Looks like you're in the United States. Switch to the United States site for products available in your region.
Post
taishiro
Origineel weergeven
The HBM trade is becoming a capacity allocation story, not just an AI demand story.
When memory inventory gets this tight, chipmakers face a choice: prioritize high margin HBM or supply conventional DRAM. That competition can push memory prices higher, but it also makes supply normalization the biggest risk to the trade.
SK Hynix has the advantage today, but Samsung's progress shows that leadership is not guaranteed.
#SamsungQ3ProfitOutlook
ARRIWYKS
#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings
#Hynix Cloud +AI HBM4 Cloud = geheugenknelpunt nu, niet GPU
HBM-markt $38B→$58B +52% 26E, $85B 27E. SK = 62% HBM-aandeel, *∼70% van NVDA Vera Rubin HBM4* (TrendForce) vs 50% geschat. 16 stacks = 576GB/stack vs HBM3E 8Gb → 2x BW.
Waarom optimistisch: Voorraad <10 dagen (voor het eerst ooit). Wafers 150-200k/maand 3-4x Micron, 50% → HBM4 = DDR5 onder druk → Q4 DRAM +10-15% NAND +15-20%. JPM ziet 20%
*Risico's:* Samsung $8,7B HBM Q3 > SK $7,6B voor het eerst*
*OKX play: Long HBM leverage, short PC DDR.*
Disclaimer: de content op OKX Orbit dient uitsluitend ter informatie. Meer informatie
