq or U.S. Treasury bonds move slightly, fund preferences immediately shift, which is the root cause of ETF funds flowing in and out intermittently.
In this choppy market, the biggest taboo is betting on a one-sided breakout. Don’t guess when it will go up, and don’t casually take heavy short positions. Before a real breakout from the range occurs, any break on either side could be a false breakout. Be patient: either wait for ETFs to flow in continuously and steadily, with volume confirming a hold above resistance; or wait until support is completely broken and then follow the direction. Opening random positions now has too low a cost-performance ratio. $ETH $SOL
#BTC持续承压，资金与市场走势出现分歧 The opponent hands over the pawn right to my mouth, but I never eat it on the spot—I first figure out whether it's a bait or a trap. $ACH is currently presenting exactly this bait: a 2.12% rise in 24 hours, the short-term RSI has already touched 65.1, and the price has been pushed to 114% of the Bollinger Band's short-term range, standing 0.3% outside the upper band—the pawn has crossed the boundary line, but there are no supporting pieces behind it.
This is a lone pawn charge, not an offensive. The real situation assessment must look at the long-term cycle: RSI is 41.7, still stuck in the weak half; the Bollinger Band's mid-term cycle has only reached 72%, with the upper band still pressing down 1.3% overhead. The short-term strength is just a tactical counterattack in the long-term endgame; the initiative temporarily belongs to the bulls, but the control is not in their hands.
Therefore, the signal points to a counter move. I never make a move when the pieces are most excited, but wait for the opponent to make one more wasted move: enter the market by placing an order 1.8% above the current price, letting that charging pawn move one step further, exposing the gap behind it.
But the cost of this game must be calculated openly. The stop loss is at +11.2%, with two take-profit levels at -4.7% and -3.4%, the risk-reward ratio is about 1 to 0.4. This is not an advantageous position; this is a sacrifice defense: winning only wins a small margin, losing means losing half the game. The chess principle is straightforward—when the risk-reward ratio is not on your side, the only thing you can do is reduce the force invested. The same judgment, using a quarter of the position to bear the risk, is called thinking twenty moves ahead before making a move, rather than taking it step by step.
The first take-profit level is at -4.7%, which is the first step back from short-term overbought; if the opponent refuses to admit defeat and continues to press up, then retreat to the second take-profit level at -3.4%, securing half a step of initiative. The +11.2% stop loss is the bottom line; once breached, it means the long-term RSI 41.7 has flipped, the entire situation is reassessed, all pieces are withdrawn, no lingering in battle.
📉 Short:
Entry: 1.8% above current price
Take Profit 1: -4.7%
Take Profit 2: -3.4%
Stop Loss: +11.2%
In this game, I don't fight for momentum, only for the initiative in the half-step endgame.💰 US spot BTC ETFs shed $643.2m on 30 October, leaving the month about $516m net negative.
IBIT drove October’s inflows, but Friday’s selling hit every major fund.
With price 7.5% below the average ETF cost, inflows beyond IBIT would be the first sign of broader demand.The probability of the Democratic Party controlling both chambers is significantly higher—about 84%–95% for the House of Representatives and 64%–78% for the Senate.
But don’t just focus on "who wins" to trade US stocks. Historical data is quite interesting: in the year following midterm elections, the S&P 500 almost always posts positive returns, averaging +14.4%; however, from May to October in election years, it typically falls by an average of 2.6% with high volatility. Simply put, party affiliation itself is not the decisive factor for the direction of US stocks.
The baseline scenario for 2026 is Democratic control of both chambers, with a short-term impact on the S&P 500 ranging from -0.25% to +0.5%, which is minimal; a split Congress might yield about +0.5% to +1%; the probability of Republicans holding both chambers is low, but the short-term volatility could be the greatest.
By sector: Republican control of both chambers benefits energy, finance, defense, and semiconductor AI; Democratic control favors hospitals, insurance, and clean energy, but pharmaceutical companies, platforms, and oil & gas face pressure; a split Congress results in the weakest policy tailwinds, with the market returning to fundamentals.Stablecoin giant Circle is about to release its Q3 earnings report. The core market disagreement this time is just one: USDC's circulation scale and payment business are indeed growing, but can this really translate into solid profits?
From the current betting sentiment, the market expectation is quite optimistic, with as many as 68% of players believing the earnings will exceed expectations. But to really break down this earnings report, you need to focus on three key indicators:
First, look at reserve income. In the current high-interest environment, Circle is making a fortune from reserves in U.S. Treasury bonds, which is its lifeline.
Second, look at distribution costs. Especially the large channel fees paid to Coinbase, which directly determine whether profits can actually be realized.
Finally, look at the real expansion of the payment business. Stablecoins can't just stay within the trading circle; whether they can move toward real commercial payments determines their long-term valuation ceiling.
Currently, CRCL stock price is slightly down 0.11%, with funds cautious ahead of the earnings report. For this kind of crypto "water seller" earnings report, the odds of betting on direction are actually not high. It is recommended not to rush into positions; wait for the U.S. stock pre-market data to come out, see the quality of profits and the proportion of distribution costs clearly, then decide whether to go long with the trend or to wait and see. #IRENQ1AICloudDelivery Neocloud pricing is ridiculous right now, especially for $IREN. Market is pricing their minimum projected $4b ARR by year end 2026 around 3x EV/ARR, while their minimum projected $17b ARR by year end 2027 is around 0.8x EV/ARR.
What a gift to be able to buy $IREN at these prices, but not sure why so many investors are fearful right now. Maybe it stems from panic in seeing their investment portfolio move down aggressively. I’m certainly not concerned with my bet on $IREN $KMNO
I haven't mentioned this coin before. Kamino, a lending protocol on Solana, surged 16% overnight.
Opened at 0.0299, now at 0.0347, 24h high 0.035, hovering near the high.
The first thing I did was check the perpetual pool, $880,000. Only this much leverage is playing. 1H volume climbed from 38,000 contracts to 280,000, then dropped back to 87,000, all spot trades, contracts didn't keep up. The fee rate is still negative, -0.035%, shorts are paying longs.
I don't chase this kind of rise. It's not that I don't believe it will go up, but the pool is too shallow, trades easily push the price themselves. I'll wait until it really drops with a high-volume bearish candle before checking again.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ $BTC
77888, the highest point touched tonight, now 77518, a pullback of over three hundred dollars.
Citibank Wealth Management just released a report, pushing spot BTC and ETH ETFs to their own clients. The channel is really opening. At the same time, the US spot ETFs saw a net outflow of one billion dollars over two trading days.
New channel opens, old money withdraws. I've seen this combination before; usually the channel arrives first, money comes later, but this time the first to arrive are redemption orders.
The market depth is more straightforward. 1H volumes are 5972, 5238, 4208, 2858, 2045, 1732, each smaller than the last. Price ground down from 77656 to 77518, 77700 couldn't hold. The fee rate is still +0.01%, open interest is 2.57 billion, just over ten million less than two hours ago.
Volume shrinks, price sideways, selling pressure is not heavy, and there are no relays. I don't consider this a bottom, only acknowledge it is not falling right now. At this position, I stay empty-handed.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ The latest leveraged long data is out, but first, let's pour a bucket of cold water on the bros 🧊
BTC: 1,507.55 longs borrowed, 68.89 shorts borrowed, about 22 times long to short; ETH: 16,400 longs borrowed, 766.95 shorts borrowed, about 21 times; SOL: 129,900 longs borrowed, only 3,148 shorts borrowed, long to short ratio directly hitting 41 times 😮
Borrowing coins and leveraging longs essentially means retail traders have already spent all their bullets. Now the short size is only a fraction of the longs, indicating sentiment is almost one-sided. The question is: how much new buying power is left to take over? Once there's any disturbance, clustered long positions are prone to concentrated stop losses, which could trigger an emotional shakeout wave 🌊
After trading for so many years, I increasingly believe one thing: when everyone is bullish, don't follow the hype. When longs are crowded to the extreme, smooth upward movement becomes difficult, and the chance of a shakeout is higher ⚠️
Coincidentally, the non-farm payrolls come on November 6, and whether there will be a rate hike in December will be repriced. Sensitive nodes combined with high crowding mean short-term volatility is inevitable 📉📈
The strategy is simple: don't heavily chase longs when sentiment is most unanimous. Wait for the shakeout to finish and for chips to change hands. Staying alive is more important than grabbing that one bite 💪$BTC #加密行业协同守护资产安全 Enterprises continue to increase their BTC holdings, with the latest holdings surpassing 2 million coins; market liquidity continues to flow out, and sentiment is clearly divided.
Within the square, 28% are bullish, 28% bearish, and the rest neutral.
• Bullish views believe:
- Strategy increased its BTC holdings by 811 coins to 849,327 coins, with a cumulative holding cost of about $64.08 billion, demonstrating long-term confidence in BTC.
- Tether holds about 150,000 bitcoins, using up to 15% of its quarterly net profit since 2023 for continuous purchases; private companies' total bitcoin holdings have exceeded 200,000 coins.
- Global systemically important banks such as Citibank have launched institutional bitcoin custody services, marking an increased acceptance of digital assets by traditional financial institutions.
Bearish views believe:
- The US spot bitcoin ETF has seen net outflows for two consecutive days, with cumulative net outflows exceeding $400 million, indicating weak institutional demand.
- The total market value of stablecoins has declined for more than a month, with $6.9 billion outflow in the past month, reflecting a decrease in market risk appetite.
- The US dollar is the strongest among safe-haven assets, while gold and bitcoin weakened during the same period, indicating heightened investor risk aversion.The most dangerous signal in the crypto circle has appeared! BTC rebounds, ETH follows, altcoins start to emerge, but the real big money may still be watching! How far can this rebound go?
First, look at $BTC: $77,622, up 0.87%
The US midterm elections are rattling the market nerves, and there is important employment data on November 6. More troublesome is that BTC spot ETFs have seen significant outflows before, and institutional buying has yet to confirm a return. Watch 78,000 in the short term; only a breakthrough will have a chance to challenge 80,000, otherwise, support at 76,000 must be guarded.
Next, look at $ETH: $2,291, up 1.79%
ETH's rebound is stronger than BTC's, but don't rush to call the bull market back. The Fed's rate expectations remain uncertain, and funds are more cautious. 2,250 is the short-term defense line; breaking through 2,350 can further open up space.
Finally, look at $UNI: $7.244, up 2.16%
UNI follows the rebound, and the DeFi sector shows signs of warming up, but sustained buying validation is still lacking. Holding 7 dollars is necessary to have a chance to push to 7.5; breaking below means caution for giving back gains.
A few final words:
The market's biggest deception is making you feel like you missed the bottom. My idea is simple: I'd rather earn less than go all in when the direction is unclear!
Brothers, are you bottom-fishing or watching this wave?
#迈威尔拟换股收购Lumentum，加码AI光通信布局 Bitcoin was below the 200-day moving average on the US midterm election days in 2014, 2018, and 2022, approximately 35%, 9%, and 22% lower respectively, but this year is different. Currently, Bitcoin's price is about $76,990, 5.2% above the 200-day moving average of around $73,169, indicating a relatively strong long-term trend. The 2026 Bitcoin bear market is shallower and the decline occurred earlier, with the main correction concentrated from January to February this year. Martin Lee, head The pinball machine looks wider, and both balls ended up stuck at the bottom edge. The 02—03 o'clock BTC and ETH also have a similar meaning: they ran further than the previous hour, but with less trading volume, and the close was near the low point.
According to OKX spot, BTC's highest price minus lowest price in this hour expanded from 187.9 to 345.1 USDT, trading volume decreased by about 24%, closing at 77590, only 30.5 above the lowest price. During the session, it even touched 20 points above the four-hour high from 8 PM to midnight last night, but closed back below that high.
ETH's hourly price spread expanded from 7.21 to 11.26, trading volume decreased by about 7%, closing at 2293.20, only 0.39 above the lowest. It passed 2300 during the session but didn't even touch the highest price of that four-hour period last night. Both ended up closing within 10% of their respective hourly range lows.
This time I will first note the closing position. If the next candle can close back in the upper half of this one, this kind of weakness ending near the low point will need to be reassessed. The 03—04 hour candle and the 00—04 four-hour candle have not yet closed. Data as of 03:00 Beijing time on November 4. For informational purposes only, not investment advice.Chairman Selig just dropped a statement on Equity Perpetual Futures
The CFTC has cleared the way for Equity Perps to begin trading on eligible regulated US exchanges, bringing stocks like Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA into the perp market.
This is bigger than just another product launch. Perps are slowly moving beyond crypto, expanding into traditional financial markets.
For platforms like Lighter, this could be a major long term narrative.
$LIT Mid-term intelligence is here, just finished digging the latest ETF data, let me show you.
$BTC here, a single-day net outflow of 398.6 million, IBIT alone withdrew 405.3 million. Including last Friday, over 1 billion was withdrawn in two days. The price looks like it’s rebounding, but big money is desperately running out, this rally really lacks strength.
$ETH is worse, a single-day outflow of 139.7 million, blood drained for six consecutive days! ETHA almost monopolized the entire day’s selling pressure. Retail investors are waiting for a reversal, institutions are quietly reducing positions, this contrast must be guarded against.
$SOL single-day net flow is zero, accumulated outflow of 71.6 million in the previous five days, can only say the selling pressure has temporarily stopped, it’s too early to talk about inflows.
In summary, institutions are all withdrawing, mainly defensive, don’t hold on stubbornly.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ Three coins, one direction. $BTC at 77,230.48 (-1.15% over 24 hours), $ETH at 2,259.38 (-0.41%) and $ZEC at 1,190.65 (-3.49%) all broke lower together, confirming what the bearish camp had argued: a bounce without volume, one that fails to reclaim a moving average, is not a reversal. The market has now validated that framework across three very different profiles. 📉 The technical picture is uniform but not identical. $BTC printed a fresh MACD bearish crossover and slipped beneath its 7-day moviConclusion first: $BTC is forming a minute-level bullish divergence indicating a short-term rebound, but the larger timeframe remains under pressure, representing a pullback window within a downtrend, not a reversal.
Short-term resistance: around 77580–78000
Short-term support: around 75880–74800
If it breaks below 74788, the bullish divergence structure fails, and the long position idea should be abandoned. #تقرير Circle's earnings are on the horizon, can stablecoin growth generate returns? USDC has become the first "significant electronic money token" in the European Union. Among forty-five types of EMT, it is the only one to hold this title, and the cost is that as of November 12, private funds, reserves, liquidity, and recovery plans will be directly managed by the EBA, while France will only handle human resources and outsourcing.BTC Faces Three Major Challenges at November's Start: Elections, Interest Rate Decisions, and Non-Farm Payrolls
At the start of November, BTC faces three hurdles: today's midterm elections, this month's central bank interest rate decisions, and the November 6 non-farm payroll data, followed by the CPI on the 10th. Before these events unfold one by one, large investors generally avoid heavy positions, leading to low volume and choppy trading, with rebounds failing to gain momentum.
Price-wise, BTC is consolidating around 77,000: there is dense resistance near 78,700 above, and support around 76,200 below. In this turbulent period, heavy one-sided bets are the biggest risk.
In terms of timing, the election results will first digest political sentiment, then the non-farm payrolls will reveal employment strength and rate hike expectations, with the CPI providing additional inflation clues afterward. Before the data releases, light or no positions and waiting is safer; enter the market only after a data point is released and the direction becomes clear. Avoid holding positions through news vacuums and enduring volatility.
This is for market observation reference only and does not constitute trading advice.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ $ETH $BTC $SOL $BTC 在77,000美元附近反复拉锯，$SUI 却连0.85美元都守得吃力——最讽刺的裂缝出现在这里：生态在扩张，开发者工具在更新，网络性能在迭代，代币价格却像没收到通知。这种“基本面热、资金面冷”的错位，正是当前市场最值得盯住的叙事。 先看$BTC。价格约77,100美元，24小时窄幅震荡，77,500美元得而复失、失而复得，能否重新站稳是短线焦点。这个位置的意义不在于整数关口本身，而在于它检验的是资金愿不愿意在震荡区上沿继续接货。若站稳，说明抛压被消化；若反复失守，则震荡格局延续。 $ETH 约2,258美元，表现明显偏跟随。2,300美元附近的压力仍在，短线上攻力度不足。它的问题不是没有叙事，而是叙事暂时换不来增量买盘——在$BTC 没有给出方向之前，$ETH 更可能继续扮演Beta角色，而非领涨主线。 真正值得单独拎出来说的是$SUI。价格约0.874美元，三者中承压最重。最新动作是持续推进网络性能升级与生态工具建设，巩固高性能公链定位，长期用户迁移与开发者故事在加强，但短期市场反应依旧谨慎。如果0.85美元失守，短线压力可能进一步放大。这里的关键不是“生态好不好”，而是“$BTC stands around $77,500, with fork lines below and above. First look at the two lines, shout before seeing the result.
Below is $76,518, the low point on October 30. If it closes below, first watch $75,000. Then look at the 200-day moving average around $73,169. Above is $80,400, the upper range from last week. If it closes back above, first see if there is inflow on the ETF that day.
Current price is about $77,533, up about 1.1% in one day. $ETH is about $2,292, up about 1.6% in one day. ETF outflow last Friday was about $643M, the largest single-day outflow since June. Strategy bought 811 coins worth about $65.5M. Average price is about $80,846. ETF and treasury average cost is about $80,000 to $81,500. Current price is below.
Bitfinex says the election is a legislative catalyst in 2027. Not a price event for tomorrow. Just watch if the two lines hold, no direction given.This altcoin has the potential to 10X again
Still not sure which altcoin to bottom-fish? Take a look here
Among the newly launched tokens this round, I’m only following two: one is $牛来 mentioned yesterday, and the other is $PONS
I made a little money on PONS this year, bought in at 0.1 and sold at 0.35, so I have some affection for it and have been keeping an eye on it
But let’s analyze rationally. Personally, I think its advantages are as follows:
① PONS is the token launch platform on the $HOOD Chain. It’s one of the very early launch platforms on Robinhood Chain, so it can capture the traffic and users on Robinhood
② The most impressive is its buyback and burn flywheel: about 80% of protocol fees are used for automatic TWAP buybacks and burning of PONS, creating deflationary pressure. This is why I’ve been saying this round could be a buyback bull run
③ Fixed supply + continuous burn: max supply is 1 billion, with ongoing burns reducing circulating supply, theoretically supporting long-term scarcity
④ Robinhood Chain is still in its early stages and has huge potential to expand its ecosystem in the future. Naturally, memecoins will be part of this, which will heat up the launch platform again
⑤ Max market cap was $270 million, currently $135 million, down 80%
In summary, next we need to watch whether market risk appetite for it will rise, whether on-chain activity can rebound, and pay attention to the price range of 0.1-0.15 There's something I haven't figured out: a company didn't do much else, just raised another round, and its valuation doubled from $8 billion to $16 billion.
Fal raised $1.3 billion in the F round, focusing on AI inference. The list of investors is impressive, led by Bessemer, with Nvidia also pitching in.
Nvidia's chips are selling like hotcakes, yet they insist on investing in inference companies—is it because they're worried about downstream demand? The computing power narrative that $TAO has been pushing for two years probably needs to be brought up again.
With such pricing in the primary market, it's not surprising that $FET moves along for a couple of days. But the money belongs to others; the position is your own.A startup focused on inference has doubled its valuation in a Series F round—Fal just secured $1.3 billion in funding, raising its valuation from $8 billion to $16 billion.
What’s worth watching is not the absolute value, but the timing of its emergence. Over the past year, the market has been discussing "AI capital expenditure peaking," but the primary market’s answer is to keep doubling down, specifically on inference rather than training.
The lead investor is Bessemer, with Nvidia also involved, along with Sound Ventures, HOF Capital, and T. Rowe Price. The fact that both financial investors and industry players are participating indicates the bet is not on a concept, but that inference demand is truly becoming a recurring paid service.
The mechanism is straightforward: once model capabilities converge, whoever offers cheaper and faster inference will capture the call volume. As call volume increases, computing power and electricity become hard constraints, and this chain ultimately transmits to on-chain computing power and decentralized inference targets.
$TAO represents the computing power supply side, while $FET and $NEAR represent the agent and inference call demand side. The narrative hasn’t changed, but this time there is a real cash pricing reference.
One point to consider: the $16 billion valuation is for an inference company that hasn’t gone public yet, while the total market cap of similar on-chain assets is not far from this number. The gap is both an opportunity and a warning—when valuations run ahead and revenues come later, pullbacks often happen faster than the rise.BTC faces a double test this week ⚠️
The crypto market is unsettled this week, with two macro events affecting $BTC nerves: the midterm election results will be revealed in the next two days; at 9:30 PM Friday, the non-farm payroll data will follow 📊. Currently, $BTC is tugging around $77,000, with both bulls and bears cautious to make a move.
Based on the current situation, there is a significant possibility of bearish impact on the crypto space after these two events unfold, and short-term sentiment may be further suppressed 😮💨. Will BTC continue to weaken? When will it recover? It's too early to conclude now. The key depends on whether the election results and employment data exceed expectations, and whether the support near $77,000 holds 🔍.
If the negative factors are realized but selling pressure diminishes, a recovery window may open; otherwise, weak consolidation may prolong. In short: wait for the events to unfold, then observe the capital reaction; don't rush to bottom-fish or blindly short 📌. (The above is market observation only and does not constitute investment advice)$BTC chip concentration indicator continued to decline today, recording 13.03% (yesterday 13.53%)
After a weak rebound yesterday, BTC fell back below 77000 today, far from the high chip concentration area near 81000
However, 13.03% is still very high, and the potential volatility risk this week remains significantBitcoin has really been worrying these past couple of days! $BTC
A few days ago, it was repeatedly fighting around the 365-day moving average, and today it took another dive! Currently, BTC has dropped to around $76,660, the 365-day moving average is about $76,929, and the upper edge of the weekly bullish support zone is around $76,719. These two lines are almost squeezed together, yet the price has fallen below them! It seems the bulls are facing quite a bit of pressure this time.
We really can't be blindly optimistic right now. The key point to watch next is whether it can quickly reclaim $77,000. If it fails to hold above that for a long time, the 50-week moving average near $75,600 will likely be tested again. Of course, the daily candle hasn't closed yet, so it's still too early to draw conclusions.
Brothers, keep observing and patiently wait for the market to give us the answer!$BTC Bearish: IBIT outflow of $405 million in a single day, the largest since June
US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net outflow of $399 million on Monday, marking the second consecutive day of outflows, totaling about $1.04 billion over two trading days (Farside, Bloomberg)
The majority is with BlackRock's IBIT, which redeemed $405 million in one day, while Fidelity's FBTC saw a slight inflow of $6.7 million
IBIT was the main source of subscriptions in October, supporting previous rebounds; this channel turning into net redemptions means the spot market loses its most stable support
BTC is currently at $77,589.9, up 0.74% in 24 hours, with a low of $76,386; the price hasn't dropped much, but institutional money is flowing out
Meanwhile, ETH ETFs have seen net outflows for six consecutive trading days, and after Binance's reopening, customer net withdrawals reached $4.72 billion, indicating overall tight liquidity.$SNDK SanDisk surged to 1153 before pulling back to 1117. This contract's move seems to have ended early. The semiconductor sector opened extremely strong in the US market. SanDisk previously closed at 1075, climbed to an intraday high of 1153, gaining nearly 7% at one point, and has now retraced to 1117, still up 3.9%. But the OKX SNDK contract already showed signs of cooling after the 10 PM hourly candle. Volume surged to 205,000 contracts when price touched 1155.8, slightly above the underlyBinance recorded a $1.6 billion inflow today. $BNB
Meanwhile, just two days ago, shortly after Binance reopened the withdrawal function, users withdrew nearly $8 billion.
After demonstrating huge liquidity and processing a large number of user withdrawals, perhaps people's confidence is gradually being restored.
They began to feel reassured and started transferring money back to the exchange. Famous rollover trader AguilaTrades just deposited 450,000 USDC as margin and opened a BTC short position worth 9.35 million USD on Hyperliquid, with an opening price of 77,429 USD and a liquidation price of 81,464 USD. Data shows that since June last year, AguilaTrades has accumulated a loss of about 38.2 million USD in rollover trading on Hyperliquid. #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $BTC 💥 11 accounts liquidated in 24 hours, is 0x4b62 flipping short again to gamble?
In the past day or so, at least 11 accounts in the entire market have been liquidated with single-account liquidation amounts exceeding $1 million, totaling about $30,459,300, with realized losses of about $2,135,600; among them, long positions account for 84.76%, about $25,818,600. 😮
The largest account, 0x4b62, has been liquidated for a total of about $11,493,000: initially short positions were partially liquidated, then flipped long, but got liquidated twice on long positions early this morning, and now flipped short again, still holding about $10,010,000 in BTC short positions. At the time of writing, BTC is around 76,800, ETH around 2,254. 📉
Will this short position hold or get slapped again? I lean towards the latter. The reason is simple: flipping million-dollar positions back and forth between short and long is not small leverage trial and error, but being driven by volatility. Just after being liquidated on longs, immediately flipping to short shows strong emotional traces; with BTC near 76,800, if it continues to surge, the $10,010,000 short position can easily trigger liquidation again. If BTC falls back, it might hold temporarily, but judging by this account’s repeated liquidations, the probability of getting taught by volatility again in the short term is high. 😅
In short: it’s not that short positions have no chance, but this flip-flop strategy loses to volatility first. ⚠️美国中期选举正在进入结果确认阶段，但对投资者来说，真正值得关注的并不是哪一党赢得更多席位，而是选举结果会怎样改变美国未来两年的财政政策、监管方向和市场对美元的信心。一个容易被忽略的现象是：政治不确定性上升，黄金和比特币不一定同步上涨。黄金更像是在交易宏观风险，BTC则同时交易宏观流动性与加密监管预期。 黄金的核心变量，始终是实际利率，而不是选举本身。 如果国会出现分裂，财政预算、债务上限和政府拨款可能面临更多政治博弈，市场对美国财政可持续性的担忧可能为黄金提供避险需求。但这并不意味着分裂国会必然利好黄金：如果财政支出受到约束、通胀预期回落，或者美债实际收益率持续走高，黄金同样可能承压。世界黄金协会在10月22日的分析中也指出，黄金对中期选举的反应，最终取决于选举之后实际形成的经济、财政和货币政策，而不是投票结果本身。芝加哥联储的研究则发现，长期实际利率和经济前景悲观程度，是影响黄金价格的重要因素。因此，判断黄金方向，10年期TIPS实际收益率和美元指数，比单纯猜测哪个党获胜更有价值。 BTC的特殊之处，在于它多了一层美国监管定价。 2026年加密行业已在100多场中期选举中投入约1.7ZEC is currently trading around $1,130 to $1,180, having broken below the $1,200 to $1,300 support zone, dropping more than 10% in 24 hours, with a low of $1,121.6. The short-term structure is clearly weakening: both the 1-hour and 4-hour trends are bearish, with trading participation only 0.03 times, and the rebound lacks capital support. The core conflict in the news is the direct clash between the NU7 upgrade and capital outflows. The upgrade is scheduled for November 5, reducing block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, and increasing Orchard throughput from 2.9 transactions/second to 6.6 transactions/second, marking the most substantial protocol improvement for ZEC in recent years. However, ETFs are withdrawing: Grayscale ZCSH has continuous net outflows, about $93.56 million in a single week, with assets under management dropping from nearly $980 million to $751 million. This round of adjustment reflects real capital withdrawal. Whales are also divided: some addresses bought 3,052 spot coins and leveraged 2x to long 8,000 coins, with a total exposure close to $14 million betting on the upgrade; but some early holders sold 25,000 coins near $1,514, taking profits of about $27 million and exiting. Controversy over community funding also triggered a major holder to announce a full exit, causing the holding structure to loosen on the eve of the upgrade. The daily close at $1,121.6 is a more honest indicator than the NU7 narrative. The upgrade provides infrastructure conditions, not demand itself; ETFs are bleeding, whales are betting, and the volatility of "buy the rumor, sell the fact" is very likely to amplify before and after the upgrade.美国中期选举已经进入结果揭晓阶段，但对加密市场来说，真正重要的不是哪个党派赢得更多席位，而是谁将掌握未来两年的立法议程和监管监督权。 加密行业这次确实投入巨大。根据路透社10月27日报道，行业在本轮中期选举中投入约1.76亿美元，覆盖100多场国会选举。Fairshake及其关联组织是主要资金力量。这笔钱背后反映的是行业的长期战略：争取能够推动数字资产立法、支持监管明确化的国会议员。 为什么ETH可能对这次选举更加敏感？因为ETH涉及质押、DeFi、代币化资产等复杂业务，监管边界直接影响机构参与的合规成本。市场期待《CLARITY法案》明确SEC与CFTC的监管分工，但必须注意，即使ETH的监管环境改善，也不等于所有相关业务自动获得豁免，更不能简单理解为法律已经认定ETH不是证券。 还有一个关键细节：此前共和党控制国会期间，CLARITY法案仍在参议院程序性投票中以49比50受阻，距离推进所需的60票门槛仍有差距。这说明加密立法需要跨党派支持，而不是单纯依靠某一党派的席位优势。 我的判断是，BTC更容易受到全球流动性、ETF资金和宏观风险偏好的影响；ETH则可能对美国监管规则变化更加敏比特币卡在77K，但真正松动的是情绪不是价格。 你看到的横盘，到底是洗筹还是大家在悄悄撤退？ 这两天看盘有种很微妙的感觉：价格没怎么跌，但空气里的紧张感变重了。BTC贴着77K反复试探，像在守住一条心理线，可外围的压力已经不太安静。油价因为伊朗局势和选举日不确定性冲上98美元上方，这种宏观层面的不安会先打到风险偏好，再慢慢传导到币圈。 更值得盯的是资金侧的两个信号：现货BTC ETF据报流出近4亿美元，币安在记录级黑客事件后据报被提走近50亿美元。单看数字是恐慌，但连起来看，是同一件事，持有者正在把"安全感"重新定价。ETF流出说明部分机构仓位在收，交易所大额提币则更像信任层面的应激反应，而不完全是看空。 这就带出一个容易被忽略的点：市场现在交易的不是"BTC会不会跌破77K"，而是"还有多少人愿意在不确定里继续扛仓位"。情绪收缩阶段，山寨通常最先失血，ETH的相对韧性会被拿来当风险偏好的温度计，BTC则扮演最后一道情绪防线。偏多的路径是：77K守住、油价回落、ETF流出放缓，风险偏好重新扩散，超跌板块出现修复。偏空的风险是：宏观噪音继续加码，提币潮演变成更广的信任折价，那77K守得越#Triển vọng báo cáo tài chính AMD: Commercialization progress of the HeliosAI system AMD reports Q3 on 11/3 The new Helios deliveries started in September, so Q3 contribution is quite small, significant growth begins from Q4. The decisive point is the Q4 forecast: around 16.2 billion USD or more is good, around 15 billion indicates Helios might slip to 2027. The line that broke yesterday has been reclaimed today
ZEC is currently at 1,213.48, up 4.33% in 24 hours.
Yesterday it broke below 1,210, but today it bounced back all the way from the 24-hour low of 1,120.03, reclaiming 1,210 and not far from the high of 1,229.63.
At the same time, BTC is at 77,628, up 0.83%, ETH at 2,294, up 1.86%. The market is rising overall, but this rebound in ZEC tells the most story: it recovered the break the day after, indicating yesterday's break was not far-reaching.
However, recovery does not equal strength: standing above 1,210 is just the first step; the high of 1,229.63 above has not been broken yet, and chasing near the high can easily lead to a pullback.
Wait and watch, don’t chase: breaking above 1,229.63 means turning strong; falling back below 1,210 invalidates this recovery.
After this recovery on the second day, will you wait for a breakout or watch first?
$ZEC
#ZEC #Recovery A friend told me that historically, after the midterm elections, $BTC always declines.
This period is not suitable for leveraging or trading contracts.
Well, let's look at the price performance of $BTC in November of 2014, 2018, and 2022.
2014:
First, looking at 2014, in Figure 1, you can see that the 200-day moving average on the daily chart is still downward, and the price is still completely suppressed by the 200-day moving average.
Moreover, the price hasn't even broken through the downtrend line.
What does this have to do with the midterm elections? Isn't this still during a bear market?
2018:
In Figure 2, 2018 saw the sharpest decline, but the market performance was exactly the same as in 2014, with no signs of a bull market, it was all bear market.
How could it rise?
2022:
How is this different from the previous two?
Where is the price? Where is the yearly moving average? Where is the downtrend line?
2026:
Do you see what's different?
Where is the price? Where is the yearly moving average? Where is the downtrend line?
The price has broken through the trend line and quickly stood above the yearly moving average.
A completely different trend. It's like carving a mark on a boat to find a sword; the boat is no longer the same, so what's the use of carving?
So you tell me, now that the $BTC price has returned to the yearly moving average, will you act???$SUI is showing recovery momentum after bouncing from 0.8595, with strong hourly buying volume pushing price back toward 0.90.
Key Levels:
Resistance: 0.900–0.905
Bullish breakout: 1H candle close above 0.905
Upside Target 1: 0.920
Support: 0.886
Downside Target: 0.860🚨The bull isn't dead, but it's still at the ICU door!
$BTC
Rebounded near 77,000, but the rise is weak
Repeated pressure at the 78,000 level
If it falls below 76,300, it will weaken again
$ETH
Fluctuating near 2,280
2,300 is a key resistance
$SOL
Dropped near 90
The weak pattern hasn't reversed
📉News
US BTC spot ETF outflows for two consecutive days
On November 2, a single-day outflow of 399 million USD
Capital retreat + midterm election uncertainty
Market sentiment is cautious
Friday's non-farm payrolls, another catalyst for new volatility
Key points
Rebound ≠ reversal
A bull market isn't declared by shouting
Watch three signals
BTC recovers 78,000
ETH holds above 2,300
SOL holds 90
Trend not confirmed
Don't rush to call the bull market back!
⚠️Be sure to set stop-loss orders on your positions
If this review is helpful, please like!
Press 1 if it stabilizes and strengthens, press 2 if it continues to dip
This is only a market review and does not constitute investment advice
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ Brother 800 really caught the bottom of $SOXL this time! 😭😭 It wasn’t easy at all! This time, you really won, dog dealer 😭 After breaking even, Brother 800 will never touch contracts again. This one semiconductor alone made Brother 800 go from a 10 million loss down to 5 million now, nearly halved!
SOXL current price is 71.42. After hitting a low of 67.66 in this wave, it started a slight rebound. Brother 800 positioned long near 69.8, targeting directly 120, betting this round is a phase bottom.
From the chip distribution perspective, it was smashed down continuously from 109 with heavy volume selling, clearing out many longs, and panic sentiment was fully released. The storage sector $SKHY $SNDK previously crashed simultaneously, now no longer making new lows, showing signs of resonance and stabilization with SOXL.
Previously holding big profits at high levels, a pullback returned those profits. Now afraid of losses, no reckless adding positions, only testing longs at low levels. This position belongs to a bottom after full realization of negative factors.
This is a tactical phase bottom, not a trend reversal bottom. The first resistance above is 74.69; if it can’t break through here, a second dip could happen anytime. SOXL with triple leverage is extremely volatile; even at the bottom, grinding and oscillation will repeatedly spike and shake out holders, making holding mentality very tough.
Negative factors have been fully hammered through, the sector has dropped into oversold territory, and funds are trying to catch here, betting on subsequent macro and earnings expectations warming up to pull a repair rally #AMD财报前瞻：HeliosAI系统商业化进展 上一轮那三个方向全打中了，这一轮复盘还是全中。XRP从1.2809到1.2833、+0.14%盈，止盈1.3061和止损1.2696都没碰；HYPE从85.73到85.86、+0.15%盈；TRX从0.3225到0.3234、+0.28%盈。三战三中，命中率100%。仓位一张没减，理由写在下面。 先说大盘，别被「史上最大盗案」这四个字唬住。上一轮那颗63亿美元的雷，三天就被市场咽下去了：平台拿自有储备填回约95%的窟窿、提现通道重开，事件首日净流出36.4亿美元——不到它总持仓的4%。比特币从六周低点76,300被接回77,700上方。这里有个反直觉的地方：十月现货产品净流出5.16亿美元、11月2日单日又流出3.99亿美元，钱在往外走，价格却没往下掉，卖的人是真在卖，接的人也是真在接。2022年11月那次信任危机之后，先跌两周、再躺平三个月；这次不一样在卖压当天就被吞掉了，76,300砸下去只留了一根下影线。 政治高手的账要这么算：美国中期选举就在这几天投票，期权市场给11月4日到期的波动率报价43.5%、比后面几个期限整整高出7个点——这是给投票夜买保险，不是给趋势定价。民主党若横The "rebound day" for Meme coins, is this it? (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
The promised rebound day, but DOGE and PEPE teamed up to teach me a lesson: what it means to "be a stone during a rebound"
$DOGE is still hovering around 0.075, RSI 34, the 7-day moving average at 0.0773 pressing down, current price close to the 30-day closing low of 0.07567 with only 1.8% distance. A net outflow of $538,000 this month, this isn’t ballast, it’s a ballast iron block. Who said it was the meme leader before? When the leader dumps, it really leads, but when it rebounds, it just stays still.
$PEPE is even more frustrating. After the hacker incident dumped it, early weekend whales bought strongly for a rebound, Sun’s related positions still hold 2.8% of supply and keep hyping it, I thought it could be tough today— but this? (｡•́︿•̀｡) Luckily the volume is only 15% of the 7-day average, last week’s 13.7% gain still cushions the profit, otherwise I’d be really mad.
$TRUMP never disappoints— up 10% yesterday, down more than half today, pure speculative pump confirmed, I suspect it’s the Trump team dumping themselves 🔨 The 30-day bottom at 1.57 is the last line, breaking it means a new low. Volatility will increase before the election vote count on the 3rd, what else can this project do besides dumping?
Conclusion: As long as you don’t have faith in meme coins, they will never disappoint you (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧ TRUMP pure dump, DOGE playing dead, PEPE a fake move— today’s rebound day, meeting adjourned! 💸$XRP
Large long positions of XRP on Hyperliquid, nearly 80% concentrated in the same wallet: 35.03 million tokens, $44.05 million.
My first reaction was danger. After calculation, the liquidation price is 0.9626, still 25% away from the current price, a patience order with 4x leverage, not a gambler.
On OKX, XRP perpetual positions are only $105 million, the pool is not deep. Eighty percent is pressed on one person's position, this is not consensus, it's a single point.
What really concerns me is the volume. At 20:00, there was a single 470,000 contract candle, the previous one was only 87,000, price pulled from 1.2574 to 1.2816. Then 160,000, 106,000, 63,000, 48,000, at 02:00 only 26,000, shrinking by 94%.
Yet the price still hangs at 1.283. Now it's not that someone is buying, it's that no one is selling.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #Anthropic营收暴增1127%，能否支撑IPO高估值？ US Treasury yields remain high and stable, creating a clear divergence in internal fund allocation among risk assets.
The continuous absorption of funds by the US dollar's risk-free yield has prevented ETH from holding buyers at the 3000 and 2500 levels, pushing it steadily closer to 2000. Its correlation with BTC and the Nasdaq is just that—a correlation—and cannot be directly interpreted as a unidirectional interest rate suppression trend. In the market, those who can consistently secure returns always follow the 20/80 distribution.
The pace of institutional fund withdrawal differs between BTC and ETH; ETH is more sensitive to liquidity easing and only has a better chance of seeing capital inflows if US Treasury yields continue to decline. This judgment will become invalid if CPI data rises again and rate hike expectations reignite.
Open your position list, check the preset stop-loss level for this long position, and confirm that the pending order has enough tolerance space from the current price.
$ETH $BTC $SOL Today is the U.S. midterm election, and many people are itching to bet on a direction to ride the volatility. As someone who has played cards for years, my advice is the opposite: during weeks packed with such events, top players don't raise their bets, they reduce them.
Count the events this week—today's election, AMD's earnings tonight, possible geopolitical moves on Wednesday, and the non-farm payroll on Friday. Four or five independent binary events crammed together, any one of which can break your position. The less clear the information, the smaller the pot should be controlled; this is the most basic survival rule at the card table.
Real money isn't made at the moment of the event; it's made when you have a clear edge, not when you're flipping a coin. If you can't see clearly, don't bet big. Earnings Report Reveal Night: $AMD, $CRCL, Apple — Who Is the Most at Risk Under High Expectations?📉
The real test of earnings season isn’t whether companies "beat or miss expectations," but whether the stock price has already priced in the good news in advance😅. AMD, CRCL, and Apple stand respectively in the AI computing power, stablecoin finance, and consumer tech sectors, each facing different challenges.
First, look at AMD🔥. The market is focused on data center growth, AI chip deliveries, gross margin, and next quarter guidance. AI demand has plenty of stories but lacks the speed of converting orders into revenue; as long as guidance isn’t aggressive enough, the valuation might take a hit first.
Next, consider CRCL💵. The key isn’t that the "stablecoin space is large," but the circulation scale of USDC, reserve income, distribution costs, and profit margins. Activity in the crypto space can boost usage, but interest rate cuts may compress reserve income, so growth in scale doesn’t necessarily mean shareholder returns grow in tandem.
Apple🍎 has already reported; next, we watch iPhone demand, service revenue, gross margin, and whether AI investments can support the valuation. A strong earnings report is just the first hurdle; holding the stock price is the second.
My biggest concern about "winning on earnings but losing on stock price" is Apple: expectations are highest, valuation is not low, and the AI narrative is unfolding slowly😬. AMD is next, while CRCL has more flexibility but a more complex profit chain. #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #苹果Q4营收超预期，下季度毛利率指引承压 #PalantirQ3营收增长96%，股价不涨反跌 A reminder for those obsessed with the "rate cut bull": not all central banks are on your side.
Last night, ECB's Nagel kept sending signals — September inflation pressure is higher than expected and approaching an adverse scenario; if energy prices get out of control, it will trigger widespread inflation, and a rate hike in December is very likely. On one hand, US Treasuries are racing ahead with rate cut expectations, pushing yields down; on the other hand, Europe is seriously discussing rate hikes. This policy divergence itself is noise that risk assets dislike the most.
What's even more critical is that the term "energy inflation" hasn't been crossed out yet. As long as it remains on the table, the so-called script of continuous rate cuts and massive liquidity flooding isn't as solid as everyone thinks. Don't mistake the first rate cut as the starting gun for a bull market.