Orbit Post Sitemap
#Korean stocks recover and rebound, can foreign capital selling pressure ease?# If the Korean stock rebound stabilizes foreign capital sentiment, ETH may have a short-term breather. But I judge the overall trend to still be bearish; treat the rebound as a correction and do not chase longs.
Current price 2427.02, down 0.6% in 24 hours, the high of 2492.97 failed to hold, the low of 2422.11 is close at hand. Both 1-hour and 4-hour trends are declining, down -4.46% and -11.57% from the highs respectively, bears dominate. Funding rate is only 0.0024%, open interest 582,000, sentiment cautious. Order book top 10 levels show 7030 buy orders and 156 sell orders, buy/sell ratio 44.99, strong buy-side support, short-term rebound demand exists.
Strategy: light short positions at rebound to 2458.6, stop loss at 2481.3, target 2385.7; if a sharp drop stabilizes near 2381.4, consider short-term longs, stop loss 2362.8, target 2444.5. Single position size should not exceed 5%, exit at target price, do not hold losing positions.
— Personal opinion only, not investment advice, wish you successful trading. —
$ETH #Tesla delivery exceeds expectations, profit recovery becomes the focus
#Korean stocks recover and rebound, can foreign capital selling pressure ease?#
$ETH The timing of the NU7 upgrade announcement is chillingly precise—$ZEC just dropped from 1697 to 1071, retail investors have just finished cutting losses, and then the good news arrives. This doesn’t look like a coincidence; it feels more like a carefully orchestrated liquidity harvest. Don’t rush to cheer yet. Look on-chain: in the past three days, over $12 million worth of $ZEC has been withdrawn from exchanges and moved into several newly created wallets just a few days old. These addresses have no history, no labels, and no staking activity. This isn’t hoarding; it’s preparing chips for some move. Now look at derivatives. The total $ZEC contract open interest across the network surged 17% in 24 hours, with open interest rising from $420 million to nearly $500 million. But the price only rebounded from 1071 to 1225, a 14% increase, while open interest ballooned so much. Both longs and shorts are aggressively adding positions, and the shorts haven’t retreated at all. If this were a clean trend reversal, the shorts would have been flushed out by now. Yet they’re still sitting at the table. Someone is shorting above 1400, with unrealized profits over four times, but isn’t in a hurry to close. The logic is straightforward: as long as the price dares to touch 1300, keep adding shorts. Every so-called high-level rebound is, in their eyes, a ticket for shorts to enter. There’s a hidden divergence being overlooked here: on-chain withdrawals are usually interpreted as bullish signals, but combined with the surge in open interest and weak price rebound, it looks more like setting the battlefield for a long-short showdown. The wallets withdrawing coins have no staking, indicating the chips are on standby, not locked. Once these chips are dumped into the market at key price levels, retail investors chasing longs will be the first to suffer. NU7 mainnetOptimistic about crypto, buying $CRCL next
Among crypto, I choose $SOL
I won’t play with unlisted contracts anymore; once investor valuations update, they just drop. I try to avoid playing those.
As for $KORU, how to say, they say Koreans play with 10x leverage. I’ll still hold it; if anthropic comes back a bit, I’ll sell, if not, I’ll hold until listing.
Anthropic tries to list before openai to avoid splitting attention, but although it’s profitable now, it wants to expand scale. It needs more investment, and the IPO keeps getting delayed. Investors worry that increased investment won’t keep up with profits.
Openai is only valued at 1.2 trillion, which feels easy for the US stock market, but anthropic is valued at 2 trillion, making capital reconsider, even thinking it can’t make money and is only worth 150 billion. My advice is still to avoid unlisted ones.$TSLA Tesla Roadster ignites the entire internet, and the crypto community has ridden the wave to launch the meme coin FTR. Many people easily associate it with Tesla, but here the truth must be clarified.
FTR stands for Flying Tesla. Just by the name, it's easy to mistakenly think it is related to Tesla, but it has no cooperation or equity ties with Tesla Inc. It is merely a grassroots coin born from riding the hype. It has no real business operations; its only narrative is the hot topic of Tesla's Roadster, making it a typical event-driven speculation.
From the market chart, you can clearly see a long upper shadow candle, with the market cap surging to 5.86M before falling back, currently up 73.74%. This indicates short-term speculative capital aggressively pumping the price. At the peak of hype, early holders have already started taking profits and exiting.
The risk signals in the data are straightforward: bundled transactions account for as much as 45.49%, and a large amount of tokens are concentrated in the hands of the project team and whales. Under this structure, the pump is only to create a profit illusion to attract retail investors, while the whales can dump and crash the price at any time.
Everyone needs to distinguish two things: Tesla on the US stock market is a legitimate listed company with deliveries and FSD business supporting its fundamentals; whereas FTR is just an emotional product of the crypto community following the hype. The hype from Tesla's launch event is the entire value source of this coin.
Classic crypto rule: buy the rumor, sell the fact. The launch event hype has fully fermented, and the positive news has basically been priced in. This kind of meme coin has a very short life cycle; once the hype cools down, liquidity will quickly dry up. Without fundamental support, there is almost no support during declines, with pullbacks often exceeding 80%.
Do not blindly enter to speculate on FTR just because of Tesla Roadster's flashy demonstration. Event-driven markets come fast and go faster. Chasing at the top easily makes you the bag holder for whales unloading. Participating in such coins carries risks far outweighing the opportunities. #Tesla launches new generation Roadster, market rises Did Tesla really make the sports car fly this time? 🚀
Yesterday, Tesla showcased the new generation Roadster at SpaceX's Texas site, using rocket thrusters to achieve brief lift-off and mid-air steering maneuvers, which is indeed a bit exaggerated.
But rather than how powerful this car is, I'm more concerned about how much actual revenue it can bring to Tesla.
The Roadster is expected to enter mass production in 2028, so its short-term contribution to revenue is likely limited.
The real highlight should be the Q3 earnings report on 10/21.
Tesla delivered 486,532 vehicles in Q3, deployed 13.7 GWh of energy storage, and what we need to watch next are the gross margin, cash flow, and the commercialization progress of Robotaxi and Optimus.
I think the most interesting thing about Tesla now is that the market no longer values it just as a car manufacturer.
But a technology showcase is one thing; whether it can really make money is another.
Do you think this Roadster is a technological breakthrough or just a topic before the earnings report? 🤔
$TSLA #Tesla launches new generation Roadster, stock rises $OKB $NFLX will release its Q3 earnings after the market closes on October 20. I tend to believe that both revenue and EPS will exceed expectations this time, especially optimistic about the profit side. Mainly, I also love watching Netflix shows hahaha. Currently, Wall Street expects Netflix's third-quarter revenue to be $12.87 billion, a year-over-year increase of about 11.8%, with EPS around $0.82. The company previously provided a revenue guidance of $12.86 billion, with an operating margin expected to reach 33.2%, higher than 28.2% in the same period last year. Analysts' earnings expectations are not aggressive at the moment, especially since some institutions have recently lowered their EPS forecasts. I am betting on an upside surprise, mainly based on three factors: advertising, subscription price increases, and content costs. Netflix expects advertising revenue to reach $3 billion by 2026, nearly double last year. This year, the US advertising pre-sale commitments have also nearly doubled. Although advertising pre-sales cannot be directly equated to actual revenue, it at least indicates that advertisers still have strong demand for Netflix placements. Advertising revenue currently does not account for a high proportion, so there is still room for growth in the coming years. Regarding subscriptions, Netflix has already raised prices in the US and several other markets, and the third quarter is expected to reflect a more complete effect of the price increase. For a platform like Netflix with a large paying user base, even if the number of users does not grow significantly, increasing the average revenue per paying user can directly improve revenue performance. What I pay more attention to is content costs. Netflix previously expected content amortization growth in the second half of the year[Pharaoh's Market Watch]
The IEA says diesel will be tight until 2027, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict is intensifying. What does this have to do with Bitcoin?
Pharaoh says the connection isn’t about diesel itself, but the word "inflation." Diesel is the lifeblood of industry; when diesel gets expensive, transportation, agriculture, and manufacturing costs all rise, ultimately turning into inflationary pressure.
First, let's look at what the IEA warned. The latest report from the International Energy Agency explicitly states that the global diesel market won’t rebalance until 2027. The Russia-Ukraine conflict continues to hit Russian refining capacity, combined with supply disruptions in the Middle East. Diesel crack spreads have surged to historic highs. Diesel isn’t gasoline—trucks, ships, and farm machinery all run on it. When its price spikes, inflation transmission is even stronger than gasoline.
What does this mean for Bitcoin? The transmission chain is straightforward: diesel price up → transportation costs up → end consumer prices up → inflation expectations harden → the Fed dares not ease → US Treasury yields stay high → risk assets under pressure. Bitcoin is currently stuck between 80,000 and 82,000, held down by this logic.
But Pharaoh must be fair. Diesel tightness isn’t a new story starting in 2026; the market has already priced it in. Bitcoin falling from 87,000 to around 80,000 has already digested a significant portion of inflation fears. What can truly change the direction are the Fed’s statements and the CPI, not diesel prices themselves. $ETH $BTC $SOL #IEA warns diesel tightness until 2027, Russia-Ukraine conflict intensifies supply risks #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins $SPCX has dropped nearly 20% from its early October peak, yet its market cap is still significantly higher than when it went public six months ago—it's actually more expensive after the drop.
The company went public in June, priced at 1.77 trillion. Only three segments have business backing: Starlink at 240 billion, launch services at 140 billion, and defense at 120 billion, totaling just over 500 billion. The remaining 1.27 trillion corresponds to markets that don't yet exist today—Starship large-scale reuse, space computing power, Mars—over 70% of the valuation is buying options.
The current market cap is over 1.9 trillion, higher than on the IPO day. But these three cash-flow businesses haven't materially changed in recent months; the extra 100+ billion all falls under the options category. The stock price fell from over 170 to 145, yet the options portion became more expensive.
The reason lies in what it is sensitive to. The company is still losing money, with a negative P/E ratio, so profit fluctuations don't affect pricing; what drives the stock price are technical milestones—on the day Starship first reached orbit, it rose more than seven points. Analysts' average target price is 225, essentially pricing in "more milestone successes."
The variable is November: after the Q3 earnings report, there will be a large-scale unlocking of shares, increasing supply, but the current price doesn't seem to account for this.
#SpaceX's first full quarterly earnings report since going public will be revealed #Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus Bitcoin $BTC short-term holders' positions have increased to 4.08 million coins, up 422,000 coins from the July low.
New buyers are concentrated in the $82,000-$86,000 range, directly pushing the average cost of short-term holders up to $74,900. Although the current price (around $82,000) is still on the cost line, the profit buffer has narrowed from 16% to 10%, and the breakeven point is extremely sensitive. Considering the recent CPI and PPI exceeding expectations and the delay in rate cut expectations, under macroeconomic pressure, this "new capital" is both a support and a hidden risk.
The $80,000 mark remains the baseline for bulls and bears. While ETFs continue to see outflows, whales are quietly accumulating between $80,000 and $86,000, creating a stark divergence from retail ETF withdrawals. However, short-term holders' chips have increased (up 154,000 coins in the first two weeks of October). Once the price falls below $74,900, the group as a whole will enter unrealized losses, which can easily trigger a chain reaction of selling pressure; the $83,800-$83,000 range remains a strong resistance for reversal confirmation, and until it is firmly held, the market will continue to fluctuate at the bottom. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 Tesla's new generation Roadster officially debuted, driving the stock price up in pre-market trading. However, this flagship sports car is a long-term concept model, expected to enter mass production in 2028, with limited overall shipments. It cannot contribute to revenue and profit in the short term, making it difficult to alleviate the current market's primary concern over vehicle gross margin pressure.
The core value of this launch event lies in the technology narrative. Equipped with the SpaceX cold air propulsion system, it demonstrates the synergy between aerospace and automotive technologies, strengthening market confidence in Tesla's engineering innovation capabilities and boosting sentiment ahead of the earnings report. However, the price increase is more of a thematic pulse; the fundamental focus remains on vehicle deliveries and the commercialization progress of FSD.
Across markets, Tesla's strength will temporarily raise risk appetite for growth stocks in the Nasdaq, indirectly providing slight sentiment support for BTC, ETH. However, the main driver for crypto remains U.S. Treasury yields and inflation expectations. This news is unlikely to push crypto into an independent trend and may see gains realized followed by a pullback.
Going forward, key points to track include Tesla's closing performance, Q3 earnings gross margin, Roadster mass production plans, and regulatory approval progress for road use in various countries. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高
Tesla released the new generation Roadster last night. The launch event was quite explosive, featuring a live demonstration of short-distance flight and aerial attitude adjustment using a compressed air thruster. Musk said this was developed in collaboration with SpaceX and will be produced in 2028. The stock price initially surged 4.62% on the news but has now fallen back to down 1.16%.
To be clear, this car was first showcased in 2017, originally planned for production in 2020, but has been delayed repeatedly until now. Whether the market believes the 2028 timeline is another matter. The flight feature sounds cool, but flying cars on the road face regulatory hurdles worldwide, and regulation is a tougher challenge than technology.
The stock price spike and retreat indicate the market is doing the math. The Roadster is a plus, but Tesla’s real problem lies in fundamentals: Q3 deliveries dropped 2.1% year-over-year, automotive gross margins are under pressure, and Robotaxi commercialization is still climbing uphill. Relying on a repeatedly delayed sports car can’t ease the anxiety over the core business.
For BTC, this is not a direct matter. Tesla and SpaceX represent AI and high-end manufacturing directions; the more intense the story, the greater the imagination space for tech stocks, and risk appetite can warm up accordingly. But Tesla’s rise doesn’t mean BTC will rise; their logics differ. BTC is currently oscillating around 82,000, with resistance between 83,500 and 84,500, and support between 81,500 and 82,000. $TSLA $xTSLA $BTC Macro and News — Waller's Dovish Turn Reverses Rate Hike Expectations
This is today's most important variable and the only lifeline for bulls in the market.
At the IMF annual meeting, Waller clearly stated he "will not pre-judge the meeting outcome," did not signal a rate hike in October, nor did he reiterate the "inflation too high" stance. The market's probability of a rate hike in October plummeted from over 25% to below 15%. The Bloomberg Dollar Index fell 0.2%, and the South Korean Composite Index surged 3.6%.
A strategist from Commonwealth Bank of Australia bluntly said that Waller's failure to reaffirm the high inflation view "disappointed the market," which further pushed the dollar weaker.
But don't celebrate too soon — the real judgment day is the rate decision meeting on October 27-28. The market's probability of keeping rates unchanged is 72.3%, meaning there is still nearly a 30% chance of a surprise.
On the geopolitical front: Iran's military threatens to close the Strait of Hormuz, escalating US-Iran tensions. Gold broke through $4,155/oz, and BTC, as "digital gold," is receiving marginal capital inflows. $BTC Whales have accumulated 85,000 coins over three weeks
◆ Whales | Buying more as prices fall
Santiment data: Wallets holding between 10 and 10,000 coins increased their BTC holdings by over 85,000 coins in three weeks, a pace only seen twice in the past year; the number of such wallets hit a record high of 20,338 on October 15. CryptoQuant: Whale holdings excluding exchanges and mining pools reached 3.03 million coins, the highest since last November, with a 30-day growth rate the fastest since February. While ETFs have seen continuous net outflows in recent weeks, whales keep buying more as prices drop.
◆ Long-term holders | Steadfast as a mountain
Analyst Murphy: During this downturn, the volume of long-term holders transferring to exchanges has remained very low, averaging 480 coins per hour, only one-fifth of short-term holders. Sellers are mostly short-term traders; long-term holders have not moved.
◆ ETH | Exchange balances down 430,000 coins in 7 weeks
Binance ETH balance dropped from 3.9 million coins on August 25 to 3.47 million coins, about $1.05 billion outflow. Spot 7-day average trading volume halved; current volatility is mainly driven by derivatives.
$BTC Buy in batches on pullbacks to 80,000–81,000, watch for a break above 82,500; $ETH Buy on pullback to 2,400, exit if it falls below 2,320. Buying on-chain doesn’t guarantee a rise tomorrow, don’t go all in on your position.$BTC $ETH #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ 【极简缠论】
复盘一下昨天的多单，价格在拉升到8.29的时候结构已完整，从5分钟视角看是走出了盘整背驰（图1- 价格创新高，黄白线没有创新高，离开段弱于进入段）
从30分钟视角看（图2-离开笔弱于进入笔，并且能量明显减弱，属于量价背离）2个级别属于共振背驰，回调了5分钟的一段，现在5分钟的向上一段反弹中。
自己又犯了之前的问题，虽然30分钟第一段看的目标位是8.4附近，但是盘面走到8.3已经出现了明显的背驰，自己犹犹豫豫一直想平一半儿仓位然后没平，等5分钟一笔回踩到8.24的时候依然没走，又是没有知行合一，难受啊🥲🥲
现在利润距离高峰已经回吐了一半儿的利润大概5K（图3）这波反弹如果不能到8.4附近，那么很可能还会跌下来跌破前低，但是跌破前低7.97依然是做多做反弹，前面说过，下跌没有力度了，已经是明显背驰。
从我个人角度看，这5分钟一段下跌力度这么大，那么这30分钟向上一段的上涨可能是终结了，后面盘面走成什么样，交给市场。 这段分析的核心是：BTC 正面临短期资金流出的压力，但大户持续积累，说明市场存在多空力量对抗。$80,000 是重要观察位，能否守住，将影响接下来是区间震荡还是继续下探。
截至 2026 年 10 月 15 日的市场报道，美国现货 BTC ETF 单日净流出约 2.615 亿美元；同期通胀数据高于预期，BTC 一度跌至约 $81,000。另一方面，链上数据显示，持有至少 100 BTC 的大额钱包在 8 月累计增加约 60,000 BTC。
1. 为什么 ETF 流出、大户买入会同时发生？
#MetaQ3AISpendingOutlook $BTC Last night's dip to $80,000 probably made many friends' hearts skip a beat. Everyone should be able to see that this is the combined effect of hotter-than-expected US inflation, weakening Asian markets, and declining risk appetite. But I believe the most important information from this move is that the market completed a position reshuffle in a short time. During the drop, the bulls were forced to sell, and during the rebound, the shorts may have started to cover. The price looks like it just bounced back from around $80,000, but the players inside have already changed.
So, judging by the current price, it doesn't look like a guaranteed rise after liquidation, but more like a technical repair after deleveraging. Spot demand has not fully returned. A true trend reversal should be accompanied by a rise in spot trading volume, the price firmly standing above $82,600 again, and ETF flows no longer continuously deteriorating.
Also, although the liquidation amount this time was large, it doesn't mean the selling pressure is completely over. Some bulls were just liquidated, and the remaining spot holders may still be waiting for better prices to exit. I do not recommend using "it has already dropped" as a reason to add positions. #US CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, will there be another rate hike this year? Fifteen minutes ago it was still frying in hot oil, fifteen minutes later a ladle of broth poured it back into the pot—CoreWeave dropped 15.46% on October 14, then pulled back 5.9% on the 15th. This isn’t cooking; it’s scraping off the burnt crust at the bottom of the pot and re-plating it, hoping diners will forget the burnt smell just now.
Jensen Huang spoke: financial conditions are improving, capital costs are falling, no need for extra guarantees. Translated into kitchen slang—supplier personally stands at the serving window, beating his chest saying, "I own this pot of soup." Deutsche Bank also maintains a buy rating, with a nicely written reason: long-term contracts, backlog of orders. But anyone who’s stood at the stove for ten years knows backlog is just a prep list; chopped scallions, ginger, and garlic lying on a stainless steel tray aren’t dishes, they’re risk of spoilage.
Over $100 billion in prep lists need to be truly cooked pot by pot to count as revenue and cash flow. Computing power delivery is the serving window; if it can’t be served, no matter how loud the front desk drums, the kitchen is still a mess.
And the stove’s temperature doesn’t lie. Its 2032 bond yield exceeds 15%, and the five-year credit default swap spread hits 1,195 basis points. This isn’t aroma, it’s the smoke detector screaming. Michelin can give you stars, but the fire alarm doesn’t care how many stars you have.
Switching to cheaper oil can indeed suppress costs; but cheaper oil doesn’t mean the dish won’t burn. Lower capital costs mean changing the oil, delivery progress is the cooking time, and credit spreads are the thickness of the burnt layer at the bottom—if these three don’t align, no matter how exquisite the plating, it’s a failed tasting.
Building an investment portfolio is like preparing a banquet. Mainstream coins are the main dishes, holding the scene; altcoins are the seasonings, the amount determines the flavor; leveraged contracts are the jar of extra spicy chili—two drops enhance flavor, half a jar and guests get burned through their guts and rushed to the hospital overnight. Right now, this credit spread is like chili oil already choking the next table: same kitchen, same gas pipes, same batch of computing power suppliers, one stove catches fire, the whole building’s exhaust system suffers. The token linked to Broadcom on the market is also shaking with this smoke.
So the real question isn’t whether this one can hold on, but whether the smoke will drift through the pipes into the neighboring cloud kitchens also cooking fiercely. Their pots are just as hot, their menus just as thick, and under their pots lies borrowed fire.
If the serving window slows, the whole pot burns, and the burnt smell never stays in one kitchen. #jensenbackscoreweaveWritten before the new week in the crypto circle: October is already halfway through, yet the crypto circle still hasn't seen an easy answer. The anticipated "rising October" has encountered repeated price fluctuations and hesitant capital. Looking back at the past week, my deepest impression is: the market still has buyers willing to catch the dips, but how long this willingness can last remains to be answered by upcoming data. On October 16, after Bitcoin briefly fell below $80,000 the previous trading day, it returned to around $82,000. According to the market report at 13:48 Beijing time, Bitcoin was about $82,130, but as of the report, the weekly chart still had the possibility of a second consecutive week of decline. Such a rebound is enough to temporarily ease sentiment but not enough to seal the weekly trend. The weekend is not over yet, and the weekly chart is not finalized. More worth examining than the price is the hesitation of capital. According to the daily data aggregated by Farside, from October 12 to 15, the US spot Bitcoin ETFs had a total net outflow of about $146 million, and Ethereum ETFs had a total net outflow of about $250.4 million. Bitcoin ETFs had a net inflow of about $175.7 million on the 13th, but then a net outflow of about $261.4 million on the 14th. A day's inflow was then offset by a larger outflow. This makes me more inclined to interpret this week as a phase of capital repeatedly testing the waters; declaring the market has turned based on a single day's rise is not enough evidence. This hesitation can also be partly explained by the macro environment. On October 14, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics released that the September CPI year-over-year increased by#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes a new highlight, bullish⚠️For personal review only, not investment advice, the crypto market is highly risky.
ETH has been consolidating around 2444 for two days, caught in a dilemma. On-chain old wallets from 2017 continue to transfer out, with a cost basis of only $14, holding for nine years with over 170x profit, currently moving funds to exchanges.
Many retail investors think 2400 is cheap compared to 2800, but ancient holders have extremely low cost bases; transferring to exchanges is to realize profits and exit. This round of rebound stalled at 2448, volume continues to shrink, and 2480-2500 is packed with trapped positions.
The futures market still has 43.8 billion open interest; a break below 2316 will trigger multi-billion level long liquidations. The 2671 short position is still held; current price shorting can be referenced with stop loss above 2500 and target at 2316. Please judge the market yourself.
$ETH $BTC $ZEC
#Ancient addresses continue to unload, rebound weak, beware of pullback$BTC What deserves attention next is not just the price, but the liquidity distribution.
According to this set of order book information:
Sell orders below $90K are relatively sparse
There are a large number of buy orders around $75K
If these orders truly exist and remain in place, the resistance above may be relatively limited, while there could be buying support below.
But this does not mean BTC will definitely surge to $90K.
Large orders may be canceled or could just be short-term liquidity arrangements.
I will focus on three signals:
Whether sell orders continue to be consumed as the price rises.
Whether buy orders near $75K are genuinely executed.
Whether $BTC's trading volume and spot buying increase synchronously.
Don't just look at how large the orders are; see if these orders are actually executed in the end. Overlaying two renderings rigidly onto one blueprint, daring to talk about topping out before even finishing the foundation—that was my first reaction to this scenario.
Changing the equity swap ratio to 0.7 sounds like proportional scaling, but in reality, it forcibly merges two buildings with completely different structural systems into one load-bearing column. Tesla’s side is reinforced concrete frame—heavy asset, long cycle, cash flow built pillar by pillar; SpaceX’s side is a suspension bridge plus rocket launch tower—R&D burns money, nodes are extremely unstable, overall stiffness relies on the success rate of each launch. You say AI, robotics, energy, and space have synergy? In design institutes, synergy is called "structure finding form"—it looks beautiful on paper, but at the construction level, all node methods must be redone, and wind load and seismic coefficients must be recalculated.
The real hidden danger lies in the voting rights distribution. 37% economic interest leverages 56% voting rights—this is a typical eccentric support frame—looks like saving materials and costs, but actually puts all seismic resistance on a few key nodes. Once nodes fatigue, the whole building doesn’t just crack locally, it topples entirely. Minority shareholders’ rights here are like those canceled seismic joints—unnoticeable normally, but the only pressure relief channel when something goes wrong.
More critically, the approval process. Renderings at the proposal stage can be drawn daily by reporters, but construction drawings require approval, seismic special demonstration, environmental assessment, and fire safety. Now there’s not even a geological survey report, no board approval, no regulatory filing—all just conceptual renderings. Doing any valuation discount analysis at this stage is like pouring a bearing platform on sand—the load hasn’t been applied yet, but the piles have already sunk.
As for the market target linkage, my judgment is simple: when onlookers start bidding on a rendering, it means the project’s real structural information has stopped being supplied. At this point, the price reflects not load-bearing capacity, but foot traffic.
A real architect never gives the owner a completion date before pile foundation acceptance. #spacextesladealscenarioOne hour after the US stock market opened, BTC, ETH, and SOL all pulled back, but I’m not watching the price, I’m watching another data point.
$BTC current price 82358, up 1.47%. $ETH 2475, up 4.34%, $SOL 106.3, up 3.12%. It looks lively, but open interest is decreasing. BTC dropped from 2.58 billion to 2.45 billion, the long-short ratio dropped from 1.88 to 1.76, ETH’s long-short ratio dropped from 2.73 to 1.85. SOL dropped from 2.72 to 2.31.
Putting these three data points together, the meaning is straightforward: leverage is retreating, it’s not new money coming in. The price is pushed up by short covering, not active buying. After the US stock market opened, tech stocks didn’t crash, giving crypto a breather, but this is a correction, not a reversal.
BTC faces heavy resistance between 83000-84000, ETH has trapped positions at 2500, SOL’s hurdle is 110. If these three levels aren’t broken, the rebound is for reducing positions, not for adding positions.
I still haven’t opened any trades today, I don’t chase this kind of corrective market. Tomorrow I’ll wait for the US stock market close to see ETF fund flows before deciding what to do.
#US CPI and PPI both exceed expectations, will there be another rate hike this year?
#Tesla releases new generation Roadster, market rises
#SpaceX’s first full quarterly report after IPO will be revealed The isobars over the Strait of Hormuz are visibly collapsing inward to the naked eye. This is not an ordinary cyclonic disturbance; it is a strong typhoon that has already completed an eyewall replacement cycle—over the past week, oil tanker flow measured by Kpler has been cut to 9.7 million barrels per day, down 43% from the pre-conflict pressure baseline. The Singapore-flagged GFS Pride sank directly into the sea on the night of October 13; that was not just a normal gust passing through, it was the eyewall sweeping directly over.
As someone who has been watching weather charts for half a lifetime, I can clearly tell everyone that this system has entered an explosive intensification phase. Brent’s closing price of $105.92 per barrel is just the outer circulation precipitation; the real heavy rain area has not yet made landfall. WTI’s 3% increase is just a drizzle before the typhoon, not enough to wet the ground.
The key variables now are the counteractions of three air masses. The first is the warm, moist airflow from Saudi Arabia increasing production, moving northward trying to fill the gap; the second is the lateral jet stream of alternative export routes—bypassing the strait via overland pipelines and transshipment through the Red Sea—forming a new moisture channel. These two airflows can indeed bring some precipitation relief, but the problem is their transport capacity has limits, and their physical paths are longer with higher unit costs.
The third and most troublesome is the cold front formed by freight and insurance costs. Once shipowners factor risk premiums into their quotes, it’s like injecting an inversion layer into the atmosphere—it won’t immediately cause heavy rain, but it will lock all convection, severely suppressing the speed of supply recovery. Markets under an inversion layer have very poor diffusion conditions; any slight disturbance will be amplified into costly strong convection.
Looking at the US stock token $xSNDK’s linkage line, its price structure essentially tracks a cross-market humidity field. Once crude oil breaks through the current circulation pattern, the inflation expectation upper trough will deepen its lower swing, and the convective potential energy of equity assets will reaccumulate. The current volatility reading of $xSNDK indicates it is being pulled by two airflows—one is the uplift from rising energy costs, the other is the subsidence from shrinking risk appetite, with strong shear that could produce a tornado at any time.
I need to point out an easily overlooked secondary disaster: alternative routes are not free weather insurance. They spread the blockage risk of a single channel into cumulative insurance rates across multiple channels. When all ships reroute, congestion on alternative routes itself becomes a new low-pressure center, which in turn further sucks freight rates. This is a positive feedback loop, called self-excited growth in meteorology, which once triggered, takes a long time to dissipate naturally.
Current numerical forecasts present two scenarios. In the optimistic scenario, the strait recovers to 80% flow within two weeks, and oil prices fluctuate sideways between $100 and $108, akin to cloudy to overcast weather. In the pessimistic scenario, if a third or fourth commercial ship is hit in the same narrow waterway, flow will drop below 7 million barrels per day, Brent’s overhead trough line will rise sharply, and $xSNDK will experience a rapid downward shear following the equity market’s humidity plunge.
What I personally focus on more is when the eyewall will truly make landfall. The sinking of GFS Pride is data from an outpost, not the peak. The real pressure trough value often appears when the public thinks the eye has passed; at that time, the wind direction reverses and the storm presses back from the other side.
The current wind and wave level in the strait is still rising; no high-resolution model can provide a convergent conclusion. #hormuzoilshippingrisks #SpaceX's first full quarterly financial report after going public will be unveiled $INJ vs $BNB :The Market Is Sending Mixed Signals
INJ's rally looks convincing, but aggressive buying after a sharp rise can also signal late entries. The risk is that early longs start taking profits just as new buyers arrive.
BNB is more interesting than its price suggests. Buyers are active despite the decline, potentially indicating accumulation.
My view:INJ has momentum, but BNB may offer a more interesting recovery setup if buying persists.
Strong momentum isn't always the best opportunity📉 81000 is under pressure for the third time, how much longer can BTC hold?
On October 9th, 12th, and 15th, BTC tested around 81000 three times, temporarily not breaking through, but each rebound peak is lower than the last. The 400-day moving average acts like a watershed; buying support is thinning. If it breaks, the psychological level of 80000 will be tested, with 78000 as the next buffer zone. ⚠️
$ETH is not easy either. ETF net outflows have continued for 10 days, early whales transferred 6369 ETH (about $23 million) to exchanges, signaling clear selling pressure; heavy sell orders around 2382 create strong resistance to rebounds. ZEC has retraced about 36% from the high of 1698, showing altcoin vulnerability again. 😰
🌍 Macro conditions have not improved: US September CPI year-over-year is 3.7%, higher than the previous 3.4%, inflation remains sticky, and the probability of a rate hike in October once rose to 47%. The Fear & Greed Index dropped from 62 to 52, shifting sentiment from greed to neutral.
Technical fatigue combined with macro headwinds means the battle at 81000 will determine the short-term rhythm. At this moment, cash and patience are more precious than impulse. 💵⏳#Tesla releases new generation Roadster, market rallies #US CPI and PPI both exceed expectations, will there be another rate hike this year? ETH, $SOL, and OKB are all waiting for positive news and all have the chance to take off. But if you ask who will move first, it still depends on the strength of the foundation:
1. $ETH is waiting for the Glamsterdam mainnet. The staking rate hitting a new high at 36% indicates long-term chips are locked up, but in the short term, there are issues with ETF outflows and BitMine buying pressure nearing saturation.
At the 2450 level, my judgment is to wait for selling pressure confirmation rather than a market reversal.
2. SOL is waiting for the ETF to stop the bleeding. There is currently a treasury company continuously buying, which is why it’s more stable than ETH—at least there’s support underneath.
But nine consecutive days of net outflows is no joke; for now, let’s see if the 100-dollar mark can hold.
3. $OKB needs to wait for no one. The 120 level is independently strengthening, with the BSC ecosystem plus buyback dual engines, holding the starting gun in its own hands.
Brothers, this kind that doesn’t rely on external forces is actually the most reassuring to sleep well at night. The technical structure is still relatively weak, yet the shorts have already started to crowd in. @梁老表 The strongest reminder here is not to go long immediately, but rather not to interpret "there is still room to fall" as "the price will definitely drop to the order placement level." In his view, BTC is currently in a complex oscillation, with short-term stop-loss sweeps back and forth. The real time window to be cautious about is around October 19 to 21. He remains somewhat bullish on the long-term cycle but clearly admits that the current price action makes it difficult to give a clear short-term direction. After going long, the price might continue to drop; after going short, it might suddenly pull back. Since there is no sufficient certainty, there is no need to force daily trades. Reducing contract trading frequency and managing spot fund allocation well is more important than betting on a direction in the middle of the range. First, look at BTC's liquidity conflicts. The analyst observed that after a sweep around 81,600, short liquidations gradually accumulated above. He mentioned the areas near 83,200 to 83,600 and further from 84,200 to 85,000 as zones short-term shorts should watch. These positions are areas where he observes liquidity and potential order sweeps, not guaranteed price targets, nor unconditional entry signals. His logic is that during oscillation phases, it’s easy to repeatedly harvest around dense leverage: longs below are just swept, and shorts above start to concentrate. If you only focus on the short structure but ignore the increasingly dense stop losses above, a single rebound could wash out even those who correctly judged the direction. The liquidation map here serves as a risk warning; it cannot replace trade confirmation, nor should any brightly colored area be taken as a guaranteed profit opportunity. Everyone's watching whether Netflix beats Q3 earnings
I'm watching the wording of the bet: OKX needs reported GAAP EPS above $0.84, while Netflix guided $0.82
A routine one-cent beat still settles NO
That tiny gap makes tax, FX and share count just as important as hit shows
A good quarter for $NFLX and a winning YES ticket are not the same thing
#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins a16z is fully committed to betting on Hyperliquid. On-chain data shows it is slowly accumulating HYPE using hundreds of addresses with TWAP, holding 5.2 million tokens, with unrealized profits nearing $100 million, and all staked and locked.
Here’s the question—when a top VC locks in their chips, is it because they truly believe in the ecosystem, or are they afraid of sell pressure? Retail investors rush in, but what do you have to compete with their patience? $HYPE #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点
Netflix's fundamentals remain solid, and the advertising business is a tangible second growth curve, but it is undergoing a difficult transition from a "high-growth myth" to a "mature and stable company." The tension between short-term stock price pressure and long-term value is the biggest contradiction at present.#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins Netflix reports its Q3 earnings on October 20, and investors are watching two key factors: revenue growth and the expansion of its advertising business.
📊 Here’s what the market expects:
💰 Revenue: $12.86 billion, up approximately 12% year-over-year.
📈 Operating Margin: 33.2%, compared to 28.2% last year.The numbers point to stronger profitability, but there’s a catch: growth is slowing compared to previous years.The big question is will Netflix’s advertising business$ETH PPI连续爆表，宏观逆风再起，别急着接飞刀。
这次市场没法装看不见了。9月PPI环比+1.3%，预期才0.5%；核心+0.7%，预期0.3%，连续两个月走强。不是能源一家的戏，是成本、服务、中游一起拱——通胀压力往深处扎了。
“更高更久”这四个字一回来，风险资产首当其冲。加密这种零票息、纯流动性的东西，最先被抽桌子。$BTC #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #TSMC Q3 Net Profit Exceeds Expectations, Earnings Hit Record High
The boss has something to say
The first long BTC position was entered at 82000, taking profit after 800 points gain. The second position averaged around 81800 and is still held.
Why enter long at 82000? This is the lower edge of a previous dense chip accumulation zone and the first support above the 80,000 round number. ETFs are flowing out, but whales have been accumulating in this range since late August, increasing holdings by about 60,000 coins, with costs between 80,000 and 86,000. Some are still buying below, so the drop isn’t deep.
The second position at 81800 is better positioned with a smaller stop loss space. Stop loss is set at 80500; if broken, it means the 80,000 level can’t hold, so cut losses and exit. The first target is 84000, the second target is 86000. At the first target, reduce half the position, keep the rest at breakeven to see if it can reach higher.
Macro pressure remains. CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, inflation has risen for three consecutive months, and rate hike expectations persist. US Treasury yields are high, and oil prices are also under pressure. Therefore, long positions are short-term plays, not bottom fishing. Reduce positions at targets, don’t hold on stubbornly.
Control position size well, avoid heavy positions. There is resistance between 84000 and 85000; decide whether to stay or leave based on volume there.
Don’t chase the rally or panic sell, set stop losses properly. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #Tesla delivery exceeds expectations, profit recovery becomes the focus
The above analysis is time-sensitive; positions must have stop losses set. Good luck.#Korean stocks recover and rebound, can foreign capital selling pressure ease? After the previous sharp drop and circuit breaker, South Korea's KOSPI has entered a technical recovery. Samsung and SK Hynix led the memory sector rebound, mainly a rebound from overselling after a sharp decline, with panic selling temporarily subsiding, but foreign capital selling pressure has not truly eased.
The core logic behind continued foreign selling remains unchanged: Longxin Memory's technological breakthrough raises market concerns about Korean memory chip pricing power; global AI capital expenditure expectations are downgraded, leading to a revaluation of HBM profitability; combined with high U.S. Treasury yields and pressure on the Korean won exchange rate, overseas asset managers continue to reduce holdings. This rebound is more driven by domestic funds stepping in to support, with no large-scale foreign capital inflow observed yet.
To judge whether selling pressure is easing, two key signals must be observed: foreign capital shifting from continuous net selling to stable net buying, and the Korean won exchange rate stopping its decline and stabilizing. Without foreign capital inflow, the sustainability of this rebound is weak and may face renewed pressure later.
As a sentiment barometer for the Asia-Pacific semiconductor sector, the short-term recovery slightly boosts the Nasdaq and computing power sectors, indirectly providing a mild sentiment floor for BTC, ETH. However, the main drivers for crypto assets remain U.S. Treasury yields and inflation expectations; a rebound in Korean stocks alone is unlikely to trigger an independent upward trend.
Going forward, focus on tracking foreign capital transaction data, the Korean won exchange rate, HBM order expectations, and changes in U.S. Treasury yields. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #SpaceXQ3Earnings I am still optimistic about SpaceX but I will not buy shares above 155
On October 13, the stock closed down 4.21% from 171.09 on October 5 to around 157
This decline is not due to fundamentals: on Tuesday this week, the FAA approved the environmental impact assessment request that raised the maximum annual launch limit at the Starship base from 25 to 456 and the annual landing limit to 912
Falcon 9 completed Tuesday 美联储10月27到28日开议息会议。美元指数已经到102.58附近，是18个月的高点。美元强、利率预期偏鹰，对高波动的资产都是逆风。
我把可能的走法抄在本子上：不加息、表态温和，$HYPE 有机会回区间上沿；加25个基点，市场已经计价了近一半，影响有限；加了还暗示后面继续加，就要防77这个支撑被跌破。
会前大概率继续震荡，会上才出方向。
我把10月28日在冰箱贴的日历上画了圈。老婆问我圈那天干嘛，我说开会。她问你有什么会，我说，全世界的会。
加息两个字，我听着头疼。四成七的概率，一半一半，跟抛硬币似的。我烦了两天，后来想通了：美联储我控制不了，我能控制的只有仓位。
会前不加仓，拿着底仓等落地。
大风大浪见多了，伞提前撑好就行。拿住。$STRK 50倍做空 · 简短复盘
0.1025开空，标记0.07446，浮盈1367.80%。
STRK基本面利好与抛压并存：10月8日1.27亿枚代币解锁（占流通量4.6%），叠加11月还有另一批解锁，代币通胀压力持续。虽有World与Visa合作推进Stellar网络USDC支付、Paxos获MAS许可等生态利好，但Starknet TVL与日活用户持续低迷，Layer2赛道竞争白热化，空头主导盘面。我在0.1025反抽开空，顺解锁抛压与多头清洗。
下方支撑看0.070-0.075，破位看0.060；上方0.085-0.095转强阻。50倍杠杆浮盈丰厚，止损严移保本，分批止盈锁利润，不贪尾部。$BTC $ETH #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ Short-term Bitcoin holders' positions have risen to 4.08 million BTC, the highest since mid-June, increasing by about 420,000 BTC (+12%) since the July low.
New buyers mostly entered in the $82,000-$86,000 range, with an overall average cost of about $74,900; unrealized profit buffers have narrowed to around 10%.
The price currently remains above cost, but profit margins are thinning. If it falls below $74,900, the short-term group will overall turn unprofitable, potentially increasing selling pressure. New demand still exists but has slowed down; $74,900 is a key level to watch. $BTC $ETH #Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes a new focus
I remain cautious about whether Netflix's latest earnings report can exceed expectations.
The current market consensus expects third-quarter revenue of about $12.87 billion, but the company's guidance is only $12.86 billion. In the past 30 days, analysts have also lowered EPS estimates by about 0.7%. More notably, the stock price has been under pressure recently, and analysts have started to worry about slowing user engagement and intensified competition.
The advertising business does have growth potential, but whether it can truly translate into profit still needs to be verified by the earnings report. For me, revenue growth is not surprising; the key is whether the actual performance can surpass the already adjusted market expectations. The "Life-or-Death Trials" on Bitcoin's Road to One Million Dollars by 2030
ARK presents an optimistic scenario where Bitcoin could reach one million dollars by 2030, but there are three life-or-death trials on this path. Failing any one of them would directly invalidate the million-dollar narrative.
The first is the regulatory life-or-death trial. For large-scale entry of pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, a long-term friendly regulatory framework in Europe and the US is required. If major countries tighten access, restrict ETFs, or impose bans, institutional funds will quickly withdraw, and the upward logic will collapse.
The second is the macro liquidity life-or-death trial. The million-dollar target is based on assumptions of long-term low interest rates, high global debt, and continuous fiat currency depreciation. If the Federal Reserve maintains high interest rates for a long time, funds will flow into stable assets like US Treasuries, putting pressure on risk asset valuations, making it difficult for Bitcoin to sustain a long bull market.
The third is the capital capacity life-or-death trial. Reaching a million-dollar market cap requires massive incremental capital inflows sustained over more than a decade. As the scale grows, maintaining high growth becomes exponentially more difficult. Once ETF funds shift from net inflows to sustained outflows, the momentum for market growth will dry up.
Institutional forecasts are merely scenario simulations, not guaranteed outcomes. Do not use distant ideal targets as a basis for trading. The crypto market is highly volatile, black swan events can occur at any time, so it is essential to control position sizes and view cycles rationally. #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 The $CORE community is being torn apart by two voices: one side shouting for zero, the other shouting for a hundredfold increase. But the truly interesting things are missed by both groups.
Let's first look at a set of data, which is quite interesting.
In 24 hours, TVL rose by 16%, DEX trading volume jumped 68% over 7 days, daily active users rebounded to 9,100+, and the price rose from 0.017 to 0.0228 within 7 days, a bounce of over 30%.
But at the same time, the on-chain 30-day Gas fee revenue was only $254.80.
Yes, two hundred fifty-four dollars. Not twenty-five thousand, not two thousand five hundred, but two hundred fifty. Less than the daily fee of a decent street dog.
TVL increased, users returned, price bounced, but the actual revenue generated by real economic activity on-chain is approximately zero.
What does this indicate?
It indicates that the current driving force behind on-chain activity is not real demand, but incentives.
Staking mining, airdrop expectations, task volume boosting—these can create attractive TVL numbers and transaction counts but cannot generate sustainable protocol revenue. Core DAO is indeed the largest Bitcoin sidechain by TVL, with $314.4 million locked, 5,541 BTC staked, accounting for 26.4% of all Bitcoin sidechain TVL. But the fees generated by these locked funds almost entirely belong to BTC holders and node operators; the CORE token itself does not capture them.
This is the core problem of CORE currently: the chain is running, but the token is "idling."
So what exactly is the market trading?
It’s not fundamentals; it’s the expectation of narrative shifts.
The core logic of the 2026 roadmap is: to pool BTC staking fees, SatPay card fees, and AMP asset management income into the treasury for secondary market CORE buybacks. This is a narrative transformation from "printing subsidies" to "rent collection buybacks."
But for the narrative to become reality, there are two critical legs in between:
First leg: SatPay. This is the largest cash flow source for the buyback flywheel. But as of October, SatPay has been indefinitely delayed due to licensing and regulatory issues, leaving buybacks without real funding support. Without SatPay fees, buybacks are water without a source.
Second leg: Ghost chips. Approximately 69 million CORE tokens leaked through the 8.31 vulnerability; a hard fork can only stop further issuance but cannot recover the already leaked tokens. The official has yet to disclose the specific whereabouts and handling plan for these tokens. The unresolved selling pressure is the most tangible suppression over every rebound.
Signals truly worth watching
The current price of 0.022 already prices in most of the "narrative failure" expectations. A drop from $6.47 to $0.017, a 99.7% decline, means the market no longer believes any promises on the PPT.
But conversely, this also means any marginal improvement in substantive progress could trigger an over-expected reaction.
Watch three things:
1. Whether SatPay provides a clear regulatory approval timeline. This is the only fuel source for the buyback flywheel. Without it, the roadmap is just words.
2. On-chain movements of the 69 million ghost chips. If these tokens start to move, it either means selling pressure release or official intervention; either way, it’s a key signal.
3. Whether on-chain Gas fee revenue shows an order of magnitude change. $254/month means almost no real paying users on-chain. If this number grows more than 10 times in the next quarter, it indicates real commercial activity is landing in the ecosystem.
Summary
The current state of $CORE is neither "going to zero" nor "taking off," but an observation window where the narrative has switched but execution has yet to be verified. The price hovering around $0.02 is not market hesitation but the market waiting for an answer: can SatPay actually get running?
Before this answer comes out, all price movements are emotional. After the answer comes out, that’s when direction emerges.
$CORE #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 $TSLA will release its Q3 earnings report after market close on October 21. I personally lean towards the results exceeding Wall Street expectations, mainly because the market's profit forecasts for the automotive business are relatively conservative. According to Visible Alpha data, the market expects Tesla's Q3 revenue to be $28.04 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 0.2%, with adjusted EPS of $0.44, down 11.8% year-on-year. In contrast, Tesla's already announced Q3 vehicle deliveries reached 486,532 units, higher than previous market expectations. Model 3/Y deliveries were 478,237 units, and energy storage deployments reached 13.7 GWh, a 9.6% year-on-year increase. I believe the possibility of exceeding expectations mainly comes from the automotive business profit margin. Deliveries are confirmed; the market will next focus on average selling price, manufacturing costs, and capacity utilization. If automotive business cost control is better than expected, even with limited revenue growth, the final EPS could still exceed $0.44. However, it should be noted that Q3 deliveries still declined 2.1% year-on-year, and deliveries exceeded production by about 22,000 units, with some deliveries coming from inventory digestion, so it cannot be simply understood as a full recovery in end demand. The energy storage business is another variable worth watching. Megapack and Powerwall are providing Tesla with revenue sources beyond automobiles. If the energy business maintains good profit margins, it will positively contribute to overall profitability. However, this quarter's energy storage deployment volume was below previous expectations #台积电Q3净利润超预期，盈利创历史新高
TSMC's Q3 net profit reached 763.1 billion New Taiwan Dollars, up 68.7% year-on-year, setting a record for six consecutive quarters. In the first quarter of 2nm mass production, it accounted for 8% of wafer revenue, with advanced process technology overall reaching 79%.
Despite the strong financial report, the stock price fell by 1.8%. The market's concern lies elsewhere: AI customers are competing fiercely for capacity, with Wei Zhejia receiving over a dozen urgent order calls daily. However, TSMC clearly stated that capital expenditures will be significantly increased from 2026 to 2028. The stronger the demand, the more aggressive the spending, and the gross margin was first dragged down by 1.3 percentage points due to the 2nm ramp-up.
The profits are real, but with this AI wave, TSMC is also bearing a heavy burden.#10.21 On the Eve of the Earnings Report, Roadster's Hype Overshadows Market Variables Easily Overlooked
Mainstream market consensus: The Roadster demo video ignited emotions, combined with SpaceX's technological support, will strongly back Tesla's earnings report and even catalyze expectations of a merger between the two entities. But one easily overlooked fact: the new product launch cannot change the already closed Q3 results; it can only serve as an emotional buffer and cannot reverse the fundamentals.
This car was delayed for nine years before debuting, and deliveries are still expected next year. It features a Falcon rocket jet device, showcasing a combination of two mature technologies, but it is not a mass-production-ready flight solution. Its practicality in daily scenarios is very low, and the ejection mechanism poses safety risks, serving only as an emergency escape concept. Previous analysis showed that the optimal window for a merger is when SpaceX's valuation is high and Tesla's stock price is low; the current price level does not meet these conditions.
If this observation fails, the signal would be: the Tesla and SpaceX merger news is officially confirmed in this earnings report.
$TSLA $BTC $ETH $SOL The US September PPI rose 1.3% month-over-month, with energy obviously contributing a lot. But another BLS measure is even more worth highlighting: excluding food, energy, and trade services, prices still rose 0.5% month-over-month, higher than August's 0.3%. Trying to explain this inflation simply as "it's all because of oil prices" is somewhat forced. For the Federal Reserve, handling these two scenarios is very different. A sudden jump in oil prices can be observed to see if the shock recedes