Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC Nonfarm Payrolls Triple Expectations + ETF Continuous Outflows: Consolidation and Bottoming, Not a Reversal, Hesitant to Chase Upside
US October nonfarm payrolls significantly exceeded expectations, adding 165,000 jobs, three times the expected 59,000; unemployment rate fell to 4.1%, hourly wages rose 0.4% month-over-month and 3.1% year-over-year, with the previous two months' data revised upward. After the data release, CME FedWatch showed a 79% probability of a 25bp rate hike in December, with rate cut expectations further delayed, macro headwinds suppressing risk assets.
No support from capital flows: BTC spot ETFs continue to see outflows, with a net outflow of $430 million on November 5 alone. Fidelity FBTC and BlackRock IBIT are the main outflow targets, with nearly $870 million outflowed over the week. Institutions are exiting during the rebound, lacking incremental funds to support the bottom.
Combined with the cross-asset spillover from the sharp drop in AI tech stocks, the crypto market previously saw a liquidation exceeding $1 billion, mainstream coins collectively under pressure. The market theme has shifted from crypto endogenous narratives to dual pressure from US tech stock sell-offs and Fed rate hike expectations.
Market overview:
$BTC current price around 75,910, 24-hour range 74,888–76,427. Nonfarm briefly surged then retreated to consolidation, light trading volume, weak funding rates.
- Support at 75,100 (last night's low), breaking below continues weakness
- Resistance at 76,400 daily high, do not chase upside before holding above
- Defensive stop loss below 74,750
- Short-term target 77,200 Congress changing sides does not mean the law is reset to zero
I'll first review the old law.
BTC spot price is $75,813, 24-hour low at $75,569.1. Bloomberg says the industry is under pressure after Congress changed sides, but the already effective stablecoin law does not automatically become void after the election.
Regulatory expectations can change, but the law is a different matter.
$BTC
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 AI Stock Crash Spillover: Crypto Faces $1 Billion Liquidation, Major Coins Retreat to Defensive Lines
From frenzy to freeze, the AI stock crash dragged risk assets down together, with the crypto market seeing over $1 billion in liquidations and major coins collectively retreating to key support levels.
· BTC: Current price around $75,979. After a nearly 6% plunge from above $80,000, it is weakly consolidating. US spot ETFs saw a single-day net outflow of $430 million. Traders view $77,000 as the critical line for whether the rebound can continue; failure to hold means further grinding.
· ETH: Current price around $2,246. Exchange ETH reserves have dropped to the lowest since 2016 (about 14.5 million coins), but the price is still dragged down by AI stock sell-offs, holding firm at $2,243 support. RSI is approaching oversold territory, and rebound momentum is building.
· SOL: Current price around $90.31. High-beta assets are prioritized for liquidation during risk events, having fallen below $90 with a 24-hour maximum drop near 7%. Shrinking open interest indicates leveraged funds are exiting.
Summary: The core conflict has shifted from crypto’s endogenous narrative to the spillover impact from US tech stocks. AI capital expenditure sustainability is being reassessed, chip stocks’ plunge triggers cross-asset liquidations, and crypto cannot remain unaffected. Until ETF funds return and macro risk appetite stabilizes, rebounds feel more like "breathers after selling pressure eases" rather than trend reversals.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 My first reaction was to check the API definitions: even though both are called probability, the statistical criteria might be completely different.💻
Polymarket gives an implied probability of 52% that Bitcoin will hit $70,000 before 2027; Kalshi's prediction, however, is the settlement price at the end of 2026.
My judgment is that this is more suitable for reading sentiment and cannot be directly used as a price guide: hitting the target midway and the final settlement are two different events. If it were up to me to change the display, I would put the settlement conditions at the top to avoid mistaking the criteria bug for a signal.Since the Binance hack until this week, spot Bitcoin ETFs have cumulatively withdrawn about a billion dollars, with BlackRock's IBIT accounting for the majority. While the price was still hovering around seventy-five thousand, spot had already started pulling out.
Leverage is even more straightforward: during the drop below seventy-six thousand, over a billion was liquidated within 24 hours, with nearly 90% being long positions. Some see this as the "end of the shakeout," but what I see is the other side — the institutional redemption queue hasn't shortened; the contracts just liquidated the long positions with insufficient margin first.
The liquidation numbers dropping to tens of millions only indicate that positions vulnerable to liquidation are temporarily gone; it doesn't mean buying demand has returned. Spot ETFs are still being sold, leverage is still short, so it's too early to talk about a reversal with this combination."Don't rush to bottom-fish, tonight is the key"
$BTC, $ETH — this pullback shouldn't be judged by candlesticks alone; macro pressures haven't eased (｡•́︿•̀o). Tech stocks are dragged down by policy uncertainty, risk appetite is contracting; the probability of a December rate hike remains around 80%, liquidity expectations are tight, making it hard for the crypto market to strengthen independently (ง •_•)ง
Tonight's nonfarm payrolls are a short-term watershed; the data will change market bets on the Fed's path. My approach: don't chase the current price, wait for an extreme spike. If it dips to 74000–72000 and shows support, then consider light long positions; chasing now risks getting trapped if it really hits 72000 (´･_･`)
Focus on tonight first, don't get carried away. How are you guys betting? ฅ( ̳• ◡ • ̳)ฅ
For personal opinion sharing only, not investment advice.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% The same amount of money, one side can't push it up, the other side can smash it down.
Yesterday at 18:00, a single order of 2,211 lots (the largest of the day) pushed 285.94 up to 286.64, a net increase of 0.59; one hour later at 23:00, a single order of 1,551 lots cut from 285.76 down to 284.18, a net drop of 1.00. It takes 3,747 lots to push up by one unit, but only 1,551 lots to smash down by one unit.
At 00:00, 880 lots pierced the 24h low of 283.87, and the two subsequent rebounds both stopped 0.40 below 285.36, unable to reach the 23:00 bearish candle opening price of 285.76. Then seven consecutive 1H candles closed bearish, with highs declining from 285.36 to 284.71.
Current price 284.65 / -0.45% / MA20 resistance at 285.50, head pressure 0.85, real pricing only at 22:30.
$GOOGL
If the rebound at 285.30~285.50 fails and the 1H candle closes bearish with volume (≥900 lots), short at 285.40, stop loss at 286.10, first target 283.87 (2.2x).
Long positions enter if closing above 285.76 and pull back to 285.5, stop loss at 284.90, target 286.64 only 1.9x, not recommended.
(Not investment advice, trade at your own risk)Ethereum is the "hero born in chaotic times," while CORE is the "scapegoat found in desperate situations"? Decentralization cannot rely solely on PPT
Faced with major crises, two different approaches clearly distinguish the superior from the inferior. When Ethereum encountered the DAO crisis, the community confronted the vulnerability head-on and engaged in open debate, forging consensus amid turmoil—truly a hero born in chaotic times; in contrast, after CORE repeatedly suffered underlying reward vulnerabilities and security incidents, it continuously issued decentralization transformation announcements but lacked substantive power transfer, easily falling into a PR trap of scapegoating in desperate situations.
Decentralization has never been a pretty concept on a PPT. Ethereum’s strong resilience comes from a vast number of dispersed nodes and an independent developer community; major protocol changes require multi-party negotiation, with no few individuals making unilateral decisions. CORE’s validator nodes have long been limited to just over twenty, concentrating governance power. After incidents, relying only on personnel changes and verbal promises to relinquish power, while treasury and underlying code permissions remain unclear, makes it difficult to dispel market concerns.
DAO narratives written on paper cannot withstand the test of a crisis. True decentralization is a system-level check and balance, not just PR rhetoric to appease investors when a crisis hits. If only superficial reforms are made without addressing the root cause of power concentration, no amount of PR can restore the already shattered market confidence
$BTC $ETH$AKE Order Book Strength Ranking: Small Orders Nearly Symmetrical, Large Orders First Hit the "Thin Side"
Based on the estimated 5-minute median slippage from the order book, $AKE's order book is not obviously weak at small order stages, but "shows weakness only when the scale expands."
When simulating a scale of 10,000, the buy slippage is 0.25%, the sell slippage is 0.23%, and the costs on both sides are very close, with little friction difference for light position entries and exits. But when the scale is increased to 100,000, the buy slippage rises to 2.44%, the sell slippage to 1.68%, with the buyer's cost clearly heavier, and the buy-sell asymmetry quickly widens.
This indicates that the order book strength cannot be judged only by small order experience: it is nearly balanced at small amounts, but the thin side pressure is exposed at large amounts. Especially for large buy orders, the impact cost rises faster, indicating that the upper support depth is relatively tight; although the sell side is also not low, the pressure is less than on the buy side.
In summary: $AKE's order book is "not visible with small orders, but revealed with large orders," with the thin side only appearing after scale expansion. Data is based on 5-minute median slippage estimated from the order book, for order book observation only.Is the pressure smaller just because SOL outflow is only 25.08 million?
Comparing absolute ETF outflows to assess coin risk easily overlooks that asset scales are not even in the same league. ETF statistics have not been uniform this year; single-day subscription/redemption ratios are more reliable than unverified cumulative headlines.
Speaking of $SOL: On November 7 at 12:00 UTC, about $89.93, 24h -0.47%; aggregate OI daily change -5.2%. More hesitant compared to mainstream, so don’t rush to declare an altcoin season.
Also $BTC: about $75,917, 24h -0.21%; 8h funding rate +0.0013%. Relatively steadier, but the follow-up still depends on spot market support.
My impression from this group of coins is: a small single-day amount does not equal small asset shock absorption; weekly charts and market depth must also be considered.
If the weekly chart is weak but the single-day ETF turns positive, first judge whether the funds are continuous, rather than treating a green bar as a trend.
Do you rank risk by outflow amount, or do you pay more attention to each coin’s absorption strength?
#BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% $CFX's market is heading down again. Actually, if you think carefully, its predicament has long been obvious. The ecosystem foundation is inherently weak; the real on-chain applications, accumulated funds, and active developers are all lagging behind. It lacks the ability to sustain itself and relies entirely on narrative support.
The domestic environment is hard to loosen, naturally lacking a local relaxed soil; overseas, foreign funds and users are also not convinced. Mainstream capital prefers mature ecosystems and stable consensus public chains, rarely willing to bet on it.
On one side, there is no policy dividend support locally; on the other, overseas market recognition is lukewarm. Neither side brings strong incremental capital. Continuous inflation keeps releasing new tokens without enough on-chain fees to form a consumption closed loop.
When the overall market is good, it can only catch a little bit of the fringe market, making it hard to achieve independent growth; once market sentiment weakens, its lack of support is fully exposed, leading to continuous decline.
No external funds are willing to enter, and the internal ecosystem is slow to develop—both ends fail. Relying solely on community expectations, it is difficult to reverse the situation. Truly breaking out is far from easy.#软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？
3. Major Risk Points (Also the Financial Report's Pitfalls)
The money is borrowed, short-term funds for long-term investment: A large amount of capital is bridge loans, with principal repayment pressure upon maturity, representing a high-leverage bet. Once OpenAI's valuation corrects, it will directly impact SoftBank's LTV (debt-to-asset ratio), triggering credit concerns.
No control rights: OpenAI's special structure means SoftBank holds 13% equity but has no board seats, unable to intervene in company direction, cooperation with Microsoft, dividends, or IPO timetable, forced to passively follow valuation fluctuations.
Competitive pressure: Anthropic and Google's Gemini continue to catch up, intensifying competition in the AI track; meanwhile, OpenAI itself is not yet consistently profitable, burning massive capital on computing power, with significant valuation bubble risk.
Book gains ≠ realized gains: Unless IPO or acquisition occurs, unrealized gains are just paper profits and can be withdrawn anytime, similar to the WeWork lesson.
4. How to view this financial report?
✅ Exceeded expectations: OpenAI valuation raised, Vision Fund's unrealized gains surged, LTV metrics remain in safe range, clear IPO outlook given → SoftBank's stock price strengthened, market continues to endorse Masayoshi Son's AI gamble.
Brief summary
Essentially: Masayoshi Son is using high leverage to bet on OpenAI becoming the AGI winner. This financial report is not about how much cash OpenAI earned, but whether the market is willing to continue supporting OpenAI's high valuation to sustain SoftBank's balance sheet $AKE Woke up early, the order I set didn't execute. This trend line was drawn before 12 o'clock yesterday. At that time, I said it would make a big pullback on the 1-hour level, and indeed it dropped from 600 to around 400. Now it still looks bullish, but the trend is very weak, with only one high point touching the upper edge of the trend. Opening a long position now still carries risk. The trend is slow, and not setting a stop loss is problematic. The 500 point must be broken and then stand above the moving average to go long. It might dig a golden pit on the 1-hour level because last time I observed a golden pit on the 5-minute chart that helped me win a big wave. Best to use 2x leverage, a 15-point stop loss, and 10% position size. Even if it loses, it's only 3 points of the total position. The target is above 800.#软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ 1. Core Information Summary
SoftBank's total $64.6 billion investment in OpenAI, once fully realized, will hold about 13% equity, representing Masayoshi Son's major bet on general artificial intelligence (ASI). The funds mainly come from bridge loans, not entirely from its own capital. The financial report for FY2026 Q2 will be disclosed on November 10, with market focus on: Vision Fund's book unrealized gains, OpenAI's latest valuation, debt pressure, and progress on the Stargate computing power project.
Key point: A large portion of SoftBank's profit is from fair value changes of unlisted equity (book unrealized gains), not cash profit.
2. Positive Logic (Reasons for Potentially Strong Financial Results)
Valuation Dividend: OpenAI's valuation continues to rise. As long as the new round of financing valuation is not downgraded, SoftBank's NAV (net asset value) and book investment income will increase, which is the biggest profit source in SoftBank's recent financial reports.
Binding Computing Power Ecosystem: The Stargate project is deeply linked with OpenAI, investing in the company while jointly building computing infrastructure, creating synergy and ample room to tell a compelling market story.
Track Position: OpenAI remains the global benchmark for generative AI, with strong user and revenue growth, and the market is willing to pay a premium for high growth.昨晚那份非农数据，把市场的降息剧本撕开了一道口子。10月新增就业16.5万，市场预期只有6.5万，整整两倍多；失业率不升反降，从4.2%滑到4.1%。数据落地那一刻，12月加息押注直线飙升，$BTC 从75,500一路跌破75,000，最低触及74,762，创下七周新低。这不是普通的回调，这是一次叙事层面的正面冲撞。 过去几周，资金一直在交易一个前提：经济走弱、美联储转向。就业数据把这个前提打穿了。就业这么强，说明经济根本没到需要降息的地步，高利率维持的时间可能比所有人预想的都长。真正值得玩味的不是跌幅本身，而是跌的方式——坏消息落地即出清，说明杠杆和预期早已拥挤在同一个方向。 多数人把这条数据读成单纯的利空，但市场往往在预期最一致时完成换手。当“降息交易”成为共识，一份反向数据带来的不是趋势终结，而是仓位重置。$BTC 在七周低位附近的反应，比数据本身更能说明多空谁更脆弱。若后续利率预期继续向鹰派倾斜，而价格却不再创新低，这种背离就是最值得盯住的确认信号。 另一个被忽略的细节是失业率与新增就业同时走强，这组合意味着劳动力市场仍有韧性，薪资压力难以快速消退，利率端的上行风险被系统性低估#BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 我们依旧是是直入主题啊《为什么区区 4.16 亿美元能撼动全行业？》 在表面数据上，很多人容易陷入到对BTC存量思维的误区，4.16亿在其他行业是天文数字，但是对于BTC而言是鹅毛： 目前美国 11 只比特币现货 ETF 的总资产管理规模（AUM）约为 550 亿至 600 亿美元，累计历史净流入峰值一度逼近 190 亿美元； 全球比特币现货日均成交量在 200 亿至 350 亿美元之间； 4.16 亿美元的累计净赎回，占总 AUM 的比例仅为 ~0.7%，甚至不足全球单日现货成交量的 2%。 为什么 0.7% 的资金流出，却引发了整个加密生态流动性的剧烈动荡？那这个鹅毛是怎么产生这么大的影响的呢？ 表面上看，相对于比特币动辄上万亿美元的宏大总市值、以及单日全网数百亿甚至上千亿美元的衍生品交易额，美国比特币现货ETF年内累计净流出的 4.16 亿美元（累计流入约 256.3 亿美元、流出约 260.5 亿美元） 似乎只是“沧海一粟” 然而，这笔看似不大的净流出之所以能够对全行业产生显著的“撬动”甚至震荡效应，主要是由加密市场的微观结构、This BTC contract long-short account ratio daily chart sends a very straightforward signal. Currently, long accounts make up 74.1%, shorts only 25.9%, with a long-short ratio of 2.86, representing a typical crowded long structure.
Reviewing the recent trend, whenever the long-short ratio spikes rapidly, it often leads to a concentrated shakeout. A large number of retail investors crowding into longs means the market is loaded with massive long stop-loss orders. Once the price turns downward, it easily triggers a chain liquidation, resulting in a long-squeeze scenario.
This indicator reflects retail sentiment, not a direct directional signal. The current chip structure is delicate; even if funds push the price up in the short term, the sustainability of the rise will be greatly reduced, with a significant probability of a pullback after a spike.
Do not simply follow the majority's direction. Where the crowd gathers is often the main battlefield for the smart money to harvest. Next week, focus on the support around 75000; once broken, this cluster of long positions will become the largest selling pressure.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 $BTC $ETH $ZEC Capital flight confirmed, don’t try to catch a falling knife 💸
After analyzing the entire network’s capital flow this morning, the conclusion is clear: this is not just rotation, it’s capital exiting the market 📉
✅ Futures | Mainstream leverage collectively fleeing
BTC futures net outflow 569 million
ETH futures net outflow 114 million
SOL futures net outflow 25.38 million
Combined, over 700 million in leveraged funds are simply retreating
✅ Spot | Support strength nearly zero
BTC spot inflow only 2.7 million
ETH spot inflow 2.27 million
SOL spot continues net outflow of 10.72 million
No incremental funds to support the bottom, bottom-fishing severely absent 👀
✅ Volume | Trading volume sharply shrinks
Total network daily volume down 56.7%, only 141.6 billion left
With shrinking volume, it’s hard for the market to make a strong reversal; bull traps are more likely to fail
✅ Outlier | ZEC accumulating alone
Futures net inflow 12.38 million, spot net inflow 19.18 million
While others are fleeing, it’s the only one attracting funds on both sides, worth continuous attention
✅ Options | Bulls only dare to play lightly
BTC call option volume accounts for 61.68%, higher than open interest proportion
Bullish sentiment remains, but funds dare not enter the market directly, only hiding in options
Big money is leaving, spot can’t catch it, volume can’t keep up. My choice is clear: don’t catch this falling knife 😤
Whether this batch of fleeing funds will return, the answer will come next Tuesday night.
#BTC #ETH #SOL #CapitalFlowReview$ACT, full name Act I, the king of AI memes in 2024: an AI agent experiment funded by the founder of a16z that launched it on Binance, capped at 0.93. Then the founder sold the coins, the community took over, and it declined steadily for two years, dropping 98.7% from its high. Recently, daily trading volume fell to just hundreds of thousands, forgotten by the market.
This week it climbed back on its own: first, some patient buyers picked up the floor, volume expanded more than tenfold; on November 6 it rose above 0.01, yesterday’s trading exploded, stepping up to 0.0119, then a 17% dip in two hours at night was bought back; early this morning it hit a new high of 0.0125, current price 0.01235.
It doesn’t rely on a short squeeze: fees are basically neutral, bulls didn’t pay to scramble for chips, positions gently doubled — spot and rotating funds are re-evaluating an old fully circulating, no-unlock chip.
The main bet is on trend continuation, targeting 0.0145 to 0.0160. But overhead is all trapped positions from two years ago; if volume dries up, it will retest 0.01 in a shakeout.
Watch three validation points: whether the 0.0119 retest holds, whether daily volume stays above ten million, and whether fees turn significantly positive — the moment fees turn positive and scramble for chips, that’s the signal for full relay buying.The size difference is 334 times, turnover rates are about the same.
BTC ETF｜Trading volume 2.69 billion Market cap 98.15 billion Turnover 2.74%
ETH ETF｜Trading volume 710 million Market cap 29.4 billion Turnover 2.41%
HYPE ETF｜Trading volume 8.0472 million Market cap 370 million Turnover 2.17%
BTC market cap is 3.34 times that of ETH, trading volume is 3.79 times.
BTC trading volume is 334 times that of HYPE, market cap 265 times.
370 million is just a fraction.
But turnover rates are all just over 2%, the structure is the same.
What differs is not the hype, but the size.
Institutions only recognize one; the other two are alternatives.
BTC spot ETF has had a cumulative net outflow of about 416 million this year.
Trading volume shows who is active, net outflow shows who is exiting.#ASTS advancing direct-to-mobile satellite service, commercialization progress pending disclosure 【Earnings Miss is a decoy, ASTS's “hard assets” are the trump card】
Q3 revenue $14.7 million, a year-over-year surge of 1236%, but far below the consensus expectation of $22 million; EPS -$0.45, also below expectations. Looking at the numbers alone, this earnings report is “failing.” But those shorting ASTS may have targeted the wrong bullseye.
💡 Sharp insight:
ASTS’s current valuation core has never been quarterly revenue, but the three hard cards of spectrum licenses + carrier partnerships + cash reserves. The FCC has granted ASTS permanent licenses to use AT&T and Verizon’s 700-900MHz low-frequency spectrum, covering the deployment of D2D services with 248 satellites across the U.S. Meanwhile, the company’s cash and liquidity have reached $3.2 billion, enough to support years of launches and operational expenses. The revenue miss is just a timing issue before commercialization; the barriers of spectrum and partners are things competitors cannot buy or replicate even with money.
📈 Investment strategy: If the revenue miss triggers an emotional sell-off, it is a window to observe the absorption capacity. The core tracking indicators are not next quarter’s EPS, but the BlueBird launch pace and the fulfillment of the H2 revenue guidance of $50-75 million. The launch of the first five orbital satellites before Q1 2026 and the year-end target of 45-60 satellites in orbit are the real catalysts.The real focus of SanDisk's stock split isn't the stock price, but the few minutes when the contract parameters were quietly rewritten. Is your stop-loss order still active? My strongest impression from watching the market these past two days is: this is neither a phase of chasing gains nor simple oscillation, but more like a mix of game theory and position washing. Everyone is focused on NAND valuation and Rosenblatt's $2400 target price, so emotions can easily be swayed, but what is truly easy to overlook is how perpetual contracts are handled when the stock split takes effect. According to current rules, the stock split won't trigger automatic liquidation or settlement; instead, the position quantity, mark price, and index parameters are adjusted proportionally to align the contract with the post-split stock price. Sounds neutral, right? But there's a painful detail in the process: trading of related contracts is suspended during the adjustment, and some take-profit, stop-loss, conditional, and strategy orders will be canceled or suspended, requiring you to reset them after trading resumes. In other words, your position value remains unchanged, but your safety net might temporarily disappear. This logic translates quite directly to crypto. First, the NAND narrative itself attracts risk-tolerant capital to look at storage and altcoin-related concepts, creating a bullish sentiment; second, the operational risk of contract parameter adjustments causes people to reassess leverage costs, especially those accustomed to placing conditional orders, who may reduce positions or simply wait during this period. Mainstream assets like BTC and ETH may not be directly impacted, but the short-term rhythm of altcoins tends to become more fragmented, reducing the cost-effectiveness of chasing trades. The bullish path is: after the stock split is implemented, the valuation anchor becomes clear again, NAND-related... An institutional-level perpetual contract full-position short order with a total value of 500 million USD also precisely confirms the core characteristic that crypto market whales generally anchor on the three major mainstream coins: $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL. This is a very typical large-capital, steady bearish trading paradigm.
The entire position's capital allocation is extremely concentrated on the top mainstream coins, with leverage controlled at a very low 5x full position range, and the safety buffer far exceeding that of ordinary contract positions:
BTC short: holding 2049.94 BTC, opening price 77965.9 USDT, current unrealized profit 4.6553 million USDT, position value 160 million USD, the core pillar of the entire position, liquidation price as high as 129196.61 USDT, with more than 65% upside from the current opening price.
ETH short: holding 33,600 ETH, opening price 2375.03 USDT, current unrealized profit 4.9055 million USDT, position value 74.983 million USDT, liquidation price 5473.08 USDT, safety buffer also very ample.
SOL short: holding 222,400 Solana, opening price 91.4221 USDT, current unrealized profit 525,300 USDT, position value 19.8067 million USDT, liquidation price 575.84 USDT.
It is worth noting that the funding fees for all three positions are positive, cumulatively receiving over 7.33 million USDT in long subsidies, indicating that the current market long positions account for a very high proportion. The shorts not only profit from price declines but also continuously earn funding fees passively.
Top whales in the crypto market almost all treat BTC, ETH, and SOL as the core targets for contract trading, fundamentally due to three considerations: liquidity, consensus, and risk control:
First, these three coins have the best liquidity in the entire market. Even orders worth hundreds of millions of USD can be closed in a very short time without the liquidity traps common in small coins, such as slippage and inability to exit positions;
Second, the global consensus on these three is the highest, with full participation from institutional and retail funds, so market trends are not completely controlled by a few manipulators, making it easier to implement large capital trading strategies;
Finally, their volatility characteristics are very clear, with sufficient historical market data. Whales can accurately calculate liquidation safety buffers and hedge risk exposures, minimizing uncontrollable risks under extreme market conditions.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 99.99%, not a single one left.
Trump's media sold 4,259 BTC, totaling $343.67 million, at an average price of 80,693.
At the 2025 peak, this batch was worth 1.4 billion, now $343.67 million, a shrinkage of 75.45%, missing out on 1.056 billion in gains.
99.99% is not a reduction, it's a retreat. Sold off all at once, not equivalent.
The remaining 0.01% is kept as a memento.
The timing was just right: the Democratic Party is about to investigate the crypto industry, looking into the financial connections between the Trump family and the crypto circle.
He ran first.
The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index recorded its largest single-day drop since March 2020.
BTC ETFs have seen a net outflow of $1.1 billion in the past 7 days.
This price is far from the peak, indicating a rush to exit.
Political figures clearing out positions are more straightforward than any analyst.
They don't say it out loud, but the accounts speak first.
The most noteworthy point is the timing: the Democratic Party is about to investigate the crypto industry and also the financial connections between the Trump family and the crypto circle, and he first disposed of 99.99% of his position. This action is more straightforward than any statement.
Combined with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index hitting its largest single-day drop since March 2020 and ETFs seeing a net outflow of $1.1 billion in the past 7 days, this round of sell-off is not just about the crypto market itself.Open source code ≠ decentralization: How CORE uses an "emergency hard fork" to teach users to rethink blockchain
Many investors have a major misconception: as long as a project's code is publicly available, it is equivalent to achieving decentralization. CORE's emergency hard fork incident directly shatters this illusion.
Open source code only means the ledger is accessible for review; it does not imply distributed network power. Although CORE's code is public, its validating nodes have long been limited to around 21, concentrating power in the hands of a small group. After a fundamental reward vulnerability appeared, nodes could quickly coordinate to push a hard fork to modify the on-chain state and recover some overflow tokens.
In contrast, a truly decentralized network requires massive consensus among nodes, miners, exchanges, and the community to drive a major hard fork, making ledger modification extremely difficult. If a few entities can dominate protocol changes, then "code is law" is just an empty phrase.
Open source is only a basic condition; node distribution and governance checks and balances are the core of decentralization. Simply releasing the code while retaining the ability to control the network is essentially a centralized architecture disguised as a public chain. CORE's recent crisis teaches the market a lesson: do not be fooled by open source narratives; public chains where a few can arbitrarily interfere with on-chain data have inherently fragile trust foundations About three weeks until 11/28. Many people are focused on the date, but it's actually more worthwhile to first understand one thing: why the RGB $USDT system can't just rely on scanning the chain to check balances.
Previously, assets like brc-20 and Runes mostly had their states reconstructed from on-chain indexes. RGB is different—it uses client-side verification: wallets need to maintain asset states and verification data locally. When switching devices or restoring wallets, just having the mnemonic phrase is often not enough; the verification data must also be preserved.
Lorenzon explained it clearly; recently unisat has been tackling these areas on the wallet side:
▪️ How to incrementally sync states without full reloads every time
▪️ How to handle backup and recovery when changing devices
▪️ How to keep local data verifiable and auditable
▪️ Making transfers user-friendly without forcing users to fully understand the protocol first
▪️ Then connecting to Utexo's interface to help users identify officially issued $USDT
So the public rollout order has always been: first wallet and UniScan for send/receive management, then connecting to unihexa's USD market. The entry layer must be stable first before the market can be integrated. Receiving is already available on Signet, but testnet visibility ≠ mainnet; $USDT mainnet is still targeting 11/28. The date is approaching, so first understand why wallets need local verification.
#FB #UniSat $FB The U.S. financial market
has shown a set of noteworthy capital data.
For the week ending November 4, U.S. money market funds saw a net inflow of about $117.97 billion, marking the largest single-week inflow in six months.
This inflow occurred precisely during the U.S. midterm elections and a large-scale adjustment in AI tech stocks.
Money market funds mainly invest in short-term, highly liquid debt instruments and are typically used by investors to manage cash. But one detail is worth noting: during the same period, U.S. equity funds also had a net inflow of $14.81 billion.
This indicates that the market did not experience a simultaneous flight of all funds from stocks. Some capital continued to allocate to equity assets, while another portion clearly increased the proportion of cash and short-term assets.
If U.S. stocks continue to decline next week and money market funds keep seeing large net inflows, the defensive tendency of capital may further strengthen. #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% $SNDK $INTC This week's calendar doesn't pick a side. It re-prices thin books.
BTC is $6 off its 7-day low: CPI Tuesday, PPI Friday, options-cut Friday.
$LIT does $10.4M/day, 29% of $XRP 's $36.4M, yet ran 18.8% to net +2% on 0.00% funding. $HYPE did 1.5 times its dollars, fell 3x.
Depth isn't the risk, funding is. Waiting on LIT. Wrong if funding turns positive.
Before CPI or after?
$LIT $XRP $HYPE #Litentry #OKXOrbit #Crypto
Crypto is high-risk. Personal observation only, not investment advice. DYOR.#RocketLab Expected Financial Report: How is the Neutron Rocket Progressing? Earnings season this time - RocketLab is entering a critical phase! Everyone is waiting for the Neutron rocket - will it be ready on time? Or will it be delayed? What is happening with me? • The company has many contracts - but Neutron has not yet made its first commercial launch • If Neutron is delayed - the stock will drop • If it succeeds - it will rise strongly My deal: Buying No - 67.52 shares - at 49.96 XP Why No? Because I think the company will not beat earnings expectations this quarter - Neutron still needs time! Are you with me? RocketHyperLabs Moves $14.5M HYPE to Team Wallets
On-chain tracking shows Hyperliquid developer entity HyperLabs has distributed 179,706 $HYPE (about $14.49 million) to six team-member wallets, about 11 hours after the tokens came out of staking.
The same address previously filed to unstake that amount, with tokens expected after a 7-day unlock window around Nov 4.After reviewing $ETH this week, my biggest impression is: there's too much noise, and actually only three signals.
First, macro. The Federal Reserve has moved from "whether to raise" to "how to raise," with the 165,000 nonfarm payrolls pegging the December rate hike at an 80% probability. As long as this pricing isn't lifted, ETH can't rally alone. Watch the 10-year yield and the dollar index; they're more accurate than watching the candlesticks.
Second, capital. The ETH ETF this week showed an "ECG" of "+53 million one day, -100 million the next," with BlackRock's ETHA being the bleeding point, while Fidelity and Morgan Stanley are buying. Don't be fooled by the cumulative 12 billion figure; look at the daily net flow sign. The day it turns positive is when institutions nod again.
Third, on-chain. 45.2 million staked, 1.37 million queued to enter, 13,000 queued to exit, BitMine holding 6.06 million dead coins but still staking 86%. These are slow money, the cement at the bottom, not rocket fuel.
As for the midterm elections, Warren, WLFI buybacks, Binance's 6.3 billion, Russia opening the floodgates—these are just emotional waves that wet you but won't drown the market. The one thing I learned this week: during a rate hike cycle, living through it is more important than guessing right. Keep your position light, withdraw coins, don't go long, and wait for CPI and the December FOMC meeting to choose the direction for us.
See you Monday. I'll buy under 2200 if it drops, and I won't chase if it rises. $ETH Tomorrow is the CPI release, and I've already made two preparations in advance for my position.
A reminder: On the evening of Tuesday, November 10, the US October CPI will be released. This is the most easily underestimated data point in this round.
Setting the background: September core PCE month-on-month was 0.3%, already stuck at expectations, previous value was 0.2%; oil prices are still fluctuating around $98, the Middle East remains unsettled; although the one-year inflation expectation of consumers dropped from 4.7% to 4.3%, it is still much higher than the 3.4% two months before the Iran conflict. In other words, the foundation of inflation hasn't cooled down.
The market is currently pricing in: an 80% chance of a rate hike in December, with the first hike of 25 basis points, and possibly a second one; TD Securities even bets on a cumulative 50 basis points hike early next year. If CPI exceeds expectations, this probability will rise to 90% or even higher, pushing the 10-year yield further up, and the ETH weekly chart will have to test the lower edge of 2200. If CPI unexpectedly comes in low, it will be a rare breathing window, and the trapped positions around 2300-2400 will be shaken out.
What am I doing? No leverage, placing small buy orders below 2200, sell orders above 2400, and no action in between. I don't touch options; for this kind of event-driven volatility, market makers inflate implied volatility ridiculously, buying in is just giving away money.
One more detail: According to the range given by 21Shares, BTC's lifeline is between 76,000 and 78,000, and ETF inflows only look above 80,000. ETH follows it, so don't be smart and bet on an independent rally.The Paradox of $ETH ETH: The More Locked, The Cheaper It Gets
There is a piece of data I have looked at three times repeatedly, and the more I look, the more I feel ETH is currently in a particularly twisted position.
On-chain: The total staked amount is 45.2 million tokens, accounting for more than 30% of the circulating supply. There are 1.37 million tokens queued to enter, waiting 24 days, and 13,000 tokens wanting to exit, which clear in one day. The network-wide staking yield has diluted from Lido's early 4.5% down to 2.2%, yet the queue to enter remains blocked. This is a "voting with your feet" long-term belief.
Market: The US ETH spot ETF had a net outflow of over $1.2 billion in October alone, and since January this year, only two months have seen net inflows. The historical cumulative net inflow of one product, ETHA, dropped from 11.7 billion to 11.6 billion, then fluctuated to 11.614 billion, with daily inflows and outflows in the hundreds of millions. The ETH/BTC exchange rate slid to 0.029, close to a three-month low.
On one side, coins are locked up, neither generating yield nor being sold; on the other, traditional channels are taking money out. This is not a contradiction; these are two groups telling different stories with different money: the on-chain group bets on "Ethereum as the world’s settlement layer," while the ETF group bets on "this thing following tech stocks." The former’s money is slow, heavy, and stubborn; the latter’s money is fast, light, and afraid of interest rate hikes.
My current judgment is that as long as the staking queue remains long and the exit queue short, the long-term bottom won’t look too bad. But when the price will rise depends on the ETF money turning net inflow again—only when these two indicators align in direction will the real market rally begin. When to buy during a bitcoin bull market: when unsophisticated tourists who local top blasted are capitulating and realizing losses, out of fear. $BTC$ETH ⑦ Russia opens the floodgates for retail investors, but this news has been completely ignored by the market
Over the weekend, I came across a news piece that didn’t really trend, but I think it’s worth much more than the WLFI buyback.
According to TASS, the Russian central bank has set a crypto whitelist open to "non-qualified investors": Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT—just these three. The related directive takes effect on November 17, allowing exchanges to publicly circulate these three assets. Note, this means "retail investors can buy directly," not institutional pilots or mining legalization.
How to estimate the scale? Russia’s foreign exchange retail market turns over hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Even if only a single-digit percentage is diverted in, for ETH—whose daily trading volume is already quite thin—this represents solid buying pressure. More importantly, USDT and ETH are released together—this means an official channel for on-chain ruble deposits and withdrawals has been opened.
Of course, don’t get too excited; this is a slow-moving variable, not a catalyst for a Monday pump. Sanctions, exchange rate controls, and how many accounts can actually be opened remain unknowns. But in a bear market, I specifically look for these "policy from zero to one" signals: they don’t change tomorrow’s price, but they determine whether someone is quietly accumulating at the bottom. At the 2243 level, someone is watching—not just us. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 $ETH The small amount of ETH I hold, I've been debating whether to sell it for a whole week
Let me be honest, not pretending to be an analyst.
I added to my position around 2300, currently floating at about a 3% loss, not terrible, but it feels uncomfortable. On Thursday, ETH dropped from around 2400 to 2236, my phone popped up seven or eight liquidation alerts, my hand was hovering over the sell button, but I didn't press it. Not because I was that determined, but because I glanced at the on-chain data: total network staking has piled up to 45.2 million tokens, with 1.37 million tokens queued for staking, needing over 24 days to activate, while the exit queue only has 13,000 tokens, which would clear in just over a day.
This is where I'm most conflicted. ETFs are bleeding, BlackRock is facing redemptions, yet on-chain people are locking ETH in. The annual yield has been diluted to 2.2%-2.6%, but some are still willing to give up liquidity for that interest. BitMine is even more extreme, holding 6.06 million ETH, accounting for 4.9% of the network, with 5.227 million staked, earning $358 million annually, and its stock price is discounted to 0.88 times net asset value. They'd rather spend $45.9 million to buy back shares than buy more coins — because buybacks are more cost-effective than buying coins.
See, even smart money hasn't figured it out. So my current approach is: don't sell below 2200, sell one-third above 2400, and play dead in between. Leverage? I will never go long during an interest rate hike cycle in this lifetime.$ETH The midterm election stone hasn't finished falling yet
Many people thought the "blue wave" drop ended on election day, but I actually think the toughest phase is just beginning.
The Democrats took both houses, and Trump became a lame duck. The market's first reaction was relief—BTC fell below 76,000 on election night, then quickly bounced back above 78,000. Bitcoin options traded $660 million in notional principal that day, with $420 million in calls alone. But the next day, tech stocks crashed and wiped all gains. Why? Because everyone suddenly realized one thing: Elizabeth Warren is very likely to become chair of the Senate Banking Committee.
Anyone involved in crypto knows who Warren is. She has already sent subpoenas targeting the Trump family's crypto business. WLFI dropped another 8% after election night, down more than 70% from its yearly high. The project team hurriedly announced a buyback, but didn't even dare to disclose the scale—would you call such a buyback bullish?
Looking at legislation: The CLARITY Act failed a Senate procedural vote 49-50 in September this year. Now that Democrats control both chambers, Duke, the regulatory expert, said "this bill is dead," and even insiders predict it won't be revived until 2028. The stablecoin line might still pass with bipartisan support thanks to the Genius Act, but the "crypto-friendly" policy dividend is definitely over. $ETH ETF drama: $53 million inflow one day, $100 million outflow the next
I have to say, watching the flow of ETH spot ETFs is more stressful than watching the candlestick charts.
SoSoValue data shows: On November 4th Eastern Time, nine ETH ETFs combined net inflow was $53.02 million, ending five consecutive days of net outflows. ETHA alone took in $32.75 million, looking like institutions were turning back. But what happened? On November 5th, it flipped completely, with a net outflow of $99.9677 million for the day. ETHA itself saw $75.2 million outflow, and even BlackRock's staked ETHB lost $21.98 million. Total net asset value dropped from $13.3 billion to $13.039 billion, and the historical cumulative net inflow was pulled back to $12.016 billion.
In short: this is not a retreat, but a "retreat while watching." BlackRock's ETHA was redeemed by about $1.4 billion throughout October, accounting for over 70% of the market's daily withdrawal volume. Interestingly, the money didn't go far—Fidelity's FETH is quietly taking over, and Morgan Stanley's MSSE is also seeing small net inflows. Big institutions are changing seats, not leaving the market.
My own understanding is that the ETF channel has now become a thermometer of sentiment. As long as ETHA can turn positive over $30 million in a single day, no need to hype the price, it will move on its own. Conversely, if there are two consecutive days of net outflows over $50 million, don't bottom-fish, your hands will get dirty. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 $ETH 2236 — is this a step forward or just a breather?
It's the weekend, and ETH is hovering around 2243, basically holding the tail of Thursday's big bearish candle in its mouth without spitting it out. Don't be fooled by the calm market now; it's quiet because the US stock market is resting, not because the drop is over.
Looking at the candlesticks: on November 5th, OKX hit a low of 2236, dropping 7.23% in 24 hours, even harsher than BTC's 5.32%. That day, the Nasdaq fell 5.52%, marking the largest single-day market cap evaporation ever — about $2.5 trillion gone. Crypto was dumped along with other risk assets into the trash. According to CoinGlass, 238,600 people liquidated $1.254 billion in a single day, with $1.11 billion from long positions — meaning most were leveraged traders betting on a "post-election bad news fully priced in rebound" who got crushed.
Right now, I'm watching the 2200 line. It's not superstition; it just happens to be near the August rally starting zone and just below the price on November 4th when the ETF suddenly turned positive. If it breaks below 2200, there's no support underneath, so we have to consider 2100 or even lower; standing back above 2300 would mean half of that day's panic has been swallowed back.
Liquidity is thin over the weekend, so don't be fooled by fake spikes. The real confirmation will come when the US stock market opens on Monday and the CPI data on Tuesday night. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% $MSTR : A CRITICAL WEEK AHEAD 🚨
On November 11, MSCI will decide to remove MSTR from its indexes
Potential selling pressure:
• $2.8B in direct sales
• Up to $11.8B including index-tracking funds
mNAV 1 is currently around $114
I’m planning to close my short near that level and flip long 👀
$BTC $ASST$OPENAI is valued at $1.25 trillion.
OpenAI has just completed the first round of its latest financing, raising about $11 billion, with a valuation as high as $1.25 trillion.
Please note the following points:
The total amount of this round of financing may reach $20 billion.
The initial goal was to raise over $30 billion, with a valuation of $1.4 trillion.
Investors participating include Coatue Management and T. Rowe Price, as well as many other large funds.
In March 2026, OpenAI raised $122 billion, with a valuation of $852 billion.
Although the valuation continues to grow strongly, the need to adjust financing targets indicates that investors are becoming increasingly cautious about the AI industry.
This information is for reference only, intended to provide data and personal opinions, and is not investment advice. Simulating 10,000 times, 83.5% of people can't survive 1,000 rounds, and half even go bankrupt by the 166th round; but the remaining 16.5% survivors have their median assets multiplied by 3.5 times—this is exactly why the Martingale strategy causes people to repeatedly fall into ruin. 1. The Casino "Cheat" In 18th century French casinos, a gameplay method has been passed down to this day: bet on red or black, and if you lose, double the bet next time. The first bet is 100, lost; the second bet is 200, won. You lost 100 in total, won 200, netting 100—exactly the amount you wanted to win the first time. Lose again? Bet 400. Lose again? 800, 1,600, 3,200. As long as you have enough principal and the table has no betting limit, this method is mathematically guaranteed to profit. Because you can't lose forever, and as long as you win once, all losses will be covered by that last bet, plus an extra bet's worth of profit. This is called Martingale. It's neither mysterious nor clever; it relies on two assumptions: You have infinite capital. The table has no betting limit. Casinos know this very well, so they set betting limits. And you don't have infinite capital. 2. The mathematically guaranteed winning method Many people argue against Martingale by saying "bad luck," but that's not the real reason. Assuming a single win probability of 50%, the probability of losing n times in a row is 0.5^n. The probability of losing 8 times in a row is 0.39%—which seems very low, right? But if you play 1,000 Can $BTC reach 70,000 by the end of the year? I'm betting on probability, not faith.
There's an interesting bet on Polymarket right now: the implied probability of Bitcoin dropping to 70,000 USD before 2027 is 52%, hitting 90,000 is 24%, and breaking 100,000 is only 9%.
It's about fifty-fifty. This isn't about someone being bearish; it's smart money pricing the path with real money. I pondered the meaning behind these numbers: the market thinks "a further 20% drop" and "holding the rebound" are almost even odds, but "a violent reversal to a new high" is already a low-probability event.
Adding a few realities: the Federal Reserve is very likely to raise rates again in December, October CPI hasn't been released yet (to be announced on November 10), and whether the new Democratic Congress will amend the CLARITY Act to give the SEC more power is still uncertain. Although Binance has stabilized, the 5% of stolen tokens with low liquidity haven't been replenished yet.
So my year-end position strategy is: no leverage, no chasing rebounds, keep 30% cash waiting for the 70,000–73,000 range. Faith is expensive; probability is cheap. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% Don't be fooled by “DAO”! CORE active nodes have dropped below 20, and the so-called decentralization is just “31 addresses taking turns controlling”
Many people are misled by the CORE DAO narrative, mistakenly believing it to be a fully decentralized public chain, but the actual validator mechanism reveals huge shortcomings. The project was initially designed to select only the top 21 validator nodes to produce blocks, with later proposals planning to expand to 31, but essentially it remains a small group of addresses taking turns producing blocks, not a truly open, massively distributed decentralized network.
After the underlying reward vulnerability was exposed, the actual number of active validator nodes on the network further declined, even dropping below 20. Block production rights rotate among a limited set of validator addresses, which looks like taking turns controlling, with governance power highly concentrated in the hands of a small group of entities.
Ethereum has tens of thousands of independent nodes distributed globally, so even in a crisis, multiple forces in the ecosystem can provide checks and balances; whereas CORE’s small validator set means that once a protocol vulnerability appears, the project team can easily coordinate a few nodes to push a hard fork to modify the on-chain state. The so-called DAO community governance mostly remains at the promotional level.
When the validator list is highly concentrated, decentralization becomes just marketing rhetoric. Limited nodes taking turns in power means the network’s fault tolerance is inherently weak, which is the core reason why this vulnerability incident’s impact far exceeded market expectations.Bitcoin is heading for a 5th red week in a row.
That happened only 3 times before, and each one was a 30-40% crash. This one is a slow bleed, no panic.
A Sunday close above the weekly open breaks the streak.
#BTCThe volume ratios of the three coins have all shrunk to between 0.66 and 0.85, with liquidation nearly zero, all grinding in the lower to middle range of the 24h interval. The short position walls above are all within 2.5%, and the long position walls below are around 1.5%. However, recent liquidations have been almost nonexistent, and bloodied chips are not being sold off; some positions are reducing while others are slightly increasing. The situations of the three coins differ: ETH is stuck with equally thick resistance and support; SOL has a short position wall above nearly two and a half times thicker than below, with large holders dominating the shorts; HYPE has dropped to the 24h low, with the most position withdrawals and small-scale rebounds. $ETH｜Resistance 2,255.35｜Support 2,210.64 The short position is around 2,255.35, +0.95% from the current price, with liquidations about 9.72 million. The support is at 2,210.64, -1.05% from the current price, with liquidations also about 9.72 million, equally thick above and below. In terms of momentum, the current price is 2,233.75, 12-hour volatility is 0.88%, Bollinger Band width is 10.66%, hovering 2.23% below the middle band. Positions have reduced by 1.40% in 24 hours and are still decreasing. Volume ratio is 0.85, contracting. Liquidations are nearly one order, almost no volume. At 06:00 in the 1-hour chart, three soldiers are rising, previously at 04:00 three crows, and at 02:00 a long upper shadow, indicating resistance above. In summary, ETH is stuck in a gap less than 2% between 2,255.35 and 2,210.64, equally thick above and below. Positions are reducing, liquidations have disappeared, unable to break through. In the short term, it will hover within this gap; the short position at 2,255.35 is a nearby wall, and the support at 2,210.64 is a buffer for longs—if broken, it will sweep longs. $SOL｜Resistance 90.645｜Support 8 $BTC Nonfarm payrolls exploded, why did my coins follow and crash?
When the data came out on Friday night, I stared at the screen and laughed for three seconds, then realized I laughed too soon.
US October nonfarm payrolls increased by 165,000, while the market expected only 65,000, nearly an order of magnitude difference, hitting a new high since March this year. The unemployment rate dropped from 4.2% back to 4.1%, and average hourly earnings rose 3.1% year-over-year, while the expectation was below 3%. Even more striking, August and September combined were revised up by 84,000.
According to the old logic, a strong economy = rising risk assets. But this time it’s the opposite. Why? Because this report pushed the Fed's December rate hike pricing directly to nearly 80%. St. Louis Fed's Mouselim explicitly warned to be cautious about AI infrastructure driving short-term inflation, and Daly was even more direct: the possibility of further tightening is high.
The stronger the economy, the more certain the rate hikes, the tighter the liquidity, the harder it is for Bitcoin. This is the most counterintuitive insight I’ve had this year. So next time nonfarm payrolls exceed expectations, don’t rush to buy the dip immediately; first check what interest rate futures say. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% $BTC The Fed's play is that "no rate hike" is even harsher than "a rate hike"
Many people only look at the final number from the Fed: on October 28, the federal funds rate stayed at 3.75%–4.00%, with 10 votes in favor and 2 against. Looks like a pause, right? Wrong, this is a "hawkish pause."
The real drama lies in the two dissenting votes. Lisa Cook and Cleveland's Hamarak both wanted to raise rates by 25 basis points on the spot. Cook is a moderate, and this is her first dissent in over four years. The statement also added a half-sentence: "Accumulating more information will help the Committee determine the appropriate policy stance"—which translates to, we haven't shifted direction, just want to wait and see.
Then Washington did something even more ruthless: starting in 2027, in every 8 FOMC meetings, 1 will have no rate vote and no statement; in 2028, this increases to 2. Fewer voting windows mean if you want a rate cut, you'll have to wait even longer. Credit cards, mortgages, car loans—all follow the benchmark rate.
The most direct impact on the crypto world: the US Dollar Index surged 0.71% that day to 102.31, and the 10-year Treasury yield hit 4.85%. With rates not coming down and the dollar staying strong, assets like Bitcoin, which thrive on liquidity, shouldn't expect a bull run. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #RocketLab Earnings Preview: How is the Neutron Rocket Progressing? "Decentralized" or "Centralized" Disguise? Behind the resignation of the CORE founder, the treasury and code rights are still held in hand!
CORE officially announced that two early core contributors have stepped down from their DAO positions, presenting it externally as a symbolic step towards decentralization. However, market doubts have never ceased: resigning from DAO roles does not equal handing over true control of the project.
This personnel change happened just after the underlying reward loophole and emergency hard fork incident. The official statement only publicized the transfer of block production rights to independent validators, but there is no clear timetable, nor a complete public plan for transferring treasury assets and underlying code upgrade permissions. With only 21 validator nodes already highly concentrated, even if block production is transferred, core development rights and multisig treasury keys are still very likely held by the initial team.
The so-called decentralization seems more like a PR narrative after a crisis. If underlying code modifications and treasury usage are still decided by a small circle, then this resignation is merely a "disguise switch" of identity. If protocol vulnerabilities appear again, the project side can still unilaterally push hard forks to modify on-chain states.
Investors must recognize: true decentralization is not about executives announcing resignations, but about core rights being fully and verifiably handed over to the community. Superficial delegation with real power retained is a key reason for the market's continued lack of confidence.