Orbit Post Sitemap
#U.S. October Nonfarm Payrolls Exceed Expectations, December Rate Hike Bets Heat Up Nonfarm Payrolls Far Exceed Expectations: December Rate Hike Narrative Returns, BTC Rebound Faces Pressure
U.S. October nonfarm payrolls increased by 165,000, well above the expected 65,000; unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%, below the expected 4.2%; August and September combined were revised up by 84,000, with average hourly earnings rising 0.4% month-over-month. Both employment and wages are stronger than expected, interrupting the narrative of a cooling labor market. After the data release, the market reassessed the prospects for a December rate hike, and U.S. Treasury yields rose.
Logical Interpretation: Strong employment plus wage stickiness means inflation may decline more slowly, leaving room for upward revision in December rate hike pricing. Rising Treasury yields and a stronger dollar directly suppress interest-free risk assets like BTC. On the other hand, strong employment also alleviates recession concerns, so risk assets may not decline unilaterally; short-term is more likely to show high volatility and repeated repricing.
Trading Strategy: Data is bearish but not suitable for aggressive shorting. Watch whether BTC's rebound to the 77,000-78,000 resistance zone shows declining volume; if the rally weakens, consider light short positions with stop-loss above the previous high; if BTC pulls back to the 74,000-75,000 support and stabilizes and ETF outflows narrow, observe for short-term recovery without heavy bottom-fishing. Core principle: Nonfarm payrolls reinforce rate pressure, not a trend reversal; expect volatile moves post-data, control leverage, and set proper stop-losses.$BTC is trading at $75,629.3 (-0.60%), weakening within its 24h range between $75,200.0 and $79,598.6.
Price is trading below MA5 ($75,717.9), MA10 ($75,915.1) and MA20 ($76,026.2), after falling from the 24h high at $79,598.6.
Driven by $1.14B USDT in daily turnover and 14.88K $BTC in 24h volume, holding below $75,629.3 could open the way for a drop back toward the $75,200.0 low.
@OKX成长学院 #DailyOrbit Brothers, today there are three altcoins worth paying close attention to, but don’t rush in just because you see a little rebound.🧐
$AKE: The downtrend still shows no obvious improvement
The price continues to decline steadily, and many people have started to speculate that the bottom has appeared. But the real problem is that the trapped positions have not been fully digested, and there is a lack of capital to drive a rally. Going all-in blindly at this stage is not wise, especially with the risk of exchange delisting to watch out for.
$BEAT: High-level consolidation, direction still unclear
The current trend looks a bit like the consolidation phase after the previous surge to $10, but sideways movement does not necessarily mean it will continue to rise. If bottom-fishing funds are overly concentrated and there is insufficient support, a rapid drop could occur.
$FOGO: Weak pattern not yet reversed
After a long period of decline, the recent slight rebound is not enough to prove a trend reversal. What’s more concerning is that this might just be a short-term rally caused by short-covering, and there is still no clear signal of reversal.
The biggest risk in altcoin trading is not missing a wave of gains, but repeatedly bottom-fishing in a downtrend and ending up trapped deeper.
If there is no trend, don’t rush to bet. Patiently waiting for real capital inflow and structural improvement is often more important than blindly chasing rebounds.
$AKE $BEAT $FOGO
#USJobsBeatExpectations #特斯拉与SpaceX两日市值蒸发约4560亿美元 The cost of backing the wrong side is extremely severe. In just two trading days, Tesla and SpaceX together have lost a total market value of $456 billion! Let me break down what exactly happened behind this. In this U.S. midterm election, Musk spent real money to strongly support the Republican Party. What was the result? The Democrats won and took control of both houses of Congress. Wall Street funds are now in a panic. What are they afraid of? They fear political retaliation from the Democrats! In the future, Musk's companies, whether making cars or rockets, will likely face extremely strict regulatory scrutiny. It's like openly offending the newly appointed general manager in your company; from then on, every project approval will be scrutinized with a magnifying glass. So, this plunge is not because Tesla cars aren't selling or rockets malfunctioning; it's purely the market pricing in Musk's "political risk." My personal view is that Musk used to like to stir things up in the crypto and stock markets with his big mouth, but now he has finally hit a wall. In the capital market, political uncertainty is the most toxic poison. The Democrats already have issues with tech giants' monopolies, and now Musk has handed them a gift on a silver platter. Do you think they will let you off? Moreover, U.S. tech stocks are already undergoing a major reshuffle, the AI bubble is being aggressively squeezed, and big money is withdrawing. Who dares to catch a "political risk" flying knife at this moment? What impact does this have? In the short term, it is definitely a heavy emotional blow $DOS distributed over 20 million at a high level, and the market maker continues to short hedge. The next TRIA coin. Gradual decline for half a yearThe ETH long position of $196,800 was closed just like that, and I stared at that liquidation record for a while 🌙 Does he really not believe in ETH anymore, or is he just pulling back for now? The average price was $2223.91 at exit, the remaining position was zeroed out, and the account leverage was 5x. The numbers themselves aren't exaggerated, but the action of "zeroing out" is very honest—not reducing the position, not hedging, but withdrawing the entire buy order directly. My first reaction wasn't "he's going to short," but that this person’s comfort level with the current position has dropped to zero. This feels more like a divergence phase in the trend, not the start phase. At the start, everyone fears missing the boat; during divergence, people begin to ask themselves: why am I still holding? A 5x leverage isn't aggressive for ETH's volatility, but once the holder starts to waver, leverage turns from a tool into a psychological burden. The nominal amount is close to $200,000; closing it won't overturn the market, but it reveals an attitude: survive first, then talk about direction. The bullish path still exists. If ETH can hold the key range during the pullback, this kind of proactive exit will actually become fuel for subsequent re-entry, releasing selling pressure early and making chip turnover cleaner. Altcoin sentiment will also ease, and risk appetite won't suddenly shrink back. But the risk is that this "exit first, observe later" behavior is contagious. One person liquidating is a record; a group liquidating is a rhythm change. If ETH's rebound lacks volume, it means those who exited haven't returned, making this phase closer to hesitation before distribution, not a washout.$BCH fell as expected, opened a 50x short at 288.3, mark price 264.41, floating profit 414.32%, position held.
The market shows weak support, rebound volume is insufficient, buying pressure to lift is weak, defense is not obvious, selling pressure continues to dominate, the short position structure has not yet been broken. It is recommended to take profit on 50%–60% first, and see if the remaining position can effectively break the integer support level near 260; stop loss reference is set above the opening price 288.3 to leave room for profit. Those not involved need not rush to chase orders, wait for the next round of structure confirmation.
It’s all about market judgment, don’t stare at the screen but hold steadily, hold firmly while the trend lasts. Everyone, don’t get emotional, participate rationally in the subsequent rotation 💪$BTC $ETH #IREN加速转型AI云，业务收入环比增长182% #IREN accelerates transformation to AI cloud, business revenue grows 182% quarter-on-quarter $ARKM Damn! ARKM is really being washed out hard, with the price stabbing back and forth at 0.1044, clearly the dog whales are clearing leverage. Looking at the candlestick volume, there is capital support around 0.10, and the chip turnover is almost done. Hunter thinks 0.1044 is a good point for a light position ambush, set stop loss below 0.098, don't go heavy. This is purely a technical situation, don't expect any news, it's just a capital game. If you want to follow, check the token market card below for the order book, following is voluntary, profits and losses are your own responsibility. Got it? 👇👇👇A fan used to get liquidated every month, but after following my advice, they turned 5000U into 8000U in three months, gradually escaping the fate of a retail trader.
My view is straightforward: going all-in is not a gambler's bet, but a risk management buffer for steady trading. Surviving long in the crypto world is far more important than making quick profits.
Bet less on direction, control your position size more, slow is fast, and stability is winning. Don't stumble alone in the dark; keep up with logic and execution to survive long and steadily turn things around.Main focus $BTC | Strategy Long
Hammer drops first
Hammer drops first, go long on $BTC with 2-3x leverage. At the current price of 79,675, take a small base position; if it pulls back to 78,600 (close to MA5 at 78,607), add another position, averaging the cost around 78,900; stop loss pinned at 77,000–78,000 whole number level, cut losses there, no sentimental holding. Target first looks at 80,810 (T1 on the chart), if it holds, then aim for 81,125 (T2). This move is quite "not friendly": on 11/03, a lower shadow wick directly swept down to 75,690 then bounced back above 80,000, like the extreme cold apocalypse false alarm in Apple weather—everyone thought it would freeze to minus thirty degrees, but it fully recovered the next day and kept rallying. The rush to climb is for three reasons: that 11/03 lower shadow solidified the bottom at 75,690, price bounced back above MA3/MA5 resistance, and funding rate flipped from neutral to +0.010%—bulls started paying shorts, sentiment flipped from panic to greed, short-term this odds worth taking a side. Don’t go all in immediately; leverage is both a magnifier and a death sentence, position size is always more precious than direction. Probe lightly first, don’t fire all your bullets at once. I've always been puzzled: The president keeps calling for rate cuts every now and then, so who exactly does the central bank listen to?
Today, White House Economic Director Hassett gave an answer — respect the judgment of Federal Reserve Chair Powell and the Fed.
Sounds pretty normal, right? But in the context of the past two years, this statement itself is news. What's more interesting is that he covers both sides: employment growth has been so strong in the past three months, inflation is said to be slowing down, and the data center says there is ample room. All good things happening at once.
No wonder $BTC is completely unfazed.
Just don't know how long this respect will last. Full position is not a talisman: Lessons from 10x long and a 3% drop to zero
A few days ago, a fan from Jiangxi went all in with 10x leverage, putting 9500U into a 10,000U account without even setting a stop loss. The market only pulled back 3%, and the account was wiped out instantly. He didn’t lose because of the market direction, but because of position size. After going full position, any small fluctuation can corner you.
I have always emphasized: the key to liquidation when going full position is not the leverage multiple, but the position size being too heavy, leaving no room for error. A 1000U account with 900U at 10x leverage will be wiped out with a 5% adverse move; a 100U account at 10x needs a 50% move to liquidate. Same leverage, completely different outcomes. This fan put all his principal at risk, effectively betting away his chance to recover.
I have operated full position for half a year without liquidation and even doubled my principal, relying not on luck but on three iron rules:
① Single position size does not exceed 20% of total funds, always leaving a way out.
② Single loss does not exceed 3% of total position; stop loss must be set in advance.
③ Do not open positions in choppy markets; only trade trend breakouts. "Seven days, from earning 760,000 to only 58,000"
Another bloody real account. Seven days ago, a certain account had an unrealized profit of $760,000, but after a tech stock crash, it turned into a loss of 956,000, with equity left at only 58,000. The breaking point is very clear: SOXL is originally a triple-leveraged semiconductor ETF, and he added 7x leverage on top, equaling 21x naked long on semiconductors. Entry at 85.82, exit at 46.68, price halved, a loss of 1.77 million, return rate -321%. Another position in SNDK was even more extreme, 22x full position long, entered at 855, exited at 819, loss of 108,000, -93.4%.
The most heartbreaking part is that his 30-day win rate was 85%. When the wind is favorable, leverage acts like an accelerator; when against the wind, leverage is the guillotine. Winning nine times, one all-in bet wiped it all out and then some. Fifteen years of trading experience only proves one thing: don’t mistake luck for skill, and don’t treat full-position high leverage as faith. When the market turns, it doesn’t even give you a chance to get off.
The recap is just three sentences: don’t bet on single stocks, don’t go full position, don’t stack leverage. Stay alive, and there will be a next round.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#非农今晚揭晓，美股大跌后市场如何押注12月加息？ Good catch — stock futures are bouncing and DXY is up at the same time, which is the tug-of-war right now. A strong dollar usually pressures $BTC, yet it's still holding $75,000 at $75,527. If futures strength carries into the weekend, $76,263 is the first test. Do you see futures leading crypto up, or is DXY the cap? #Bitcoin #BTC #USJobsBeatExpectationsTrader Gu Jingci: Bitcoin/Ethereum Evening Operation Strategy for 11.6 with Market Analysis
The previously mentioned strategy of shorting on rallies and adding to winning short positions for Bitcoin/Ethereum yesterday saw the market retreat from around 80800 and 2440 down to approximately 75100 and 2205, fully utilizing the available space. Currently, the market is consolidating sideways at a low level, entering a weak recovery phase. After a slight rebound in the morning session, it faced pressure again and remains in a weak pattern overall. Last night’s plunge triggered massive long position liquidations, clearing leveraged funds, and market sentiment has clearly turned cautious. The current rebound is mainly a technical correction. The lower support levels to watch are around 75000 and 2170. If these break, the market will likely see further declines. Resistance levels at 78000 and 2300 will also pose short-term pressure, but no chasing shorts should be made before the lows are broken.
Evening operation suggestions: Enter long near 75500 for Bitcoin, targeting around 77000; enter long near 2225 for Ethereum, targeting around 2280. Analysis and strategies are for reference only; please bear the risks yourself. The article’s review and publication are not timely; please rely on real-time data! #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 $SOXL
OKX SOXL perpetual just saw 48.81 USDT, down 14.52% in 24 hours. This move surged then shrank quickly, quite exhausting. The previous two 1-hour K bars first dropped then rose, closing back near 48.6. The current bar hasn't closed yet; it just crossed above the previous bars' upper edge but then retreated. I'll wait for the hourly close to confirm. If it remains in the consolidation zone, I'll continue to view it as sideways.BTC fell below $76,000, the real danger lies in leverage
On November 5th, BTC dropped below $76,000, with about $1.08 billion liquidated in the market over 24 hours, including approximately $954 million in long positions.
This decline is not just a story within the crypto circle. The US tech stock sector weakened simultaneously, risk appetite quickly cooled, and leverage liquidations amplified the volatility.
I am more focused on three things: whether spot buying can hold, whether contract leverage is fully cleared, and whether trading volume keeps up during price rebounds.
The drop is just the result; the capital structure is the clue. The first bullish candle after a crash does not necessarily mean a trend reversal. Rather than rushing to guess the bottom, it’s better to first see if the market can stabilize.
$BTC #非农今晚揭晓，美股大跌后市场如何押注12月加息？ Over the past two years, the relationship between the White House and the Federal Reserve has been a source of market noise, with a single sentence capable of making interest rate futures jump. Today is different: White House National Economic Council Director Hassett said they will respect Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh and the Fed's judgment.
Looking at several things he mentioned together: they are studying the rapid employment growth over the past three months; even though data center growth is slowing, the economy is still expected to grow strongly, and data centers still have ample room; Trump respects places that do not want to build data centers; inflation should slow down.
Strong employment means there is no need to rely on rate cuts to save the economy, so the "recession trade" currently has no foothold. The bottom logic for risk assets has shifted from "waiting for central bank easing" to "the economy can sustain itself."
The data center comment is the easiest to overlook—growth is slowing but there is still room, which means AI capital expenditure is being braked but not stopped. Computing power expansion drives electricity and upstream costs; slowing the pace eases inflation pressure, which is two sides of the same coin as his statement that "inflation will slow."
Clearly respecting the Fed's judgment removes political interference from rate pricing, reducing uncertainty in long-term interest rates and the dollar.
For crypto, this is a combination of "improved liquidity expectations plus no recession." The macro bottom for $BTC is more solid, while $ETH and $SOL are high beta; whether they can keep up depends on whether risk appetite continues.
One point worth pondering: slowing data center growth is good for inflation but bad for the AI computing power narrative; which to trade first depends on whose data is more solid.$SNDK No chasing the rally, wait for the failed breakout to short. Closed yesterday at 806.43, pre-market at 898, gap of 92 points (11.4%). This gap has three risks: Yesterday's close was at the day's low (804), volume was 30.72 million shares, 3 times the average volume — this is clearly institutional distribution, not panic selling. The gap fill target is 806, downside potential 10%. $SNDK rose 11.4%, QQQ only rose 1.71% — the storage sector's gain is 6.7 times that of the Nasdaq, this is a short squeeze, not value discovery. 🅰 Short on failed breakout (preferred, 55% probability) Trigger: After opening surge to 930–960, falls back below 900 within 30 minutes Entry: 890–905 Stop loss: 960 Targets: T1 860 → T2 806 (gap fill) → T3 760 Risk/reward: Risk 60 → Reward 35 / 90 / 140, R:R 0.6 / 1.5 / 2.3 Position size: 4%, no leverage 🅱 Long if holds above 937 (secondary, 25% probability) Trigger: Holds above 937 (lower Bollinger band) after 1 hour post-open Entry: 940–955 Stop loss: 875 Targets: T1 1,000 → T2 1,039 Risk/reward: Risk 70 → Reward 55 / 95, R:R 0.8 / 1.4 ⚠️ Risk/reward is average Every time the US stock market crashes sharply, even plummets, it eventually recovers and reaches new highs. However, as investors, can we accept the preparation for a long-term battle? A few months of decline really isn't much.
If we encounter something like the 2000 internet bubble, with continuous steep drops for three years, cutting the value in half, would we still have the confidence to keep buying and holding? Probably not, because at that time, negative news would be everywhere, and countless people would be forced to cut losses and exit.
The financial market is that ruthless. Right now, I am mentally prepared for a long-term battle. I am very patient. I don't trade US stocks, but US stocks are the parent of Bitcoin; if US stocks perform poorly, Bitcoin will also suffer.
If US stocks continue to fall, Bitcoin will most likely follow. I will buy Bitcoin below 60,000 and definitely will not try to catch the bottom with everyone else at 75,000. If it doesn't drop below 60,000, then I will keep waiting. Low prices represent higher probability, better risk-reward ratio, and odds, meaning sufficient margin of safety. $NET
After Cloudflare's earnings report, how can we determine if AI traffic has converted into revenue?
Cloudflare's official calendar lists the Q3 earnings event on November 5. Traffic and developer adoption can increase platform value, but how much customers are willing to pay, product gross margin, and sales efficiency ultimately determine commercial returns.
I focus on large customer expansion and cash flow. If demand growth is accompanied by better retention and profits, the realization is more solid; if usage increases but relies on price cuts or higher customer acquisition costs, the valuation needs to be more cautious. Five little-known facts, each of which can explain why you lose money.
1. 100x leverage doesn't mean you liquidate only after a 1% drop; liquidation can happen after just a 0.5% drop.
100x means a 1% margin, but there are also maintenance margin and fees. BTC's maintenance margin rate is about 0.4%-0.5%, so the actual liquidation price is around -0.5%.
The same applies for 20x: it's not actually -5%, but about -4.5%.
The leverage tolerance is narrower than you think.
2. Fees can eat up half your principal in a year.
Assuming you use 10% of your funds each time with 10x leverage, the nominal position equals your entire principal. The one-way fee is 0.05%, so opening and closing a position costs 0.1%.
Two trades a day equals 0.2% daily. Over 250 trading days, 50% of your principal goes to the exchange.
You lose to fees before you lose to the market.
3. Funding rates are a hidden holding cost.
0.01% every 8 hours, three times a day, about 11% annually.
Long-term longs pay an 11% "position tax" yearly. Even if the market doesn't move, you're losing money.
4. Adding to a winning position raises your average cost.
Buying 10,000 U coins at 10U, then adding another 10,000 U at 20U, your average price becomes 15U.
If the price drops 25%, your unrealized profit turns into an unrealized loss.
Adding to a position amplifies both gains and costs; it doesn't amplify gains for free 🚨 Bitcoin Is Fighting to Hold $76K — Is This a Dip or a Bigger Warning?
Bitcoin has faced heavy selling pressure as over $1 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated. Spot BTC ETFs also recorded around $430 million in outflows.
Here's what matters now:
🔹 $75,300 — Key support
🔹 $77,900 — Important resistance
🔹 $80,000 — Recovery level to watch
The next move matters more than the latest candle. A quick bounce doesn't guarantee a reversal.
#DailyOrbit Friday into the weekend — and $BTC is camped at $75,505, right on top of $75,000 support. Weekend liquidity is thin, so moves get sharper: hold $75,000 and the range survives; lose it and $74,900 is next. Resistance sits at $76,263. Are you trading the weekend or sitting it out? #Bitcoin #BTC#Laporan keuangan Moderna Q3 akan mengungkap tren penjualan vaksin
💉 $MRNA (Moderna) is set to report its Q3 earnings before the US market opens on November 6. After posting a net loss of approximately $800 million in Q2, investors will be watching vaccine sales, seasonal demand, cash burn, and progress in its mRNA cancer treatment pipeline for clues about the company's future growth. 📊#AI Giant Financing Watch: Microsoft and Meta Issue $40 Billion in Bonds Combined This round, the two giants are focusing on bond issuance, essentially to fill the funding gap in the AI computing power arms race. The funds are mainly directed towards data centers, GPU procurement, and power infrastructure, locking in capital for computing power expansion over the next few years in advance. Microsoft has AAA top-tier credit, so its financing costs are relatively controllable; Meta faces greater capital expenditure pressure, with high investment already pushing free cash flow into negative territory, and relying solely on internal cash flow can no longer sustain the continuously increasing AI investment.
Choosing bond issuance over stock issuance is a cost consideration: even though U.S. Treasury yields are currently high, debt financing is still more cost-effective than equity issuance and does not dilute shareholder equity. However, risks are also prominent. The entire computing power sector is currently facing valuation cuts, and the market is beginning to question the investment return cycle. If subsequent cloud business and AI subscription revenues fall short of expectations, high interest expenses will continue to erode profits. Coupled with the Democratic Party controlling Congress, tighter approvals for data centers and energy consumption regulations may slow down production schedules, further lowering returns.
The funding contradiction is straightforward: giants are still borrowing to expand production, but secondary market funds are fleeing from the computing power supply side. The focus going forward is on two things: bond subscription yields—rising yields indicate the market demands higher risk premiums; and the growth rate of AI revenue from cloud providers—only if monetization keeps pace with capital expenditure will this debt issuance be considered a healthy investment. $BTC $ETH $ZEC Nonfarm payrolls blew past expectations, is gold really going to test 4020 this time?
Tonight, the US nonfarm payroll data came out, clearly stronger than market expectations, making gold bulls uncomfortable again.
October added 165,000 nonfarm jobs, while the market originally expected only 65,000, exceeding by 100,000. The unemployment rate also dropped from 4.2% to 4.1%, and average hourly earnings rose 3.1% year-over-year, also higher than expected.
Putting these data points together, the Fed has even more reason to raise rates in December.
The job market is stronger than expected, and wage growth has not cooled significantly, meaning inflationary pressure may persist for some time. If US Treasury yields and the dollar continue to strengthen, it definitely won't be good news for gold.
Now looking at gold's movement.
Yesterday $XAU once surged near $4146, but failed to hold the gains and is under pressure again today.
I am mainly focusing on three levels:
① $4100: short-term resistance; only by stabilizing above this can the decline be repaired.
② $4020–4040: key support area to watch next; if it holds, there is still a chance for a rebound.
③ $4000: if $4020 is effectively broken, this round number may be tested again, with further attention to around $3986 and even $3900.
Tonight, it depends on whether $4020 can hold. What do you think? Will gold first return to $4000, or climb back above $4100?
#美國10月非農超預期，12月加息押注升溫 Game theory perspective at the contract level: short squeeze itself is the fuel
AKE's contract data repeatedly shows one characteristic: during the downtrend, shorts continuously add positions, the funding rate once deeply negative, and short squeezes have repeatedly been the direct trigger for violent rebounds. In a rally in September, the 24-hour short liquidation scale exceeded $30 million, and the buy orders generated by short covering significantly amplified the gains. Earlier data showed that AKE perpetual contracts once experienced daily short liquidations exceeding $1 billion, indicating that once the short squeeze on this asset reverses, the price elasticity far exceeds that of typical altcoins.
The current bullish logic does not require AKE to immediately return to previous highs. It only needs a verifiable marginal catalyst—such as selling pressure being absorbed after unlock and landing, an official announcement of a new retail or OEM contract, or ESL cooperation entering formal terms—to trigger a repricing driven jointly by short covering and low-position longs. Under the extremely narrow circulating supply structure, the magnitude of such repricing is often measured in "multiples" rather than "percentages." Yesterday, I closed my $BTC long position around 80400, and now it really feels like I dodged a bullet.
At that time, the price rebounded from above 76000 all the way to above 81000. The market looked quite strong, and many people were waiting for it to continue surging. But the market turned around faster than flipping a page in a book, with a big bearish candle smashing the price back down to around 76000.
I don't have much to brag about; being able to exit around 80400 yesterday at least allowed me to pocket the profits I had made. After trading for so long, I increasingly feel that how much you can earn is one thing, but whether you can take the money away is another.
This drop is not just a simple technical correction.
After the US midterm elections, with the Democrats taking both houses of Congress, the market began to reassess crypto regulation and AI industry policies; then the US tech stocks faced sell-offs, the AI sector cooled down, and risk assets came under pressure. On top of that, the previous Binance security incident impacted the market, and over the past 24 hours, more than $1 billion worth of crypto derivatives positions were liquidated, delivering another heavy blow to the bulls.
Right now, I'm actually not in a hurry to enter the market.
We need to see if the support around 75500 can hold, and then look at the support near 74780. Only if the price can climb back above 78000 should we reconsider the strength of the rebound; if it continues to break down with volume, there might be more turmoil ahead.
Exiting yesterday doesn't mean I'm completely bearish; today's drop doesn't mean it's immediately a bottom-buying opportunity.
The market offers opportunities every day; there's no need to participate in every single move.
Is this a shakeout of high leverage before a new buildup, or is the rebound over and the real second bottom just beginning?#AAOIQ3 revenue increased by 128% year-on-year, hitting a new high for six consecutive quarters Waking up, the market dealt investors another heavy blow. U.S. stocks continue to be under pressure, and the crypto market has weakened again, with mainstream coins collectively retreating. Short-term risks cannot be ignored.
$BTC surged to $81,200 yesterday but failed to hold, then continued to pull back, hitting a low near $75,600 today. The short-term focus is on the $75,500–$76,000 support zone; if broken, it may further test $74,000 below. To improve the trend again, it needs to reclaim at least $78,000.
$ETH’s decline is significantly greater than BTC’s, indicating insufficient capital support currently. First, watch the support near $2,200; to form an effective rebound, it needs to stand above $2,300 again.
$SOL’s key defense is currently at $90; if it continues to break below, further bottom testing should be watched for. On a rebound, the pressure near $95 is the focus.
This recent pullback after the rally cannot yet be simply defined as a trend reversal. Whether BTC can hold $75,000 next will directly affect short-term market sentiment.
My view is clear: no rush to bottom-fish now, nor blindly chase shorts. First observe if the support is effective and whether volume improves; wait for a genuine stabilization signal from the market before considering the next move.
The more uncertain the market, the more important it is to control risk.
#USJobsBeatExpectations Two key price levels for Bitfinex
🔍 Bitfinex Alpha believes that $79,821 could trigger a new round of forced liquidations; if BTC recovers $84,400, the average cost for ETF investors would return to profitability (crypto.news).
⚖️ Their assessment: traders have rebuilt leverage, but there is a lack of sustained spot buying.
🧮 From $81,382 to $84,400 is about +3.7%, down to $79,821 is about -1.9% (my own calculation).
📉 The upside room is slightly larger than the downside, but this is just price difference arithmetic and does not indicate direction.
This is the institutional view; I'm not sure if it's right or if I might be mistaken.
📍 The levels I'm watching:
• $84,400: ETF average cost
• $82,000 to $83,000: recent repeated range
• $79,821: forced liquidation trigger
Do you think the leverage being rebuilt is a risk or fuel for BTC?
$BTC #CanBTCHold80K #ChipStocksFallOver12% #USJobsDecemberRateWatch $BTC $ETH $ZEC Cardano ($ADA) - a PoS blockchain where security is rewarded to pools and delegators. Rewards consist of fees and a portion of reserves allocated at launch. Currently, the fee portion is small, and the reserve is large. The main question of the analysis: will network activity grow enough for fees to start covering a significant share of rewards while reserves decrease. The article is analytical, without trading signals. Snapshot: November 5, 2026. DeFi metrics as of November 4. Discrepancies between sources about*💰🚨 Bitcoin has lost the 50-Week EMA (Bull/Bear market Indicator).*
*If it fails to reclaim above that level then It could fall sharply towards the 200-Week EMA at $69K–$70K.*$BTC $SOL 🚨4 BILLION $ONE TOKENS CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR!
In August 2026, Harmony reportedly suffered a major exploit, allowing hackers to mint 4 billion ONE tokens—26% of the total supply.
Now the team plans to abandon its own mainnet and migrate to Ethereum, shifting focus toward AI video.
When trust breaks and billions can be printed out of nowhere, what’s left for investors to believe? 🤔
#DailyOrbit $HYPE will use blockchain in the future, but is making transfers convenient enough?
Can others see your own transaction records? Is your asset status completely exposed? Is there a way to both protect personal privacy and meet necessary regulatory requirements?
These are all unavoidable issues for the future of blockchain.
What STAK wants to do is find solutions in these areas. To allow users not only to freely use digital assets but also to better protect their transaction privacy and truly control their own assets.
I believe this is the direction blockchain should develop towards in the future.
#STAK #Web3 #PrivacyProtection Order Book Strength Ranking
5-minute median slippage, estimated by order book
After amplifying orders for AKE and SNXX, slippage for both buying and selling increased significantly, with AKE showing the highest simulated slippage at the 100,000 scale.
$AKE simulated slippage for 10,000 scale buy/sell is 0.27%/0.30%, and for 100,000 scale is 1.31%/1.46%. Do not linearly extrapolate slippage from the 10,000 scale to the 100,000 scale; read the levels according to actual order sizes.
$UVXY large buy cost decreased, sell cost increased. Simulated slippage for 100,000 scale buy/sell changed from 0.63%/0.26% to 0.55%/0.37%. Mixed changes; read each side separately, do not combine into one conclusion.
$SNXX simulated slippage for 10,000 scale buy/sell is 0.07%/0.06%, and for 100,000 scale is 0.26%/0.25%. After amplifying orders, slippage on both entry and exit sides increased significantly.After $XRP uses blockchain, is it enough to just make transfers convenient?
Can others see your own transaction records? Is your asset status completely exposed? Is there a way to both protect personal privacy and meet necessary regulatory requirements?
These are all unavoidable issues for the future of blockchain.
What STAK wants to do is find solutions in these areas. To allow users not only to freely use digital assets but also to better protect their transaction privacy and truly control their own assets.
I believe this is the direction worth developing for the future of blockchain.
#STAK #Web3 #PrivacyProtection US stocks Black Thursday, this big drop is not because corporate fundamentals exploded, but because hedge funds were forced to liquidate in a stampede!
The S&P fell 4.4%, the Nasdaq 100 plummeted 6.4%, the semiconductor index crashed 12%, and the VIX surged explosively. A large number of multi-strategy fund internal trading units faced redemptions and forced liquidations, dumping AI chips regardless of cost.
The election downside is the second wave of the attack. With the Democrats controlling Congress, the market worries that data center approvals will be blocked, shaking the logic of AI capital expenditure, and the long-term expectations for storage and chips collapse accordingly.
Get the sequence right: first leverage liquidation drives the market down, then regulatory concerns add the finishing blow. Fundamentals are fine, but crowded capital just can’t hold on.
In this kind of stampede market, don’t rush to catch the falling knife. Wait until the passive selling pressure truly exhausts, then talk. If you want to watch for signals that the selling pressure is ending and find key support, come to the homepage research club!
#ChipStocksFallOver12%
$SNDK $SOXL $xSOXS Beginner's Diary｜Is the gaming chain also "moving" to Ethereum Rollup? 🎮
Saw the news: Immutable Chain officially announced plans to upgrade from their own modified Geth fork to an Ethereum Rollup based on OP Stack by mid-2027 — state and chain ID will be retained, accounts, balances, and contracts basically carried over as is; target block interval reduced from about 2 seconds to 1 second.
But don’t rush to shout "immediately faster and cheaper" 😂 The official statement says: transaction fees may slightly increase due to the need to pay Ethereum data availability fees; native withdrawals back to the mainnet will take about a 7-day challenge period; a short block pause of a few hours is expected during migration.
Beginner’s note: migrating to Rollup is not just changing the underlying code, it will also change fee and withdrawal waiting rules. The upgrade hasn’t happened yet, so don’t treat the roadmap as if it’s already live.
Are you more concerned about faster game confirmations or how long withdrawals take?
Learning check-in, not investment advice$DOGE will use blockchain in the future, but is making transfers convenient enough?
Can everyone see your own transaction records? Is your asset status completely exposed? Is there a way to both protect personal privacy and meet necessary regulatory requirements?
These are all unavoidable issues for the future of blockchain.
What STAK wants to do is find solutions in these areas. To allow users not only to freely use digital assets but also to better protect their transaction privacy and truly control their own assets.
I believe this is the direction worth developing for the future of blockchain.
#STAK #Web3 #PrivacyProtection $ETH just had a 15-minute candlestick sharply drop, which startled me. The price broke below the previous low near 2232, but the close quickly pulled back. This move took out the stop-loss orders hanging below the previous low. It was a false breakout and quick recovery; the drop and rebound happened very fast. The buying pressure only resisted briefly at the moment of the breakout.
However, the rebound triggered by this liquidity sweep didn't go far. Earlier, the 4-hour chart also saw a false breakout around 2225. At that time, it also broke below the previous low but then closed back above. Subsequently, the highs of several rebounds kept getting lower, showing the buyers' willingness to support has been diminishing.
Looking at the 4-hour timeframe, several EMA lines are pressing downward. The overall downtrend remains unchanged. The market is climbing along the rebound, but the current price is stuck near the 4-hour resistance at 2236. The buyers' trading volume has not increased enough to absorb the sell orders stacked overhead.
In the short term, I lean bearish. The current price is constrained by key resistance on the 4-hour chart. Since the bulls can't push upward, it is highly likely the price will be pushed back down.
$BTC $SOL #比特币承压，ETF近7日净流出约11亿美元 BTC falls below $80,000, ETH drops even harder: Who is amplifying market panic?
BTC falling below $80,000 is already eye-catching, but ETH's decline is even more alarming. During market adjustments, capital does not withdraw evenly from all assets.
On November 6, Fortune recorded the early morning Eastern US market showing BTC around $76,024, down 5.23% from the previous morning; ETH around $2,240, down 8.28% over the same period. This means ETH's short-term decline is significantly greater than BTC's.
My observation is that this divergence deserves analysis in conjunction with leverage structure. ETH is usually affected simultaneously by spot selling pressure, contract liquidations, and changes in risk appetite, but price data alone cannot determine which type of capital is dominating the decline.
What requires more caution is the quality of the rebound. If BTC stabilizes first while ETH continues to underperform BTC, it indicates that market risk appetite may still not have recovered.
Conversely, if ETH's relative performance to BTC begins to improve, and both trading volume and funding rates normalize, then it is more worthwhile to study whether the rebound has sustainability.
Now, are you more focused on whether BTC can hold the key area, or whether ETH can stop its catch-up decline?
#BTC现货ETF连续流出 After $SOL uses blockchain, is it enough just to make transfers convenient?
Can others see your own transaction records? Is your asset status completely exposed? Is there a way to both protect personal privacy and meet necessary regulatory requirements?
These are all unavoidable issues for the future of blockchain.
What STAK wants to do is find solutions in these areas. To allow users not only to freely use digital assets but also to better protect their transaction privacy and truly control their assets.
I believe this is the direction worth developing for the future of blockchain.
#STAK #Web3 #PrivacyProtection After $OKB uses blockchain, is it enough to just make transfers convenient?
Can others see your own transaction records? Is your asset status completely exposed? Is there a way to both protect personal privacy and meet necessary regulatory requirements?
These are unavoidable issues for the future of blockchain.
What STAK wants to do is find solutions in these areas. Allow users not only to freely use digital assets but also to better protect their transaction privacy and truly control their own assets.
I believe this is the direction blockchain should develop towards in the future.
#STAK #Web3 #PrivacyProtection For shorting $ONE, it is recommended to watch the resistance at 0.00175 before taking action. The current position is extremely unsuitable for shorting. Previously, after breaking through 0.00148, it also retested the short-term support at 0.00127 where there was capital inflow. The resistance level before 0.00147 may turn into short-term support. After such a 40% rally in this small market cap coin, blindly guessing the top could be painfully wrong.Translate
Someone once asked me how long I plan to hold CORE.
I always said long-term holding, even for several years is fine.
But recently I realized that this statement can't be said casually anymore.
The premise of long-term holding is that the project itself continues to develop, and the original investment logic has not fundamentally changed.
If exchange support decreases, market confidence drops, and the project has no new progress for a long time, then you can't just use long-termism to explain all problems.
I still hope CORE can come through.
But if someone asks me how long I will hold in the future, I probably won't give a specific number of years anymore.
First, watch the project's performance, then decide how far you can accompany it. $CORE
#CoreWeaveStockBondDrop $BTC Trading Strategy After Non-Farm Payroll Data 🅰 Pullback Short (First Choice, usable near current price) Trigger: Price pulls back to 75,750 to 75,900 Entry: 75,800 to 75,880 Stop Loss: 76,150 (give up if it recovers above the pre-data high) Targets: T1 75,500 (today's low) → T2 75,208 → T3 74,900 Risk/Reward: Risk 330 → Reward 340 / 640 / 930, R:R 1.0 / 1.9 / 2.8 Position Size: 8%, Leverage ≤2x 🅱 Breakout Short (Second Choice, wait for confirmation) Trigger: 15-minute close < 75,450 Entry: After break, pullback to 75,500 to 75,600 Stop Loss: 75,950 Targets: 75,208 → 74,900 → 74,264 Risk/Reward: Risk 400 → Reward 400 / 700 / 1,040, R:R 1.0 / 1.8 / 2.6 Position Size: 8% 🅲 The Only Long Condition Trigger: Close back above 76,050 (4H close or two consecutive 15-minute closes above) Entry: 76,050 to 76,150 Stop Loss: 75,550 Targets: 76,416 → 76,732 This condition currently has only about a 20% probability, but it must be kept because the US stock market open might bringA while ago, I was transferring $USDT to a friend.
After copying the address, I was about to paste it.
My hand trembled and I took another look.
I found the first few characters matched,
but the ending was different.
I quickly deleted it and copied again,
muttering to myself.
Later I learned this is called address poisoning.
Someone inserts a similar address into your history,
waiting for you to be careless next time.
Since then, I always do three things before transferring.
First, verify the first six and last six characters of the address.
Then, make a small test transfer.
Only after it arrives do I send the rest.
For large amounts like $BTC, I’m even more cautious.
After copying, I always double-check.
Before transferring $ETH, I also check if the network is correct.
Now when others urge me to hurry,
I say it’s not worth rushing this step.
If the address is off by one character,
the money is gone.
Taking a little more time to check carefully
is better than anything else.#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温
#美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势
#比特币承压，ETF近7日净流出约11亿美元