Orbit Post Sitemap
Last night I just mentioned sideways movement over the weekend, and by early morning the bulls got a lesson! BTC once dipped to $80,813, and ETH was even more brutal, touching 2,356 before pulling back to around 81,800 and 2,416 respectively. According to previous statistics, about $118 million worth of related contracts were liquidated within an hour, nearly 86% of which were long positions. Last week's ETF outflows are a background pressure, but that doesn't necessarily mean institutions were dumping over the weekend. Additionally, the Middle East situation hasn't eased; Saudi Arabia continues to face attacks, and Brent crude oil approached $110 last Friday. The inflation pressure from high oil prices may continue to affect risk sentiment next week. Recently, Sun Ge mentioned the quantum computing Q-day. BTC's BIP-360 is still a draft, and ETH is also advancing quantum resistance research. I think this is a security issue worth long-term attention and should be monitored more closely going forward. Personally, I still see a bearish bias amid the current volatility. BTC is indeed stubbornly strong; first, watch if it can hold between 81,600 and 81,700; ETH needs to reclaim 2,420–2,425. If it breaks below 80,800 and 2,356 again and fails to recover, be cautious of continued weakness. I still prefer to wait for real buying pressure on Monday to give the answer. Weekend impulse to check the market again, after watching I just want to say: short-term trading really can be torturous😮💨
$BTC: 1h and 4h spot and futures are all leaking, futures are dropping faster; 24h spot still has net inflow, indicating long-term money hasn't withdrawn, but short-term relay is broken. The dollar is pressured by news, BTC still needs to guard against pullbacks after surging. Chasing the rebound? First ask yourself if you can take the hit😅
$ETH: funds are flowing back and forth, 1h spot turning to outflow, 4h futures inflow again, typical lack of direction. But ETF has had 10 consecutive days of net inflow, big institutions are supporting around 2300-2400. There's a floor and a ceiling, don't guess, wait for it to choose a direction🧐
$SOL: spot 1h, 4h, 24h all receiving inflows, but futures 24h have large outflows. ETF applications and upgrades are the story, FTX/Alameda potential selling pressure is the stone. Spot and futures are fighting, just watch the show, don't get involved🎭
I opened a $BTC ant position short at 81431 on OKX, stop loss at 83904, taking profits in batches as it falls. Not bearish long-term, just betting on a washout from a break in buy orders first. Small position, clear attitude: right, no arrogance; wrong, no pain😎
This wave of “buy orders falling behind,” are you holding spot strong or washing out short-term first? Let's chat in the comments, everybody🙌BTC is retesting the ascending trendline; whether it holds will determine the subsequent direction.
From 58,000 at the end of June, to 75,000 in mid-September, and now around 81,000, the daily lows have been steadily rising, and the mid-term upward structure remains intact. However, with lows rising and highs falling, the two trendlines are gradually converging, and BTC has entered a critical pivot window.
The macro environment has slightly eased: U.S. stocks opened lower but closed higher, with the S&P and Dow Jones finishing up. CPI and PPI consecutively exceeded expectations but did not trigger outright panic. U.S. Treasury yields have fallen, and the probability of a Fed rate hike in October has dropped to about 30%, improving short-term liquidity expectations. However, inflationary pressures persist, and tariffs, energy prices, and valuation risks in AI tech stocks continue to suppress risk appetite.
So, this is neither a clear bottom nor a genuine breakout upward. The focus is on two levels: $80,000 is the key mid-term trend defense line; holding it still offers a chance to push toward $85,000–$87,500. $84,000 is near the descending trendline, and only a breakout with volume can confirm bulls regaining control. Conversely, a valid daily close below $80,000, especially if a rebound fails to recover it, calls for caution toward a retest of $75,000–$78,000.
Short-term bias is toward consolidation and recovery, not rushing for a one-sided rally. The third retest of the trendline could be an opportunity or a trap.
#BTCBoss Shi's short position this round is strong in "depth," not "aggressiveness"
Only two perpetual contracts in the real account, both with the same direction: fully short.
XRPUSDT: short 1.2 million tokens, full position 10x leverage, entry at 1.5022, mark price 1.296, unrealized profit +247,500 U, +137.28%.
BTCUSDT: short 150 tokens, full position 10x leverage, entry at 86195.3, mark price 81630.2, unrealized profit +684,800 U, +52.96%.
Total unrealized profit of about 932,200 U for both positions.
The key point is not the profit, but the page showing "current position short 1.88x": it says 10x, but the actual portfolio exposure is about 1.88 times; maintenance margin rate is 6401.5%, liquidation price still "--". This indicates he is not maxing out leverage to bet on direction, but leaving a sufficient safety buffer to ride the trend.
The insight is clear: XRP has more volatile profits, BTC has a larger amount. If there is a rebound, XRP will be more volatile; if the decline continues, BTC is the main driver. Don't copy the direction, copy his sense of distance: staying far from liquidation is what allows holding onto unrealized profits. Account balance back to $200, but the weekend fatigue lingers. Where exactly do $BTC and $ETH want to go? If they are going to drop, let it be decisive. Why then draw a V-shaped reversal? Every day you hear shouts of "the bull is back," and the more they shout, the more it makes people uneasy. This sentiment itself is a signal. When market consensus slides from "panic" to "mechanical bullish shouting," yet prices still repeatedly tug near key levels, it indicates neither bulls nor bears have decisive chips. $BTC is currently watching the 80000 support line, while $ETH treats 2388 as a lifeline—these two numbers are not drawn arbitrarily; they overlap with leverage liquidation concentration zones and previous chip turnover areas. Price repeatedly spikes here, essentially liquidity hunting rather than trend initiation. The most interesting game is on $ETH. Some want to open longs here, placing stop losses just below 2388, reasoning it as "buying insurance": if it rises, you can profit both ways; the stop loss is just missing an opportunity. This sounds smart but ignores a second-order effect—when enough traders stack stop losses at the same spot, below 2388 becomes a "liquidity magnet" for market makers. Price may not truly break the trend but is very likely to first sweep these stops before deciding direction. The so-called "genius repeatedly eats" premise is that the position survives until the trend materializes. Looking at $ZEC, the sellers are still holding firm, shouting "recharge faith." Such slogan-like statements often appear on the eve of chip loosening—the truly confident funds do not needToday's market breadth: 20 up / 179 down, median -2.72%, very grim.
BAT's current round is a textbook "pump and dump" scenario: from 10-15 to early 10-16, it surged from 0.168 to 0.216, +22%. On the morning of 10-16, it was directly dumped by -10%, then rebounded for two days, and today it dropped again by -10.5%, closing at 0.18 — basically all gains were given back.
This is not an accident, it's structural. After a volume explosion and price surge, a dump inevitably follows, and the decline during the dumping phase is often smoother and harsher than the rise, because those who chased in become trapped holders, and the selling pressure is active.
The current market environment: out of 199 coins, only 20 are rising, breadth is extremely compressed. At times like this, the two most common mistakes are —
First, seeing a lot of decline and trying to bottom-fish, thinking "oversold = rebound guaranteed." But oversold can get even more oversold; until leveraged longs are fully liquidated, the bottom isn't solid.
Second, seeing BAT drop 10% and thinking it's cheap. Cheap is relative; a 30% drop from a high is still a high level, the valuation system has already changed.
My experience is: wait. Wait for volume to shrink, wait for moving averages to converge, wait for the market to choose its own direction. Today's breadth at least indicates the market hasn't finished falling yet, no rush.
Do you think BAT can hold this position? $BATThis sideways movement over the weekend isn't a buildup, it's a lack of participants.
BTC at 81,858, grinding between 80,813 and 81,892 over 24 hours, with a volatility of 1.33%, and it hasn't broken out of this box for six hours now.
Looking at the rates makes it clearer: BTC at 0.0071%, even lower than the 0.01% baseline; ETH at 0.002%; SOL is actually negative. The longs aren't willing to pay more, and the shorts aren't willing to pay either—neither side is betting.
Just saw a guy on the square with only 200 bucks left, saying he wants to open an ETH long with a stop loss at 2388, "even if stopped out, it's just missing out." This is the real sentiment in a thin market: not bullish, just afraid to miss out.
Sideways without liquidations + rates near zero, it's not a buildup, it's that no one is willing to pay for direction. They're waiting for external events, not technical patterns.
To prove me wrong: if BTC remains between 80,813 and 81,892 before the US stock market opens at 21:30 on Monday, there will be a one-sided move over 1.5% within 12 hours after the open; if it breaks above 82,309 before Sunday, consider this prediction wrong.
The most costly thing about sideways movement isn't opportunity cost, it's your assumption that something is brewing.
This week I made three predictions, two were right, one was off by 1.6%, so don't treat this one as gospel either.
What do you think this wave is waiting for?
#USCPIandPPIsurpassexpectations, will there be another rate hike this year? $BTC $ATOM The essence of ATOM K-line volatility -- a surge followed by a drop exposes the "script"
A 17% surge in one day, then a drop the next day — what is the main force testing?
On October 9, ATOM surged to $2.06 (+17.34%), then fell back to $1.95 the next day. The daily chart shows resistance at the upper boundary of a symmetrical triangle; the script is "profit-taking leads to a pullback": inflation halving implemented + all Neutron funds recovered. The Gauntlet report reveals the truth: the problem is not inflation, but the distribution mechanism, Phase 2 is being rewritten.
Community users say: "I didn’t sell during the drop because the system is evolving."
The K-line is the surface; the narrative is the fuel for the main upward wave.
#特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins ETF withdrew 2718 $BTC in five days
In five days, the ETF had a net outflow of 2718 $BTC.
On the 13th, 2147 came in; on the 14th, 3144 went out.
How this number is calculated:
Subtracting inflows from outflows, the net for five days is an outflow.
On Friday, another 1002 left; money is moving out.
The moment it triggered:
3.25 billion was liquidated across the entire network in 24 hours.
94,000 people were forcibly liquidated, with longs accounting for 79%.
The price didn’t crash because the selling pressure was absorbed.
$BTC is now stuck at 81286.
Positions are shrinking faster than the price, indicating no one wants to hold overnight.
$ETH is at 2389, $SOL at 102.78.
The liquidated longs were bought on margin.
When the price hits that line, the system sells for you automatically.
After selling this batch, the next batch’s line appears again.
Whether the 81286 level holds or not is a different matter.
#VanEck stops pushing Lido staked Ethereum ETF
#$BTC $ETH #Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus No wonder BTC and ETH started to steadily rebound at 3 a.m.
It turns out our beloved Mr. Trump spoke. According to the latest news on October 18, he said at a rally in Kentucky that the nearly eight-month-long Iran war will soon end, and gasoline prices will fall below pre-war levels. Coincidentally, Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi also reiterated the "seven-day navigation plan," expressing willingness to restore normal navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. One after another, expectations for a cooling down of the Middle East situation instantly surged.
This is clearly a "political puzzle" for the midterm elections. If oil prices fall back, it will ease inflation. Coupled with the uncertainty of rate hikes after CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, risk assets get a breather. BTC stabilized and slightly rose around 81,000, ETH followed suit, but don’t get carried away by the "about to explode" momentum.
The macro environment hasn’t fully loosened yet, ETFs are still seeing net outflows, and the 80,000-83,000 range oscillation remains unbroken. Geopolitical news is fluctuating (the previous "seven-day plan" had setbacks), and high leverage is most vulnerable to such spikes. It’s wise to rebound with light positions and wait for institutional inflows and substantive ceasefire signals; don’t try to guess the bottom or chase highs. Brothers, preserving your principal is more important than missing out! $BTC $ETH $ZEC #Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes a new focus
Netflix's fundamentals have consistently been steady, with low expectations and a low stock price level, so the probability of a "slight beat + stock price recovery" is not low; however, revenue growth has slowed to about 12%, the slowest in nearly 11 quarters. To have a big surprise, it would depend on the advertising business or a clearly optimistic Q4 guidance, which is unlikely.$ETH issued 2,969 new coins yesterday and burned 13.59 coins. The output is 218 times the amount burned.
The saying "burning equals deflation" has always been the underlying assumption for its pricing. But the burn amount depends on how congested the mainnet is, and over 80% of transactions have long moved to layer two, leaving the mainnet quite idle. The daily burn dropped from $600,000-$700,000 at the end of September to around $50,000 in mid-October, a nearly 70% week-over-week decrease over seven days, and the total over thirty days accounts for only one ten-thousandth of the market cap.
On the issuance side, it's rigid: about 2,900 coins go to validators every day, no less. Net issuance is over 2,900 coins daily, resulting in an annualized inflation rate of 0.9%.
Ethereum is now a mildly inflationary asset. The deflation narrative is no longer factual, just a memory.
Demand side hasn't helped either—Ethereum ETFs saw cumulative outflows approaching $900 million in October, with $320 million outflow last week alone, more than Bitcoin funds.
The price still holds above $2,400, relying not on deflation but on staking: nearly 30% of supply is locked in staking, and publicly listed companies' treasuries account for another 6.6%. These two are different in nature; deflation is a mechanism, irreversible; staking is a choice, can be unlocked anytime.
The support levels are $2,397 and $2,417, with resistance at $2,534 and $2,552. When that ETH line crashed down, 2400 didn't hold at all. Within an hour, Binance, Bybit, and OKX combined saw $27.02 million worth of long positions wiped out directly, while shorts only cleared a few hundred thousand. The price slid from 2424 all the way down to 2355, without even a decent rebound. BTC wasn't doing any better, dropping to 81000, with over $115 million in long positions liquidated within sixty minutes. Weekend liquidity is thin to begin with, and when leverage kicks in, it's as fragile as paper.
What’s even worse is the ETF side. ETH spot ETFs had a net outflow exceeding $1.4 billion in a single week, breaking both the 7-day and 30-day moving averages, with technical patterns leaning bearish. On-chain, a batch of old addresses holding 3 to 10 years are selling at the fastest pace since 2021. On the macro front, CPI at 3.7% exceeded expectations, and the 10-year Treasury yield surged to 5.26%. With money this expensive, assets that don’t generate cash flow naturally get hit first.
But interestingly, during these days of decline, large addresses have been accumulating in the opposite direction, with several whales buying over $1 billion worth of ETH cumulatively.
The liquidation chart structure is also very divided now: if ETH breaks below 2392, there’s another $475 million in long liquidations waiting below. On the upside, short liquidations at 2618 have a strength of $466 million, but that’s a story for later.
At this point, those cutting losses are handing chips over to the ones catching the falling knives. I don’t advise bottom fishing, but weekend leverage flushes have never been reasonable.
Are the long positions in your hands still holding?#SpaceX's first full quarterly financial report after listing will be unveiled. SpaceX officially went public on Nasdaq on June 12, 2026, Eastern Time, with the stock ticker SPCX. For this first full quarterly report post-listing, the market's focus is no longer just on revenue scale; the core is the cash flow matching of its three main businesses, which is also a major test to verify whether its "space + AI" story can be realized.
Starlink is the only stable cash-generating foundation. The market is focused on user growth, large government and enterprise orders, and average revenue per user (ARPU). Consumer-end user growth and Starshield government contracts determine how much operating profit Starlink can generate to subsidize cash-burning businesses. Starlink's profitability is the cornerstone supporting its valuation.
The AI computing power business is the biggest growth highlight but also a capital-consuming beast. Computing power rental orders are growing rapidly, with very high revenue growth; the shortcoming lies in huge hardware investments, causing sustained short-term losses. The financial report needs to be examined for: new signed orders, gross margin improvements, and capital expenditure growth rate. If capital investment continues to far exceed revenue growth, it can easily trigger market concerns.
Aerospace launches and Starship development belong to long-term strategic investments. Falcon 9 launch business cash flow is acceptable, but Starship V3 test flights and iterations continue to consume funds. The success or failure of Starship determines the future possibility of low-cost orbit access, large-scale deployment of V3 satellites, and space computing power construction. This quarter, attention should be paid to launch frequency, Starship test flight progress, and control of R&D expenses Tesla will release its Q3 earnings report after the market closes on October 21. Deliveries of 486,000 vehicles indeed exceeded expectations, but year-over-year they still fell by 2%, and Wall Street is not focusing on car sales at all. The market expects revenue to be around $27.8 billion, EPS about 0.45, down nearly 10% year-over-year. The real highlight is the gross margin—automotive business gross margin is expected at 17.3%, with Jefferies more conservative at 16.7%. Whether it can hold is key. Cash flow is also precarious; free cash flow turned negative last quarter, capital expenditures are increasing, and whether operating cash flow can make up for it this quarter is a question.
Robotaxi is showing some real progress. The Austin Cybercab fleet expanded eightfold in 30 days, surpassing 300 vehicles, with over 1 million miles driven without regulatory oversight and zero major accidents. But Morgan Stanley put it bluntly: fleet size does not equal commercial success; vehicle utilization, safety performance, and unit economics are the true tests. Expansion in Dallas should be approached cautiously. Don’t take Optimus too seriously; the probability of shipping by the end of the year on Polymarket is only about 7%.
$BTC here is basically unrelated to Tesla’s AI narrative and is still hovering around 81,000. ETFs saw an outflow of $82.4 million on Friday, so the funding environment hasn’t strengthened. No matter how lively Tesla’s earnings are, it can’t drive the broader market; they’re going their separate ways. #Tesla deliveries exceed expectations, profit recovery becomes the focus #AMD财报超预期，增长已被透支？ 凌晨那根针，$ETH 又比$BTC 多跌了一截
BTC插到80700附近就收住了，ETH直接干到2356，从2450附近砸下来接近100美元
链上数据监测到一个巨鲸，之前用最大杠杆开了1.87亿美元多单，其中4890枚ETH的仓位，清算价刚好卡在2356
凌晨5点那波下跌精准打穿了他的清算线，1174万美元的仓位被强平
这个低点很大程度上就是这笔清算自己砸出来的
$ETH 现货ETF昨天净流出了6022万美元，现货端的钱在往外走，链上的杠杆又在换手，导致经常喜欢“抽风”
ETH涨的时候猛，是因为空头一挤就飞；跌的时候狠，是因为多头杠杆一戳就穿
#BTC ETH#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus Today's Core Judgment The most noteworthy point today is not new regulatory policies, but that the three types of spot ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) for BTC, ETH, and SOL all experienced synchronized net outflows again on the last trading day of this week. On October 16, the spot ETFs for BTC, ETH, and SOL had net outflows of $82.4 million, $69.7 million, and $12.7 million respectively, totaling about $165 million. Among them, SOL has seen net outflows for ten consecutive trading days; the capital pressure has not eased but instead set the largest single-day outflow this week. The situation of OKXICE facing objections from listed companies is still developing, but this is a continuation of previously disclosed risks and does not count as new negative news today. My judgment is: The current institutional capital environment remains weak, especially for ETH and SOL. Exchange OS (Exchange Operating System) has entered public beta, but whether OKB can gain substantial new demand still depends on whether real trading, external deployment, and staking rules can be continuously fulfilled. 1. ETF Funds: Three Asset Types Synchronized Outflows Again October 16 is the latest effective trading day: - BTC: net outflow of $82.4 million; - ETH: net outflow of $69.7 million; - SOL: net outflow of $12.7 million. This week, the three ETFs combined net outflow was about $574 million, with BTC outflowing $228.4 million, ETH $320.1 million, and SOL $25.5 million. BTC buy orders remain unstable, ETH continues to have consecutive outflows, S# Netflix Growth May Slow, Advertising Business Becomes New Focus Key Points
Netflix's traditional subscription business is marginally slowing down, and growth space relying solely on raising membership fees and acquiring new users is under pressure; the ad-supported subscription plan (low-cost version with ads) has become the clearest second growth curve at this stage and is currently the biggest market highlight, but the overall advertising revenue share is still relatively small and cannot fully support overall growth in the short term.
1. Why the original growth is starting to slow down
1. Membership base ceiling appears: Netflix's global paid membership volume has reached a high level, with high penetration in major overseas markets, making it harder to simply add new members. The total user viewing time growth has significantly slowed, and it also has to compete with TikTok and YouTube for user time.
2. Price increases have side effects: Netflix has repeatedly driven revenue growth through subscription price hikes in the past, but continuous price increases tend to cause old users to churn and cannot be used indefinitely.
3. Industry competition intensifies: Streaming services like Disney and Amazon continue to compete, with content investment costs remaining high. The market once worried that Q3 revenue growth would hit a recent low, and the stock price was pressured after earnings expectations were released.
2. Advertising business: New focus
After Netflix launched the low-cost subscription plan with ads, expansion speed exceeded expectations:
1. Revenue expectations: The company guides that advertising revenue in 2026 is expected to double year-over-year, targeting about $3 billion, which, although a small proportion of total revenue, is the company's fastest-growing segment. $BTC 美国中期选举，真的会影响比特币周期底部吗？
2014年，美国中期选举后第71天，比特币触底。
2018年，美国中期选举后第39天，比特币触底。
2022年，美国中期选举后第13天，比特币触底。
71天 → 39天 → 13天。
时间间隔越来越短。
那么，2026年呢？
如果这个规律继续缩短，市场会不会在中期选举后更早迎来底部？
当然，历史不会简单重复，但总会给市场留下值得研究的线索。
真正的问题不是底部会不会出现，而是当所有人都在等待底部时，市场会不会提前反转。
你觉得2026年，比特币会复制这个规律吗？
评论区留下你的判断：看涨还是继续探底？2021年牛市里，$SHIB、$GALA和$DOGE都曾出现极端涨幅，小市值代币的财富效应一度被推到顶峰。
但历史涨幅不能直接复制。市值、流动性和筹码结构都已变化，上一轮赢家未必还是下一轮赢家。
如果2026年出现新一轮山寨币行情，你认为涨幅最大的三个币会是谁？#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes a new highlight LanlingWatching the $2400 USD level without catching falling knives, $ETH hourly liquidation of $27.24 million long positions followed by a slight rebound to $2404 USD, with both bulls and bears holding hidden cards.
The bears' hidden cards are heavy; ETH spot ETF weekly outflows account for 3.7% of net assets, with redemption intensity more than 5 times that of BTC, and the top buyer BitMine's holdings are approaching the 5% limit.
The bulls' confidence lies in the rapid 16% clearance of ETH contract leverage on platforms like OKX over 5 days, combined with the recent launch of VolatilePair Hook on Uniswap mainnet, which has boosted on-chain yield recovery.
I believe contract deleveraging can only provide short-term rebound elasticity; before BitMine's buying peaks and BlackRock's ETHA stops outflows, a major reversal lacks incremental ammunition.
At the current position, continue to watch without bottom-fishing; only a volume-backed recovery above the $2440 USD resistance level signals a short-term halt to the decline.
If the $2395 USD intraday low is broken again, the deleveraging rebound logic fails directly, and the search for a bottom continues downward.
With contract leverage reduced by 16% amid an ETF redemption wave, at the $2400 USD level, do you prefer to bet on an oversold $ETH rebound or follow the trend to short?
$ETH $BTC $UNI
#Ethereum #CryptoMarket At $81,400, neither blindly bottom-fishing nor recklessly shorting, $BTC on OKX perpetual contracts saw a large long liquidation at $80,639, followed by a rare underlying divergence in the market.
Bears are fixated on the futures open interest stuck at a high of $36.6 billion, while the daily funding cost for longs has surged 57.3% to $1.5 million, and the weekly stablecoin net inflow across the network has sharply dropped by 75%. However, the bullish hidden signals are equally strong: the CVD indicator for active selling on perpetual contracts has decayed by 90.7%, and BlackRock's IBIT continues to buy net against the trend despite a $679 million ETF outflow this week.
I believe this is a classic stalemate where spot cold wallets are locking positions to support the bottom, but high-interest longs on contracts are stubbornly holding on; it's difficult to reverse directly without washing out these high-interest longs.
Currently, I am observing around $81,400 without chasing orders. Only a volume-backed break and hold above the previous high at $83,600 with cooling funding rates would confirm a bullish victory. If the price effectively breaks below the $80,600 liquidation low, these high-interest longs are prone to triggering a cascading liquidation, causing short-term support to fail.
Facing the divergence between the exhaustion of contract CVD selling and the 57% surge in long funding costs, at $81,400 would you lean towards left-side buying of $BTC, or short on rallies?
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#Bitcoin #PerpetualContracts $APR remains bearish for the next five days before unlocking, with $130,000 worth of long positions liquidated within 24 hours. Those trying to catch the dip during the decline were the first to fall. Only 28 short positions were liquidated, meaning almost no one was forced to cover, and there isn't enough fuel to push prices upward. Open interest and volume are nearly nonexistent; such a thin market has to absorb new chips equivalent to 47% of the circulating supply, so selling pressure will only be released early. In our backtests, about three-quarters of events in the week before unlocking underperform the market, with consistent directional samples before and after; $APR is currently within this window. The fee rate for all three periods is flat at 0.0050%, indicating no one is willing to leverage to bet on direction. The RSI at 27 is already very low, but the weak zone can persist for a long time, with supply pressing overhead; oversold conditions cannot support a decent rebound. The condition to turn bullish is to reclaim and hold above 0.04729 before unlocking; if it fails to do so, it will continue downward along the descending trendline. After the 23rd, backtests show no stable direction, so we won't extend the forecast further.CoreWeave单周跌超25%，CDS飙至1195基点，债券逼近失速区。
看见了：周五收盘$61.39，较10月9日约$82大跌超25%。5年CDS创纪录约1195基点，2031年债券约79美分，收益率超16%。债务担忧已扩散到芯片板块。
我觉得：这不是单纯情绪杀，是高杠杆AI算力基建的偿债压力开始被市场定价。观察不追，不接飞刀。
我怎么做：站稳$65看能否企稳收复，跌破$58失效继续观望，不抄底。
你觉得这是AI基建的正常回调，还是债务危机的开始？
$CRWV #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 $NVDA $BTC
#AI算力 #贝莱德转向超配短债，下调美股评级 Nearly $942 million in forced liquidations occurred, yet $BTC barely held around $82,000 — the key question in this deleveraging round isn’t "who is selling," but "who is buying." Within 24 hours around October 15, the entire network saw about $942 million in contract liquidations, with long positions accounting for approximately $863 million, a high proportion of 91.6%, and $ETH-related liquidations around $283 million. After concentrated leverage risk was cleared, prices did not show a decent rebound, which itself is a signal overlooked by many 📉 First, clarify a common misconception: forced liquidation does not equal the end of selling pressure. Forced liquidation can wipe out excessive leverage at once, but whether spot holders continue to sell or institutions reallocate positions won’t automatically change due to a single liquidation. Leverage clearing addresses "existing risk," while the market currently lacks "incremental buying." Next, consider the nature of the rebound. $BTC briefly dropped below $80,000 before quickly pulling back, then oscillated repeatedly around $82,000. This movement resembles liquidity repair rather than a trend reversal. After concentrated liquidations end, reduced selling pressure and tentative low-level buying can create a quick bounce, but this is different from the capital supply needed for sustainable gains. Price bouncing up doesn’t mean funds have returned. The third layer of pressure comes from macro factors. U.S. inflation data exceeded expectations, causing the market to reassess the Federal Reserve’s interest rate path, and risk assets remain under the shadow of uncertainty. This also explains why after deleveraging, $BTC and $ETH #US CPI and PPI Both Exceed Expectations, Will There Be Another Rate Hike This Year? 🤔
The data gave the market a lesson first: September PPI year-on-year 6.3%, CPI year-on-year 3.7%, both exceeding expectations. Normally, rate hike bets would heat up, but Fed officials did not respond. Wash said on October 16 that he does not predict the future interest rate path and did not hint at action in October; Daly and Goolsbee were also cautious. After the speeches, market bets on a rate hike in October quickly dropped to 15%.📉
This is a brief window for BTC: rate hike expectations cool down, pressure on the dollar and US Treasury yields eases, and risk assets get a breather. But inflation stickiness remains, and the option to raise rates again this year is still on the table. BTC is tugging around 82,000, with resistance at 83,500–84,500 above and support at 81,500–82,000 below; the direction is still unclear.⚖️
On the ZEC short side, if the market rebounds due to cooling expectations, ZEC may also pull back in sync. But 1,273–1,288 is a strong resistance zone, and the head and shoulders pattern has not been broken; prices returning to 1,260–1,288 can still be seen as a short opportunity. Stop loss remains at 1,430; hold if not triggered, exit if triggered; target remains 1,008, with 1,070–1,050 as a range to halve the position first. $BTC 🎯今年6 月和 7 月的时候，$BTC 在 6 万筑底
深处当时环境，我们很难知道是不是底
但是有很多宏观事件和现在很像，细思极恐
8 月初，比特币在 63000 附近震荡，市场传出消息美联储要加息，这个消息在当时引起了恐慌，因为自从 2024 年开始，就没有讨论过加息，大家都认为未来只有降息唯一选择，结果这个幻想被打破了
还有一个重大事件，8 月初，大家期待的牛市催化剂清晰法案彻底凉凉，市场已经默认今年通不过，基本放弃了这个叙事。
又是加息预期，又是法案通过的可能性彻底放弃，结合当时熊市环境，大家都认为熊市会继续恶化和持续很长时间，比特币必然会跌破 5 万 4 万
结果 8 月瞬间拉盘，直接涨到 8 万，完全不按常理出牌
现在也是一样的环境，cpi 超预期，加息预期升温，美债油价都高高在上，完全看不到上涨的理由
当这种失望被压到极限的时候，随便一个利好就会触发价格大涨
宏观利空只负责让卖压快速出清，健康的筹码结构才会决定牛市持续
$BTC $ETH
这个过程会异常难熬#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 Will Netflix's growth slow down, and can its advertising business change the situation?
It can partially change it, but it is not a "silver bullet."
Positives: It directly contributes to revenue growth, improves monetization of low-priced users, expands reachable audiences (especially international and younger users), and helps profit margin expansion. Combined with price increases and content/live streaming strategies, it supports the company in maintaining double-digit revenue growth and stronger free cash flow. Management also clearly regards it as one of the core growth pillars for the future.
Limitations: The advertising scale is still small and cannot fully offset the slowdown in subscription growth in mature markets. Overall growth has shifted from high double digits to mid-to-low double digits, which is a normal phenomenon as the streaming industry moves from expansion to maturity. Long-term success still depends on content appeal, pricing power, international penetration, and possible further monetization innovations.这个在前天凌晨杠杆拉满开 $1.87 亿多单搏反弹的巨鲸似乎失败了：
他 4,890 枚 ETH ($1174 万) 多单，在凌晨 5 点的下跌中在 $2,356 被清算。
这是今天凌晨向下插针的$ETH 最低位置，也就是说最低位置可能是由他的爆仓所贡献的The rebound looks like photo retouching; no real money has come 📉. $BTC fell below 81,000, down 1.77% in 24h, nearly 80,000 liquidations.
$BTC — Support is weakening. Spot net outflow of 13.7 million in 1h, 133 million in 24h, contracts withdrawing simultaneously; weekly contract net outflow around 3.3 billion in volume, ETF buying also braking. Short-term inflows seem more like passive patching, not new money lifting the market 🚫.
$ETH — The biggest deceiver. 24h contract net inflow of 375 million looks bright, but 1h and 4h turned to outflow, spot 24h outflow of 57.05 million; spot ETF net outflow for 11 consecutive days, totaling 780 million USD. Bright face but slippery feet ⚠️.
$SOL — The best among the short. Spot net inflows in 1h/4h/24h, showing support; but contract funds still leaving, on October 15 SOL spot ETF single-day net outflow nearly 9.82 million USD. Spot support is the lifeline, weakening means a flash in the pan 🌪️.
News is cold: Fed's probability to hold in October is 71.8%, rate hike shadow not gone; CLARITY Act procedural vote failed; Brent crude approaching 110 USD 🧊.
Conclusion: Volatility is not a trend. Wait for $BTC and $ETH spot to turn green, wait for $SOL spot support to stabilize; before that, chasing longs is futile. Don't fear missing out, fear being left holding the bag 🙂.美国以太坊ETF在10月16日净流出6,970万美元，全部来自贝莱德ETHA；Farside所列其余10只产品当天均为0。最新完整一行仍是周五，不是周末新增流出。
把10月12—16日五个交易日相加，合计净流出3.201亿美元，只有周二录得净流入。前一周10月5—9日净流出5.422亿美元，流出规模虽已收窄，但资金方向还没有转正。
这影响的是通过这些基金持有ETH的需求：净流出表示赎回超过申购，基金渠道整体在收缩，而不只是币价变动让账户估值降低。对观察ETH资金承接的人，它说明这一渠道仍偏弱；能否被其他买盘吸收，还要看更广的现货成交和后续资金流。
接下来先看新交易周是否出现连续净流入，以及流入能否扩展到更多产品。单日或单只基金不足以代表所有机构。表格也不能用来认定某笔交易所链上转账就是ETF卖币。
来源及配图：Farside Investors；10/18约09:12北京时间抓取，表内单位百万美元、括号为净流出。下方仅为ETH/USDT现货行情，非基金入口。
https://www.okx.com/zh-hans/trade-spot/eth-usdtThe consolidation zone above $BTC, marked by the red box, has been broken down. Because multiple rebounds failed to break above the 82614 resistance level, the breakout failed, and a pullback is inevitable. The pullback also broke the 81788 support. After breaking the 81788 support, as indicated by the white arrow above, there were multiple attempts to reclaim the 81788 resistance level, but none succeeded. Is it okay to short at this position? Yes, it is, because it meets the shorting conditions. What are those conditions? First, the current trend is downward since the highs are decreasing without forming higher highs. Second, the consolidation range between 82614 and 81788 has been broken, indicating structural damage. Third, after breaking the 82614-81788 consolidation range, there was a rebound attempt to return to that range, but it failed. So shorting is justified. A natural rebound that fails to surpass the upper resistance will definitely retest the support level again. So, have you shorted? Place a stop loss just above 82614. Why place the stop loss just above 82614? Because only a breakout above the consolidation zone marked by the yellow box at 82614, forming a higher high, can continue the rebound. Without breaking 82614, no structural breakout occurs, and the price won't rise. Therefore, I set the stop loss here. Take profit can be considered step by step! If 80974-80159 breaks down, continue to look lower. In trading, there's no such thing as who is better or worse. Simply put, trading is a gamble with a 50% chance of profit or loss. If anyone had a 100% win rate, even Musk would be using it.$RIVER talks about the long-short ratio every day. I wonder, can't the whales fake a large number of long orders to lure shorts?#Institutional funds continue to flow out, can BTC stabilize? This weekend's market really wore down both bulls and bears. Watching BTC hover around the $81,000 mark feels like waiting for the other shoe to drop. Another big bearish candle appeared in the early morning, which looks scary, but after breaking below 81k, it was pulled back up, reclaiming 81.4k in less than half an hour. The volume didn't explode out of control, and there were plenty of buy orders nibbling at the low end of the order book—this movement looks more like a "liquidation fakeout" rather than a downward trend reversal. It feels like big money took advantage of the panic to execute a large-scale turnover; some are running, while others are taking the opportunity to buy heavily. This kind of "volume-driven drop" itself signals an intense battle between bulls and bears. The liquidation was quite severe. According to Yujin monitoring, a certain whale who previously opened a $187 million long position with maximum leverage had 4,890 ETH longs liquidated at $2,356 during the early morning drop, with a position value of $11.74 million. This price was the lowest point ETH reached in the early morning, possibly triggered by this liquidation. The key point is that after liquidation, the open interest (OI) barely dropped. BTC futures OI is still around $52.6 billion, only shrinking by 0.14%. What does this mean? The leverage hasn't died out; it just changed hands to a new batch of holders, and the market's fragility remains unresolved. Right now, the overall market sentiment is somewhat "cold outside, hot inside." On the surface, the macro environment is indeed troubling. The inflation data from the US feels like a stone weighing on everyone's heart, and everyone is watching closely On October 18, according to a post by Jiang Zhuoer (@Jiangzhuoer2), the risk of quantum attacks on Bitcoin is currently underestimated and not properly priced. He believes the likelihood of occurrence within 1.5 years is low, citing calculations that suggest "Q-Day" is more likely to occur in the mid-2030s; with the development of AI-assisted research, quantum attacks have shifted from "two or three decades later" to "a few years later." His calculations estimate that about 1.7 million coins from Satoshi's era in P2PK format (including about 1.1 million Satoshi coins), plus an estimated loss of about 1 million coins from 5.17 million coins exposed by P2PKH address reuse, total approximately 2.7 million BTC vulnerable to quantum attacks. This amount is comparable to the total holdings of 2.9 million coins by ETFs, MicroStrategy, other large companies, and various governments; if stolen and dumped on the market, it could crash the coin price back to at least $10,000. He states that directly invalidating lost coins would violate Bitcoin's spirit of inviolable private property; believers advocate allowing hackers to steal (BIP-360), while capital and organizations advocate invalidation if not migrated by expiration (BIP-361). If the two sides cannot compromise and hard fork, the scale of conflict will far exceed the BCH split back then. He also mentions that ETH's early lost coins are much fewer, and since the only social value created by blockchain is RWA, ETH replacing BTC as the largest market cap coin may be inevitable, with quantum attacks possibly being the most likely catalyst. #US CPI and PPI both exceed expectations, will there be another rate hike this year? $BTC $ETH $SOL Elon Musk flew a flying version of the Roadster, which got 70.29 million views and 815,000 likes. He said he wants to fly over the Grand Canyon and then land and continue driving with wheels. The whole internet is buzzing. Watching it makes me want to propose on the spot. But do you know? In the same week, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell 3.8% on Friday, chip stocks have dropped for 8 consecutive days—the longest since 2008. The Nasdaq fell 2.14% that day. BTC is now hovering around 81,000. (All data above is from the morning of October 17-18.) The narrative is flying high, but cash flow is crawling on the ground. It's like a boyfriend saying he will take you around the world, but his WeChat balance is only double digits. Romance is the narrative; the bill is reality. Here’s my observation: First, when tech sentiment diverges from the market, don’t rush to take sides. Sentiment is free, but positions require real money. Second, the Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00% in September, and Powell hasn’t closed the door on further hikes. All risk assets are freezing during the rate hike cycle, and crypto is no exception. This week, the US spot BTC ETF still saw continuous net outflows; institutions are moving out. You’re not the only one feeling cold. Third, but the pipeline hasn’t stopped. Tokenized US Treasuries are nearly $15 billion now. DTCC’s tokenization service launched this month. Prices are cold, infrastructure is hot. This is the time that tests patience the most. Like in relationships, everyone has a honeymoon phase, but those who stay through the quarrels are true love. So today’s peace summary: Watching the flying car is exciting, but decisions must be calm. Don’t chase highs or bottom-fish calls. Positioning.The arc public chain developed by crcl has recently gone quiet, with daily revenue only about 50,000 to 60,000 USD, totaling roughly 2 million USD per month at most. The profit is too small to have any real impact on crcl's stock price; crcl still relies on interest income from US Treasury bonds reserved in USDC.
To expand the market and increase USDC's adoption rate, crcl shares revenue with many channel partners. For example, Coinbase and Binance, although this reduces their own profit margins, it helps increase USDC's market share. This strategy is correct and actually similar to how internet companies operate—burning money to capture market share and user mindshare, then starting to make money once they win.
I am still quite optimistic about crcl's stock price. As long as crcl continues to expand USDC's adoption and deepen its presence among users, when the big bull market truly kicks off, crcl will most likely soar. If it can surpass USDT's issuance volume, that would be even more incredible. Looking forward to that day.周末美股休市，币圈难得自己走自己的路。
看一个有意思的错位：10月以来美国现货比特币+以太坊ETF净流出已经超过10亿美元，光10月12日到16日这一周就净赎回6.1亿美元。机构明显在撤。
但价格呢？BTC这周只跌了1.7%，现在81,000上方，还稳稳贴着50日均线没破。
机构在卖，价格却不崩，说明有另一股力量在接。这种紧平衡不会一直维持，方向选择往往就在平静的周末之后。
你们觉得下一根决定性的K线，是机构卖完自然见底，还是等宏观数据来点火？#比特币 #加密货币以前谈异地恋 最心疼的不是机票 是每次给对方转点钱 银行先替你收一笔“思念税” Borderless最新的Q3报告给了一组挺扎心的数据 汇200美元 传统渠道中位数成本12.72美元 费率6.36% 用稳定币通道中位数只要2美元 大概1% 整体便宜了约84% 越是需要钱的地方 差距越大 撒哈拉以南非洲 稳定币2.9% 传统8.46% 拉美 稳定币1.25% 传统5.64% 企业汇1万美元去欧元区 稳定币最低26美元 银行电汇加换汇要135到150美元 速度也是降维 巴西和哥伦比亚中位数两分钟到账 墨西哥三分钟 SWIFT一般要等到下一个工作日 这就像你发消息对方秒回 和对方隔天才回“刚看到” 感情能一样吗 不过我也想泼点理性的冷水 到账成功率差别很大 墨西哥98.6% 哥斯达黎加只有73% 稳定币自己跑得再快 最后一公里还是要靠当地的出入金和支付基础设施 恋爱也一样 光你热情没用 对方家门口那条路也得修好 所以我对稳定币的看法一直很朴素 它最大的价值不在涨跌 在于让普通人的钱少被吃一口 这也是为什么RWA和支付赛道我会长期盯着 而不是只盯K线 顺手说一句 今天BTC在8.16万美元附近The S&P 500 fell 1.09%, but BTC closed up 0.21%. This is a rare "inverse" combination in recent months—has decoupling really happened this time? First, the news. Let's line up the data: On the US stock side, the S&P 500 closed at 7,659.44 (intraday -1.09%), with a noticeable pullback in tech stocks; on the crypto side, BTC was at $81,528.4, +0.21% in 24 hours, -1.84% over the past week; on the macro side, the US Dollar Index was 101.78 (-0.22%), gold at 4,186.7 (+0.40%); on the capital side, the latest single-day net inflow for the US spot ETF was $16.2 million (turned positive), with 5-day net outflow of $323.7 million and 10-day net outflow of $848.1 million; on the sentiment side, the Fear & Greed Index fell from 63 to 55. Next, looking at capital impact. The correlation between BTC and US stocks comes from "common factors"—liquidity, interest rates, risk budgets. When common factors dominate, both rise and fall together; when their respective capital structures dominate, correlation decreases. Today's divergence has several clues: first, the dollar weakened (beneficial for BTC and gold); second, the main reason for the US stock decline was the tech stock pullback (sector-specific issue); third, BTC's ETF capital turned positive in a single day. These three all point to "BTC is pricing itself according to its own capital logic," rather than following US stocks. Implications for BTC: a single day of decoupling does not indicate a long-term pattern, but it is a signal worth noting—if US stocks continue to pull back and BTC can hold near 80,000, then ZEC 一路跌到了 1126，一个月跌掉三成。后天有个日子，可能决定它能不能翻身。
10 月 20 号，开发者要拍板 NU7 升级的主网激活高度，目标 11 月 5 日上线主网。
这次升级不是小修小补：出块时间从 75 秒压到 25 秒，等于给引擎换了一套；每笔手续费的 60% 进储备池，以后网络靠手续费养自己，不再只吃增发老本。
链上还有个信号：进匿名池的币已经占了总供应的 29%，说明真有人在用隐私功能，不是纯炒概念。
坏消息也没停。灰度的 ZCSH 基金 10 月持续净流出，矿工也在抛，价格从高点下来量一直没缩回去。
说白了，升级是好事，但 20 号会得开顺、11 月 5 号主网不能跳票，利好才能落地。
$ZEC $XMR $DUSK
#zcash #隐私币 本来以为周末成交量这么低，不会有大行情。想不到昨晚纳指跌了2.15%，带崩了加密。
现在行情太惨了，一句话来概括就是：加息在压估值、油价在拱通胀、ETF还在抽血。
1. 9 月CPI3.7%、核心2.6%双双超预期；30 年美债最高冲到 5.6%，创 2002 年来新高。WTI 连涨7天到101.71刀，布伦特逼近 110。#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？
2. 资金面更难看：10 月美股现货 $BTC +$ETH 的ETF 净流出超 10 亿刀，上周净赎回 6.107 亿（ETH 3.2亿、BTC 2.3亿）。
ETH ETF连续10天净流出，$SOL ETF 结束 14 周流入，也是连续9天净流出。BTC 未平仓合约来到今年的低点，仅剩58万枚，全市场都在去杠杆。
3. 唯一的暖意：BTC ETF昨天录得约 1.6 亿净流入，SEC昨晚批准代币化股票交易豁免。
但这点量，填不上 10 月的坑。本周最大雷：28号FOMC出结果。CME 现在给 10 月按兵不动 84.5%、12 月加息 25bp 75.5%。ETF funds are exiting simultaneously, and the support for this rebound still needs to be verified
Data from October 12 to 16 poured cold water on the current rally: about $574 million was withdrawn from the combined US BTC, ETH, and SOL spot ETFs.
SOL: The most persistent retreat. The net outflow of $25.5 million this week may not seem large, but it has been bleeding for 10 consecutive trading days, totaling $50.5 million. On Friday alone, $12.7 million was withdrawn, nearly half of the week's total. The longer this lasts, the more it indicates that the funds are not just hesitating briefly but are cautious.
ETH: The most prominent amount. This week saw a net outflow of $320.1 million, exceeding BTC's scale. Withdrawals occurred for three consecutive trading days from Wednesday to Friday, totaling $259.5 million. Observing only through the ETF channel, ETH currently lacks sustained replenishment support.
BTC: The most volatile inflow and outflow. This week had a net outflow of $228.4 million. On Tuesday, there was an inflow of $175.7 million, but on Wednesday it turned into an outflow of $261.4 million.
All three move in the same direction but with different patterns: SOL shows persistence, ETH shows scale, BTC shows volatility. To make the market more confident in this rebound, it is necessary to observe whether funds can turn into net inflows for several consecutive days.
$SOL $ETH $BTC
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 美元回落、币圈回暖：轮动逻辑在发酵🌊
近期美元指数走弱，BTC（+0.16%）与ETH（-0.25%）在8.1万及关键位附近震荡偏强，美元与加密资产罕见同向，本质是美债收益率回落下的资金轮动。CPI与PPI双超预期后，美联储“不预判”态度让10月加息押注降至15%，估值压力暂缓，但通胀根子未拔。
盘面上，BTC仍处80000-83000区间洗筹，现货ETF持续净流出显示机构减仓观望；ETH短线动能略强却受限于生态抛压，成为风险偏好风向标。ZEC等山寨受NU7升级扰动，波动剧烈。月底议息前，宏观未转松，市场等催化，节奏重于方向。
策略上，上方83000-84500强压，下方80400支撑，未破前高抛低吸。美元弱反弹或致加密回踩，勿被插针骗，轻仓等机构回流信号。$BTC $ETH $ZEC 案板上这块和牛还没片完，前厅就传来消息：招牌主菜可能被从菜单上撤下去了。MSCI十月十五日换了新规矩，把“非经营性公司”这把刀架在了Strategy和Metaplanet的脖子上，十一月十一日公布最终名单，十一月三十日收盘后正式上菜——或者撤盘。Strategy十六日拍桌子抗议，说会计口径不清不楚，Metaplanet那边连个回话都没有，后厨一片沉默，只有灶火还在烧。
做菜最怕什么？不是火大，是配比失衡。Strategy这道菜的配方太极端了——整锅高汤里几乎只放比特币这一味主料，别的调料一概不下。摩根大通那帮美食评论家算过账：一旦被指数除名，约二十八亿美元的被动卖盘会像退单一样砸进后厨。二十八亿是什么概念？相当于你正炖着一锅老火靓汤，突然有人把灶台整个端走。Strategy自己说指数基金只占约百分之三点一，盘子端走不影响生意——可这话听着就像厨子说“少一桌客人不要紧”，真到月底盘账，进货的钱从哪儿来？
被动基金是预制高汤，平时不显山不露水，可它是底味。底味一撤，整锅汤的层次就塌了。融资是进货现金流，估值是菜单上的标价，比特币采购是每天清晨去市场挑的鲜货——三样东西环环相扣。高汤少了，标价撑不住，鲜货就进得少，主菜的分量跟着缩水。杠杆合约？那是特辣辣椒，这会儿谁往锅里多撒一把，谁就是嫌自己肠胃太结实。
Metaplanet那边静悄悄，像后厨学徒被师傅骂了不敢吭声。Strategy倒是先跳出来喊冤，说规则不清楚。可榜单的规矩从来不由厨子定，米其林想撤你的星，理由可以写得很体面，刀子落下来是一样的快。十一月十一日名单一出，十一月三十日收盘之后，这锅汤是继续煨还是直接倒掉，就看评审团那几双筷子怎么夹。
真正要盯的是：被动卖盘砸下来的时候，主菜的价格会不会被压到连摆盘的余地都没有；进货的钱断了，比特币采购的节奏还能不能稳住；标价塌了，融资的客人还愿不愿意坐下来点单。三道火同时关小，再硬的灶也熬不出浓汤。指数基金那百分之三点一听着不多，可它是汤面上的那层油——油没了，汤就寡了。
这锅汤的咸淡，十一月三十日收盘见分晓。灶上还炖着东西的人，先摸摸自己的调料罐够不够厚。 #strategyopposesmsci