Orbit Post Sitemap
After the Federal Reserve's rate hike was implemented, Bitcoin rose 9.3%, Ethereum rose 2.7%, and the median increase among the other 194 tokens was 21%. Layer2 surged 32%, RWA and AI tokens each rose 29%, while meme coins and payment tokens only increased by 5%. The money hasn't left the market; it's just changing seats. The altcoin season index hit a yearly high on October 12, but the proportion of coins above the 200-day moving average has dropped from over 90% to 52% — this is not a broad rally, but a brutal selection process.
The selection criteria are becoming ruthless. The on-chain total market cap of RWA is $39.18 billion, with holders increasing by 16.3% monthly. Ant Group and HSBC are jointly testing Agent tokenized payments, and Robinhood is exploring tokenized ETFs. BlackRock's "machine-native economy" points in the same direction: AI Agents require a payment track that doesn't need human "confirmation." Stablecoins and tokenized assets are currently the only candidates with real traffic, although actual Agent commercial payments are only $5,000 to $11,000 per month.
Ansem said Q4 is the "best quarter for altcoins in a long time," because positions and sentiment are at historic lows, leaving only upward direction.
Wintermute's response is colder: without renewed net inflows into ETFs and stabilization of long-term yields, chasing low-quality altcoins is not recommended.
Protocols that can collect rent in the Agent economy, infrastructure that can handle compliant RWA flows, and tokens no longer relying on VC unlocks for survival are the real direction.
— The rest, ETF bleeding has already voted for the market.223.8 million and exiting SOL, causing the treasury stock narrative to collapse in 30 days!
Unrealized losses exceed $150 million, major shareholders refuse to participate in buybacks and question management, severely damaging market confidence. Short-term selling pressure has landed but sentiment remains bearish; the corporate coin hoarding model has been disproven. Can the current financial environment still support a BTC bull market?
Key conclusion: It can support a rebound and consolidation but is insufficient to confirm a new major bull market.
1. Macro liquidity: headwinds remain
The 10-year US Treasury yield is about 5.1%, making the opportunity cost of holding BTC high.
The Federal Reserve has not entered a sustained easing cycle; liquidity has only marginally improved.
Assessment: Macro conditions are restrained, not a flood of liquidity.
2. ETF funds: channels exist but are unstable
Large single-day net inflows alternate with monthly net outflows.
Funds are mostly trading or rebalancing types, not consistent long-term accumulation.
Assessment: Buying channels are open, but sustained inflows have not formed.
3. Institutional holdings: slow money hasn’t exited, fast money is reducing
Hedge funds and other fast money are reducing positions; advisors and banks (slow money) maintain slight increases.
Slow money has not shifted from symbolic allocation to sustained accumulation.
Assessment: Institutional structure exists, but momentum is insufficient.
4. Price structure: bull market not completely broken
BTC oscillates near $80,000, still 30%-35% below previous highs.
Key supports: $83,000 (ETF cost zone), $77,000 (active investor average), $72,000 (200-day moving average).
Assessment: Structure intact, momentum weak.
5. Leverage and risk appetite: short-term remains fragile
Previously, $19 billion in leveraged liquidations occurred, with long leverage heavy.
US stock breadth is weak, credit volatility rising.
Assessment: High leverage causing volatility, not a healthy trending bull market.
⚠️ The above is a market structure analysis and does not constitute investment advice The treasury companies are starting to "go their separate ways" 💸
Strive is still aggressively buying BTC, Strategy is busy with buybacks,
while on the other side, SkyAI has completely sold off its SOL treasury.
SkyAI, listed on Nasdaq (formerly Sharps Technology),
disclosed to the SEC on 10-19 that it still held over 2 million SOL in September,
but now it's zeroed out, with about $223.8 million cash on hand.
The money wasn’t used to buy the dip—
it launched a $3/share cash tender offer, spending $201.3 million to buy back 95% of shares and warrants,
returning cash to shareholders. The treasury isn’t hoarding coins anymore; it’s returning cash.
I think "public companies holding coins" is shifting from faith to business:
buy more if the price rises, sell off and return cash if it doesn’t.
On the day, SKYA rose 5.3%, shareholders clearly prefer cash.
Invalidation conditions: if SOL breaks above $105.7 and continues to rebound,
or if SkyAI announces a repurchase after the tender offer expires on 10-29,
then the divergent narrative won’t hold.
Are you still holding treasury concept stocks?
$SOL
#Strive大额增持，Strategy回购规模超买币 $MUBARAK $MUBARAK 三重博弈！美联储 10 月决议看点
9 月 CPI 超预期反弹，市场加息押注升至 40%。但两大约束摆在眼前：美债利息负担沉重，且本次会议距离中期选举仅 6 天，历史上选举前这个时段加息十分罕见。
预期维持 4% 利率不变，重点看讲话与点阵图：
👉偏鹰，保留加息空间，币圈承压
👉偏鸽，把加息悬念延后至 12 月，利好反弹
多空拉扯，震荡为主，建议控仓等信号落地。
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 $BTC $ETH $SNDK #Visa partners with Mesh to expand stablecoin payments to 175 million merchants
175 million merchants. 💳
Visa teams up with Mesh to directly extend stablecoin payment channels to over a billion cash registers worldwide.
If this happened during a bull market, KOLs on Twitter would hype it for at least half a month. But now?
I advise you not to get excited just yet. There are two extremely counterintuitive truths behind this.
First, the more stablecoins spread, the more awkward Bitcoin becomes.
Have you noticed? In the future, when foreigners buy a cup of coffee, the backend settlement will be all in USDC—fast and cheap. But they don’t need to hold BTC or care about any Web3 narrative. Stablecoins have become the real "on-chain dollar," while Bitcoin can only watch from the sidelines for now.
Second, infrastructure fanatics can’t fix the current "drought."
Watching the news every day, it feels like blockchain is about to dominate the world. But looking at the market?
Bitcoin is still stuck around 82,000, options volatility hits a five-year low, even the big players are lying low. Hot money is flowing into US stocks, and the 5.6% high yield on US bonds is still draining liquidity.
What is this called? It’s called "long-term extreme optimism, short-term extreme cash shortage."
Visa is building roads for the next decade, but we have to survive this winter first.
Don’t use your own principal to pay for the infrastructure of the giants.👇
What do you think about Visa’s big payment move? Is it truly good news for the crypto world, or is it draining liquidity?Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $527 million yesterday, with BlackRock being the largest buyer.
But don't just focus on that one day. Looking back from October 7th, the overall trend still shows net outflows; even including yesterday's $500+ million inflow, there was still a net outflow of just over $400 million, and without it, nearly $1 billion.
Money is coming back, but the momentum isn't strong enough to support a trend. With the Fed's expected cooling in October and risk appetite warming up, BTC touched around 82,800 on Monday, but institutional disagreements remain evident.
Next, watch two things: whether BlackRock can continue to attract funds, and whether other ETFs will follow. This will determine if it's a rebound or a reversal.
$BTC#特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点
马斯克要给全美7300万个孩子每人送一股SpaceX，总价约107亿美元——币圈翻译一下：史上最大"空投"。
10月19日他亲手发的X帖文："明年，我要给美国每个孩子送一股我的SpaceX股票。"
算账：人口普查7300万未成年人，SPCX现价约146美元，乘出来就是107亿。
讽刺的是细则为零：谁来发、托管账户、增发稀释还是他自掏腰包，一个字没说。
币圈老玩家表示这剧情熟：5月28日Hyperliquid上Ventuals的SpaceX永续合约预言机喂错价，半小时暴跌45%，484个用户被清算。
四天前他秀飞行版Roadster，Hyperliquid的TSLA合约一小时成交量从280万干到4700万——币圈24小时帮马斯克站台。
我觉得这不是撒钱，是拿"股份就该直接给公众"的逻辑抽Anthropic慈善基金的脸，顺手给SpaceX造流动性。
散户别跟着嗨：107亿美元潜在抛压加增发稀释，真追进去就是接飞刀。
站稳$378（TSLA合约当晚高点）热闹继续，跌回$362（Roadster发布当天收盘价）以下故事告一段落。 观察：物理常识戳破$TSLA 飞行汽车，营销掩盖不了基本面博弈
Yann LeCun直接拿物理公式打脸：600升、700巴压力的压缩空气，实际有效推力连10秒都不到
面对这种硬核科普，马斯克只能回一句“朝你放屁”，这本身就说明技术底气不足
这款所谓的飞行汽车，本质上就是个空壳子加大气罐的营销噱头。
讽刺的是，虽然车是个笑话，但特斯拉的Q3财报预期可能并不差
交付量48.6万辆高于预期，哪怕同比降了2.1%，盈利修复和现金流改善依然是资本市场的核心看点
马斯克在这个节点疯狂搞噱头，无非是为了在财报披露前强行拉高关注度。
但在高息抽干流动性、对冲基金狂抛科技股的宏观大背景下，单靠“PPT造车”和口水战根本撑不起高估值
资本最终只认真实的毛利率和造血能力。噱头再响，也改变不了商业本质。Concerns about the AI bubble are spreading from the stock market to the crypto market. However, the capital flow is showing divergence; the spot ETF just recorded the largest single-day net inflow in a month, but almost all the new inflows come from BlackRock, while Fidelity and Grayscale are still seeing outflows. Overall, new funds are not abundant and seem more like they are picking ETF issuers. JPMorgan included Bitcoin in its ten-year outlook for the first time, and BlackRock has filed for a third Bitcoin ETF. These are long-term news and do not alleviate the current pressure.
BTC is currently at 81,458, down 1.1% in 24 hours. 81,000 is the psychological bottom line for this wave; if it breaks, the next target is 80,000. On the upside, 82,500 to 82,700 is the resistance zone for this round of fluctuations; reduce positions when it rebounds to that area.
ETH is currently at 2,384, down 1.65% in 24 hours. 2,400 has already been lost; the next support is 2,350. It has dropped 5.37% over seven days, more than twice the decline of BTC, showing a clearly weaker trend. Don’t expect it to lead the rebound.
ZEC is currently at 1,140, down 0.31% in 24 hours. It is the most resistant to decline in the last 24 hours, but it has dropped 7.34% over seven days. It doubled in a month when rising but slowly declined when falling. This kind of trend is the most wearing; don’t be fooled by the single-day drop.
To be honest, what is least lacking now are stories; what is most lacking is someone to put real money in first. If the US stock market doesn’t recover, the crypto market can’t create an independent rally on its own. Those itching to trade should hold on a bit longer; don’t mistake a rebound for a reversal.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC $SOL
SkyAI清仓全部SOL，2.238亿美元套现离场SOL，财库股叙事30天崩塌！
浮亏超1.5亿美元，大股东拒参回购并质疑管理层，市场信心遭重创。
短期抛压落地但情绪利空，企业囤币模式被证伪。从长期看，Solana生态韧性仍在，SkyAI转型AI，稳定币基建或成新看点。
利空出尽后，SOL走势将回归链上活跃度与应用落地，而非机构囤币故事。
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 早，老铁们☕️蹲坑顺手刷了眼盘面：全网持仓1394.5亿，24小时微增，BTC、ETH、SOL齐加仓——钱是进来了，方向还在掰手腕🤼
$ETH 最别扭：持仓307.48亿，涨幅排第二，可5分钟买卖比0.82，空头占54.9%。边加边砸，24小时爆1.11亿，66%是空单，空头被抬走，多头也憋屈😤
$SOL 最顺：持仓63.97亿，增速第一，涨幅也领跑，多头略占上风。升级剩一天半，开关没动，加注的先到了🚀
$BTC 负责吵：持仓528.2亿，涨得最少。散户看多仍多，大户看空人数减少，大户持仓1.14偏多——自己先打起来了🤔
美股反弹，纳指涨1.57%，周一ETF未更新，先看场内吵出结果📈
我的看法：
①持仓增但爆仓仅3.06亿，杠杆悄悄堆，怕突袭，仓位别打满⚠️
②散户用人数投票，大户用仓位投票，跟钱不跟嘴💰
③SOL最欢也最悬，升级前夜不追；ETH、BTC回调接多更稳🧘
子弹上膛，别急着扣扳机。我的空单蚂蚁仓还套着，求回本🙏#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 别急着把昨晚的反弹当成"信心回来了"✨ 可你真的确定，这波是买盘回来了吗？ 我第一眼看到美股开盘那会儿，其实有点想笑。重工业涨跌互现，几乎五五开，真正拉指数的是科技股，纳指涨超1%。表面看是风险偏好回暖，但细看更像超卖之后的技术性修复，而不是情绪彻底翻转。资金并没有从"防守"切到"进攻"，它只是暂时停止了撤退。 这个区别很关键。因为技术性回补和真实配置盘进场，交易的是两套东西。前者快、脆、容易熄火；后者慢，但会沉淀。现在更像前者。 币圈这边也跟着动了。BTC 盘中最高涨超1.4%，但推动力主要来自空头被挤，24小时清算约1.8亿美元，其中空单约1.1亿。也就是说，这波上行更像是被"被迫买回"推着走，而不是现货资金主动追价。$ETH $ZEC $BTC 里，ETH 和 ZEC 的弹性更容易被这种回补放大，因为它们的短线仓位更敏感。 我真正关注的不是涨幅，而是资金偏好变了没有。目前看，答案偏保守：美股资金停在科技龙头里避险式抱团，币圈资金则停留在高流动性标的做短打，山寨整体没有出现全面接力的迹象。这种结构下，BTC 若想延续，需要看到现货成交和稳定币流入同步跟上；否则空头挤完，动能就容易断BTC has been very frustrated recently; every time it touches above 83000, it gets pushed back, and today it’s hovering around 81000 again. What’s going on?
Data speaks: Last week, BTC and ETH spot ETFs had a combined net outflow of $593 million, with ETH alone losing $320 million from one person, marking three consecutive weeks of bleeding. The institutional buying, the core engine, is not only not stepping on the gas but is actually hitting the brakes.
Why is 83000 so critical? Because the average cost line for BTC ETF holders is around 84300. When the price approaches this area, the break-even holders flood out to sell. If you push it up, they run, so naturally, it can’t be pulled higher.
Technically, BTC is grinding back and forth between 82000-83500, with the 50-day moving average still supporting it, but the highs keep moving lower. There is strong support at 80000; if it breaks below this, it will test 79000. Resistance is at 83700, and without volume, it simply can’t break through.
My judgment is simple: without ETF inflows, this game is over. Right now, existing funds are just cutting each other in contracts; no one is taking the spot. Don’t rush to bottom-fish; wait until ETFs have two consecutive days of net inflows.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 #奈飞财报在即，广告业务成新看点 $BTC $ETH $ZEC AI究竟到没到泡沫破碎那一步？
可以看一个指标——纳指100除以纳指综合指数。
互联网或AI爆发，从来都是由少数龙头领导的。
所以在大约1998~2000年，我们看见NDX/IXIC出现了爆发式的增长，这种增长可能来源于互联网龙头股票的泡沫。
但是从2022年底至今，NDX/IXIC的涨势根本和互联网泡沫阶段没有可比性。
可能要感谢川普，一会儿加关税，一会儿政府停摆，一会儿打伊朗，让所谓的AI泡沫没能吹起来多大就回调了。
所以现在，可能也是中期选举，加上美伊引发的高油价形成的一次回调。#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
I am the mid-term intelligence guy.
Latest market analysis on October 20: Data agency Kaiko reports that the largest liquidation event in the crypto market over the past year has not yet fully recovered.
Looking at core data: In Bitcoin terms, $BTC perpetual contract open interest is about 16% lower than before the crash; the USD-denominated spot market depth is even worse, down 27%. Leverage is decreasing faster than liquidity, with leverage per dollar of market depth 20% lower than before October 10.
Intelligence guy's interpretation: Leverage clearing is obvious, liquidity recovery is lagging. From a mid-term perspective, deleveraging is a healthy signal, but a true reversal requires liquidity replenishment.
$ETH $ZEC Gold is approaching 4,200, BTC stands above 82,500, both assets strengthening on the same day. What does this combination usually mean over the past year? First, the news. Four numbers: Gold 4,196.0 (+0.36%, spot 4,178.50), BTC 82,493.7 (24h +1.62%, past week -0.28%), US Dollar Index 101.82 (-0.02%), Fear & Greed Index rising from 53 to 59. On the capital side, ETFs have seen slight net inflows for three consecutive days, but still net outflows of 327.1 million over 5 days and 730 million over 10 days; on the stock market side, the S&P 500 closed at 7,659.44 (-1.09%) in the previous trading session. Next, the impact on capital. Gold and BTC rising together usually corresponds to two scenarios: one is improved liquidity expectations (weaker dollar, falling real interest rates), with capital flowing into both asset types simultaneously; the other is simultaneous rise in both safe-haven demand and risk appetite (inflation expectations heating up), with both assets used for hedging. The key to distinguishing these is the dollar and US stocks: if the dollar weakens and US stocks rise, it’s closer to the first scenario; if the dollar strengthens and US stocks fall, it’s closer to the second. Today, the dollar is flat and US stocks fell in the previous session, somewhere in between. Implications for BTC: the simultaneous rise itself is a positive signal, indicating capital is not choosing "either-or" between the two asset types. But gold approaching the key level of 4,200—if it breaks through, capital may further concentrate on the safe-haven side, and BTC could be diverted. So, this is what to watch next 比特币巨鲸的60日净持仓，刚刚从-62,600 BTC翻到了+5,230 BTC。
这是CryptoQuant今天盯到的一个关键翻转：持有1000到10000枚BTC的地址，结束了持续净抛售，重新转向积累。但同一份数据里，现货端完全没有跟上——Coinbase溢价指数停在-0.1416%，周度交易所净流入8,428枚BTC，短期持有者还在盈亏平衡线附近割肉离场。
这个分化值得关注，因为巨鲸通常是链上最敏感的那批钱，它们先动，但现货买盘不接，行情就缺一条腿。与此同时，Binance上的USDT储备已经从7.9亿美元悄悄堆到了17.6亿美元，弹药在增加，只是还没扣扳机。
目前更支持一种观察：市场正在从“卖方衰竭”往“潜在筑底”过渡，但底部的确认权不在巨鲸手里，在现货买家手里。
接下来重点盯两件事：Coinbase溢价指数能不能翻正，以及STH-SOPR能不能站上1。这两个信号同时出现，巨鲸的积累才算真正被现货接住。
巨鲸动了，现货还没动——这次是巨鲸先对了，还是又一次提前抄底抄在半山腰？评论区聊聊你的判断。$BTC $ETH Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF funds showed a very striking divergence today.
On the same day, the US Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net inflow of $527 million, with BlackRock's IBIT alone sweeping $665 million; meanwhile, the Ethereum spot ETF experienced a net outflow of $103 million, marking the fourth consecutive day of losses. The cumulative outflow in October has nearly reached $955 million, the largest monthly outflow this year.
This is not simply a case of a "weak market." More noteworthy is another set of data: Wall Street hedge funds reduced their short positions on Bitcoin by about 15% during the same period, while their calendar spread arbitrage positions surged by 48%. Shorts are withdrawing, but not turning bullish; rather, they are shifting from directional bets to playing the spread. At the same time, 90% of liquidations in the derivatives market over the past 4 hours were long positions, indicating longs are being cleaned out.
This combination currently supports one observation: funds are not leaving crypto but are structurally switching between Bitcoin and Ethereum. Institutional appetite for Bitcoin allocation is genuinely reflected on the ETF side, but selling pressure on Ethereum has yet to abate.
Going forward, the focus is on two things: when the outflow from Ethereum ETFs will turn positive in a single day, and whether the over $500 million inflow into Bitcoin ETFs is an isolated rebound or the start of continuous replenishment. Is ETH's current bleeding a rotation or a structural abandonment? Share your thoughts in the comments. $BTC $ETH 比特币这周其实挺能扛的。上周还差点跌破8万，结果周末开始反弹。从6月底那个接近5.8万的低点算起，已经反弹了不少，但距离去年10月的12万多高点还差挺远。很多人看它稳，其实背后是资金在往它身上集中——比特币的市值占比（dominance）已经爬到接近60%，甚至有说冲到60.7%的。意思很简单：钱不敢乱撒，先抱紧老大。Continue to track the fundamentals of $PONS.
Currently, the PONS protocol has a daily trading volume of about 3 million USD, which may have already approached a short-term bottom.
The protocol currently generates about 50,000 USD in daily revenue. If the trading volume remains at this level, the expected daily burn amount could reach around 100,000 tokens.
Looking at Robinhood Chain, under the current market environment, I believe the on-chain trading volume still has the potential to maintain around 80 million USD.
The latest on-chain trading data for PONS also shows a recovery:
Trading volume: from 3 million USD to 3.7 million USD (+15.6%)
Platform fees: from 269,000 USD to 457,000 USD (+67.3%)
Protocol revenue: from 36,000 USD to 68,000 USD, now averaging about 50,000 USD daily (+88.9%)
Newly issued tokens: from 1,100 per day to 1,800 per day (+54.5%)
If this data rebound can continue, the fundamentals of PONS may be stabilizing. Referring to the 2023 $ORDI and $PEPE listings on exchanges with an 85% plunge, PONS is currently not at the bottom but is not far from it.DeepSeek与华为联手挑战英伟达AI算力霸权：参与下一代芯片设计，年底冲刺国产芯片预训练
去年，DeepSeek 尝试用华为昇腾芯片训练 R2，最后没能成功。《金融时报》当时披露，芯片稳定性、跨卡通信和软件支持都存在问题。即便华为派工程师驻场协助，DeepSeek 最终还是转回英伟达芯片完成训练。
一年多后，双方的合作进一步深入硬件设计。《The Information》现在披露，华为工程师长期驻扎 DeepSeek 办公室，将模型训练中的实际需求直接纳入下一代昇腾芯片的设计，包括如何安排计算任务，以及如何在芯片之间传输数据。
DeepSeek 今年 9 月底刚开源了昇腾版 TileLang，以及矩阵计算、MoE 专家通信等底层工具，减少了模型迁移到国产芯片所需的开发工作。但软件能跑起来，距离完整预训练还有很长一段路。上万颗芯片需要连续协同数周，任何一颗发生故障，或者数据传输出现延迟，都可能拖慢整个集群。如今双方开始从芯片设计阶段处理这些问题。
华为计划将 2027 年第一季度就绪的昇腾 960DT 的大部分供应优先交给 DeepS…Netflix is likely to slightly exceed EPS, with revenue probably close to guidance and unlikely to significantly surpass expectations. Price increases and ad-supported plans support profit margins, but weak user engagement growth means revenue expectations are already set quite low.
Tesla's delivery data is decent, and revenue is expected to meet targets, but exceeding EPS expectations is difficult, with a higher risk of falling short. The main pressure comes from continued automotive gross margin compression, while FSD and humanoid robot R&D continue to consume profits.
Meta's advertising fundamentals are solid, with a good chance of slightly exceeding revenue expectations, but EPS uncertainty is the highest. The biggest variable is AI computing capital expenditure; if investment continues to increase, profits are easily eroded, resulting in meeting revenue targets but missing profit expectations.
I believe all three companies will find it difficult to exceed expectations
#奈飞财报在即，广告业务成新看点 兄弟们，SpaceX这次财报，我偏乐观
先看第二季度，营收78.1亿美元，同比增长约92%；净亏损5.41亿美元，去年同期亏损约10.08亿美元；调整后EBITDA约35亿美元，同比增长191%
增长确实猛，但EBITDA为正，和净利润、自由现金流为正，完全是三回事
Starlink是重要支撑，上季度连接业务收入增长66%，营业利润增长79%，用户约1,200万，企业和政府客户也在贡献增长
这次最大的变量是AI业务，市场预计收入从上季度约25.6亿美元升到约64亿，增长预期已经拉得很高
集团营收市场预期约127亿—129亿美元，我个人押132亿美元，调整后EBITDA约68亿美元，调整后EPS约0.17美元
真正让我警惕的是支出，市场预计本季度资本开支约196亿美元，自由现金流约负116亿美元，收入增长再快，也得面对这张账单
上季度末现金及证券约1,000亿美元，看着很厚，但同期IPO净募资约857亿美元，还发了250亿美元债，不能全部当成经营赚出来的钱
所以我押业绩偏强，但股价要持续上涨，还得看到AI合同兑现、回款改善
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 Yesterday's market was quite volatile in terms of price patterns, but from the perspective of capital behavior, I still want to describe it as "interesting." During the US trading session, the market showed significant divergence. Then, while consolidating around 82000, the spot market saw a large-scale and sustained proactive buying, yet the price remained completely unchanged. The core reason was that this buying pressure was absorbed by a large amount of selling pressure from the spot side above. After the proactive buying paused, accompanied by proactive selling on the contract side, the price subsequently declined. After a brief minor fluctuation, the price settled near 81500 and continued to consolidate sideways. What's even more interesting is that during this period, the spot side initiated another round of proactive buying, but the price still remained unchanged. By analyzing open interest and funding rates, we can clearly determine that this round of selling absorption above was provided by the contract side and dominated by coin-margined contracts. In other words, during the Asian and European sessions, there were two consecutive instances where proactive buying from the spot side was continuously and strongly absorbed, with the absorption coming respectively from the spot side and the contract side. This compels us to reassess the determination of both bulls and bears in the current battle over the consolidation range. If we organize the current data, it is difficult to conclude that either side holds an absolute advantage. However, overall, the bears currently hold a slightly higher dominant position. The selling pressure is indeed continuously absorbed by the coin-holding groups during the sideways movement, but when the market continues to face more and larger selling pressure, it may have to undergo another pullback to find a new price acceptance zone. Moreover, the bears face a critical issue of insufficient aggressive selling power to push prices lower, as well as the risk of some late-stage short sellers entering the market and fueling a short squeeze. Similarly, the bulls... Surface sideways, underlying currents: $BTC is almost flat near $82,000, $ETH reports $2,408 with only a slight increase, the weak trend remains unchanged. But what’s really worth watching is not the price, but the layering of funds—last week, spot BTC and ETH ETFs had a combined net outflow of about $549 million, with ETH alone bleeding $320 million, the heaviest among the two. The secondary market is withdrawing, but long-term on-chain accumulation is happening; this divergence is the signal that should be most understood right now📉. Corporate actions sharply contrast with ETF flows. Strive increased its BTC holdings by about $335 million last week at an average price of $82,803, indicating that some balance sheet players see the current range as a window for allocation rather than an exit reason. At the same time, BlackRock submitted an application for a “Bitcoin Protection Management ETF,” aiming to add a layer of downside mitigation to IBIT holdings. This is not a loss of interest in $BTC, but institutions want a more controllable way to hold it—while sentiment weakens, product innovation is actually accelerating, a contrast underestimated by the market. The divergence on the $ETH side is even more extreme. SharpLink invested $400 million ETH into Ether.fi and Lido for liquid staking, BitMine continues to increase holdings, long-term funds locking chips on-chain; yet ETF redemptions have not stopped, naturally suppressing short-term prices. On-chain accumulation and secondary market withdrawal coexist, such divergences usually require time to digest, not something resolved by one or two candlesticks. My judgment is: the main一群人盯着$ZEC 喊冲1万，却没人看它才回调一个月。从前高1697回撤34%到1120，主升浪早着呢。最多配10%现货，分3次买，合约别碰，1万是叙事不是目标。
$BTC 卡在8.3万关口，上方卖单墙压着，每次弹上去都像触电。不破81100轻仓接多，跌破8万等7.8万承接。ETF还在流出，别当反转做。
宏观最大压制是原油，CL居高不下币圈涨不动。等特朗普中期选举前后压油价，才有痛快行情。控制仓位，活着最重要。$ETH
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ BTC has only risen 0.38% over five trading days, and the premium bulls pay every 8 hours has decreased with each of today's three settlements.
At midnight, it was still fully loaded at 1.0bp, but by the afternoon it dropped to just 0.52bp.
Since 10/11, there hasn't been a single day closing above 83,000.
Pressing the same price level for ten days turns that pressure into consensus.
On OKX, BTC's open interest contracts have remained between 3.18 billion and 3.36 billion throughout October.
The ETF talks about incremental inflows that won't come anytime soon, the fee rate talks about no fees paid on existing positions, and the position talks about no one entering the market.
All three perspectives point to the same thing: little pressure from above, and no one stepping in from below.
The most costly thing in this market is itchy hands, the second most costly is guessing the direction.
I don't think this is a bottom building; it's that no one is willing to bet.
For the rebound to continue, someone has to be willing to open new longs, not just close old ones.
Watching the fee rate is more useful than watching the K-line: the line is the result, money is the cause.
The longer it stays sideways, the more both sides seem to be waiting for the other to move first.
Entering now means profiting from volatility but losing to time decay.
I won't chase. Conditions for invalidation:
If it stands back above 83,149, open interest rises 5% in a day, and the fee rate returns to 1bp, I'll admit new money is entering;
If open interest falls below 3.18 billion, it means bulls are starting to withdraw, and it's even less worth stepping in.
The next wave at 84,000—are you waiting for new leverage or for the ETF to stop outflows?
$BTC $ETH
#ETF continuous outflows, can BTC's rebound continue?
#TradingVoice: Your experience deserves to be heardNVIDIA GTC Berlin conference is approaching, why did the whale open a large short position?
#芯片股终结八连跌，AI行情能否持续？
The NVIDIA GTC Berlin conference is about to take place. At this time, a whale opened a large short position with an average entry price of $218.078, currently holding a position valued at about $12.61 million, with an unrealized profit of about $86,600.
The main reasons I think the whale opened the short position now are:
1. Sell the news hedge: The positive expectations for GTC Berlin (Oct 20-22) and Jensen Huang's speech (21st) have been partially realized (investment in four German startups, industrial AI cooperation). After a highly anticipated event, a "sell the news" pullback is likely, so the short bet is on volatility.
2. Technical pullback: The stock price has fallen from the early October high of about $243 to around $217 (about -10%), with recent momentum cooling off, making it suitable to short before the event.
3. Macro pressure: High oil prices, inflation, and concerns about the Fed's path are pressuring tech stocks. Doubts about AI capital expenditure returns are rising, making valuations sensitive at high levels.
4. Tactical position: Short-term trading on platforms like Hyperliquid, average price $218.078, currently slightly profitable near the current price, not a long-term bearish view.
Going forward, $NVDA is likely to mainly range trade before the event.
Support: 214-215, then looking down to 210
Resistance: 220, 225, 230
Hold above 214 or rebound; if it breaks below, look toward 200;
If the speech exceeds expectations, it could surge; otherwise, it may easily pull back.$CORE $CORE The essence of core's decline is due to the large unlocking in the early stage causing selling pressure release. But from the perspective of value and development, it has been improving continuously, for example, now it has a mainnet, many dapps, and financial projects under development.
After listing, combined with the liquidity analysis at that time, the liquidity was one-fifteenth of the current liquidity, so the lowest price at listing was about 0.3u. Liquidity has increased 15 times, and the price has dropped 15 times compared to the lowest point after listing, just around 0.02. The subsequent unlocking of locked tokens is spread over many years and represents a very small incremental selling pressure.
Therefore, it is judged that the bottom area of core is approximately around 0.02, with some margin of error up or down, but not very large.
The current price very much matches the characteristics of bottom value.
From a technical analysis perspective, as long as the price does not hit a new low, it is an opportunity.
As retail investors, we can only be those who have faith or those who cut losses and run.
So, what do you choose? AVAX at $9.4, would you still dare to hold it?
Institutions are quietly accumulating while retail investors are calling it trash. RWA growth leads all chains, yet the price has fallen back to the starting point—is this the final shakeout or an escape window?
First, look at the surface: continuous good news, but the price doesn’t rise.
AVAX is currently at $9.40, down 2.3%-2.7% in 24 hours, down 8% over 7 days, and weakly fluctuating over 30 days. Market cap is $4.17 billion, 24-hour volume $198 million, circulating supply 444 million tokens. The candlestick chart shows a decline from mid-October’s $10.5-$11 range, now testing lows around $9.39-$9.26. Price is below the 20/50 moving averages, RSI is 35-43, neutral to weak, close to oversold but not extreme—all indicators say one thing: support nearby, waiting for direction.
First thing: institutions are buying, but why no price pump?
Look at these news items, don’t skip:
Janus Henderson (about $500 billion AUM) became a validator and invested in the on-chain lending platform Tranched.
Dubai DIFC court put court orders/records on Avalanche C-Chain.
Hyundai Card is piloting cross-border payments on Avalanche via Axiym, reducing time by over 96%.
Tokenized US Treasuries about $545 million, roughly 4x growth this year; RWA distributed assets about $1.73 billion; RWA grew about $266 million in the last 30 days, leading multiple chains.
Charles Schwab plans to launch AVAX trading by year-end; Goldman Sachs-related Treasury funds access Avalanche settlement network via Lynq.
In plain language:
AVAX is no longer just the "high-speed public chain" story; it’s becoming the settlement layer for institutional RWA and payments.
But the harsh truth is:
Institutions are buying the settlement layer five years from now; you’re buying the candlestick five days from now.
Institutions enter slowly, not to pump the price for you.
So the price is slow to react to good news—not because the narrative is fake, but because macro and liquidity don’t cooperate.
Second thing: fundamentals are strong, but retail doesn’t buy in
AVAX’s foundation is solid:
DeFi TVL about $580-$590 million, stablecoin market cap about $1.25 billion, active RWA AUM over $1 billion.
Daily active addresses about 40,000, daily transactions about 250,000.
Advantages include institutional-grade subnets/L1 customization, fast finality, fee burning, and quick RWA/credit/payment adoption. BlackRock BUIDL and Securitize have significant shares.
But weaknesses are clear:
Retail DeFi activity is weaker than Solana/Base, DEX and perpetual volumes are shrinking, fees and per-user transactions are low.
In short:
Institutional narratives are sophisticated; retail doesn’t understand them; retail doesn’t play, so price lacks elasticity.
AVAX doesn’t lack a story; the story is too advanced, and short-term funds lack patience to listen.
Third thing: macro is the biggest blade, 9.3 is the litmus test
BTC is fluctuating between 81,400-82,000; US September inflation rose to 3.7%, above expectations; 10-year yield about 5%; market even prices in possible rate hikes by end of October.
In a high-interest environment, altcoins’ beta to BTC will be amplified.
No matter how good AVAX’s RWA narrative is, it can’t withstand Fed rate hike expectations.
Technically more direct:
Falling from $10.5-$11, now testing first support at $9.30-$9.40.
Secondary support at $9.00-$9.10, stronger at $8.70-$8.90.
Resistance near term at $9.50-$9.60, mid-term $9.75-$10.00, higher at $10.50-$11.00.
Funding rate near neutral, long-short ratio slightly bullish but not extreme, open interest moderate, recent long liquidations more frequent. Weekly chart still at the bottom of a large range, down over 93% from ATH.
9.3 is not an ordinary support; it’s a litmus test:
Holding it is a golden pit; breaking it with volume is a bottomless pit.
Long-short showdown, you decide:
On one side:
Janus Henderson, Charles Schwab, Goldman Sachs-related funds, Hyundai Card—institutions landing real projects
RWA 30-day growth $266 million, leading all chains
Tokenized US Treasuries 4x growth this year
Testing $9.3-$9.4, RSI near oversold
On the other side:
Macro high rates + 3.7% inflation + rate hike expectations, risk assets under pressure
Weak retail DeFi, shrinking DEX/perpetual volumes
Price below moving averages, short-term bearish
Breaking $9.3 may accelerate drop to $9.0 or even $8.7
Key levels
Resistance above: $9.50-$9.60 → $9.75-$10.00 → $10.50-$11.00
Support below: $9.30-$9.40 → $9.00-$9.10 → $8.70-$8.90
Trading strategy
Short-term traders:
Light position to observe if $9.30 holds.
If it rebounds and stabilizes at $9.50-$9.60 and BTC stabilizes, consider short-term longs targeting $9.75-$10.00;
If it breaks $9.30 with volume and accelerates down, consider short positions near $9.00.
Swing traders:
Wait for below $9.00 or a volume breakout above $10 to increase positions.
Fundamentals support mid-to-long-term logic, but don’t chase highs before macro turns.
Long-term believers:
If you believe in RWA/institutional narrative, accumulate below $9 in batches, don’t all in at once.
Targets are for future cycles, but macro turnaround and BTC strength are prerequisites. Prioritize position management, avoid heavy single-coin exposure.
AVAX now is like LINK in 2023—
Everyone curses “old coin not rising,” but institutions quietly accumulate RWA and payments.
What happened later? LINK rose from 5 to 20.
AVAX isn’t losing price; it’s losing retail patience; institutions aren’t buying candlesticks; they’re buying the future settlement layer.
$BTC $ETH $AVAX 晚间观点：10.20日。
大饼的阴跌又开始了没完了吗？上方红色箭头所指大饼两次反抽想重新收回到82120的阻力上方运行全部以失败告终，并且还在白框圈出的位置收出了孤立高点，出现孤立高点说明上方遇到了阻力，阻力位就是82120。在以后的交易中各位同学看见孤立高点的时候你手里有多单的你就要警惕了，要么减仓要么清仓，出现了孤立高点就是在提醒你，我可能要走回调了，你不减仓或者清仓你就要挨揍了，记住白框圈出的这个k线形态。出现孤立高点之后随机把三角形又跌破了，从当下的盘面来看大饼要准备回踩81026-80789的区间支撑了，这个区间支撑能撑住还没啥事会走82120-80789的盘整震荡，这个区间支撑一旦被跌破那就要留意前低79732的位置，前低被跌破收不回来更大的跌幅就来了。下方白色箭头所指的量能对应的k线，下跌的量能有了，但是价格却没有向下走，这里出现了缩量下跌，缩量下跌，跌不多深这是我个人主观偏见。可能会假跌破一下80789的支撑在收回，因为80789附近有大量多头流动性待清理，这是在没有利空消息的前提下我觉得会这样走，出利空消息可能就真的收不回来了，写不下了看评论区做单逻辑锚定 $OKB 自身的价值捕获疲劳：平台币长期依赖“季度回购销毁”作为核心看涨期权，但近期市场交投结构变化，现货交易量向新兴赛道（如 Meme、AI）分散，主流永续手续费贡献增速放缓。回购利好逐渐“买预期、卖事实”，119.81 上方多头承接枯竭。做空至 113.52，本质是做空“回购红利消退后的估值回归”。当前 113.52，110 为心理关口，若回购数据不及预期或现“利好出尽”插针，破位看 108；20x 杠杆浮盈翻倍，需移动止盈锁利。$ETH $BTC #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 Netflix is reporting earnings tonight, and it looks like it will slightly beat expectations.
Q2 revenue was $12.56 billion, up 13.4% year-over-year; operating profit was $4.193 billion, up about 11%; net profit was $3.401 billion, up about 9%; split-adjusted EPS was $0.80, compared to $0.72 in the same period last year.
The profitability is strong, but the operating margin dropped from 34.1% to 33.4%, profit growth lagged behind revenue growth, operating cash flow was $1.744 billion, and free cash flow was $1.525 billion, down about 28% and 33% year-over-year respectively.
The company explained that part of this was due to increased cash taxes.
Meanwhile, it repurchased $4.7 billion in shares this quarter, about three times the free cash flow for the quarter, and the EPS growth also benefited from the reduced share count.
The company’s guidance this time is revenue of $12.86 billion, EPS of $0.82, and an operating margin of 33.2%.
Personally, I’m betting on revenue of $12.95 billion, EPS of $0.85, and an operating margin around 33.5%.
Price increases are contributing more fully, ad revenue continues to grow, and content amortization growth is expected to slow in the second half, all of which are favorable for profit realization.
But the market has long known these positives, and the full-year ad revenue target of about $3 billion only accounts for about 6% of the full-year revenue guidance.
What really determines the stock price is whether the full-year revenue target of $51 billion to $51.4 billion and the 31.5% operating margin target can be raised.
I am cautiously bullish.
#奈飞财报在即，广告业务成新看点 BTC is sharpening its blade on the fault line, ETH is counting seconds on the line between life and death.
$BTC is stuck at 82,000; 82,500–83,000 is not an ordinary resistance, but a liquidation fault line created by short stop-losses and leveraged positions. Funding rates have dropped to the lowest since June, and open interest has shrunk to a 5-month low—the selling pressure is not being held up, but the leverage is withdrawing first. However, ETFs saw a total inflow of 527 million yesterday, IBIT alone took 665 million, while FBTC and GBTC are still bleeding. On-chain, addresses holding 1,000–10,000 coins have shifted from a net accumulation of -62,600 coins over 60 days to +5,230 coins; the whales are accumulating, but spot demand has not kept up.
$ETH is near 2,380, with 2,360 as the line between life and death; tests in the past three days have been pulled back twice. ETFs have seen outflows for the fourth consecutive day totaling 103 million, with ETHA withdrawing 95.4 million in a single day. But while whales are increasing shorts, BitMine’s holdings have surged to 6.04 million coins, and JPM Coin is directly deployed on the Ethereum mainnet. On one hand, derivatives are used to suppress prices; on the other, real money is used to accumulate chips.
The strategy is twofold. BTC: touching 82,500–83,000 will itself change micro liquidity; a close confirmation is not necessarily required, but no trades between 82,000–82,500 as position rotation odds are worst there; breaking below 81,000 means looking for the next level at 79,000. ETH: maintain the squeeze logic above 2,360, lightly test and stop loss below 2,350; only consider 2,480 if volume breaks above 2,440; if 2,360 breaks, next stops are 2,320 or even 2,200, no catching falls.The market with continuous ETF outflows is mostly a rebound driven by short covering and contract short squeezes, which is a pulse-like repair and rarely develops into a sustained strong rally. To continue the rebound, other funds must take over; relying solely on retail and large investors bottom-fishing and holding the pressure will be exhausting.
Many people easily fall into a misconception: ETF outflow = immediate sharp drop. Actually, they are not the same. ETF redemptions are Wall Street institutions reducing risk and adjusting positions, indicating a lack of incremental institutional buying; however, on-chain whales, off-exchange spot, and contract short covering can still push the price up, so it is common to see a divergence where "ETF is running out, but the coin price is rising." This divergence is the biggest hidden risk in this round: institutions exit during the rebound, and the higher the rebound, the heavier the selling pressure above.
Two scenarios to consider separately
✅ Optimistic scenario, the rebound can continue:
ETF outflows gradually narrow and stop accelerating; US Treasury yields and the US dollar weaken, providing liquidity support; on-chain whale addresses keep accumulating coins, spot exchange inventories continue to decline; contracts are not purely short squeezes, and new long funds slowly take over. In this case, the rebound can continue and move upward within a range.
❌ Pessimistic scenario, the rebound is likely to fail:
ETF outflows continue to expand with large daily redemptions; the US dollar and US Treasury yields strengthen; this rally is purely driven by short liquidations, and after the liquidation, there is no spot buying to follow. This kind of rebound is a "bull trap repair," shorts have fully covered, institutions continue to sell off, and the price is very likely to fall back to test support levels again. #ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ $XAU Hawkish pressure and safe-haven support create a dilemma
Currently, gold is clearly caught in a tug-of-war between bulls and bears. The Federal Reserve's meeting saw three dissenting votes advocating rate hikes, combined with a rebound in the US dollar and rising US Treasury yields, which have short-term suppressed gold prices. This is the main reason gold fell back from above 4190.
However, the downside is also capped. Tensions in the Middle East and unresolved geopolitical risks keep safe-haven demand alive. The People's Bank of China increased its gold holdings by 23 tons in September, marking 23 consecutive months of gold purchases. Gold ETF holdings also hit a record high. Domestic physical and allocation demand remain active.
In simple terms, short-term dollar strength and rate hike expectations weigh on gold, but geopolitical safe-haven demand and central bank gold buying provide a floor. The fundamentals have not deteriorated, and gold is mostly range-bound. #ETF outflows continue, can BTC's rebound sustain? $BTC
My current position hasn't changed much; I continue to hold Bitcoin spot without any movement,
and my long contracts on Bitcoin are also still open.
I see this more as a bullish continuation, a period of doubt between the bear market and bull market. I believe the adjustment space won't be very large. A deep pullback might reach around 77000 or 78000, which would be a highly cost-effective entry point. Whether it gets there, I'm not sure, but I won't bet on it.
Bitcoin's yearly candle has never closed negative for two consecutive years. Now that the adjustment is in place, it will continue to charge toward 100000 by year-end. Until the bull market direction changes, I won't make significant adjustments to my position, only managing leverage size. Core Bull-Bear Logic
Dimension 📈 Bullish Signals 📉 Bearish Risks
Capital Flow ETF single-day net inflow of 665 million, capital flow shows a sharp reversal; last week ETF total still net outflow of $593 million; price failed to strengthen following ETF inflows
Technical 50-day SMA (81,166 dipped then recovered) MACD zeroed, momentum exhausted; 82,789 false breakout turned resistance; price below 7-day/20-day SMA
Derivatives OI decline due to deleveraging rather than new short positions; funding rate neutral; 1-hour taker buy/sell ratio only 0.5321, sell orders nearly double buy orders
Macro October rate hike probability only 15%-17%, short-term interest rate shock risk low; economists warn "fifty-fifty"; December rate hike probability near 80%; Brent crude still around $110
Sentiment Doctor Profit at 94,000 Greed Index 48, sentiment neutral to slightly cold; bulls washed out after yesterday's false breakout $BTC $ETH $ZEC #ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？
帮主有话说：
10月FOMC将至，市场押注暂停加息的概率已超80%，预期已经打满了。
真正的变数不在10月，而在12月。评论区有句话说得很准：10月暂停已被定价，真正的风险是12月加息预期升温。如果CPI、PPI或油价继续走高，鹰派声音会再次抬头。
油价现在还在100多美元的高位，通胀压力没散。10月美联储大概率按兵不动，但如果声明偏鹰，或暗示年底还要加息，风险资产就要承压。所以FOMC落地前，方向不明，不赌单边。
大饼今日微跌0.40%，市场观望。我昨天直播的三单已全部止盈，现已空仓。重点看8万关口能否守住，守住就是震荡，跌破则看更深回调，上方压力84,000-85,000，不追涨杀跌，等会议落地再找机会。
单子记得带好止损。 $BTC $ETH $ZEC
以上分析均有时效性，祝君好运。At 8:30 PM, before the US stock market opens, I was frantically watching the data.
The weirdest divergence appeared today: last night, the US stock market Bitcoin spot ETF just recorded a net inflow of 526.7 million dollars, but today the coin price surged to 82,067 and then completely gave it all back, now stuck at 81,412.
Why can't BlackRock's large purchase move the price? Look at the three most core hot data points today:
1️⃣ Hashrate debt is still collapsing: The hashrate leasing leader CoreWeave ($CRWV) before the US market tonight directly broke the $60 lifeline, plunging 5.03% to $58.30 (lowest hit $57.98, a new 52-week low). The hashrate default risk is growing bigger and bigger, and cross-asset funds are still taking the opportunity to sell for dollars while the ETF supports the market.
2️⃣ Institutions completely abandon the losing side to save the winning one: Last night while $BTC saw inflows, the $ETH spot ETF reversed with a net outflow of 103.3 million dollars. Today $ETH directly broke below the 2,400 level, hitting a low of 2,376.9, now quoted at 2,381.
3️⃣ On-chain big players openly shorting: Today social media uncovered a Hyperliquid address marked as Wintermute holding a position of 81.36 million dollars, 85.5% of which are short positions (just the 15x short on $ETH alone is 22.61 million dollars, also shorting $SOL and the S&PAre you like this too: bullish on Bitcoin, but can't stand it halving in value every time it drops; afraid of missing out when out of the market, but can't sleep when fully invested. BlackRock is targeting exactly these people this time.
On October 19, it submitted the iShares Bitcoin Managed Protection ETF to the SEC, ticker PBIT. In short: it wants to capture the upside while providing a buffer layer during downturns, offering those who can't hold BTC a middle option that doesn't require going all-in or completely missing out.
But it doesn't hold Bitcoin directly; instead, it uses a combination of IBIT call options plus short-term U.S. Treasuries: buying call options at about 90% of the strike price, selling call options at a higher strike price, and using the premium from selling options to subsidize the cost of buying options. Essentially, it's a collar strategy wrapped in an ETF shell—limiting some losses below and capping some gains above. The fund also runs three staggered layers, so when you buy affects which protection segment you benefit from.
Note, the "initial maximum buffer of about 10%" is anchored to the IBIT reference value at the time of layered construction and is before fees, not a principal floor. Fees will eat into part of the buffer; BTC volatility often exceeds 10%, so losses still occur if it falls below the range. The trade-off is straightforward: upside is capped, so strong rallies will underperform IBIT.
PBIT is not yet approved. It may not make you more profit, but it might help you hold longer—for those afraid of volatility but unwilling to exit, this is the appeal.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？ $BTC $ETH The same institution's valuation for SOL in 2030 ranges astonishingly from $9.81 to $3211.28. There is also a baseline scenario at $334.70. If you only highlight the highest figure, the entire report becomes misleading.
This is an old study released by VanEck on October 27, 2023. Reviewing their calculation method this time, it is not about raising the target price today. In the three scenarios, Solana's assumed market share in the smart contract platform market is 5%, 30%, and 80%, respectively.
The algorithm can be broken down into three steps: estimate how much cash flow can be generated at that time, multiply by the valuation multiple the market is willing to give, and then divide by the expected token supply. The baseline scenario estimates that the cash flow to token holders in 2030 will be about $6.96 billion, with a 33x valuation multiple, resulting in $334.70 per token. The pessimistic and optimistic scenarios change revenue, multiples, and supply, so the results can differ by more than 300 times.
For those looking at target prices, the key is to check how far these assumptions have progressed: whether paid demand can be sustained, whether revenue can flow to tokens, and how much market share competitors will take. The cash flow in the model is not a dividend that can be directly received just by holding tokens. The $3211 price corresponds to a set of optimistic conditions and is not the only conclusion given in the report.
Source and original table: VanEck "Solana Valuation by 2030," 2023/10/27; reviewed on 10/20. $SOL 10月FOMC马上到了，市场都在喊暂停加息，这中间到底还藏着什么变数？法老直接说，变数不在市场定价里，在沃什那张嘴上。 先看现在的定价。 CME数据显示，10月维持利率不变的概率在82%到85%左右，加息概率只剩15%到17%。沃什在曼谷IMF年会上刻意不表态，说“不预判会议结果”，市场直接把加息概率从27%砸到15%以下。高盛顺势把下一次加息预测推到了12月。 但变数就在这儿，市场可能把沃什想简单了。 第一，通胀数据其实不支持暂停。 9月CPI同比3.7%，核心CPI环比0.3%，PPI同比干到6.3%，能源之外的商品价格也在加速。牛津经济研究院的经济学家直接预测10月和12月连续加息，前美银首席经济学家说这是“五五开”。市场定价和经济学家的判断，裂开了一道缝。 第二，沃什的“沉默”不等于“鸽派”。 他上任后就废了前瞻指引，刻意不给市场抓手。市场把“不说话”解读成“不加息”，但沃什完全可以在28号那天用行动说话。他8月在杰克逊霍尔就放过鹰，9月全票通过加息，骨子里是个鹰派。 第三，政治因素被高估了。 有人说美联储不敢在中期选举前六天加息Whether 82,000 holds or not is not about the price
The Nasdaq rose 1.11%, $BTC surged to 83168 then fell back near 82,000.
What is this price level: 82,000 is not a technical level, it is a dense order zone.
Above it, 82,500 and 83,000 have sell orders pressing down; every surge is pushed back.
What others think: If it rises, you should chase.
Taking a step back: This move is a correction, not a one-sided rally.
If it were truly strong, 83168 wouldn’t have been given back so quickly.
$BTC needs to hold above 82,500 for short positions to be reconsidered.
If it breaks below 81,700, it means this rally wasn’t sustained.
When orders are withdrawn, the position changes.
#ETF持续流出，BTC反弹能否延续？
#$BTC 加密收益金库规模持续扩张，真正值得警惕的不是收益低，而是收益来源说不清。
同样是10%的年化，来自真实借贷需求，和来自杠杆、激励或复杂抵押品，风险完全不同。
我看金库只问四件事：底层资产是什么、谁在管理策略、极端行情怎么退出、历史回撤有多大。
收益率是广告，穿越危机的能力才是产品。#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins Bitmine还在买ETH，但这笔持续买盘已接近既定目标。ETH下一阶段的需求，不能只靠同一家公司的持仓纪录支撑。
公司10月19日公告显示，持仓约604万枚ETH，接近总供应量5%的目标。随着目标接近，按这套计划继续增持的剩余空间也在收窄。
这意味着，市场需要看到更多买方接力。后续新增购买量才是关键。目标完成后的购币安排尚待披露，不能把每周增持视为永久买盘。