Orbit Post Sitemap
The same institution's valuation for SOL in 2030 ranges astonishingly from $9.81 to $3211.28. There is also a baseline scenario at $334.70. If you only highlight the highest figure, the entire report becomes misleading.
This is an old study released by VanEck on October 27, 2023. Reviewing their calculation method this time, it is not about raising the target price today. In the three scenarios, Solana's assumed market share in the smart contract platform market is 5%, 30%, and 80%, respectively.
The algorithm can be broken down into three steps: estimate how much cash flow can be generated at that time, multiply by the valuation multiple the market is willing to give, and then divide by the expected token supply. The baseline scenario estimates that the cash flow to token holders in 2030 will be about $6.96 billion, with a 33x valuation multiple, resulting in $334.70 per token. The pessimistic and optimistic scenarios change revenue, multiples, and supply, so the results can differ by more than 300 times.
For those looking at target prices, the key is to check how far these assumptions have progressed: whether paid demand can be sustained, whether revenue can flow to tokens, and how much market share competitors will take. The cash flow in the model is not a dividend that can be directly received just by holding tokens. The $3211 price corresponds to a set of optimistic conditions and is not the only conclusion given in the report.
Source and original table: VanEck "Solana Valuation by 2030," 2023/10/27; reviewed on 10/20. $SOL The October FOMC is coming up soon, and the market is calling for a pause in rate hikes. But what uncertainties are really hidden in this? Pharaoh directly says the uncertainty is not priced into the market, but lies in Wash's mouth. Let's first look at the current pricing. CME data shows the probability of keeping rates unchanged in October is about 82% to 85%, with the probability of a rate hike only 15% to 17%. Wash deliberately refrained from taking a stance at the IMF annual meeting in Bangkok, saying "no prediction on the meeting outcome," which caused the market to slash the rate hike probability from 27% to below 15%. Goldman Sachs then pushed the next rate hike forecast to December accordingly. But the uncertainty lies here; the market may be underestimating Wash. First, inflation data actually does not support a pause. September CPI year-on-year was 3.7%, core CPI month-on-month 0.3%, PPI year-on-year hit 6.3%, and prices of goods excluding energy are also accelerating. Economists at the Oxford Economic Research Institute directly predict consecutive rate hikes in October and December, and the former Bank of America chief economist says it's a "fifty-fifty" chance. The market pricing and economists' judgments have a gap. Second, Wash's "silence" does not equal "dovishness." Since taking office, he scrapped forward guidance, deliberately giving the market no handle. The market interprets "not speaking" as "no rate hike," but Wash can fully speak with actions on the 28th. He was hawkish at Jackson Hole in August and approved a rate hike unanimously in September; at heart, he is a hawk. Third, political factors are overestimated. Some say the Fed dares not hike rates six days before the midterm electionsWhether 82,000 holds or not is not about the price
The Nasdaq rose 1.11%, $BTC surged to 83168 then fell back near 82,000.
What is this price level: 82,000 is not a technical level, it is a dense order zone.
Above it, 82,500 and 83,000 have sell orders pressing down; every surge is pushed back.
What others think: If it rises, you should chase.
Taking a step back: This move is a correction, not a one-sided rally.
If it were truly strong, 83168 wouldn’t have been given back so quickly.
$BTC needs to hold above 82,500 for short positions to be reconsidered.
If it breaks below 81,700, it means this rally wasn’t sustained.
When orders are withdrawn, the position changes.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$BTC The scale of crypto yield vaults continues to expand, but what truly deserves caution is not low yields, but unclear sources of yield.
The same 10% annualized return means completely different risks when it comes from real lending demand versus leverage, incentives, or complex collateral.
When I evaluate a vault, I only ask four questions: What are the underlying assets? Who manages the strategy? How do you exit in extreme market conditions? How large has the historical drawdown been?
Yield rates are advertising; the ability to survive crises is the real product.#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins Bitmine is still buying ETH, but this ongoing buying spree is nearing its set target. The next phase of demand for ETH cannot rely solely on the holdings record of a single company.
The company's announcement on October 19 shows holdings of about 6.04 million ETH, close to the target of 5% of the total supply. As the target approaches, the remaining room to continue increasing holdings under this plan is also narrowing.
This means the market needs to see more buyers stepping in. Subsequent additional purchases are the key. The purchase plan after the target is reached has yet to be disclosed, and weekly increases in holdings should not be seen as a permanent buying force. It dropped back from 82700 to 81500 again, this market is really something else.
It was still hovering around 81700 in the afternoon, I thought it would stay flat overnight, but then it surged to 82760, and now it’s dropped back to 81585. Up and down three or four times a day, each time rising about 1000 dollars, then dropping about 1000 dollars. If you go long, it gets smashed after the rise. If you go short, it gets pulled back after the drop. On the 4-hour chart, MA5 is at 81820, MA10 at 82075, MA20 at 81813, the three lines are tangled together again. This means it’s going to keep grinding.
I think I understand now, this recent market is just designed to wear people down. If you chase, it’s no good; if you don’t chase, it’s no good either. Both longs and shorts get swept back and forth.
But we have to look at a few data points tonight. In the past 24 hours, the whole network liquidations totaled 188 million USD, with long liquidations at 104 million USD and short liquidations at 84.12 million USD. Actually, the longs took a heavier hit. Bitcoin long liquidations were 30.87 million USD, shorts 18.59 million USD. When it surges up, shorts get swept; when it drops, longs get buried—both sides hurt.
The fundamentals aren’t reassuring either. The Federal Reserve is very likely to hold steady in October, but the probability of a rate hike in December has already soared to 75%. Oil prices are still fluctuating at high levels, inflation data exceeded expectations, and risk assets are generally under pressure. Coinbase premium index dropped to -0.141, hitting a new low since late June, indicating insufficient buying support in the US market.
I’m not watching tonight, let it rise or fall as it wants. Anyway, in the 80000–83000 range, I’ll just wait for it to break out before making a move. How many times have you been swept back and forth today? $BTC#SpaceX's first full quarterly earnings report after listing will be unveiled
SpaceX (SPCX) announced its Q3 results after market close today. The market consensus expects revenue around $12.9–13.4 billion and EPS about $0.13–0.15. I am optimistic that SPCX's Q3 earnings will exceed expectations for the following reasons:
The AI segment is the biggest growth driver. Q2 revenue already reached $2.56 billion (up 247% year-over-year), Q3 signed $6.7 billion in new cloud service contracts, and computing capacity is ramping from 1.4GW toward over 2GW by year-end, potentially contributing incremental revenue exceeding $6 billion.
Starlink continues to scale. At the end of Q2, there were 12 million users (net increase of 1.7 million that quarter), and Q3 is expected to add another 1.7–2.3 million users. Connectivity revenue is projected to rise from $4.3 billion to nearly $5 billion, while maintaining high profit margins.
Q2 already significantly beat expectations (revenue $7.81 billion, EPS better than expected), with adjusted EBITDA reaching $3.5 billion, showing operating leverage. $47.5 billion in orders on hand and about $100 billion in cash provide strong support. Some institutions have forecasted even higher figures (revenue $13.2 billion, EPS $0.21), with the average sell-side target price exceeding $220.
High capital expenditures remain a concern, but if revenue realization pace exceeds expectations, it will strengthen the "space + communications + AI" narrative. BTC's rebound yesterday looked more like a risk appetite recovery, with institutional buying still lacking evidence.
Yesterday during the European morning session, BTC briefly returned to around $83,000, and Nasdaq futures also strengthened in sync. The simultaneous recovery of stocks and crypto markets supports the judgment that capital is re-accepting risk. If this were directly attributed to institutional inflows, it would not align with the currently released data: the US spot BTC ETFs still saw a net outflow of about $228 million from October 12 to 16.
Therefore, the key to this rebound lies in whether fund demand can catch up after the price rises first. The redemptions over the past week mean this buying channel has left a capital gap in the market. If this gap can be filled in the new week, the rebound will gain an additional layer of support; relying solely on stock market sentiment to drive it, the sustainability still depends on external markets.Sold out, not a single one left.
SkyAI, once the fifth largest Solana holder among US stocks, confirmed in a filing to the SEC on Monday that it has liquidated all $SOL holdings, leaving about $223.8 million in cash as of October 16.
At the beginning of October, the company transferred SOL from its on-chain wallet to an exchange, announced on October 11 the sale of about 1 million tokens and planned a tender offer to repurchase shares at $3 each; the liquidation was completed and the repurchase started on October 16.
The repurchase cap is $201.3 million, covering up to 95% of shares and warrants, all paid with available cash, expiring on October 29, and no longer linked to the SOL price.
Behind these numbers lies the harsh reality of the Digital Asset Treasury (DAT): SkyAI raised over $400 million last August to accumulate coins, holding about 2.08 million tokens at the end of the year with a cost of about $194 per token, suffering an unrealized loss of about $153 million; this position was ultimately sold at an average price of about $107.51, confirming the loss.
I think this is the most textbook example of a "coin-based treasury" curtain call this year: the stock price soared with the coin price when buying coins, but when the coin price halved, the stock price was also crushed, and in the end, they could only sell coins to save the stock price.
The company says it will continue to build stablecoin infrastructure and AI on Solana. On Monday, the stock price rose 5.3% to $2.79. Who do you think will be the next to liquidate?
$SOL
#TreasuryCompany #LiquidationMacro Background: Market Pricing "On Hold," Economists Shout "Fifty-Fifty"
There is significant divergence in the pricing for the October FOMC (October 27-28):
Market Pricing: Interest rate futures show only a 15%-17% probability of a rate hike in October, with over 80% probability of no change.
Economists' Judgment: Former BofA Chief Economist Ethan Harris bluntly calls it "fifty-fifty"; Oxford Economics' Matthew Martin more explicitly predicts the Fed will hike rates in both October and December. The core basis is the September inflation data: CPI year-on-year at 3.7%, PPI year-on-year as high as 6.3%, and prices of non-energy goods accelerating upward — these goods have low volatility, so their strengthening implies more persistent inflationary pressure.
This means: If there is an unexpected rate hike in October, the impact on U.S. Treasury yields, the dollar, and risk assets will be significant; but even if the Fed holds steady in October, the pricing for a December hike is already close to 80%, so medium-term tightening pressure remains. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #OctoberFOMCApproaching What variables remain for the Fed to pause rate hikes? Digital Currency Market Evening Preview｜2026-10-20 (Beijing) Data cutoff: Beijing time October 20, 18:00
One-sentence market status: BTC is consolidating narrowly along the 50-day moving average, with neither bulls nor bears showing decisive strength. Ahead of the event week (FOMC + PCE + options expiration), the market has entered a "waiting for data" mode. The first risk window is the US stock market opening at 21:30 tonight. 1. Core conclusions (the most important judgment in the entire article) The next 10 days mark the most intensive macro + derivatives event window of the year (10-27/28 FOMC, 10-29 PCE + Bank of Japan rate decision, 10-30 about $11 billion options expiration). Currently, the $80,000-$83,200 range is the consolidation zone before these events; before 10-29, directional positions (especially high leverage) have an unfavorable risk-reward ratio. Short-term strategy should focus on range trading and defense. The key observation level is $80,000—if broken decisively, the downside target is $78,000 (the options maximum pain point); if held, consolidation continues. Institutional funds show clear divergence: BTC spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $526.6M on Monday (the largest single-day inflow since September 22, with IBIT alone accounting for $665.2M), but after the price surged to $83,155, it retreated to close at $81,938. "Inflow without follow-through" indicates spot selling pressure is absorbing ETF buying; ETH spot ETFs experienced four consecutive outflows (Monday -$103On-chain is telling a very typical "early bottom phase" story:
Whales are accumulating, the US hasn't followed yet.
✅ 1000–10000 BTC holders: 60-day net accumulation flipped from -62,600 to +5,230, distribution turning into absorption
✅ Binance USDT reserves: 790 million → 1.76 billion, on-exchange ammo ready
❌ Coinbase premium -0.14%, weekly net inflow +8,428 $BTC into the exchange, short-term SOPR 0.998 slight loss cut
Big money is positioning, US funds are watching.
True reversal looks at three signals: Coinbase premium turns positive / exchange net flow turns negative / STH-SOPR holds above 1.
This is neither a bull run nor a crash, but a "structure bottoming, demand waiting for signals" phase. Whales buy with a 12-month logic; fighting them with 15-minute candles is a losing game.
The bottom is not a single bullish candle, but a period of "whales accumulating, retail doubting, US slow to act." $BTC $SOL $ETH The most outrageous thing today: a publicly listed company that treated SOL as treasury assets completely sold off all its SOL, then turned around to offer a buyback of its own shares at $3 per share, up to 95%. The meaning is very straightforward — I’m done playing with the coin, taking the money back to buy my own stock.
This story is funny to tell. A month ago, the market labeled it as a “SOL treasury stock,” saying it achieved asset appreciation by hoarding coins, but now it can’t hold on anymore. What’s even more lively is that a shareholder holding nearly 10% of the shares directly slammed the table, complaining $3 is too low and demanding $3.5, and questioned the management for acting secretly. Selling out is not the problem, buyback is not the problem, being openly challenged is the real problem — isn’t this just admitting the show is over?
The takeaway for the crypto world is very direct: next time someone brags that “a certain company treats XXX as a treasury strategy,” just treat it as a business that could be overturned at any time, and the coin hoarding accounts shown to shareholders can change on a whim. ETH at 2,386 today is basically drifting with sentiment; don’t really treat it as some safe haven. $SOL Maji's position this time is really under increasing pressure.
Huang Licheng currently holds 1,600 $ETH long positions, with an average cost of about $2407.59, a position value of approximately $3.852 million, using 28.64x full-position leverage. The liquidation price has already reached $2370.86, and the backup margin is basically gone.
What is more concerning is the overall account unrealized loss, which is close to $37 million, and losses over the past 30 days have also exceeded $5.3 million.
But what really needs to be watched out for is not the book loss figure, but the position structure.
High leverage + full-position mode + no additional margin means there is very limited room for the market to move against the position. As long as $ETH drops further, the position risk will significantly increase.
From the previous large profits to now continuously enduring drawdowns, this again shows that the hardest part of trading is never catching a single market move, but controlling risk after making profits.
The market offers opportunities every day; there is no need to keep increasing positions just to recover losses.
Positions can wait slowly for opportunities to reposition, but once the principal is wiped out due to risk control failure, there will be no qualification left to even wait for opportunities.
#BTC #ETH #HYPE #ETF资金流出$BTC fees are about to turn negative
Bears are as numerous as ants, with dense sell orders stacked like a high wall between 81,600 and 82,200 above.
This extreme “short concentration zone” is often the favorite prey of the main players. When everyone believes the resistance above is insurmountable and rushes to short at 50x leverage or even higher, the risk of a "short squeeze" is exponentially brewing. Once the price breaks through the 81,600 defense line upwards, the short squeeze triggered by a bear stampede will instantly become rocket fuel pushing the price higher, directly blowing out high-level low-leverage short positions.#Strive Large-scale Increase, Strategy Buyback Scale Exceeds Coin Purchase
Strive bought 4,045 BTC in the latest week, spending about $335 million, raising its holdings to 36,818 BTC, continuing to expand its balance sheet through warrants and SATS preferred shares.
Strategy only added 267 BTC this week but spent $193.1 million to buy back STRC, raising the buyback authorization from 2 billion to 3 billion. Coin purchases were $22 million, and buybacks were nearly 9 times the amount spent on coin purchases. The signal is very clear: currently, restructuring capital is more cost-effective than chasing higher coin prices.
My judgment is that this is not bearish on BTC but that the treasury model has entered the "accounting phase":
• Strive is still in accumulation mode, using high-cost funds to exchange positions, betting on BTC's long-term upward trend;
• Strategy has grown so large that the marginal impact of buying coins is smaller; preferred stock discounts, dividend pressure, and BTC content per share are the key issues;
• When mNAV premium compresses, issuing shares to buy coins dilutes existing shareholders, while buybacks can support per-share value.
• Don't treat buybacks as new buying demand; they protect the financing machine from stopping.
The market used to only look at "how many coins were bought," but now it must consider four numbers: financing cost, dilution rate, cash flow coverage, and BTC/ETH per share. This round eliminates not those with weak faith but those who cannot withstand high interest and pullbacks.
In the long term, I remain bullish on BTC, but in the short term, don't automatically translate "company buying coins" as positive; first see where the money comes from and whether it can be sustained. Evening Review
Position Overview
HYPEUSDT Full Position 20X Long
Entry price 73.897, current mark price 78.45, unrealized profit +680.25U, return rate 115.60%, margin ratio 5.35%.
Smart money data on the market: nominal long-short ratio 48.11%. 198 traders long, 391 traders short.
Long average entry 79.78, short average entry 77.16. Current price is below the long cost, most shorts are in profit, both longs and shorts have trapped funds.
This long position caught the trend correctly and benefited from a wave of gains, but the margin ratio is low, so beware of risks from rapid market pullbacks.
BICOUSDT Full Position 8X Long
Entry price 0.0349588, current price 0.01602, unrealized loss -1911.40U, return rate -945.69%, margin ratio only 5.35%.
Smart money data: nominal long-short ratio 22.53%. 118 traders long, 160 traders short.
Long average entry 0.0181, short average entry 0.0198. Current price has fallen below the long average cost, vast majority of shorts are profitable, longs are largely at a loss.
This position is a counter-trend bottom-fishing trade, the market continues to weaken, deeply trapped, with very little margin space, extremely high risk.
Market Summary
The two positions form a stark contrast: HYPE long with the trend is profitable, BICO counter-trend bottom-fishing suffers huge losses.
From the smart money perspective:
HYPE: More shorts, but current price decline traps shorts, short-term opportunity for short covering driven rally exists, but if price reverses, profits in winning positions will quickly erode.
BICO: Smart money shorts dominate with nearly 98% profitability, large funds remain bearish, counter-trend bottom-fishing is very difficult, avoid blindly averaging down.
Personal Reflection
Biggest trading problem: At the same time, holding profits on one side with the trend, while subjectively guessing the bottom and heavily buying against the trend on the other side, one loss wiped out profits and caused a large net loss. Subjective bottom prediction ignored large fund positioning.
Position risk control: Both positions have margin ratios only 5.35%, full position high leverage, extreme volatility easily triggers liquidation, very low error tolerance.
Signal selection: Did not respect smart money fund direction before entry, BICO was clearly short-dominated, yet chose to go long, against the fund trend.
Future Plan
$HYPE long: Implement trailing stop to lock in partial profits, closely monitor market pullbacks, set defensive points to prevent profit erosion.
$BICO long: No longer blindly add to positions to average down, continue observing fund movements, evaluate timing to reduce or exit to avoid liquidation risk from continued decline.
Future entry principles: Prioritize following smart money large fund trends, avoid subjective bottom-fishing; strictly control margin ratio, reduce leverage, reserve sufficient buffer for volatility.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓
#奈飞财报在即，广告业务成新看点 Morgan Stanley names Top Pick, raises target price to 350, AMZN up 4.98% on Monday closing at 262.45
What we saw:
Monday was the first rebound day after the AI infrastructure sell-off, with the Nasdaq up 1.11% closing at 26,430.89, SOX up 1.61% ending an 8-day losing streak.
AMZN traded about 56 million shares (1.6 times the 50-day average volume), intraday high 263.72; Morgan Stanley target price raised from 335 to 350, implying about 33% upside from the closing price.
However, market breadth was narrow, only 3 out of 11 sectors closed higher; AMZN is still 8.6% below its 52-week high of 287.20.
My view:
This is a combination of "institutional endorsement + oversold rebound," not a fundamental change; whether the 33% upside can be realized depends on AWS growth in the 10/29 earnings report.
My approach:
Watch and don't chase. If the daily closes above 263.72 (Monday's high), look for strength toward 270; if it breaks below 255.22 (Monday's low), watch for a gap fill at 250; if Tuesday's opening does not continue the positive analyst reports, discard this idea.
Do you think this AMZN move is the start of a reversal or just a one-day wonder?
$AMZN $QQQ $NVDA
#Amazon #EarningsSeason #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins Today the market set a very convenient trap for retail investors: Hynix up 4.6%, Micron up nearly 3%, Amazon up 5%, AI chip stocks collectively rebounded, and the shouts of "the bottom has arrived" are everywhere. Meanwhile, my short positions in crypto and storage sectors haven't moved at all. 🎯 What’s truly worth watching isn’t how much the stocks have risen, but that the perpetual contracts have fallen back from their highs at the same time—my shorts haven’t lost but are actually recovering. This divergence is the reason I dare to hold: the spot stocks reflect trading sentiment, while perpetual contracts price leverage with real money; no need to say which is more honest. Following this logic further, the market may be underestimating one thing: this rebound is a "sector sentiment recovery," not a "structural reversal." The daily charts of $BTC and $ETH still show a clear downtrend structure; one rebound candlestick can’t change the trend framework. The dumbest move in trend trading is to rush to close positions after a wave of recovery—hold when you should hold, that’s basic skill, not courage. My supporting argument: when spot stocks and perpetual contracts diverge in direction, trust the latter, because leverage pricing contains no placebos. 📉 The confirmation signal is also clear: if perpetual contracts strengthen in sync with spot stocks, and both funding rates and open interest rise together, the divergence is considered repaired; otherwise, the rebound only gives shorts a better entry point. The daily structure of $BTC and $ETH remains the main switch for this narrative. #ChipStocksEnd8DaySlide #MustReadForBeginners: Everything You Need Is Here
Everyone is discussing earnings reports and US stocks. Have you noticed that US tech stocks generally exceed expectations? 🤨
This may not be because the earnings data is inflated, but mainly due to the "catering to market expectations" mechanism.
There is a long-standing pattern in US stocks: about 70%–85% of companies "beat expectations." The beat rate in the tech sector is usually higher, which is no coincidence.
Externally, companies deliberately give conservative guidance.
Management: Slightly beating expectations → stock price rises; slightly missing → stock price may plunge. The punishment far outweighs the reward, so they tend to "set low expectations and deliver high."
Analysts: In the weeks before earnings, companies use IR communications and guidance to gradually lower analysts' expectations, so the consensus becomes an "easy-to-cross threshold."
The result is that actual performance is just normal or slightly better, but compared to the lowered expectations, it becomes a "beat."
Tech companies indeed have more accounting flexibility: timing of revenue recognition, choices between capitalizing or expensing R&D costs, one-time project adjustments, share buybacks boosting EPS, etc.
Research has focused on tech companies using aggressive revenue recognition to "just beat" or "slightly beat."
But large-scale systemic fraud is uncommon because tech companies are strictly regulated by the SEC, and analysts, short-sellers, and auditors are all watching closely.
Mixing in some embellishment is also an industry practice and unspoken rule. Many times companies beat the quarter, but due to bland guidance or high capital expenditures, the stock price still falls.The overall market weakened together, with the entire market down 3.28% in 24 hours, but the top gainers list was almost entirely dominated by tokenization and RWA sectors. The tokenized assets market cap of $48.14 billion doubled in a single day, even smaller categories like Legal and card-based RWA were lifted. The capital is chasing the same narrative: bringing real-world assets onto the blockchain.
Where is the money coming from? USDT market cap shrank by 0.29% in 24 hours, and there was no new money entering OTC. The market is falling, stablecoins are shrinking, so these gains can only come from reallocating existing funds from other sectors. The greed index is 55, slightly lower than 57 a week ago, and there’s no sign of more people chasing the hype.
Therefore, this round of RWA rally is essentially a zero-sum game with questionable sustainability. Watch two signals to judge if the rotation is over: the RWA sector’s 24-hour gains turn negative, and USDT market cap continues to shrink. If both happen simultaneously, it means the money that moved in is moving out. $BTC $ETH $ZEC
#ETF continuous outflows, can BTC’s rebound continue? It's 7 PM now. Has this whole afternoon of slowly boiling frogs mentally worn down many brothers? During the day, they were thinking of probing the bottom, but now most likely they're stuck halfway up the mountain. However, don't rush to blindly add positions yet.
$BTC has fallen below 82K, and $ETH and $SOL have also lost key levels. Logically, with such a drop, the bulls should have admitted defeat, right? But look at the contract data: ETH's 4-hour long-short ratio has actually surged to 2.52, and SOL's is as high as 2.31. What does this mean? Retail investors haven't fled; they're crazily holding on and even adding positions.
In trading, this is the most dangerous signal. With retail bulls so crowded, why would the main players spend money to support you? The load is too heavy. Unless the high leverage below is blown up or the price repeatedly spikes to shake out the undecided, the market can't be pulled up. Bottom fishing now has a very poor risk-reward ratio.
There’s a tough battle coming soon in the US stock market tonight. My approach is simple: if you have positions, defend them and don't stubbornly hold on hoping for luck. If you're empty-handed, don't always try to buy at the lowest point. Wait for the right side to stabilize and for liquidations to finish before entering. Protect your principal and wait for a real trend to emerge before making a move.
#ETF continuous outflows, can BTC's rebound continue? $SOL is ruthless; institutions cut their losses without even blinking!
Just came across a big scoop: SkyAI, a company that started in medical equipment, finally couldn't hold on after a year and cleared out all 2.08 million SOL they held. Guess the average price? $194! They poured over 400 million dollars in, and now at $104, they're "selling off with tears," basically halving their position. Then they took the remaining 220 million in cash to buy back their own stock. This "buy high, sell low" move by the retail investors is honestly laughable.
Look at the current market: SOL is around $104, with daily charts showing consecutive bearish candles crashing down from the high of 124, breaking all moving averages, and MACD forming a death cross downward—it's heartbreaking to watch. This trend is confusing for anyone. The 15-minute and 1-hour charts try to hold around 104, but heavy resistance above means any slight rebound faces selling pressure.
Interestingly, while institutions are admitting defeat and fleeing, there's a hidden current on-chain. Circle just minted 250 million new USDC on the Solana network, and THORChain announced plans to resume SOL trading. Liquidity is still flowing in, indicating big money is still active in this ecosystem.
Folks, SOL at $104 is full of bloodied chips. Are you planning to cut losses and exit with SkyAI, or ready to bottom-fish against the trend and catch the falling knife? A word of advice: when institutions admit mistakes, it's called a "strategic pivot," but when we retail investors do, it's real money lost.市场快评：柴油缝窟窿，利率不松手⛽️
一纸柴油合同，15—20天运抵美国。画面很割裂：一边在打仗，一边在做生意🌍。生意照做，风险照算。
PPI报6.3%，降息预期被压下去📉。柴油到了，能压一压能源价，通胀只是喘口气，不是退烧。卡在哪？美债5.6%的收益率摆在那，钱被抽走💸。$BTC 在8.4万趴着，期权波动率五年新低，市场像屏住呼吸😶。
这批柴油改变不了供应链的缺口，只是把窟窿缝上🧵。缝得住眼前，缝不回旧秩序。美联储的手松不开，高利率还得待一阵⏳。战争与生意同框，通胀与利率拉扯——市场短期喘气，长期仍得算账。#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 #奈飞财报在即，广告业务成新看点 ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
ETF在往外跑，价格却在往上弹，这种背离最容易骗人。
10月12至16号，美比特币现货ETF净流出约2.29亿，以太流出更狠达3.2亿；19号BTC单日再流1.39亿。机构买盘退潮是铁事实，钱实实在在撤了。
但BTC确从8万弹到8.3万，现8.2万震荡。资金撤、价却涨，根源是空头平仓推动的“死猫跳”。存量博弈下无增量买盘，反弹底子虚，似无源之水。
8.3万系前期密集成交套牢区，缺真金白银难突破；下方8万为心理防线，若ETF续流且跌破8万，或引发多头去杠杆才见真底。
操作最忌追高，图中100x做空持仓极危。反弹至阻力位宜减仓锁利，降杠杆保本金，等方向明确。这波是诱多还是反转前兆$BTC $ETH $ZEC #摩根大通JPMCoin上线以太坊主网
帮主说：摩根大通美元存款代币JPMD已上线以太坊主网，仅面向机构，用于全天候转账和结算。
核心两点：1. 银行放弃自建链，直接用以太坊生态；2. 机构是租用结算层，不是买ETH，所以ETH不涨反跌0.85%。
长期利好生态和RWA，短期不构成买盘。大饼看宏观，FOMC前观望，我已空仓。BTC关键看8万支撑，上方压力84000-85000，不追涨杀跌，带好止损。
$BTC $ETH $ZEC 霍尔木兹重开方案还在，市场就会继续交易希望。但船东愿不愿意派船，是另一道很现实的检验。
对谈判消息，我愿意保持一点乐观。只要沟通还在，供应压力就有缓解的可能。只是从方案走到稳定通航，中间每一步都要兑现，不能把“有机会重开”直接当成“运输已经恢复”。
即使有船开始通过，也需要看后续能不能连续、安全地完成运输。
我会特别留意商业机构的选择：船东敢不敢排航次，保险公司愿意按什么价格承保，买家能不能把交付重新纳入计划。它们要承担真实损失，通常不会仅凭一条乐观表态就放下顾虑。
油价提前下跌很正常，金融市场总会走在现实前面。可如果实际运输改善迟迟没跟上，跌下去的那部分风险溢价就容易反复。
目前我更倾向于边看落实、边调整判断。通航逐渐稳定，油价才更有条件继续回落；如果谈判卡住，或者运输再次受扰，供应担忧又会回来。
这种行情最磨人：标题让你觉得事情快结束了，现实还在拉扯。比起急着猜油价能跌多深，我更想先看到正常装货、正常出港的船确实多起来。
#霍尔木兹重开方案仍有效，油价能否继续回落？ 20 Days After $CORE Official Node Exit: A "Graceful Retirement" or the First Domino of a "Soft Runaway"?
On October 1st, Core DAO issued an announcement with a polished tone: "Gradually handing over the remaining block production roles to independent validators," marking another step toward decentralization.
Today is already October 20th. After 20 days, the community still lacks consensus on how to characterize this event. Some say it’s a necessary path for the public chain to mature; others say it’s the project team’s most dignified exit after calculating the economics.
Looking at both perspectives side by side, the answer becomes much clearer.
Official Narrative: Temporary Measure, Graceful Retirement
Within the official framework, the logic is self-consistent. Since the mainnet launch in 2023, the DAO’s own validators have been responsible for block production, defined as a "temporary measure" for early network stability. Now that independent validators have started operating under the current framework, the DAO "gracefully retires," handing block production rights to a permissionless, decentralized group of operators.
A community article on CoinMarketCap on October 1st laid out this narrative fully: The Satoshi Plus consensus rotates validator elections every 24 hours, selecting the top 31 active validators based on a hybrid score, with miners and stakers jointly participating to prevent control concentration. The DAO’s exit aims to let the network be "governed by a broad, permissionless set of independent operators, not any centralized coordinating group."
If you only read this part, it indeed sounds like a standard, textbook decentralization advancement.
But there are three things the official narrative can’t explain.
First: The timeline.
From late August to early September, some validators exploited a reward contract loophole to overclaim CORE. Core DAO urgently hard-forked, and exchanges like Coinbase temporarily suspended CORE deposits and withdrawals. This incident exposed the issues of governance centralization and validator structure fragility.
Then on October 1st, the official exit from block production was announced.
The sequence—problem first, then power handover—is more telling than the announcement’s wording. A community author on OKX put it bluntly: rather than the DAO "voluntarily handing over power," it’s more like shedding a cost burden under economic pressure.
Second: The change in node count.
The project initially promised to build 34 nodes; reportedly, only 20 remain operational now. The official narrative says "independent validators are taking over," but on-chain data shows the takeover speed can’t keep up with the exit speed.
Each validator must stake at least 50,000 CORE. At $0.02 per token, this stake’s nominal value is just over a thousand dollars. When block rewards don’t cover server, bandwidth, and maintenance costs, running a node turns from "participating in the ecosystem" into a losing business. Analysis on Gate Square points out that the node reduction likely results from "operator revenue not matching maintenance costs," causing voluntary exits.
Third: Where did governance power go?
This is the most critical layer.
The official node exit sheds block production operational costs. But true decentralization isn’t just about geographic and operator dispersion of validator nodes; it also involves dispersing governance rights, rule-making authority, and token distribution control.
An OKX post titled "A Carefully Planned Responsibility Shift" highlights a core fact: while offloading operational burdens, the project team retains control over core assets and governance. If a large portion of delegated stakes remains concentrated in a few top validators, then "decentralization" merely shifts control from the project team as a single entity to a handful of major players.
Responsibility is delegated, but power is not.
So, is this really a "runaway"?
The word "runaway" is heavy. Strictly speaking, the project team hasn’t absconded with funds; the chain still produces blocks, the code still runs, and announcements are still issued.
But another term in the community is more accurate: "soft exit." Some have noticed that the CORE app and official website are no longer updated or maintained. Supported exchanges have shrunk from the initial 34 to a dozen or so, with platforms like CoinEx already initiating delisting. Nodes are exiting, exchanges are contracting, frontends are ceasing updates.
These contraction trends align. This consistency is hard to fully explain with just the word "decentralization."
A More Worthwhile Question
Instead of debating the binary label "runaway or decentralization," consider this:
If this truly is a healthy decentralization transition, where should the succeeding independent validators come from?
The official narrative assumes a "permissionless, widely distributed independent operator group" is ready to take over. But the node count dropping from 34 to 20, the validator staking threshold making operation unprofitable at $0.02 token price, and the scarcity of new nodes all signal a shortage of successors, not abundance.
Decentralization isn’t a state achieved by declaration. It requires willing parties to continuously invest economic resources on-chain—not out of faith, but because it’s profitable. When the math doesn’t add up at $0.02, the most honest interpretation of the official exit isn’t "runaway" or "maturity," but:
The project team withdrew first, leaving a system that requires others to do the math to keep running.
As for those still doing the math—node operators calculating maintenance costs, token holders calculating break-even chances, exchanges calculating risk exposure—their choices will more honestly determine this chain’s next steps than any narrative from any side.
$CORE 盘面有点反直觉😏：BTC现货ETF两周净流出9.07亿美元，ETH十月单月失血9.55亿、创今年最难看，账面上像机构在撤退。可贝莱德反手递交带下行保护的BTC新ETF——期权加固收，跌有垫子、涨有封顶。撤单和排队，可能是一拨人换了姿势🔄。
$BTC 今晨在81800附近打转，跌1%出头，81000没破；ETH压在2400下方，9.55亿砸出的坑在三大主流里最深；SOL在105附近横着，明晚北京时间21点前后“换心脏”，我核过没延期，别走神⚠️。
宏观也在拉扯：9月CPI同比3.7%，高于预期3.6%，加息话题回锅，风险资产先低头；Warsh避谈加息，FOMC还有8天。吓你的是加息，哄你的是波动🎢。
我的判断：这个位置不追空。SOL升级若平稳落地，波动溢价会被熨平；FOMC若放鹰，81000大概率再测。ETH坑最深，反而离水面近，真超跌反弹它弹性最大，我盯2400能否站回👀。
条件就两条：升级顺利+宏观不放鹰，多头才有饭吃；任一掉链子，空头手里的撤退单就是现成燃料🔥。#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 The trapped positions above $BTC shouldn't be underestimated; not sure if they can still be freed...
There should be a chance to free them, but it's unclear if these people will run after getting free?SkyAI卖光$SOL ，转头花2亿美元回购股票，这是什么操作？
SkyAI这波操作有点意思。之前公司拿着一大笔SOL，现在直接全部卖掉。截至10月16日，公司持有约2.238亿美元现金，还准备拿出最多约2.013亿美元回购股票和权证，报价是每股或每份权证3美元，要约暂定10月29日截止。简单说，就是不继续拿着SOL了，手里有钱之后，转头想把自家股票买回来。
第一，宣布回购，不代表股价就一定涨。
3美元是公司提出的回购价格，不是对未来股价的保证。最后能回购多少、股东愿不愿意卖，以及回购后公司还剩多少价值，都得看实际结果。
第二，这件事对SOL有什么影响？
少了一个企业持仓方，确实意味着这部分SOL已经卖出。但单靠一家公司的动作，还不足以判断SOL后面是涨是跌。真正值得关注的是，其他上市公司会不会也开始卖币、收缩加密资产仓位。
接下来重点盯住10月29日的回购进展，以及SkyAI后续到底要做什么。$BTC $ETH
#Strive大额增持，Strategy回购规模超买币 AI这三个字，别把三门生意说混了
$WLD 背后的World ID做的是真人与唯一性证明，也覆盖属性与在场证明，核心是可信身份。别把它当成模型能力的替代品——它从应用防重复账户切入，解决的是身份问题，评价标准自然不同。近24小时涨2.94%，价格有回应；但长期逻辑要看验证功能能否被场景持续使用，身份需求能否转成代币需求。
$NEAR 的Intents让第三方竞争满足用户交易目标，报价被接受后再由链上验证合约结算。这门生意的关键是竞争能否带来更好执行结果，少点几次按钮只是入口，成本与可靠性更重要。近24小时涨2.14%，交易表现不弱。研究这条路线，评价应落到报价和体验上，而不是停在“跨链以后会很热”的口号里。
$TAO 官方把参与者分成提供产出、评分和设计激励等角色，各子网提供计算、推理、存储等服务。最该关心的是评分标准：奖励能鼓励参与，但高分产出是否真是外部客户愿意买单的东西，要分开验证。现价268.7美元，可以当成一套激励市场来研究。#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 #奈飞财报在即，广告业务成新看点 Today I checked the ETF data, quite interesting 👀
On October 19, the US spot BTC ETF had a net inflow of $527 million, basically carried by IBIT alone: a single day +$665 million, the largest in a year. FBTC and GBTC actually saw outflows of $83.6 million and $54.9 million respectively.
On the same day, BlackRock submitted a new product PBIT, a Bitcoin “custody protection” ETF. It uses IBIT options plus short-term bonds for structure, buying protection at about the 90% level for each tranche, initially bearing about a 10% drop (before fees, not guaranteed), with the trade-off being capped upside. Fees and caps are still open, expected to take effect around early January next year.
My understanding: big money is still buying above 80k, but the new product focuses on "losing less," institutions want stability, not all-in. ETH spot ETF has had outflows for 4 consecutive days (Oct 19 -$103 million), money clearly favors BTC.
$BTC is now around 81,460, 80k has not been broken. If it holds, wait for the 83k upper boundary to break through; if it breaks, don’t rush to buy. I’m staying away from $ETH for now.
Sources: Farside, SoSoValue, The Block
Just personal opinion, not investment advice, DYOR
#BitcoinETF #BTC #BlackRock To conclude first, this rebound is not driven by ETFs at all, but by short sellers disarming. ETFs are still bleeding daily, yet prices are pushing upward, which indicates that the selling pressure is not from spot ETFs but from the leverage longs and short funds in the futures market fighting each other.
BTC is a typical example now. ETFs have continuous net outflows, but the price bounced from 80,000 to 83,000 before falling back. Many people don't understand why the price rises while funds are leaving. Because the ETF outflows hit the spot market, but the real short-term price driver is short covering in the futures market. The essence of this rebound is that a group of shorts were forced to cover by buying back, pushing the price up, not that new money came in to open positions. Once the shorts have mostly covered and buying stops, the price naturally softens, which explains why it surged to 83,000 then quickly dropped back to 82,000.
Looking at ETH, it's even worse. ETH's ETF outflow scale is larger than BTC's, and the independent narrative that bulls hoped for is completely absent. BTC at least has short covering support, but ETH doesn't even have shorts willing to push at this level; it purely follows BTC's trend, falling faster when BTC weakens.
My view is straightforward: this rebound is an illusion caused by a short squeeze, not the start of capital inflow. As long as ETFs don't resume net inflows, the ceiling above BTC is firmly welded shut. Don't mistake short covering for a new bull market. After this leverage is cleared, if ETFs still don't return, BTC will have to go back to grinding the bottom. #ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ 我做$WLD 这种短线波段，最关注的就是入场以后价格有没有按照预期运行。
这笔多单开仓均价0.5134，目前标记价格0.5368，50倍杠杆，浮盈翻了2倍多。从入场到现在，价格已经向上走出了约4.6%的空间。
但眼下还不能只顾着看收益。0.54是我接下来首先关注的位置，如果能够突破并站稳，短线有机会进一步向0.55附近试探。
下方则重点看0.53，一旦价格重新跌回去，就需要观察这波反弹是不是开始减弱。
我个人还是喜欢把交易拆成几个阶段来看，进场看位置，持仓看结构，后续看风险。方向做对只是第一步，能不能把利润保护好同样重要。$BTC $ETH #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 油价又疯了，WTI破100、布伦特冲110
还是海峡那边的锅，美伊和谈僵住，避险一下就起来了。
美股盘前已经先跪：美光跌破900，这个位置其实有点性价比了；$SPCX 跌破148，也不算贵。晚间开盘估计还得下挫一波。
说真的，川普，留给你的时间不多了。
这周如果地缘和油价还是没缓和，就算周内财报超预期，也未必托得住盘面。资金现在看的不是业绩，是油价和战争溢价。
但有个经验可以记：油价很难长期站100以上。9月WTI冲到106不也回落了？消息一缓，资金立刻重新定价下行。
所以现在虽然还是左侧，但右侧应该不会太远。这个阶段，美股核心权重股跌出来的低位置，反而是性价比区域。
而且眼下能看见的黑天鹅其实不多，美股不太会跌太深。等市场缓和、中期大选这些事件落地，指数慢慢爬出底部是大概率。
川普啊，该出手了。$BTC $ETH
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ SOL财库清零了
美股公司SkyAI 9月还拿着
200多万枚 $SOL
嘴上说要坚持财库路线
一个月不到 全卖光了
卖币的钱全拿去回购自家股票了
每股3美元 几乎全收
原来回购还挂着条件
SOL得守在100美元上面
现在币没了 条件也删了
持股快一成的大股东不干了
要求独立审查这几笔卖币
股价比手里资产还便宜
卖币回购成了最省事的路
你觉得下一家跟着卖的会是谁？
#SkyAI出售全部SOL并发起现金要约收购 $SOL. $JUP
A trading interface can become valuable by simplifying a fragmented market, even when users never think about the infrastructure underneath it. Jupiter has developed within Solana’s trading ecosystem, where routing quality and access to liquidity are central considerations. Competition is intense, however, and favorable market conditions can exaggerate apparent momentum. Recurring usage, product diversification, and the relationship between protocol activity and token utility deserve $BTC 跟着大盘一起走弱，全市场 24 小时跌 3.28%，涨幅榜前排却几乎全挤在代币化和 RWA 这条线上。代币化资产 481.4 亿美元的盘子单日翻倍，连 Legal、卡牌 RWA 这种小分类都被带了起来。资金追的是同一个故事：把现实资产搬上链。 钱从哪来？USDT 市值 24 小时少了 0.29%，场外没有新钱进来。大盘在跌，稳定币在缩，这些涨幅只能是存量资金从别的板块挪过来的。贪婪指数 55，比一周前的 57 还低一点，追热度的人也没有变多。 这轮 RWA 行情是存量腾挪，撑不了太久。看轮动结束的信号：RWA 板块 24 小时涨幅转负，同时 USDT 市值继续缩。两个同时出现，就说明挪过来的钱在撤。$SOL 板块对照｜公链：同一赛道，表现并不一样
SOL过去24小时-0.88%，NEAR同期-6.67%。
这两个币里，SOL暂时更强。我会先看它能否保持优势，而不是仅凭“同一赛道”就押NEAR一定会补涨。📊 Bitcoin spot ETF sees the largest single-day net inflow in nearly a month, but almost entirely thanks to BlackRock.
On Monday (10/19), US spot BTC ETF net inflow was $527 million:
• BlackRock IBIT +$665 million, the largest single-day in nearly a year
• Fidelity FBTC -$83.6 million
• Grayscale GBTC -$54.9 million
• Other products had zero liquidity
On the same day, ETH ETF outflow was $103 million, marking four consecutive days of net outflows.
💡 My view:
1) Buying is concentrated in a single product, more like large allocations by a few institutions rather than broad inflows; sustainability remains to be seen.
2) This inflow offset last week's $229 million outflow, but October still shows a net outflow of about $90.5 million.
3) Funds have come in, yet BTC still hovers around $81k, indicating that macro pressures (US Treasury yields above 5%, oil prices, AI stock pullbacks) are temporarily outweighing ETF buying.
4) BTC inflows and ETH outflows suggest institutional risk appetite is still contracting.
Data source: SoSoValue / CoinDesk. For personal opinion only, not investment advice.
#BTC #ETF #BlackRock #CryptoMarket The past couple of days have basically been a bottom-building process, with the Nasdaq index needing to build a bottom around 29100. Bitcoin is also expected to hover around 8.1 for a while.
After all, overall, without guidance from the Federal Reserve, only earnings reports and the US stock market can drive crypto.
As shown in the chart, if it stabilizes around 8.11, a small long position can be considered, but if it falls below the 8.1 yellow line and the highs do not get higher, the main strategy remains to short on rallies in a downtrend.
————————————————————————————————————
1. Oil prices are still high, and Treasury yields have slightly pulled back and stabilized; the short-term outlook is still upward, but overall macro pressure remains significant.
2. Gold fell today, which indicates that people believe inflation will lead to a longer period of high interest rates, causing real interest rates to rise. Short-term liquidity is unfavorable, which suppresses gold prices; theoretically, this means the opportunity cost has increased.
3. Therefore, Bitcoin and gold have not played their hard currency role as inflation hedges; in fact, they are being suppressed by interest rates.
4. So the safe-haven attribute has not faded; it’s not that money from Treasuries has flowed into risk assets, and risk appetite has not increased. If risk appetite does increase one day, gold will also rise, not fall (high probability). At the moment of the surge and fall, I stared at the screen in a daze for two seconds, feeling a bit cold inside💫 Is this small rebound an opportunity or a trap? The batch of altcoins that reversed against the trend and turned red in the early session now looks more like a brief emotional impulse. $APR once led with +8.29%, even surged to +12.70% two hours ago, but then in the next hour price dropped -3.00%, holdings -1.93%, volume -4.50%, all three indicators weakened simultaneously, still down -6.66% in 24 hours, and yesterday’s deep pit was not filled at all. The most dangerous part of this trend is not the drop itself, but that it makes people feel "it's already stable." $METIS superficially shows +7.52%, 24 hours +3.92%, but price in 1 hour has turned negative -1.54%, holdings +1.11%, volume +13.97% amplified inversely. With a small market cap of 500,000 and volume of 830,000, this structure is easily manipulated by small amounts of funds and prone to amplified drawdowns during retreat. $BAT is still holding high at +5.67%, 24 hours +10.41%, holdings +1.79%, but funding rate is deeply negative at -0.0299%, indicating crowded shorts and hesitant longs; such tug-of-war is often not a one-sided signal. Looking at $A and $GRASS, one just started but volume is shrinking, the other has all three indicators weakening simultaneously; the morning momentum is clearly fading. Crowd psychology at this moment is typical: afraid of missing out when seeing red charts, afraid of... BlackRock's proposed PBIT uses IBIT-linked options and short-term fixed income to trade some upside for a loss buffer. That structure could broaden the Bitcoin ETF audience among investors who cannot absorb full spot volatility, but capped returns and no principal guarantee make the trade-off real.
Approval and actual demand remain open questions.
#BlackRockBTCBufferETF Papertrade 的跨链兑换采用了 Across。具体是出于报价、技术集成还是商务合作，目前不能只凭这条消息下结论，但它让我想到 DEX 聚合器正在面对的一个现实问题：技术做得再好，如果用户和流量都留在别人的产品里，自己该怎么获得持续增长？
大多数用户不会关心一次跨链兑换究竟由哪家协议完成。他们只在乎交易能不能顺利执行、费用是否合理、到账够不够快。只要钱包、交易终端或其他应用能直接提供这些服务，用户就没有太大动力再打开一个独立的聚合器网站。
这也意味着，聚合器之间的竞争不再只是比报价和路由。接入难度、稳定性、开发者支持和商务合作，都会影响一个协议能否进入更多应用。
以后有些基础设施可能不会拥有最显眼的品牌，却能处理大量真实交易。对它们来说，能否成为其他产品愿意长期依赖的服务，比自己的前端有多少访问量更重要。Standard Chartered's 2030 bold prediction: BTC at 500,000? Don't get too excited yet, first see how it contradicts itself
Standard Chartered Bank is making big promises again, with the latest forecast: BTC heading straight to $500,000 by 2030, ETH at $40,000 sounds exciting, right? But let's dig into its "flip-flop history"
Last December, it predicted BTC would reach $300,000 by 2026; shortly after, it lowered that to $150,000; now it simply closes its eyes and pushes the timeline to 2030 for $500,000. Why the back and forth? Because ETF and MicroStrategy's incremental buying is nearly exhausted, and frankly, its current forecast logic boils down to one thing: all depends on BTC's mood
As for those high target prices for L2 and DeFi tokens in the table, just take them with a grain of salt—believing them seriously means you lose
Also, the hottest debate recently in the community is the "quantum computing threat." Nine institutions just formed a Quantum Alliance to promote post-quantum standards. Justin Sun publicly turned bearish on Bitcoin a few days ago, citing this very reason. Technical black swans must be guarded against, but don't be scared out of your wits
Reviewing the cycle pattern:
In 2020, the market was ignited by DeFi Summer;
In 2024, it was the institutional bull run driven by ETFs and MicroStrategy;
So what about 2028-2029? Most likely a combination of several forces, but the biggest uncontrollable variable remains macro liquidity. The Fed's money printing and tightening are the ultimate drivers of the cycle
In summary:
Long-term target prices from big institutions can be a reference, but don't treat them as trading gospel. The market moves step by step, not by shouting it out loud Doubts about the AI bubble are growing louder, yet speculative funds are still aggressively trading storage stocks! Last week, $SNDK plummeted nearly 18%, then rebounded 5.5% on Monday; $MU followed with a rally, but $SKHY continued to be hammered. The Nasdaq 100 just bounced back to 29,529 after a week of decline and one day of gains—are we really ready to call the correction over? Who’s giving that confidence? Storage demand isn’t fake: SanDisk’s fiscal 2026 revenue surged 175%, data center revenue rose 437%; TrendForce still expects NAND contract prices to increase 15%–20% in Q4. But here’s the problem: expectations keep rising, yet can the sky-high capital expenditures poured into the AI industry chain really be recouped in the future? Even more surreal, SanDisk’s perpetual 24-hour trading volume once exceeded $52 million, with open interest close to $20 million, supporting up to 15x leverage. Seriously, stop the noise—trading volume is just long-short turnover, not net inflow. I’m more inclined to believe AI demand is real, and so is the capital speculation. The bubble we should truly be wary of isn’t that chips have no buyers, but that some people mistake the current windfall profits for guaranteed earnings over the next few years—that’s the bubble I’m most worried about!$BR 空不了，项目方在控盘💥💥
BR舞不舞的我不知道，从盘面来看肯定是不能做空，从昨晚开始BR就已经开始上涨，涨幅不大美元吸引到散户的目光，今天睡醒睁眼就是一波爆空单筹码
其实BR24小时之所以强劲，原因有二：
一是因为链上地址，项目方关联地址一直有持续买入的动作，链上明显控盘，项目方再借机做市筹码
二是今天有1800万代币解锁，靠解锁炒作，太高市值，真的就是龙抬头景观
日线连阳几天了，今天开始暴力拉升纯是拉高出货，对标上一次突破新高，今天大概率是称称王，萱个人认为短期是不建议做空的，因为链上资金都还在，主力没撤退散户就不能盲目做空
因此个人操作建议：短期可以顺势项目方踩准节奏做多，推荐进场点位0.66-0.68接多，目标看0.8【激进选手当前位置0.72轻仓多，留好防守】