Orbit Post Sitemap
This ETH trade has gained +204% from the waterfall bottom
(Used 30x and 100x leverage for trading)
Last night at dawn, the waterfall dropped to 2358, and the whole network was shouting for further decline. I caught the dip around 2360, with an average price of 2360.91. The reason is simple: the 1H RSI dropped just above 25, which is a historically oversold zone. I don’t chase the rally, I only catch panic sells.
Now the mark price is 2409, with an unrealized profit of +185U, and the margin has more than doubled. But I don’t intend to get emotionally attached to it; the trade has already been managed for the worst-case scenario:
Take profit at 2420, stop loss moved up directly from cost to 2387.7.
The 2420 level is not arbitrary — the 1H 200 moving average is right at 2420.7, exactly. Below the moving average is a bear market; a rebound hitting this line will most likely be pushed back, so I set the take profit right at the moving average, ready to lock in profits once touched.
After moving the stop loss up, the worst outcome for this trade is exiting with over 100 U profit, eliminating the risk of turning unrealized gains into losses.
Two scenarios going forward: hitting 2420 triggers automatic exit, locking in profits; if volume surges and the close breaks above 2424, truly stepping on the moving average, I will manually target 2438. If it breaks below 2387.7, no hesitation, the system will exit for me.
This is how you trade against the trend: enter with courage, exit with discipline. $ETH $BTC AI and demand have not disappeared, so why are storage stocks the first to falter?
Last night, the US stock market stirred again, with the Nasdaq dropping 2.6%, marking its largest single-day decline since June. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 6.72%, and the storage sector collectively came under pressure.
What’s more notable is that Meta, Microsoft, and Google are still ramping up AI investments, and Western Digital’s earnings exceeded expectations, yet their stock prices still fell. (Demand is clearly still there, so why is capital fleeing first?)
MU closed at $856.49, down 6.26%
SNDK closed at $1261.49, down 8.47%
META closed at $648.85, down 6.98%.
The performance of these three stocks reflects the market’s reassessment of AI industry chain valuations.
Micron and SanDisk need to see if storage prices and orders can continue to support profits; Meta needs to prove how much return the continuously increasing AI investment can ultimately bring.
The issue may not be that AI demand has disappeared, but that the market is starting to question: how long can demand growth last, and how long will it take to recoup investments? When good news has already been priced in, even earnings beating expectations may not stop capital from taking profits.
Next, the focus will be on storage companies’ earnings reports and guidance. If demand remains strong but stock prices continue to weaken, watch for whether the market is lowering valuations.
AI is still developing, but capital no longer just listens to the story; ultimately, whether it can make money is the key next step.
#存储芯片股再度下跌，AI投资回报担忧加剧 $SNDK $MU FOMC Eve Market Confirmation｜Gold Sideways, Meme Products Declining, Tech Stocks Under Pressure
$XAUT near 4131 🥇
XAUT is backed by physical gold, with its price pegged to spot gold. It remained flat before the Fed decision; the market neither bet on a rate cut in advance nor showed safe-haven buying, all waiting for the policy statement. Interest rates will directly determine the cost of holding gold.
$DOGE near 0.08 🐶
Bitwise Dogecoin ETF liquidation closure marks the decline of meme coin products; institutional enthusiasm for meme assets without cash flow is cooling. The 0.08 level reflects community sentiment pricing, making it difficult to drive the market relying on ETF narratives.
$SNDK near 1374 💀
The Nasdaq and tech stocks weakened, dragging down the storage sector. As a NAND manufacturer, SanDisk's fundamentals have not deteriorated; the current price is more driven by sector beta and risk appetite. Waiting for the Fed decision and tech stocks to stabilize before returning to inventory cycle logic.
💡Insight
Cross-market linkage is a major highlight on FOMC night, with different assets reflecting current market risk appetite in advance. $XAU 🔥 特朗普突然对俄罗斯松口，BTC和黄金要注意了！
路透社10月22日消息：特朗普近期放松部分俄罗斯柴油制裁，推动俄乌和谈。
表面是外交，背后还有美国中期选举前的油价和通胀压力。
我更关注这条传导链：
📉 能源供应增加 → 油价压力缓解 → 通胀预期降温 → 降息预期可能升温。
如果美元和美债收益率随之回落，BTC可能受益，黄金也可能获得利率层面的支撑。
⚠️ 但要注意：俄乌谈判不等于停火，油价也不一定马上跌。
我的观点：与其只盯特朗普讲话，不如观察油价、美债收益率和BTC是否同步变化。First, let's pour some cold water on this: when you see a large short position opened, don't rush to take it as a signal of a price drop. Core Trader 57 has newly opened or added to a $ZEC short position: 6x leverage, 84.01 coins, with a nominal value of about $103,300. Although I tend to be bearish, this position alone is not enough for me to confirm the direction.
I'm not in a hurry to agree, for two reasons. First, the monitoring only shows the position size, not the full account; it could be a directional bet or a hedge. Judging the market based on a single address's actions can easily mistake someone else's insurance for your own attack signal. Second, 6x leverage amplifies not only the judgment but also the cost of mistakes. Roughly calculating by nominal value, the initial margin is about $17,200; if the price rises 5% against the short, the unrealized loss on the short position would be about $5,163, which is roughly 30% of the estimated margin, not including fees. If the price really goes up, the most painful situation is a short who left no buffer and is unwilling to admit mistakes.
Of course, he could also be right. If the price continues to fall afterward and the rebound cannot recover the reference price of about $1,229.15 for this trade, I would be more convinced that this short entry timing was correct; this is my observation condition, not a market fact that has already happened. Regarding this 6x short position, are you bullish or bearish? Give a price-based reason for your judgment, and clearly explain under what circumstances you would admit you were wrong.Brent crude surged to $113! The Middle East is heating up again, why is $BTC not acting as a safe haven but instead being suppressed?
#Middle East energy risks escalate, international oil prices remain high
Everyone is going crazy watching this, Brent crude jumped 4% in one day, directly hitting $113, a five-month high, and WTI even broke $100 intraday. $CL
Why such a fierce rise? The Houthi militants targeted Saudi airports and energy facilities with bombings, and the US has already evacuated some diplomatic families stationed in Saudi Arabia; Iran escalated rhetoric in the Strait of Hormuz, and the US and Israel were exposed to have plans ready to strike Iran after the midterm elections. The market is starting to price in a "war restart" into oil prices.
Here's the most interesting part: logically, in wartime, people should buy gold as a safe haven, right? But gold and silver were heavily hit, and BTC didn't benefit either, surging to 84,000 then falling back to around 82,700.
The logic is actually simple—oil price surge = inflation uncontrollable = Fed dares not ease, high interest rates hang over, so volatile assets like crypto get cold water poured on them first. So now it's not a "buy crypto as a safe haven" scenario, but rather "the higher the oil price, the heavier the shadow of rate hikes, the more suppressed crypto is."
In the short term, the Middle East situation is the biggest variable; if real conflict breaks out and oil prices surge again, BTC will likely fluctuate with the macro environment. At times like this, don't bet on direction; watching oil prices and Strait news is more useful than watching K-lines.#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings
SK Hynix will release its financial report for the third quarter of 2026 on October 28. The market expects a new all-time high in operating profit — the sixth consecutive quarter with a record update. However, behind the impressive numbers lie serious concerns: HBM4 shipment rates are below expectations, and Samsung Electronics is rapidly closing the gap.
Earnings forecast: operating profit around 77 trillion won Conclusion first: $EDGE rose 10% today, half due to real protocol revenue returning, and half driven by perpetual leverage.
On-chain data (DefiLlama, edgeX fees): On October 17, it was only $34,305, then rose continuously over five days to $88,175 on October 22, an increase of 157%. 7-day total $484,000, 30-day total $2,577,000, daily average $86,000 — yesterday's single day just reached the 30-day average.
But the token didn't follow. On CoinGecko, $EDGE is still down 44% over 30 days, with an ATH of $1.54 (May 22) now less than a quarter of that. Protocol TVL is $59.93 million, circulating supply only 350 million / total supply 1 billion.
The driving force is in the contracts: OKX perpetual 24h volume $6.16 million, while spot is only $840,000, a 7.3x difference. Open interest rose from $1.87 million at 0:00 today to $2.27 million at 14:00, a 21% increase in 14 hours — indicating new longs entering, not shorts covering. Funding rate flipped from -0.004% at 12:00 yesterday to +0.005% at 12:00 today.
Revenue recovery is real, leverage increase is real. Paying a premium chasing the high is not the same as paying for expectations.
Are you buying into the protocol revenue logic, or this wave of perpetual premium? $EDGE $XAU This wave of short positions on gold is so smooth!
From 4070 precisely caught down to 3994, perfectly validating the power of following the trend.
Although the price has now reached 3994, don't rush to bottom-fish; the next target is straight to 3950!
Why dare to continue bearish down to 3950? Let's break it down.
US initial jobless claims hit a new low not seen in nearly 57 years; strong employment means the Fed's rate cuts are nowhere in sight. In a high interest rate environment, holding zero-yield assets like gold has a high opportunity cost, and funds are still flowing out. After breaking through the 4100 and 4075 defense lines, bullish confidence collapsed.
The current rebound is just a downward consolidation; the 4030-4040 range above is all trapped positions. As long as it doesn't hold above 4050, any rebound is a bull trap. Next week, the PCE data, the Fed's most watched inflation indicator, will be released. If the data remains hot, gold could directly crash to test 3950 or even lower.
Operationally, it is recommended to lightly short at the current price, set stop loss at 4055, and target breaking 4000 straight to 3950! Remember, do not try to guess the bottom before the trend reverses.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ I really don't quite understand this Yushu stock. A few days ago when it dropped to 404, everyone said robots couldn't really make much money. Today at 624, it hit the 20% daily limit with over 4 billion in trading volume.
The same company, just a few trading days apart, suddenly worth so much more?
The funniest part is that Yushu itself issued a risk warning a couple of days ago, saying the P/E ratio was already 388 times, while the industry average was only 39 times. But after the market read the announcement, they kept buying.
I actually think these funds never intended to care about the P/E ratio at all.
Yushu surged past 1100 on its first day of listing, then fell all the way down to just over 400. At that time, many thought this stock was done for. Now it has rebounded from 404 to 624, up 54%, and people are starting to think the robot sector is about to take off.
People's memory sometimes really only lasts for three candlesticks. But I won't rush to short just because it rose 50%. When it went from 500 to 600 before, probably many thought it was about done, but today it hit the 20% limit again. When a stock like this gets emotional, trying to guess the top by valuation might just get you out early.
I'm more interested to see how it moves next week. If it repeatedly opens the limit at 624 and people are still willing to rush in, that might be more interesting than today's straight limit-up. If it opens and crashes below 600, those who chased in today will probably have to watch their phones even while sleeping.
I haven't bought yet, honestly feeling a bit sour. At 404 I thought it could fall more, at 624 I think it's too expensive.
Watching others make money while I'm sitting here calculating P/E ratios, damn."BTC surges then falls back: Don't rush to call it a bull trap (￣▽￣)ノ"
BTC first touched $84,739, then slid back to around $81,100, a pullback of about 4.3% from the high. Those chasing the rally got their excitement quickly dampened (╥﹏╥).
This rapid rise and fall isn't necessarily due to "someone setting a trap." The buying from shorts forced to cover during the rally comes fast and leaves fast; Glassnode notes that spot and ETF demand remain weak, lacking follow-through; after a failed breakout, stop losses and leveraged liquidations amplify the pullback.
Next, watch three key levels: holding above 85,000 with volume to ease bull trap concerns; whether 82,000 can be reclaimed and act as support; if 80,000 breaks on the daily, beware of downside risk (｀・ω・´).
My view: The short squeeze flavor is obvious, but it's too early to say it's a deliberate bull trap. The real danger is the lack of sustained spot buying with every rally. Is this just a shakeout, or is the rebound over? What do you think (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
$BTC $ETH
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ $XAUT
The gold token is also falling; has the hedge failed?
In this morning's spot snapshot, XAUT's 24-hour price change was -2.20%, ranging between 4018.1 and 4124.2 USDT.
In the same snapshot, the decline was smaller than BTC's but still negative, indicating that diversification and absolute non-loss are two different things. Gold exposure priced in USD may also be affected by changes in real interest rates and liquidity, so it cannot be simply regarded as cash.
If risk assets continue to decline but relative advantage is maintained, diversification effects may still exist; if tracking deviates or bid-ask spreads widen significantly, additional risks at the token trading level need to be considered.When gold, silver, tech stocks, and $BTC all fall together, it’s not risk aversion—it’s forced deleveraging. In this market, cash is king. My biggest position right now? No position.Storage stocks plummeting does not mean Micron is already cheap
On October 22, the storage sector collectively plunged: $MU closed at 856.49, down 6.26% (Motley Fool).
SanDisk dropped about 8% intraday, Western Digital about 7%, storage ETF DRAM about 7%, while QQQ only fell about 2.8% during the same period (24/7 Wall St.).
MU has retraced about 23% from the September 25 high of 1108.72.
I think this drop is not just about sentiment:
The progress of China's ChangXin DRAM has made the market start worrying about supply and pricing, compounded by Brent crude oil surging to $112 and doubts about AI spending.
The intraday low on October 22 was 849.25, breaking below the October 15 low of 858, with new lows still being made.
My approach: don't catch a falling knife.
Only a close above 928.45 (the high on 10/21) counts as a stop to the decline.
Breaking below 849.25 (the low on 10/22) means the decline continues, so keep your distance.
Do you think it’s more likely to recover above 928 or break below 849 first?
#存储芯片股再度下跌，AI投资回报担忧加剧
$MU
#存储芯片股下跌 Looking back at Aave's quarterly live broadcast on X yesterday, founder Stani Kulechov announced the upcoming launch of Aavenomics 3.0, which includes AAVE buyback, staking, and burning mechanisms, and the buyback program will be restarted. Combined with the launch of seven Coinbase tokenized stocks on Aave V4 two weeks ago, Aave's ambition is clear: while expanding the use cases of real-world assets, it is also redirecting protocol revenue back into the token economy.
There is no doubt this is a positive direction for $AAVE token value capture, but the key still lies in whether the buyback funds come from real revenue or new token incentives, whether the lending demand for tokenized stocks is stable enough, and whether the new assets on V4 can continue to be used without subsidies.
That is all, DYOR Why can a logic become unreliable once everyone agrees on it!
When I first started trading, I loved looking for "certainty": policy support, institutional entry, sector explosion, preferably with consensus across the entire network.
When everyone is bullish, it seems to mean you are on the right side.
Later I realized that trading profits don’t come from having the correct view, but from prices not yet fully reflecting that view.
I once chased a popular sector.
The logic was indeed sound: user growth, funding background, ecosystem narrative were all strong, and research reports clearly explained the positives. But by the time I bought in, early investors had already made several multiples, funding rates were high, contract positions crowded, and every subsequent positive news only caused a brief price spike.
The project didn’t immediately deteriorate, but the price started to fall because the market lacked not reasons, but buyers who came later and were willing to pay higher prices.
Consensus itself is not the risk; overpricing is. To judge an opportunity, you can’t just ask if the logic is correct, but also: how many people already believe it, how much capital has entered, and if the positive news is realized, who will continue to buy?
The best opportunities often don’t have zero consensus, but facts are improving while prices still carry doubt. When everyone can fluently repeat the same story, trading may have shifted from discovering value to fighting over the last chair.
Remember: good logic does not equal good price; when the correct answer is known by all, what really needs to be calculated is how much buying power has yet to enter.#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Regarding the Q3 earnings report: profits are very likely to continue to increase significantly quarter-on-quarter, mainly driven by price hikes in traditional storage. HBM4 is a bonus factor, not a decisive variable; if Q3 HBM4 shipments exceed expectations and yield rates are good, the earnings report will surpass expectations; conversely, if delivery pace is slow, performance can still be supported by the resilience of ordinary storage prices.SK Hynix Q3 Preview and HBM4 Observation
SK Hynix is expected to announce its Q3 results around October 28. The market consensus forecasts an operating profit of approximately 76.96 trillion KRW, with a profit margin of about 78.4%, potentially marking a record sixth consecutive quarter. This figure represents a 5.6% downward revision from the consensus three months ago.
The main reason is that HBM4 shipments have fallen short of expectations for two consecutive quarters. Due to adjustments in NVIDIA Rubin's schedule and extended mass production tuning time, some capacity has shifted to general DRAM. Bernstein estimates show Samsung's Q3 HBM revenue at about $8.7 billion (up 33% quarter-on-quarter), SK Hynix at about $7.6 billion (up 11% quarter-on-quarter), with Samsung surpassing SK Hynix in HBM revenue for the first time. SK Hynix's share has dropped from 58% in Q1 to 50% in Q2.
Despite pressure on market share, rising prices for general DRAM and NAND continue to support overall profitability. The Q3 earnings report will focus on verifying the actual contribution of HBM4 and management's outlook for 2027.
#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Funds have shifted
$ZEC Why is it crazy? A whale openly added nearly ten million dollars at an average price of 1252 dollars, with unrealized gains exceeding twenty million; expectations for Grayscale ZEC Trust converting to spot ETF are fermenting, daily trading volume tripled. Even more hardcore is the NU7 upgrade confirmed to activate on November 5 — block time compressed from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, 60% of fees per block removed from circulation until 2031, a blatant model to reduce selling pressure.
But don’t chase the highs. Coinbase data shows ZEC has given back 10% of its weekly gains, a typical profit-taking before positive news lands. NU7 is a November 5 event; entering now is just carrying the whale who built a position at 1200 dollars.
$ETH Why is it weak? It broke below 2400, 1-hour ADX at 33.90 bearish, 2412-dollar sell orders concentrated at 98.8%, top five bid-ask depth ratio only 0.33. Below, 2360 is a short-term cover.
But bears shouldn’t be too confident yet. The Glamsterdam upgrade activates on October 26 on the Hoodi testnet, gas limit increasing from 60 million to 200 million, a 3.3x increase. Ethereum whales are best at stirring things up during upgrade windows; the current selling pressure might be price suppression to accumulate.
· Don’t blindly go long on ZEC; wait for a pullback to the 20-day moving average without breaking it before considering. Liquidity depth is poor; spikes can make you doubt reality.
Don’t catch the last baton in ZEC’s FOMO, nor throw away blood-stained chips in ETH’s panic. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Avoid going long or short on $UNITREE in the coming weeks as much as possible. I'm not trying to help anyone; I just really don't want to see so many people lose. This thing was originally used for arbitrage, basically a bunch of wealthy people have a private market elsewhere similar to the previous Snowball liquidation incident. Someone is shorting. For now, it's best to avoid shorting and just observe.[Pharaoh's Market Watch]
Zuckerberg delivers the report card: revenue is up, but shareholders aren't smiling. Making money is like turning on a faucet, spending is like a fire hydrant—who wouldn't check their wallet first?
Pharaoh believes the market's concern is how long it will take for AI investments to pay off. Meta's Q3 revenue reached $64.6 billion, a 26% year-over-year increase, surpassing market expectations; ad impressions grew 10%, and average ad prices rose 14%, proving their core business still performs.
On the other hand, quarterly capital expenditures hit $34.9 billion, with free cash flow negative $2.1 billion. The full-year capital expenditure guidance floor was raised from $130 billion to $135 billion, with the ceiling remaining at $145 billion. Shareholders were expecting dividends, but Zuckerberg says: hold on, I still need to buy computing power.
Don't blame all the profit pressure on AI; this quarter also included nearly $9.9 billion in litigation costs. The real focus should be whether future ad and AI revenues can sustainably cover these investments.
Regarding Bitcoin, Pharaoh judges the impact mainly through risk appetite transmission: if concerns over AI returns continue to drag down tech stocks, Bitcoin could also be affected; if subsequent performance proves the investments effective, sentiment may recover.
When watching the market, don't just focus on the six words "revenue beats expectations," also watch the cash flow. No matter how attractive the story, someone has to pay the bill; don't let contract positions pay for the giants' dreams. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #MetaQ3营收超预期，巨额AI投入引发担忧 To start with a cold splash of water, seeing someone open a short position, I as a short-seller won't automatically cheer. Core Trader 75 just opened a 25x leveraged $ETH short position, holding 56.85 ETH, with a notional value of about $136,700. My judgment is: what needs the most scrutiny in this trade is the margin for error; you can't take a large short position as direct evidence of a bearish outlook.
I have two concerns. First, roughly calculating with 25x leverage, the initial margin is only about 4% of the notional position. If the price rises about 4% against the position, losses could approach the initial margin, and actual liquidation depends on margin mode, maintenance margin, and other factors. Second, monitoring only shows the opening action, no stop loss or other positions; this short could be a directional bet or serve as a hedge. Judging a price drop solely based on one address misses part of the logic. If the market moves up, the most uncomfortable will be high-leverage shorts who left no margin and refuse to admit mistakes.
Of course, he might be right. If the price continues to fall and rebounds fail to sustain, I will increase my recognition of the short direction; but I evaluate correct direction and appropriate leverage separately. Regarding this 25x ETH short, do you stand long or short? State your reasons: do you value the opening direction more, or the ability to withstand adverse volatility?X Layer is offering $50,000 to incentivize trading, but the real test is still ahead
📊 X Layer recently launched a community-certified token trading competition, running from October 19 to 26, with a total prize pool of $50,000.
This is not the first time X Layer has used funds to incentivize ecosystem trading. In September, it also launched an RWA liquidity incentive program.
What I focus on is not how much the reward is, but whether the funds will stay after these activities end.
💰 For a public blockchain, short-term trading volume is not hard to stimulate. As long as the rewards are attractive enough, trading activity can quickly rise.
The challenge is whether users are willing to continue trading and liquidity providers are willing to stay on the chain after the rewards stop.
This is also an important criterion for me to judge the quality of X Layer's development.
🔍 What’s worth watching next is whether active addresses, DEX trading volume, and locked capital scale significantly decline after the event ends on October 26.
If the ecosystem remains active without rewards, that is the real change worth OKB holders’ attention.
$OKB
#XLayer #OKB #OKEx #OnChainData #PublicChainEcosystem#SK Hynix Q3 earnings report is coming, can HBM4 boost profitability? 🌆 Three updates on Friday afternoon: meme product retreat, gold and interest rates, interest-bearing also waiting on interest rates
$DOGE around 0.08, meme productization has receded 🐶
Bitwise's Dogecoin spot ETF product BWOW has been liquidated and closed, investors receive cash. This is a retreat of meme coin productization, institutions are losing interest in token products without cash flow. At 0.08, it has returned to pure community sentiment pricing, so don't expect an ETF narrative rally in the short term.
$XAUT around 4,131, gold is waiting for next Tuesday 🥇
Backed by physical gold bars reserves, redeemable 24/7, price anchored to spot gold. Before the 10/28 interest rate decision, the opportunity cost of holding gold follows interest rate expectations. Around 4131, there is neither a bet on rate cuts nor panic buying of gold; the direction depends on the statement.
$ENA around 0.1927, interest-bearing protocol also waiting on interest rates 🌬️
USDe generates yield through a collateral portfolio, with returns linked to short-term USD interest rates. Before the decision, the attractiveness of yield won't suddenly change; 0.1927 moves with risk appetite. Once the interest rate direction is clear, funds will reassess whether interest-bearing USD products are worth entering.
This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice.
#Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ $BTC $ETH With the October meeting approaching, the market's bet on a pause has exceeded 80%, but the September CPI year-on-year rose to 3.7%, higher than the previous 3.4%. The inflation rebound means the risk of rate hikes has not disappeared. (The market is not afraid of rate hikes, it just prefers to wait first.) The real variable is in December. 1 If inflation remains high, the Federal Reserve may delay easing expectations; if employment weakens, it will limit the space for further tightening. A pause in October does not mean safety by the end of the year. The crypto market also has its own variables. On October 19, BTC once touched $82,830; on that day, BTC spot ETF net inflows were about $527 million, but ETH ETF net outflows were about $103 million, and SOL ETF also had net outflows of about $6.7 million. Funds did not flow synchronously to all coins. On the US stock side, if US Treasury yields fall, tech stocks may continue to recover; if rate hike expectations rebound, valuation pressure will return. What I pay more attention to is: whether the pause expectation can continue to cool down, and whether ETF funds can spread from BTC to ETH, XRP, and SOL. The Federal Reserve's decisions affect risk appetite, but real capital flows better test whether this rebound has staying power. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ SK海力士 is about to release its Q3 earnings report, and the entire market is focused on one key question: can the new generation HBM4 truly boost profits?
AI high-bandwidth memory is currently the most profitable business in the storage industry. In previous years, ordinary memory only yielded thin margins, but HBM4 is the core component of NVIDIA's new generation AI chips, with a high unit price and thick profits, making it crucial for raising gross margins.
However, HBM4 did not fully explode in Q3 this year. On one hand, NVIDIA's new platform was delayed, causing SK海力士's shipments to fall short of expectations; on the other hand, Samsung quickly caught up, significantly improving yield rates and capturing a considerable market share, narrowing SK海力士's leading advantage.
Therefore, this quarter's profits mainly relied on price increases in traditional storage and stable support from older HBM3 models. The large-scale profit release from HBM4 has not yet fully materialized.
Institutions predict that Q3 profits will still be good, even close to new highs, but with limited growth. The real performance breakout is expected in Q4 when HBM4 is officially delivered in volume and large-scale expansion occurs next year.
Summary: This earnings report is very likely to be stable and not poor, but HBM4 has not yet truly taken up the banner of profitability; its explosive potential is to be seen later. For AI, chip, and tech sectors, this earnings report also serves as a short-term sentiment indicator and will directly impact tech stock volatility. $SNDK $SKHYNIX #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Q3 high profitability is certain, but this is the dividend brought by the price increase of HBM3E+DRAM; HBM4 has not yet truly taken over as the main performance driver this quarter. Whether HBM4 can meet expectations depends on the Q4 shipment data and the delivery progress of Nvidia's Rubin chip, while Samsung's catch-up is the biggest variable.🔥 Expectations for the Federal Reserve to pause rate hikes are growing, but don’t rush to celebrate! For BTC, what truly impacts the market isn’t just whether the pause button is pressed this time, but where interest rates will head in the future.
📌 Currently, the market’s expectation for a pause has reached 92.8%, indicating that most traders have already prepared in advance. However, market expectations are not the final outcome; even if the decision meets expectations, prices may not continue to rise. Funds might position early or choose to take profits after the announcement.
📊 The latest US initial jobless claims dropped to 194,000, reflecting resilience in the labor market. However, single-week data cannot represent the entire economy, nor can it solely determine Fed policy. Subsequent inflation data, employment trends, and policy statements will all influence market judgment.
📉 On the other hand, the 10-year US Treasury yield has fallen below 5%, providing some support to tech stocks and the crypto market. But as long as interest rates remain at restrictive levels, risk assets cannot fully escape macroeconomic pressure.
⚠️ What worries me most is not the pause itself, but the market interpreting the pause as a full dovish turn. If the Fed continues to emphasize inflation risks, BTC may still face volatility caused by expectation adjustments.
Brothers, are you more bullish on BTC now, or are you waiting until after the meeting to act? Remember, expectations can be referenced, but position sizing must be controlled by yourself! #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ [a16z even removed "Crypto"—Is crypto VC starting to find the sector too narrow?]
a16z renamed its flagship fund from a16z Crypto to a16z Frontier, clearly expanding into frontier areas like AI, robotics, and biotech, but the official statement also said it will continue investing in crypto projects.
What’s worth pondering about this shift is that capital is beginning to redraw boundaries. a16z’s fifth crypto fund raised $2.2 billion this year, less than the $4.5 billion fund in 2022; the scale decrease alone doesn’t prove institutions are bearish on crypto, but at least it shows the previous round’s huge fundraising enthusiasm has cooled.
Imran mentioned the migration of mining infrastructure and talent toward AI, which has practical logic: mining has accumulated experience in power, data centers, and computing operations, and these capabilities can be transferred, but that doesn’t mean all mining farms can transform without cost.
This is crypto capital broadening its hunting grounds, not announcing an exit. The real test for the industry is whether it can create products that make money without relying on token speculation like $BTC, $ETH, $SOL; going forward, where a16z’s new fund actually invests is more convincing than what name it changed to.🔥Before the FOMC meeting, what BTC needs to guard against most may not be a rate hike, but rather "after the pause, the market finds it’s not as dovish as expected!"
📈 The market currently prices in a 92.8% chance of a rate hike pause, which on the surface looks clearly positive. But when most people have already bet on the same outcome, the moment the announcement is made could actually mark the start of a new battle between bulls and bears. The realization of good news and short-term profit-taking could both cause an unexpected pullback.
🔍 Initial jobless claims in the US dropped to 194,000, showing the labor market remains resilient; meanwhile, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below 5%, providing some cushion for risk assets. Taken together, these signals suggest the market has some breathing room but still faces policy uncertainty.
⚡ Going forward, focus on three directions: whether the Fed’s statement continues to emphasize inflation risks, whether its stance on future rates leans hawkish, and whether BTC can hold key support after the news is released. Simply guessing the decision isn’t enough; how the price reacts is equally important.
🛡️ My choice is not to heavily bet on direction before the meeting, nor to chase highs just because of one positive factor. Waiting for volatility to release and trends to confirm before considering the next step usually gives more control.
Brothers, do you think this pause will become a catalyst for BTC’s rise, or will it turn into a realization of good news? Share your thoughts in the comments! Hope everyone can protect their principal and trade rationally. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ The core issue now is not how much interest rates have fallen, but when funds will leave safe-haven assets and return to risk markets.
US Treasury yields have plunged, so why hasn't BTC followed suit?
This round of yield decline is not due to improved risk appetite, but because funds are withdrawing from tech stocks and high-volatility assets, shifting to US Treasuries as a safe haven.
At the close of US stocks on October 22, the Nasdaq fell 2.60%, the S&P 500 dropped 1.21%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 6.7%. Safe-haven buying pushed the 10-year US Treasury yield down by more than 19 basis points in a single day, marking the largest one-day drop since March 2023.
Lower interest rates usually benefit risk assets, but this time the funds flowed into US Treasuries rather than tech stocks and the crypto market. Although yields fell, the market is still reducing risk exposure, so BTC did not rally.
BTC is currently around $81,800. First, watch if $81,000 can hold; only if it rebounds above $82,700 will the rally have a chance to continue.
ETH is currently around $2,405, with support at $2,370 and resistance between $2,435 and $2,450.
This time, don't rush to be bullish just because US Treasury yields have fallen. Yields dropped but BTC did not rise, indicating funds are still defensive. BTC must reclaim $82,800 to signal that risk appetite is beginning to recover. If it fails to do so, the short-term trend remains weak and volatile.This time the position increase is not to lower the cost basis; instead, it raised babala's ETH long average price from 2385 to 2396.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？
Honestly, adding more longs at this level is somewhat bold.
$ETH just dipped to a low of 2358, then bounced back near 2407. My judgment is that there is still support above 2350, and the price reclaiming 2400 indicates the short-term trend hasn't completely broken down, so I chose to add back to the long position.
But this trade isn't exactly comfortable right now.
$BTC is currently only around 81800; although it rebounded from 80900, it hasn't reclaimed the previous breakdown zone. Meanwhile, on October 22, the US BTC spot ETF saw a net outflow of about $636 million, and the ETH spot ETF also had a net outflow of about $111 million, showing a clear shift to caution in capital flows.
Plus, the Federal Reserve meeting on October 27–28 means the market will likely continue to fluctuate around interest rate expectations.
So this time, my position increase is not a bet on ETH taking off immediately, but rather that the 2358 level won't be easily broken again.
The 2400 level and my 2396 average price are key short-term support zones. As long as the price stays above these, I will first look at 2440, and after a breakout, target 2470–2500.
But if it falls back below 2396, it means this recovery to 2400 is just a weak rebound; if it can't hold 2358 either, then I will need to reassess the logic behind this position increase.
babala's long position has already been increased, with an average price of 2396.
Knowing the capital situation isn't great but still adding to the position is indeed a bit stubborn. Hopefully, this time ETH won't perform like "just stood above 2400, then immediately fell back down."🔥 With 92.8% expecting a pause in rate hikes, does BTC have to rise? I don't think so! The real risk might be exactly when everyone thinks there's no suspense.
📊 As the October FOMC meeting approaches, the market generally expects the Federal Reserve to keep rates unchanged. But the trading market never just speculates on the outcome; it also factors in the gap between the outcome and expectations. If the pause has already been fully priced in, profit-taking might occur when the announcement is officially made.
🌍 Additionally, the U.S. economy hasn't shown clear signs of slowing down, with the latest initial jobless claims dropping to 194,000, indicating the labor market remains resilient. Meanwhile, whether inflation pressure has truly eased is still a matter the Fed needs to weigh. We can't assume monetary policy will immediately turn accommodative just because rate hikes pause.
📉 The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield falling below 5% is a positive signal for risk assets, but that doesn't mean BTC will necessarily rise. What deserves more attention next is the Fed's stance on inflation in its statement and how the market reassesses the future path of interest rates.
🛡️ My approach is simple: don't bet on direction before the meeting; watch price reactions after the news. If BTC breaks through key resistance with volume, we can observe for continuation; if it rallies then falls back, be cautious of chasing gains and getting trapped.
Brothers, do you think this will be a bullish realization or will the bulls keep pushing? Feel free to leave your comments and discuss! #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Brothers, don't treat ETFs as the whole market
Although ETFs make it easier for traditional financial market funds
to allocate BTC📈
Bitcoin itself is traded 24/7
ETFs have their own trading hours and fund subscription/redemption mechanisms
So ETF data and Bitcoin prices
don't necessarily move in sync
Sometimes ETFs flow in, but the price still falls📉
Sometimes ETFs flow out, but the price can still rebound📈
The key is to look at the overall market buying and selling power
A Bitcoin rebound doesn't necessarily mean the bulls have won
It could just be that the shorts have withdrawn first
But if you want the rebound to turn into a real uptrend
You still have to see if new buying interest comes in
If this rebound is mainly driven by shorts taking profits
Then when the shorts have mostly covered, who will keep buying?
So to judge whether the rebound can continue
You can't just look at how much the price has risen
You also have to see if there is sustained capital demand for the rise $BTC 🚨Whale holding three short positions, surviving on funding fees!
$BTC $ETH $SOL
The combined unrealized loss of BTC, ETH, and SOL triple short positions is nearly 30 million U, with accumulated funding fees collected at 10.68 million U.
The position leverage is not extreme, the liquidation price is far away, no immediate risk of forced liquidation in the short term, mainly focusing on long-term funding fee earnings.
⚠️Key reminder:
As the market continues to rise, unrealized losses will keep expanding; funding fees may reverse at any time. This strategy is only suitable for very large capital; retail investors should not blindly follow and hold short positions!
⚠️For review and communication only, not trading advice
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Watching the market too much makes it hard to hold positions.
SOL dropped from 107.50 to 103, then rebounded to 104.63. Many people watched it all day these past two days, but the more they watched, the more anxious they became, and they lost positions they could have held.
There are only two useful times to watch the market closely: when the price is testing a key level, and when your position is close to the stop loss. The former is to see if the market will break through, the latter is to wait for a signal to confirm whether to exit.
Every small fluctuation, every 15-minute candle pullback looks like a reversal. Watching too long makes normal volatility seem like a risk signal. From a high of 104.85 down to 103.46, a swing of $1.39 is normal for SOL.
The period from 10 PM to midnight is indeed when direction is set, that’s when you should watch. At other times, the price hovers around 105, no key levels are tested, and the position is still far from stop loss, so watching won’t change anything.
Holding a $SOL long position with stop loss set below 102, now at 104.63, there’s still $2 room before stop loss. Watching all day at this time is just noise; it’s better to wait until the price nears 102 to watch closely.
Watching three times a day versus thirty times a day leads to completely different results.The probability of a rate hike pause in October has soared to 92.8%. On the surface, the market is celebrating wildly, but this is actually an extremely dangerous boiling frog trap. The real uncertainty is not whether there will be a hike in October, but the logic behind the US Treasury yield falling below 5% and how the Federal Reserve will set the tone for December.
But with no economic recession and inflation not crushed, why would the Federal Reserve cut rates? The current decline in the 10-year US Treasury yield does not mean the risk is gone; rather, funds are preemptively trading the peak of the rate hike cycle. The high interest rate environment remains, and as long as the Fed does not soften its stance in December, this mountain could crush risk assets at any time.
Looking at $BTC, it is now in a sideways consolidation after a dead cat bounce, propped up by expectations of a rate hike pause, but there is heavy overhead resistance, and ETF funds have not formed sustained net inflows. If the Fed insists that further hikes are still possible, this emotional rebound will collapse instantly, testing lower support levels.
Looking at $ETH, Ethereum remains the most fragile follower. ETFs continue to see outflows, the ecosystem has no new breakout points, and it falls fastest when the market softens. Don’t assume it has stabilized just because it is consolidating; once the funding dries up, the decline will definitely accelerate.
Looking at $XAUT, gold has recently rebounded following the drop in US Treasury yields, but there is a huge expectation gap here. If the Fed maintains high rates, the gold rebound will be short-lived. But if the market starts to truly price in that the economy cannot withstand high rates, central bank buying and safe-haven funds will immediately take over, leading to an independent rally. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ 🔥The logic behind BTC's rise may be changing! Many people in the market only focus on capital inflows but overlook a key question: how much selling pressure remains?
📊 If buying continues to increase but a large number of holders still choose to sell, the price may not immediately rise. Conversely, when selling willingness gradually declines, even without a sudden surge in buying, the supply-demand balance could drive more noticeable price changes.
🔍 Looking at some historical trends from the past two bull markets, the weakening of selling pressure may occur in two stages. After the first signal appears, the market may still experience declines, sideways movement, and repeated fluctuations; only when signs of further exhaustion of selling pressure appear in the second stage can the trend truly improve.
🚀 What’s special about this BTC cycle is that the first stage already saw a volume-driven rise, not fully replicating the previous pattern of a long bottoming phase followed by a concentrated breakout. Therefore, the subsequent trend deserves continuous tracking, but we cannot directly conclude that the second stage is complete based solely on historical experience.
🛡️ In practice, the focus remains on observing price structure, volume, and pullback support. If selling pressure weakens while the price breaks through and holds key resistance, the signal is more convincing; if support continues to fail, a reassessment is needed.
Brothers, do you think BTC is now at the prelude to a new market cycle, or does it still need time for confirmation? Share your thoughts in the comments! #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ OpenAI's reported move from a $1.4T to $1.25T pre-money target is notable because even a modest reset at that scale signals that capital is demanding clearer terms for compute-heavy growth. The round may still be enormous, but price discipline is becoming part of the story. Profitability and long-term capital needs remain unresolved.
#OpenAIValuationCut #France's government bond yields hit a 24-year high, will the bond market risk spill over?
"French government bonds surge to 5%, Bitcoin gives back $3,000"
The yield on France's 10-year government bonds broke through 5.14%, reaching a 24-year high, while Bitcoin dropped directly from $84,500 to $81,600, giving back nearly $3,000 in a single day.
France's public debt is approaching 119% of GDP. Overseas institutions selling French bonds were required to top up margin. After closed-door reconciliation at multinational trading desks, they had to first sell the most liquid Bitcoin positions to raise cash.
The latest coin price is narrowly holding around $81,700, and all eyes are on whether France's new budget proposal can pass the National Assembly next week. $BTC Big players are hyping $10,000, but 369 shorts are lining up to get slaughtered! $ZEC 1231 is just ridiculous
The house holds 97% of the chips watching you perform, yet you fantasize about toppling the house with just a few hundred U.
News and market: Gemini twins are aggressively pumping ZEC, shouting "Crypto Bitcoin" long-term target $10,000. But reality is harsh, the K-line has steadily dropped from 1367 to 1231. Plainly put: big players are responsible for the hype, the market is here to slap it down.
Funds and whales (retail trader profile): 95 million quietly exited in 15 days. The most absurd part is the chip concentration at 97%, retail investors basically hold nothing! 121 longs average at 1085, comfortably making 10 million; meanwhile, there are 369 shorts, triple the number, averaging 1252, all squeezed above 1250-1300 waiting to die.
Trading strategy (20% position, mainly long with some short):
Long: squeeze the shorts. Aggressive traders buy directly at 1231, conservative ones buy on pullback at 1200-1210, target 1260.
Short: guard against false breakouts. Aggressive traders short on resistance at 1260-1280, conservative ones chase after breaking below 1200, target 1150.
Personal view: Don’t be fooled by the $10,000 brainwash. With 97% of chips in the house’s hands and so many shorts packed in, the main force will likely push up to trigger a short squeeze and blow out the shorts. Chasing shorts now is just handing your head to the dog house. #MetaQ3营收超预期，巨额AI投入引发担忧 SOXL six hours from 77.99 pulled up to 87.40, up 11.8%, U.S. stocks haven't opened for a minute.
The market opens only at 21:30, triple-leveraged ETFs have no net asset value during the holiday to hedge, prices are entirely driven by Asian capital speculation — this spike at 77.99 and this 11.8% increase are not true closing prices, just shadows amplified by leverage.
Last night there was a real dump: at 22:00 a -7.07% drop from 93.57 to 85.33 (989,000 contracts), from 23:00 to 00:00 another 1.36 million contracts dumped down to 80.12 at 07:00, four bearish candles with 3 million contracts.
At 08:00 during the Asian session, 623,000 contracts pushed down to 77.99 then pulled back to 84.06, then gradually lifted stepwise 84.98→85.61→87.23, breaking above MA20 at 85.15, but volume was only 40% of the dump.
Short covering is not a reversal. Chasing highs means buying for the 21:30 open.
Close above 87.40 with volume (≥250,000) → buy on pullback at 87.0~87.2, stop loss 86.30, target 89.55, risk-reward 3.0.
Close below 84.30 with volume (≥250,000) → short on rebound at 84.8~85.2, stop loss 85.90, target 82.47, risk-reward 3.0.
$SOXL
(Not investment advice, trade at your own risk)#Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ From where to see?$SPCX Yesterday, there was a public short-selling signal at $155, and today it dropped to a low of $143.78! The target of $150 was taken down!
Brothers, I warned yesterday that with SPCX's positive news landing, don't rush to chase the upside! The news of Musk giving shares combined with earnings beating expectations had already been partially priced in earlier, and short-term funds might cash out profits anytime based on the news.
So I directly gave the idea: try a light short position around $155, with a target of $150!
How did the market move? The price fell steadily from the high, hitting a low of $143.78, even breaking below the $150 target!
Positive news doesn't mean the price will keep rising, and earnings beating expectations doesn't mean the price won't fall! What really matters is judging market expectations, the rhythm of funds cashing out, and the price level.First, consider the worst-case scenario: if the attention brought by influencer promotion fades, token holders may face a combination of cooling sentiment and potential selling pressure, rather than just a "endorsement fee" gossip. This is my risk assessment and does not mean it has already happened.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, kimchi is suspected to have received 1.35 billion $PUMP as a platform endorsement fee and removed Pump.fun from their personal profile two days later. During these two days, the platform's revenue dropped from $1.61 million to $1.35 million, about a 16% decrease; active addresses fell from 178,539 to 159,492, about an 11% decrease.
My judgment is that this looks more like a signal of an interest relationship that needs verification and should not be directly taken as negative price news. ⚠️ I will watch three risks: the nature of the endorsement fee is not yet confirmed, so speculation should not be treated as fact; revenue and active addresses declined simultaneously, but this does not necessarily mean the influencer's presence caused it; if the tokens have indeed been received, how they are handled afterward will add uncertainty, but receiving tokens does not equal selling them.
When I do risk control, I usually first write down the maximum loss I can bear, then judge whether the news changes my original assumptions, without replacing risk budgeting with the influencer's attitude. When encountering such questionable endorsement relationships and platform data decline, how much stop loss do you generally set for a single trade? Based on price proportion or on the account's bearable loss?【Leverage Check #1】Don't think XRP can't fall anymore; the number of longs on OKX is already 3.8 times the shorts.
This time analyzing XRP, look at three things:
① Number of people. The long-to-short account ratio for OKX XRP contracts was 3.26 at 1 PM yesterday, and 3.77 at 1 PM today. The price dropped from 1.40 back to 1.32, yet more people went long.
② Money. During the same period, OKX XRP contract open interest fell from $114 million to $111 million. More people but not more money, it looks more like small positions bottom-fishing, big money hasn't followed.
③ Funding rate. The funding rate is normally slightly long-biased, not extreme, indicating longs haven't been cornered yet.
Product people would be more cautious seeing this data: when users crowd overwhelmingly on one side, liquidity is often on the other side.
My judgment: XRP is weak in the short term, most likely first to sweep longs near the 10-20 low around 1.286.
Wrong line: If it reclaims the 10-22 high at 1.399, I admit I was wrong.
Which side are you on: Are the bottom-fishers right this time, or will they get swept again?
#韩国全北银行接入Ripple，XRP能否受益
$XRP ZEC fell 2.91% with liquidations of only 9.41 million, while BTC fell 1.07% with liquidations close to 100 million: what does this data contrast indicate?
24h total network liquidation data update. BTC liquidations at 96.93 million, ETH at 73.43 million, totaling about 170 million, accounting for 40%. ZEC's 2.91% drop far exceeds BTC's 1.07%, but liquidations are only 9.41 million, less than one-tenth of BTC's.
The main reason for concentrated liquidations in BTC and ETH is the large contract size base. Open interest and trading volume are much greater than other assets; larger contracts often generate higher absolute liquidation amounts, which does not equate to higher leverage risk. One must look at liquidation as a proportion of open interest.
ZEC liquidations at 9.41 million with a 2.91% drop. Shallow contract depth and small positions, or possibly due to lack of open interest data, can only be reasonably explained but not concluded. This cannot be used to infer "low selling pressure" or "easy rebound."
XAU liquidations at 18.56 million, SOXL at 14.33 million, with long positions absolutely dominant. These retracements synchronized with crypto or were disturbed by FOMC, requiring cross-verification with US Treasury and USD. SOL liquidations at 7.99 million with a relatively mild 0.39% drop.
ZEC's large drop but small liquidation amount reminds us: liquidation rankings reflect the scale of liquidated amounts, not the ranking of leverage risk. Follow-up tracking of ZEC's relative strength and changes in BTC and ETH liquidation concentration is needed.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ $BTC $ETH $ZEC BTC dominance hits highest since May, but that doesn't mean ETH will catch up
CoinDesk: BTC market cap dominance rose to 60% on October 21, the highest since May, while the Memecoin index dropped over 5% in a week.
Reported on October 23, about $435 million liquidated in 24 hours, with longs around $385 million.
$ETH is currently priced around 2402.6 on OKX, ETH/BTC at 0.02937, about 11% lower than 0.03294 on September 10.
I think this is not the "eve of a catch-up rally," but rather funds moving to hide in BTC:
The exchange rate has been declining steadily, with the low on October 18 at 0.02883, not far from now.
On October 21, it surged to 2526.4 but was pushed back down, indicating sellers remain above.
Observing without chasing.
If volume supports holding above 2526.4 (October 21 high), then consider a breakout.
If it falls below 2317 (October 14 low), it means the lower boundary of the consolidation zone is broken, so stay away.
Do you think next is more like ETH/BTC bottoming and rebounding, or breaking below 0.0288 first?
$ETH
#BTC dominance hits highest since May
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Brothers, the 30U target is rushing towards 300U, currently at 122U, the opportunity has come again, the opportunity has come again.
This time we have to seize it, Unitree Technology suddenly skyrocketed.
Honestly, watching this surge excites me greatly!
$UNITREE jumped straight from 74.2 to 88.38, a daily surge of over 14%, it really looks fierce. But why pull up precisely at this time?
Tomorrow is Unitree's earnings report meeting, this is clearly the main force rushing to induce a bull trap, filling expectations in advance, and once the earnings report lands, it will be their time to sell off.
Why am I so confident?
Just look at the fundamentals.
Unitree's revenue in the first half of 2026 grew by 48%, but net profit excluding non-recurring items actually dropped nearly 20%, the growth rate has clearly slowed down.
More importantly, over 30% of the profit is supported by government subsidies, the real profitability is not that strong.
And don't forget, Unitree's A-share IPO issue price was only 150.8 yuan, now the on-chain token price converted shows an extremely exaggerated premium.
Rushing to pull up before the earnings report, after the report the good news is fully priced in and turns into bad news, this script has played out countless times in the crypto world.
So my plan is very clear: do not chase the rally, wait for it to surge and then pull back.
In the 88 to 90 range, as long as it can't break through, I will enter short positions in batches.
Stop loss is set above 92, target first looks at 80, if it breaks down, it will head towards the previous low of 74.2
$BTC
$ETH
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？