Orbit Post Sitemap
About 33.41 million $PIEVERSE tokens are set to unlock on 11/14 — roughly 3.3% of the total supply, equivalent to just over 10% of the market cap at current prices (USD value fluctuates with price).
Tokenomics-type trackers report a single-day figure of about 33,411,329 tokens; the recipients are split approximately as Community 33.5%, Insiders 24.9%, Private Investors 24.9%, Foundation 16.6%. Some media outlets package the "team/investors 12-month lockup end" as about 86.4 million tokens — that includes cliff plus subsequent linear release all combined, so don’t confuse it with the single-day figure.
Why it matters: The small market cap unlock calendar is approaching; entering circulation does NOT mean immediate dumping, it depends on who holds the tokens and how they act after receiving them.
Confidence level: Medium-high | Tokenomics.com unlock schedule (11/10). Are you more concerned about "who gets the tokens" or "whether they will dump all into the market on the same day"? I personally believe that NVIDIA's financial report will not be affected by Jensen Huang.
There are several main points:
1. Currently, NVIDIA has completely dropped consumer graphics cards like the RTX 5090 / 5080 and is fully focusing on AI professional chips and computing cards; even if it may face policy restrictions from the US Democratic Party or personal-related rumors in the future, these will not fundamentally shake its revenue and financial report data.
2. NVIDIA has long held an absolute leading position, with AMD far behind and no competitors in sight.
Although the stock price may inevitably fluctuate in the short term, I believe this is actually a good opportunity to buy NVIDIA stock at a low point. Commercial spaceflight is booming, so why can't BTC be directly considered a beneficiary coin?
Being optimistic about the space industry doesn't necessarily mean you have to buy BTC; there needs to be a bridge for this cross-market causality. The market is currently focused on earnings previews, not conclusions after announcements.
$BTC is currently priced around $73,903, down 2.67% in 24 hours; if it can stabilize first, it will be easier for other coins to recover with a more solid foundation.
Looking at another coin, $TRUMP is about $1.12, down 4.89% in 24 hours. Unlike other Meme coins, the Meme sector is not uniformly recovering.
In the same snapshot, $BCH is down 3.26% in 24 hours, priced around $237.42. Payment-type assets also follow market pullbacks; narratives cannot replace capital.
The three types of coins have different drivers, but risk appetite might be a common underlying factor. Without business connections, the so-called benefits can only be regarded as guesses about risk appetite.
What do you think about the statement "Tech benefits must drive the crypto circle"?
#RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？ #美国10月CPI前瞻：12月加息预期会否改变？ #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% Tokenization has once again been thrust into the spotlight, but what I really want to see is whether this recognition has translated into actual transactions.
According to CoinDesk, Robinhood has confirmed it does not oppose its stock being traded on the joint venture platforms of OKX and ICE, and has clearly taken a stance: tokenization is the future of financial markets, preferring to participate in building it rather than sitting on the sidelines. However, out of the initial 62 companies selected, 56 chose to withdraw. This makes the remaining recognition scarce, but it does not mean the market has fully accepted it.
The hype around tokenization has reflected in prices, with XHOOD quoted at 84.56, up 4.33% in 24 hours, just 0.91% below its high. It looks strong, but the trading volume is only about 296,000 USDT.
Looking at Strategy, which also did not disclose opposition, XMSTR fell 0.30%, but its trading volume was about 7.92 million USDT, 26.8 times that of XHOOD.
I tend to treat this wave as a narrative reaction within thin volume rather than recognition being fully priced in. The price increase has caught the buzzword, but the trading depth has yet to catch up.
Do you stand by "scarce recognition being priced in" or "thin volume following the trend"? Without thicker trading volume, how many more rounds of discussion can tokenization sustain? #美股探索代币化与全天候交易 $xHOOD $xMSTR $xCOIN Core Long-Short Logic
Capital Aspect: On November 6, ETF net inflow for the day was $240 million, IBIT turned positive from negative, indicating short-term institutional buybacks, providing marginal support; however, the weekly net outflow was still $403 million, and the cumulative net outflow for the year has turned to $910 million, so the capital-driven pressure has not been relieved.
Technical Aspect: The 75,500 level has been tested multiple times without a solid break below, and the 4-hour doji indicates an attempt to stop the decline; however, the 77,410 resistance zone remains unbroken, daily and 5-hour charts are still bearish, and the descending converging triangle is approaching its end, with resistance prevailing before direction is chosen.
Macro: After the non-farm payrolls exceeded expectations, prices did not fall, indicating that negative factors are dulled and selling pressure may be temporarily exhausted; however, the probability of a rate hike in December is about 80%, and next week's CPI may bring greater shocks, so macro pressure still dominates.
Correlation: BTC and U.S. tech stocks are highly synchronized, AI trading shows concentrated sell-offs lacking independence, and external risks tend to amplify volatility.
Overall, short-term conditions for recovery exist, but capital, technical, macro, and correlation factors have not yet formed a resonance to turn bullish, so the rebound is better viewed as a stress test. A rumor about Nvidia chief Jensen Huang, spreading fast online and impossible to verify, was enough to knock the stock sharply in US pre-market trading and drag crypto through a violent overnight flush. That a chip executive's personal life could move digital assets says less about Huang than about how thin the market's cushion has become. When there is no real bid, any headline will do. 😳 The damage is concrete. $BTC sits at 75,228 after breaking through 73,385, and the striking detail is not On November 9, Charles Schwab added SOL, AVAX, and LINK to its own crypto accounts. Along with the previously available BTC and ETH, this veteran brokerage holding massive retail assets now allows clients to directly buy and sell five types of crypto assets.
The timeline is worth noting. In May, BTC and ETH were only open to a few clients; in August, there was a hint about adding these three coins; in October, it was extended to all eligible retail clients; on October 15, management said there would be three more by year-end; and in November, it was fulfilled.
The key is the account structure: Charles Schwab Bank acts as custodian, Paxos as sub-custodian and responsible for matching. Clients receive direct ownership of the tokens themselves, which can be transferred out, not fund shares. This is a different matter from buying an ETF with crypto exposure.
The cost is also clear: 0.75% per transaction based on the USD amount, so $7.5 for $1,000. This fee is outrageously high compared to on-chain fees, but what it sells has never been cheapness, but rather "being able to buy with a couple of clicks in a brokerage account I've watched for twenty years."
So this is more like building a channel, not a market catalyst. SOL, AVAX, and LINK entering the compliant sales list of a mainstream US brokerage for the first time has a much bigger long-term impact than a single day's price fluctuations.
One question remains: clients in New York, Louisiana, and overseas still cannot buy now. If this model is replicated, who will be diverted first: retail traders on exchanges or shares of spot ETFs?- 2万、7.9万、7.6万三档抄底，现在全被挂在树上。 你有没有发现，这轮最热闹的不是涨幅，是"抄底"的人特别多？ 我这几天盯盘最直观的感受是，表面看着到处有人在接，但真实承接的厚度完全跟不上热度。BTC从8.2万一路有人抢，7.9万再抢一波，7.6万还有人不服，结果三档买盘叠在一起，反而成了上方最沉的那层包袱。ETH也是同款剧本，抄底的人排着队，价格却迟迟给不出像样的反弹。 这里其实有个跨市场联动的信号被忽略了。美股那边风险偏好并没有真正回暖，资金在等宏观数据给方向， crypto 这边的反弹更像是场内资金的自救式脉冲，而不是外部新钱进场。也就是说，热闹是局部的，承接是稀薄的。这种结构下，价格越往上抬，越容易遇到解套盘和短线获利盘的双重挤压。 偏多的路径当然也有：如果宏观预期转暖、BTC能带量站稳前高附近，被套筹码会从压力变成锁仓，反弹的持续性才会出来。但潜在的坑在于，多数人把"跌得多了"当成"该涨了"，忽略了弱势震荡里最磨人的不是跌幅，是时间。横久了，信心先碎，量能再缩，山寨的跟风意愿会更弱，板块之间也很难形成合力。 所以我的判断是，短期更像弱震荡消化筹码，而不是一口气V回去救人#Vitalik重提ETH价值存储定位，手续费销毁还是核心吗？ $ETH $BTC Vitalik重提ETH价值存储定位，手续费销毁还是核心吗？这是这两天以太坊社区吵得最凶的一个问题，而且正好撞上 ETH 领跌的行情。 一、V 神到底说了什么 11 月 8 日，Vitalik 在 X 上连发长帖，核心意思是：把 ETH 当成"价值存储"，比当成"靠手续费销毁的代币"更站得住。 • EIP-1559 和销毁机制要保留，但即使销毁量长期不到抵消增发所需的 10%，持有者也"不必难过"，ETH 的价值来自别处。 • 他认为 2021 到 2023 年的大额销毁从来不是真正的估值底：那时的手续费大多来自币圈内部的借贷和 NFT 抢购，最夸张时一场"数字猴子"发售一天就烧掉约 1.8 亿美元手续费。ETH 价格一跌，这些需求也跟着缩水。 • 如果要靠销毁撑起约 2700 亿美元市值，以太坊就得像欧莱雅这样的大公司去运营，每年约 70 万枚 ETH 的协议内研发开支，验证者收入要少掉约三分之二，还需要长期强干预的治理，这和去中心化目标冲突。 • 他给价值存储开出的第一条标准是"活下来"：抗量子、$BTC weekend selling pressure was obvious, rarely seen recently. If it continues to close lower this week, the weekly chart will record the fifth consecutive bearish candle.
➤ Key points
🌟 This round of decline occurred before the CPI data release, with stop-loss liquidity below the previous low being swept, causing panic selling to concentrate.
🌟 Consecutive weekly bearish candles combined with weakening sentiment suggest paying attention to whether a strong rebound is brewing this week.
🌟 The more intense the panic, the more we need to watch for reversal signals rather than blindly shorting.
Overall, short-term sentiment is pessimistic, but extreme emotions often precede a market reversal. $BTC
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 Regulatory concerns intensify after midterm elections:
· Democrats take control of both the House and Senate
· Senator Elizabeth Warren is seen as a potential next chair of the Senate Banking Committee
· Some Democratic lawmakers call for tighter anti-money laundering and risk management regulations in the cryptocurrency industry
Several cryptocurrency-related bills passed in the past two years were mainly driven by Republicans, raising market concerns about possible changes in future regulatory policies.
Regulatory risk #消费动能转弱，9月政策仍受通胀制约 After organizing this week's macro weekly framework, I came to a conclusion: from after this week until the December 9th interest rate meeting, this period might be the best time for everyone to bottom-fish, whether for tech stocks or #Bitcoin, basically the same.
Recently, on the macro front, industry narratives, and black swan events, everything has basically exploded all at once, which can be seen as a short-term thorough acceleration of clearing selling pressure.
The December rate hike expectations have basically been maxed out, and with multiple unstable factors emerging, it seems we have reached a "freezing point" market phase. When most people around you start to feel disappointed and give up, buying at this time means that once the negative conditions gradually ease, it will be a series of positive stimuli for the market.
When I am desperate about life but then realize the future is not so desperate, even the smallest good thing becomes a very, very optimistic condition for me! #美国10月CPI前瞻：12月加息预期会否改变？ RocketLab Earnings Preview: How is the Neutron Rocket Progressing? The core contradiction in RKLB's earnings is: stable revenue, but Neutron delays reset the mid-to-long-term narrative.
Q3 revenue guidance midpoint is $257.5 million, up about 66% year-over-year; backlog is $2.36 billion, indicating decent revenue visibility. However, Neutron's maiden flight is postponed to 2027, with paid missions possibly even later, pushing the profitability inflection point accordingly. Q3 gross margin guidance falls back to 29%–31%, adjusted EBITDA loss widens to $17 million–$23 million, reflecting launch investments and business structure pressures.
Therefore, the Q3 figures themselves are not the key; the key is whether management can provide a credible Neutron timeline and the pace of converting orders into cash flow. Before that, revenue beating expectations is unlikely to offset valuation multiple compression.
Current Rocket Lab (RKLB) holding marked No, shares 11348.55, corresponding profit/loss -183.3 xp
You can open the holdings page to verify the profit and loss record of this position. #
$BTC $ETH $SOL 7.45 Billion Liquidated in One Hour at Dawn, Don't Mistake the Rebound for a Reversal
In the one hour at 5 AM on Monday, the entire network's contracts liquidated $745 million, with long positions accounting for $715 million. BTC dropped straight from 75,718 to 73,385, hitting the lowest since August; ETH perpetual contracts were also pushed down to 2,051. Leverage is just the surface; spot BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of about $1.28 billion last week, with $412 million outflow in a single day on Friday, of which IBIT alone accounted for $403 million.
Glassnode's short-term holder cost is around 75,700, exactly the starting point of this round of decline, meaning recent entrants are mostly underwater. On OKX, BTC contract open interest dropped from about 3.84 billion to 3.7 billion, with a long-short ratio of 2.86; longs were shaken out once but not completely. Current price is around 74,950, funding rate is 0.0027%, almost zero.
Current strategy:
Do not bottom-fish nor chase shorts. The stop-loss below 73,385 has already been triggered once; short-term is very likely to fluctuate between 73,400 and 75,700. There is buying interest near 73,385; try small long positions with stop-loss below 73,200, first target at 75,160, which is the high of the 8 o'clock candlestick. If 75,700 cannot be reclaimed, treat the rebound as just a rebound; before Tuesday's CPI, keep position size small. The total computing power of the Bitcoin network continues to maintain a high level ranging between 881 EH/s and 1 ZH/s, with the network's mining difficulty concurrently at a historic high level ranging between 120T and 140T. The growth rate of computing power is influenced by multiple overlapping factors.
In February 2026, the total network computing power was about 881 EH/s to 1 ZH/s, with a short-term decline of 10% due to winter storms and miners shifting to AI-specific computing.
In June 2026, the computing power reached an all-time high, followed by fluctuations within a high range On one hand, there's a desire to increase the state/cut gas, but on the other hand, there's fear of breaking immutable old contracts — Glamsterdam's repair route has already started to clash.
Around 11/6 Ethereum Foundation: ChainSecurity found that several project invariants would be broken after EIP-8037 / EIP-8038 (which rework some operations and state gas metering). ACD decided: no fork activation for Hoodi until the issue is resolved; the parallel line Hegota is unaffected and continues at full speed. Around 11/9 CoinDesk: two opposing repair proposals emerged — Leo Glisic's EIP-8488 proposes letting existing contracts continue using the old gas table, while new contracts use V2; Giulio Rebuffo's proposal suggests dual metering within transactions (execution according to old rules, billing according to new rules). Both are drafts with no target date, and no client implementation or consensus testing fully in place yet.
Why it matters: this is a cautious delay at the testnet/spec layer plus draft debate, not a mainnet fork failure or upgrade cancellation.
Confidence: High | Ethereum Foundation Blog (11/6) + CoinDesk (11/9). Are you more concerned about "old contract compatibility" or "how the new gas table will be implemented"? $ETH #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% Rocket Lab Q3 Earnings Preview: I Choose Yes!
After the U.S. market close on November 9, RKLB will release its Q3 earnings report. Although currently 74% of people choose No, there is more optimism about revenue exceeding expectations.
① Increased launch frequency. In Q3, Electron completed 6 launches, higher than 4 in Q2, supporting growth in launch business revenue.
② Strong order backlog. At the end of Q2, backlog reached $2.36 billion, a 137% year-over-year increase, providing a foundation for continuous delivery in the aerospace systems business.
③ Modest revenue expectations. The market consensus is about $257 million, with the company guidance ceiling at $265 million; actual revenue has a chance to exceed $260 million.
Neutron delays are indeed a negative factor but have limited impact on this quarter's revenue.
Currently holding RKLBUSDT perpetual 3x long position.
You can open the position to verify the preset take-profit and stop-loss points for this perpetual position.
$RKLB $BTC $ETH My judgment is that the deflationary burn narrative that $ETH relied on to support its valuation in the past has completely come to an end. Vitalik directly set the tone at Devcon 8, shifting the positioning to a store of value and underlying collateral. The cash flow model propped up in the previous cycle by on-chain high-frequency leverage and crazy speculative gas burning has long been defunct after Layer 2 siphoned off mainnet traffic and fees, rendering the burn mechanism effectively dead.
What concerns me more is how institutions are responding to this shift. Tom Lee's Bitmine took the opportunity to add another $20 million, with holdings reaching 6.07 million $ETH, accounting for nearly 5% of the total supply. Just from staking yields alone, it can reliably earn $309 million annually. The big money mindset has shifted to treating it as an interest-earning collateral asset.
Ethereum's path ahead will be very difficult. Everyone should stop deluding themselves with the old dream of explosive growth through deflation. From now on, it can only grit its teeth and follow the collateral and store of value route. The core question is whether Wall Street will buy into it.一位巨鲸的合约账本，正在撕开当前市场最值得玩味的分歧：$BTC 空单持续浮盈，$ETH 多单却被按在水下近200万美元。这不是普通散户的试错，而是一套高杠杆、全仓位的对冲组合在真实市场里的压力测试。 先看最扎眼的一组数字。该账户以40倍全仓做空249.9枚$BTC，开仓价78104.1美元，名义价值约1892.75万美元，未实现盈利59.11万美元，另累计收取资金费19.64万美元。空头不但赚了价差，还在持续“收租”，这说明市场多头情绪并未退潮，杠杆资金仍在为持空者付费。这是典型的拥挤多头结构留下的痕迹。 真正值得警惕的是另一侧。9823.81枚$ETH多单，25倍全仓，开仓价2427.28美元，名义价值2186.58万美元，浮亏197.93万美元，资金费再倒贴11.92万美元。也就是说，这笔多单在价格和费率上遭遇双杀。$ETH的相对弱势，正在被这套组合放大成一个清晰的信号：资金更愿意为$BTC的下跌买单，却不愿为$ETH的反弹付费。 第三腿更有意思。259600枚HYPE空单，5倍全仓，开仓价72.8005美元，名义价值1978.73万美元，浮亏88.5万美元，但资金费收入高达123No matter how elegant the bluebird on the blueprint is, it can't withstand a structural limit review once. Satellites are hoisted one by one; outsiders see the skyline, insiders focus on node welds and cash flow—the earnings call is the completion inspection of this spatial truss, and you know where the load-bearing walls are by tapping.
The Bluebird constellation is essentially a large-scale cantilever structure, with each satellite acting as a stress node. Direct device service is the load path that transmits floor loads all the way to the foundation. Mobile network partners are not just landscape features in the renderings but embedded parts and anchor bolts—once the embedded parts rust, the entire truss failure is only a matter of time. Commercial revenue is pre-sale payments, and cash burn is the continuous pumping operation during the pouring period; stopping the pump once leaves cold joints in the structure, causing exponential increases in future reinforcement costs.
What truly determines whether this building can stand is never the renderings from the launch event but three things: whether the satellite deployment construction rhythm is continuous, whether the partner network node stiffness meets standards, and whether the burn rate and payment curve form a closed load transfer system. Any plastic hinge in any link will redistribute overall stiffness, which is not visible on the surface, but settlement monitoring points will speak first.
Looking at the token-backed linkage layer, its positioning is as a curtain wall system hung outside the main structure. The curtain wall can be made extremely thin and flashy, but all wind loads must ultimately be transferred back to the main body—the cash flow of the underlying asset is the main structure, and the token price is just the surface. Surface cracks are not fatal; displacement of the main structure is. When the three construction diagrams of satellite deployment progress, commercial payments, and burn rate do not align, no matter how transparent the curtain wall glass is, it cannot hide the stress concentration inside.
I don't look at renderings; I only look at construction organization design and concealed works acceptance records. Satellite launch is hoisting, earnings reports are flaw detection, and partner contracts are material entry re-inspections. The most critical thing in this project now is not how many more satellites are hoisted but whether the load transfer path is closed—if the commercial revenue structural column is not properly poured, every additional floor afterward is burying a more expensive reinforcement plan for the future. #astsq3commercialoutlookFacing a breakdown crisis, the bulls and bears in the market are fiercely battling around the core iron bottom between $72,500 and $73,500. Several well-known analysts and traders point out that the 200-day moving average (around $73,200) and the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement level of the $57,000 to $87,000 upward wave ($72,581) form the most critical defense line at present. In addition, CoinAnk data shows that the $722,850 to $74,700 range holds an extreme bullish liquidation cluster peak of up to $289 million. However, the gain or loss of the 50-week moving average still makes technical analysts sweat nervously. Doctor Profit warns that the 50-week moving average is the last line of defense for the bull market; if it cannot be effectively reclaimed, the previous $57,000 to $87,000 rise may become a bull trap, and the price could head straight to the Fibonacci golden pocket between $68,000 and $69,000. Ash Crypto, Ardi, and Material Indicators co-founder Keith Alan also point out that if this week's drop cannot be confirmed as a "false breakdown," Bitcoin may further test the $66,000 to $70,000 level (200-week moving average) or even the $60,000 level to seek buyer liquidity. #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $BTC The market fears this situation the most: there is news about negotiations, but the risks have yet to be lifted.
The US-Iran diplomatic mediation is still ongoing, but the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz remains unresolved. If the situation escalates again, oil prices, inflation, and global risk appetite could all be impacted.
Looking at the crypto space, the big brother BTC is struggling around $74,000, ETH and SOL are clearly under pressure, and altcoins lack sustained buying. BTC's market dominance remains high, and funds are temporarily unwilling to take risks chasing smaller coins.
Don't rush to bet on a reversal in the geopolitical situation; first, watch the negotiation outcomes and BTC's support. Opportunities always exist, there's no need to jump in on every fluctuation.
Personal trading record shared, not investment advice.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#美伊外交斡旋持续，霍尔木兹通航分歧待解 Someone opened a massive $96,000,000 $BTC short position.
Liquidation Price: $89,623November 10th📷
$SNDK 【Today's market surge is indeed quite exciting】
Previous lowest price touched: 790
Risen to the highest price: 905
Increased by nearly 14.6%
A rapid rally can instantly fill the market with greed; but once funds start to take profits, the pullback speed will be just as ruthless.
The data is still good, but the key is whether 【NVIDIA】's scandalous news can withstand the FBI's investigation.
Although SanDisk's data rose well today, $BTC still can't break through the 76,000 mark, and $SOL also returned to the initial stage after a small rise.
Now just waiting for the data after the 5:00 close to see what changes will occur #美国10月CPI前瞻：12月加息预期会否改变？ 凌晨看盘时看到那条爆仓记录，我盯着屏幕愣了好几秒 🌙 一个传闻，真的值得押上这么多吗？ 先把事实摆清楚：某巨鲸在半夜被强平了 63,000 枚 ETH（约 1.35 亿美元）和 60.8 枚 BTC（约 456 万美元），触发点是一则关于 Nvidia 掌门人的传闻在低流动性时段发酵。更让我在意的是，他平完之后又继续加仓，目前仍持有约 1.13 亿美元的 BTC 和 ETH 多单，浮亏约 1,239 万美元，BTC 清算价 72,197 美元，ETH 清算价 2,004 美元。 这里市场真正在交易的不是八卦本身，而是"半夜薄盘里，一则未经证实的消息能撬动多大的杠杆链条"。凌晨时段订单簿本来就稀，一笔大额强平足以让价格短暂失序，进而触发相邻仓位的连锁反应。这类事件的传导路径很清晰：先打多头杠杆，再影响短期风险偏好，最后才轮到现货情绪。山寨在这个阶段通常最先被抽走注意力，因为资金会本能地往确定性更高的地方缩。 偏多的解读是：强平本身就是杠杆出清，浮筹被洗掉后，如果价格能守住清算价上方，反弹的阻力反而更小；而且这位巨鲸没有离场，某种程度上说明有资金愿意在恐慌里接。偏空的一面同样明显：CPI#RocketLab财报前瞻：How is the progress of the Neutron rocket? SPACE Rocket Lab plans to release its Q3 earnings after the U.S. stock market closes and hold a conference call at 5 PM Eastern Time;
Focus on four key points:
Whether revenue reaches the mid-point or above of guidance, especially the project delivery and revenue recognition pace of the space systems business.
Whether gross margin and losses improve: revenue growth does not equal improved profit quality; need to look at gross margin, expenses, and cash flow.
Whether backlog can convert into revenue: Q2 disclosed backlog was $2.36 billion, but backlog does not mean immediate revenue recognition, nor is it a profit guarantee. (investors.rocketlabcorp.com)
Neutron's new timeline, costs, and cash burn: this may impact the market's long-term valuation of the company more than a slight beat in quarterly revenue.
Neutron progress: direction is still moving forward, but the timeline has clearly been pushed back.
Judgment: The company's fundamentals are attractive, but before the earnings report, it is not suitable to treat it as a low-risk earnings trade. The earnings report will focus on revenue and cash flow; the real valuation watershed remains whether Neutron can turn the “2027 target” into verifiable engineering progress.
You can open your position list to check the preset stop-loss level for this position.
$SPACE $BTC $ETH Just now while watching the market, I noticed $ARB order book showing a "sandwich market" at 0.18341 — the spread between the best bid and ask suddenly widened, @大勇干短线（互动）
Market makers withdrew shallow orders, leaving only deep walls. Took a 50x short position, smashed down to 0.17775 to exit, 154.29%. The spread widening means a liquidity vacuum, usually signaling downward direction.
But it could also suddenly close the gap and pump to shake out shorts, moving stop losses tight to breakeven. Missing the move is not a mistake, don't chase or catch. If you missed it, patiently wait for a rebound. $BTC $ETH Overnight, US tech stocks rebounded, but the Nasdaq weekly chart still fell about 3.4%; ETH/USDT is currently at 2,123, down 4.91% in the past 24 hours, clearly diverging from the stock index rhythm.
The Nasdaq closed higher but the weekly chart is still down 3.4%, indicating that the overnight move was just an oversold rebound and risk appetite has not truly recovered. Naturally, $ETH is not in a priority position for capital replenishment. The 24-hour drop of 4.91% is steeper than the weekly decline of the stock index, and the selling pressure in crypto is still being digested internally.
So, there are two conditions to watch going forward: first, whether the area around 2,123 can hold and whether it turns green within a 3-day window. According to historical statistics, the rebound is likely to be eaten up by a secondary dip; second, whether the Nasdaq weekly chart can turn positive after this week's FOMC interest rate decision, which would be a true signal of risk appetite recovery. Holding above 2,123 and recovering the single-day 4% gap is considered a reversal; falling below it means maintaining the original rhythm.
$ETH #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% Tech stocks surged, so why does ETH look worse than BTC?
If the US stock market rebound could directly drive crypto prices, ETH shouldn't be performing this weak today. The S&P rose about 0.3% on Friday, while the Dow actually fell about 0.5%, showing divergence within the US stock market itself.
In contrast, $ETH dropped 6.46% in 24 hours, priced around $2,094. The on-chain ecosystem narrative hasn't shielded it from this round of selling pressure.
Interestingly, $BTC is around $73,903, down 2.67% in 24 hours; its market cap is about $1.48 trillion. It's more suitable for measuring risk budgets and shouldn't be treated as an absolute safe-haven asset.
Also interesting is $BCH: about $237.42, down 3.26% in the past 24 hours. Its risk sources differ from Meme and shouldn't be placed on the same trading scale.
Though all are large assets, the different declines indicate that endogenous supply and demand are also speaking. The rebound last Friday has already happened; what needs to be tested next is whether capital is truly willing to take over.
Do you think ETH is catching down, or is the market unwilling to bear elasticity?
#美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #美国10月CPI前瞻：12月加息预期会否改变？ #RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？ Up 1.1% but down 3.4% for the week, don’t overlook this contrast
Only talking about Friday’s rise makes it easy to miss the selling pressure from the previous four days; only talking about the weekly drop misses the recovery. Last week’s tech stock rebound and today’s crypto market are not the same trading window.
$BTC isn’t easy either, spot around $73,903, down 2.67% in 24 hours; market cap about $1.48 trillion. Relative resistance is an advantage, but follow-up volume and closing structure need confirmation.
Speaking of $SOL, around $85.73, down 3.91% in 24 hours; market cap about $50.61 billion. If risk appetite continues to shrink, the high elasticity of public chains may amplify two-way volatility.
Speaking of $ZEC: about $1,192, down 5.74% in the past 24 hours. Independent themes don’t have immunity from market selling pressure; watch for volume continuation later.
There are also strength and weakness differences within large-cap coins; rebounds require continuity. Getting excited just by rebound size misses the weekly pressure, which should also be on the table for a complete discussion.
Do you think the next step is to watch the Nasdaq for a high point, or a low point without making a new low?
#美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #美国10月CPI前瞻：12月加息预期会否改变？ #RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？ What is more worth being cautious about now is the secondary impact caused by repeated news fluctuations, rather than the single-day pullback itself.
The Middle East situation still has not provided a clear answer; negotiations related to the Strait of Hormuz are ongoing and dragging on, making it difficult for shipping and energy risk premiums to quickly dissipate. As long as oil prices and geopolitical news can change at any time, global risk appetite will find it hard to truly open up.
The crypto market is equally cautious. BTC is repeatedly testing within a range, altcoins are showing clear divergence, SOL is under short-term pressure, and some smaller coins have pulled back even deeper; ZEC is relatively more resilient. ETF fund flows are also fluctuating, which makes the rebound lack sustainability, and chasing the rally easily turns into catching emotions.
At this stage, blindly buying in is not appropriate. When geopolitics are unclear and funding conditions are unstable, rebounds are more likely to be bull traps. Managing your position first and waiting for clearer signals before making moves is more important than rushing to bottom-fish.
This is only a personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice.NVIDIA is pushing for $100 billion in revenue, and with the earnings report coming up, I think there are three issues worth discussing together
NVIDIA will release its FY2027 Q3 earnings after the US market closes on November 17. Last quarter's revenue grew 106% year-over-year, and this quarter's guidance has already reached $108 billion
With Blackwell continuing to scale, there's a good chance product delivery will support another revenue record high (though this number is a bit exaggerated)
However, rather than focusing on the $100 billion record, I have three questions I'd like to discuss with friends on Orbit
1. Will $NVDA still be just a chip-selling company in the future?
I think not entirely. From GPUs to networking equipment, and now complete computing systems, NVIDIA is bundling the entire AI infrastructure. They’ve long been selling more than just a chip.
2. Do gaming and automotive businesses still have opportunities ahead?
The data center segment is currently so dominant that other businesses feel somewhat neglected (NVDA can’t rely on just one segment to carry the whole show forever).
3. After breaking the $100 billion mark, what can drive further growth?
I’m more optimistic about AI inference and enterprise applications. After all, training models is just the first step; the real focus is on the demand that will bring AI into all industries.
Of course, this is just my perspective.
Friends on Orbit, which of these three questions do you think deserves the most attention?
Can NVIDIA continue to surprise the market after this earnings report? Feel free to discuss,
Let’s see if everyone thinks the same as I do
#英伟达冲击千亿美元季度营收纪录 The first US staking INJ ETF listed on Nasdaq
The first US staking INJ ETF has landed on Nasdaq, coinciding with the fifth anniversary of Injective's launch. The market reaction is restrained, with INJ up +2.52%.
Holders were expecting a narrative upgrade, but instead got a small bullish candle first. Those looking to get in see the same signal: the ETF is listed, but the price hasn't followed.
What’s worth watching is not the listing itself, but the actual capital inflow and secondary market trading after the product launch. The staking structure is different from a regular spot ETF; premiums and redemption rhythms will tell the story. The fifth anniversary review is the project team's narrative, but capital flow is the market's answer.$BTC at 74k is a very critical position, hoping it can hold; if it can't, then brace for half a year to a year of waiting.
Never expected to reach 73k in this way... North Korean hackers and the US circuit breakers aren't as fierce as Huang Renxun's moves. I originally planned to go all-in on a black swan event, only to realize this is the real black swan 😭
This morning, retail investors were still very bullish, but the main players withdrew all large orders above 65k. Now retail is still enthusiastically long, while the main players have placed large orders at 70k. Strong altcoins are no longer hitting recent lows, but BTC is still probing the bottom, which is very rare...
The over 10k pullback I called at the end of September has already happened, a 13,000 dollar drop, nearly 16%. The weekly chart shows five consecutive bearish candles, the 3-day moving average is converging, and the daily, 3-day, and weekly charts are all oversold. BTC is still struggling in the negative gamma zone... I believe there is still a very strong demand for a rebound, but if 74k doesn't hold, then it's game over, and spot holders should just play dead.
Brothers, what do you think? Will it plunge straight down to 68k, or shoot like an arrow through the clouds to 80k?#NVIDIA aims for a record quarterly revenue of $100 billion Nvidia (NVDA) ahead of the report at the end of 2026: frenzied demand for Blackwell chips and record revenue push the stock price to $185–$200, but extremely high market expectations and margin risks increase volatility before the results release. Is SOL relatively resilient related to the tech stock rebound?
Seeing that SOL has fallen less than ETH, the instinct is to categorize it under tech risk appetite, but the evidence is insufficient. Last week's tech stock rebound and today's crypto market are not the same trading window.
$SOL is not easy either, currently around $85.73, down 3.91% in 24 hours. Active public chain narratives do not mean there is new buying every day; short-term still depends on transaction support.
$ETH is currently about $2,094, down 6.46% in 24 hours; today's drop is relatively deep, and mainstream risks are not evenly distributed.
Breaking down $OKB, about $96.19, down 5.96% in 24 hours. Smaller scale than large-cap coins, so you can't just compare the price changes of two coins to assess risk.
Relative strength is real, but attribution requires caution; don't mistake correlation for causation. Market strength cannot be judged solely by index colors; internal differences often better indicate risk.
What do you need to see to believe in tech capital transmission?
#美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #美国10月CPI前瞻：12月加息预期会否改变？ #RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？ $BTC 74600, ETH 2120, just glanced at this screen full of -1%, this trend is really something.
Many people think a 1% drop is nothing, but take a closer look at the details in the screenshot: although Bitcoin and Ethereum dropped 1%, BCH below has already dropped 2.3%, XRP dropped 1.8%, OKB dropped 1.5%.
This kind of "big coin slight drop, altcoin big drop" market actually reveals a harsh reality: there is no incremental capital in the market.
Funds are being drained from altcoins, flowing back to mainstream assets for risk aversion. The whole market is like a stagnant pool, with no profit effect, no panic selling, just slowly drifting down bit by bit.
This kind of market is the most tormenting for contract traders. Long positions fear breaking support, short positions fear sudden spikes, the back-and-forth volatility wears down fees completely. It's even harder for spot traders, with daily slow declines, reluctant to cut losses, but afraid to add positions and get hit by sudden drops.
Actually, when encountering this kind of extremely low-volume garbage time, the best strategy is "no move beats any move."
Don't try to guess the bottom, don't bet on a rebound. Lower your leverage, control your position size, patiently wait for the market to pick up volume, wait for the market to choose a direction again. Remember, in a market of zero-sum competition, not losing money already beats 80% of people. Sharing my view on $BTC (no offense if you disagree). Feel free to discuss and welcome any guidance (my win rate is relatively low).
🔴 Market signals
1. Upper resistance: First resistance at 75220, strong resistance at 76000, previous high at 76160 is the key watershed for this rebound. Without a volume breakout, a direct reversal is unlikely.
2. Lower support: Recent low at 73385 is the core support level. If this level breaks again, the downside space will reopen.
3. Volume: Volume has not significantly increased during the rebound phase, indicating a weak recovery after the decline, a consolidation and bottoming process, not a strong reversal.
4. Cycle performance: 7-day -3.80%, 30-day -10.92%, the mid-term trend remains bearish, currently only a short-term oversold rebound repair.
📌 Trading ideas
- Short-term long: Play rebounds based on 73385 support, target first at 75220, strictly use stop loss, exit immediately if support fails, do not hold losing positions.
- Short-term short: If rebound reaches 75220-76000 resistance zone, try short if pressure causes stagnation, place stop loss above previous high.
- Conservative approach: Moving averages are tangled and direction is unclear, prioritize watching, wait for volume breakout above resistance or break below support before following, to avoid being stopped out repeatedly in a range-bound market.📊 $BTC /USDT heatmap on OKX (24h)
The price oscillates around $74,713 trapped between two key liquidity zones:
🔻 Support / Magnet below: Large concentration of long liquidations at $73,640 ($27.98M), being the most loaded and attractive level to sweep.
🔺 Resistance above: Short liquidation zone at $75,857 ($16.37M).
Greater pressure towards lower liquidity before seeking new highs. Patience in spot! 🎯
#BTC #OKX #Trading #Báo cáo tài chính RocketLab trước thềm: Tiến triển của tên lửa Neutron ra sao?
I assess Rocket Lab as having attractive long-term prospects, but Neutron should not yet be considered a guaranteed revenue driver in 2026. The report on 11/9 needs to be evaluated alongside technical updates: a good revenue quarter will be a positive signal, but the ability to thoroughly resolve the first stage production issues is the decisive factor for RKLB's long-term valuation.
$RKLB $xRKLB Funding situation: ETF "weekly outflow" and "single-day replenishment" coexist 📊
Don't be misled by a single data point; ETF capital flows need to be analyzed separately 🔍.
On a weekly basis, among the five trading days this week, only Wednesday saw net inflows, with a total weekly net outflow of about 910 million; on Friday, another outflow of 403 million occurred, while Fidelity's FBTC inflow was about 42.8 million, only partially offsetting the outflow 📉.
However, there was marginal improvement on a single day: on November 6 (Thursday), ETF net inflow was about 112 million, and FBTC inflow was around 75,000, indicating that institutions are not uniformly retreating 🧐.
Before next Monday, whether ETFs can continue to replenish is the first observation point to judge the strength of the rebound 👀. If net inflows continue after the U.S. stock market opens on Monday, the $75,000 support will gain more substantial backing; if large outflows resume, the current sideways movement looks more like a downward consolidation rather than a bottom formation ⚠️.The most surreal thing isn't the $49 million theft, but the platform's notification: read-only access has been restored.
To translate — balances and positions are all visible, but not a single cent can be moved. The numbers as of November 2 are there, but what happened afterward is unknown.
Withdrawals? Time is undetermined. To transfer money, you must first verify your registration information, and you can only withdraw to accounts under your own name. Some of the stolen funds were frozen within hours, which is good news, but it has nothing to do with your withdrawal queue.
Last time I complained about self-custody being troublesome, now I think a bit of trouble is acceptable. $BTC $NVDA on September 21st suggested that Nvidia is just one final push away from potentially starting a major correction, see Figure 1. Currently, it fully meets expectations, and even the chart drawn at that time requires little modification.
Back to the trend, see Figure 2. The yellow line represents wave 5-1 or wave five; breaking below 176.8 negates wave 5-1. The September view remains unchanged; the yellow line more closely resembles a 3-3-3-3-3 structure, meaning the yellow line is more likely to be the ending wave, i.e., the probability that the yellow line represents the entire five waves is higher. Therefore, a major wave two correction is very likely at present, with support at 150.4.After the Brazilian exchange Mercado Bitcoin was attacked, about 49 million USD worth of assets were transferred out. The platform is now restoring read-only access to accounts in phases: users can view but cannot operate. The official has not given a single word on when withdrawals will resume.
The read-only view shows balances and positions as of November 2; changes after that are not included. Users must first verify their registration information to transfer funds, withdrawals will first open the Pix channel, and only withdrawals to accounts under the user's own name are allowed. Another portion of the stolen funds was frozen within hours after the attack.
But what is truly worth pondering is the method. Security analysts say the attackers transferred funds through ordinary transfers, not by exploiting smart contract vulnerabilities. This statement is heavier than the 49 million: the money was not "hacked" away, it was "signed" away. The signature authority was already in the attackers' hands at that time; no matter how strict the on-chain layer is, it cannot stop it. The platform has yet to explain how the attackers obtained wallet access permissions.
This also shatters an old assumption: compliance and regulation do not equal security. Regulation addresses post-incident accountability and licensing endorsement, but does not solve who holds the hot wallet permissions. The weak point has never been in smart contracts, but in people, permissions, and those few withdrawal approval steps.
Freezing does not equal compensation; "how much is recovered" and "when users get their money" are two different matters. To evaluate an exchange, it is better to see whether it dares to disclose wallet architecture and withdrawal thresholds. The volatility of $BTC is visible, but counterparty risk is not.$BTC surged to around 75570 before facing pressure and pulling back; the short-term recovery rally has temporarily paused, and the market has re-entered a phase of bullish and bearish contention.
Often after a rapid rebound, there is a tendency to subconsciously assume the low point is established, overlooking the risk of a secondary pullback after the rebound exhaustion.
From the moving averages perspective, the price has fallen below the short-term moving average, and the 75200–75500 area above has turned into a significant resistance zone. For this round to strengthen again, it needs to reclaim this zone and confirm buying support; if the support is weak, it will retest the effectiveness of the support near the lower lows.
The pullback after the rebound is a process of secondary structure confirmation. Given the current market, would you prioritize observing the stability of the support below, or wait for the price to break above the resistance again before reassessing the possibility of the rebound continuing?
#美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% $ETH US East November 9: Dow +1.19%, S&P +1.25%, Nasdaq +1.53%, major tech and chip sectors surged, Nvidia weakened against the trend, Golden Dragon Index retreated. Short-term judgment: structural market, mainly volatile, no chasing highs
Tech: funds are rotating within the AI chain, prioritizing AMD, optical communication, storage chips, etc., Nvidia is on short-term watch, waiting for earnings release
China concepts: Golden Dragon weakened, considered a speculative category, light positions
Stable base positions: high dividend, consumer defensive for hedging
Key focus: US Treasury yields, Nvidia earnings
Prefer to watch
Today is a rebound repair, not a trend reversal; AI internal differentiation, inflation data, and Nvidia earnings are all variables, not suitable for chasing highs; small positions for speculation are okay, heavy positions are recommended to wait for signal confirmation. Abraxas Capital: Two hedge accounts on Hyperliquid have collectively profited $428.56 million.
Abraxas Capital's two hedge accounts on $HYPE continue to generate substantial profits and have not yet closed their positions.
• Total profit from the two accounts: $428.56 million
• Still holding short positions worth $1.05 billion.
• The news does not specify which coins are being shorted, nor does it clarify whether the prices mentioned are entry or liquidation prices.
I noticed that although many traders like March have lost everything, one fund made nearly $500 million by correctly betting on the direction. They currently still hold short positions worth $1.05 billion, so I believe they likely expect the market to continue falling and have not closed all their positions yet. However, if there is a strong rebound, such large-scale shorting is very risky; I wouldn't take such a big risk.Take a look at the latest URPD chip structure.
Currently, $BTC is around 75.03K. After five consecutive weeks of decline, many people really can't hold on anymore, and the chip distribution has also changed significantly. The old chips around 62–65K have loosened to some extent; whether this is profit-taking, turnover, or swing trading cannot be concluded directly; meanwhile, chips above 81K have also decreased noticeably. The beginning of a bull market is this harsh, with constant fluctuations and continuous chip washing.
Looking at the latest URPD migration:
(1) In the last 7 and 14 days, the 75–76K range has seen the most significant net increase in chips, approximately +310,000 BTC and +306,000 BTC respectively.
(2) Extending to 30 days, chips were mainly concentrated at 81–82K before; after the recent pullback, the new cost has clearly shifted downward to the 75–82K range. At the same time, there is a noticeable net decrease around 81–86K, indicating that the old chips above are being digested again.
From the current chip structure, 62–65K remains a very thick historical cost concentration area, making it difficult to break through. A more likely scenario is filling the chip-thin area near 72–74K, which is a potentially important observation area where this round of adjustment may bottom out. $HYPE 大额解押筹码流入 FalconX
过去约 11 小时，3 个地址先后向 FalconX Deposit 转入 51.2 万枚 $HYPE ，价值约 3930 万美元
0xE0f3：12.29 万枚，约 942 万美元
0xB750：8.56 万枚，约 657 万美元
0x416Be：30.35 万枚，约 2331 万美元
往前追了一下，这三个地址此前都有大额质押记录
近两天相关筹码陆续从 Hyperliquid 质押体系转出，随后进入 FalconX
三笔操作路径基本一致，时间也比较集中
FalconX 本身有机构交易和 OTC 业务，暂时还不能确定是出售还是托管调仓
昨晚 HYPE 下跌了 5% ，应该是有一定的相关性Strategy adds 1,036 $BTC and buys back $188M of $STRC
Strategy disclosed in a Form 8-K filed Nov 9 that it bought another 1,036 BTC and repurchased $188M of its STRC preferred stock.
1. As of Nov 8, the company holds 850,364 BTC plus $4.9B in USD assets.
2. Its USD duration stands at 3.4 years.
3. Strategy's "BTC Credit" spread on STRC tightened 2 bps to 58 bps, based on assumptions of a 10% BTC annual return, 40% BTC volatility and a BTC price of $75,800.