Orbit Post Sitemap
1127 times revenue growth served alongside an operating loss of $567 million — this isn't a recipe, it's someone dumping a whole jar of chili extract into the soup and telling you the bright color means it's perfectly cooked.
Anyone in my line of work knows: a restaurant's table turnover rate skyrocketing elevenfold sounds like fireworks, but step into the kitchen and you'll see the stove is rented, ingredients are on credit, and the assistant cooks haven't been paid yet. Anthropic's Q3 report is exactly this dish: revenue soaring to $16.956 billion, but operating profit burning a black layer at the bottom of the pot. Even worse is that long-term compute procurement and leasing commitment — $895.4 billion, with nearly $69.8 billion due within the next twelve months. What does that mean? It's like signing fixed contracts for ten years' worth of truffles, caviar, and whole bluefin tuna, with cold storage rent due monthly, but the seats aren't even full yet.
The people I fear most in my kitchen: menus longer than Michelin's, stock piled to the ceiling, but cash flow only enough to cover three weeks of utilities. Revenue growth is a fierce stir-fry, aroma wafting three blocks away; but losses and commitments are the fire under the stove — too strong a flame and the pot will burn through. Fine dining isn't about who has the biggest fire, it's about who has the most stable ratio — main dishes hold the plate, seasonings enhance the layers, and extra spicy chili is allowed only a drop. This company's current situation is like spending the entire main dish budget on chili.
Then look at their plan to issue $3.5 billion in new shares to six brokers in Japan. Simply put, it's opening new stalls, attracting new customers, and collecting deposits upfront to keep the pot going. The problem is deposits can help in a pinch, but they can't save the flavor. The real test is: when that $69.8 billion short-term payment deadline ticks like a timer, can the kitchen still deliver consistent dishes?
As for the market linkage of that US stock token, I see it very clearly — the sentiment of such assets is like the oil temperature in my pan, rising fast and flipping out even faster, with speculators deliberately adding ingredients into the hot oil, splashing all over. No matter how beautiful the revenue curve looks, it can't hide how thin the margin for cash flow turnover really is.
In my life, I only believe in one thing: growth is the spice, cash flow is the soup base. When the soup base is weak, no matter how much chili powder you sprinkle, it just irritates the nose and doesn't fill you up. #anthropicrevenueup1127%#Apple Q4 revenue exceeds expectations, next quarter gross margin guidance under pressure Let's first look at this earnings report. Apple’s revenue this quarter was $114.5 billion, up 12% year-over-year, with the main contributor still being the iPhone, which brought in $57.6 billion, up 17%. Overall, the numbers are indeed impressive. But looking further down, Apple’s own guidance for next quarter’s gross margin is only 45% to 46%, below market expectations. Why? Apple’s management revealed: storage chip prices have surged sharply, plus the huge costs invested in AI services have severely squeezed profit margins. On the market, tokenized Apple stock rose slightly, but it’s clear that investors are very hesitant. My personal view is: this is the "midlife crisis" faced by tech giants—revenue grows but profits don’t. Apple’s current situation is extremely awkward. The hardware sells well—new phones always find buyers—but when storage costs rise, it’s like working for upstream suppliers. Even more troubling is AI. The whole world is competing in AI now, and Apple has poured so much money into AI, yet there’s still no blockbuster app that can truly support revenue, while costs have already been firmly pressed down. Wall Street people are the most pragmatic; you not only have to sell well, but also earn well. Once profit margins peak, big investors are unwilling to give you a high valuation. This is called an expectations gap. What’s the impact? In the short term, this is a clear "cooling" signal. Apple is the bellwether of global tech stocks; if even Apple’s profit margins are under pressure due to AI costs and hardware price increases, then other small and medium tech companies following the AI trend will only have it harder.$xAAPL Negative: Next quarter's gross margin guidance is 45% to 46%, below expectations, with memory price increases starting to eat into profits
Revenue of $114.5 billion and iPhone sales of $57.58 billion both exceeded expectations, but the market is more concerned about profit margins. Apple closed down nearly 2% on Tuesday, XAAPL currently at 328.12, 24-hour low at 322.03
This quarter's 47.9% gross margin includes about 1 percentage point from tariff refunds. The CFO said that excluding this, the margin dropped about 1 point quarter-over-quarter, mainly due to memory price increases; last quarter was 50.1%
December quarter guidance is 45% to 46%, below analysts' average of 46.3%. Besides memory costs, there are also expenses related to the launch of Siri AI
Greater China revenue was $17.54 billion, about $1.2 billion less than expected. iPad sales were $6.23 billion, down 10% year-over-year, with growth almost entirely reliant on iPhone and Mac
Before memory prices fall back, this gross margin pressure is hard to offset by selling more. The highlights of the earnings report have already been partly eaten up by costs.
#苹果Q4营收超预期，下季度毛利率指引承压 A 7.63 percentage point drop is not just market movement; it's a sacrificed piece — the opponent pushes the rook behind your king, and you think they are going for a strong attack, but actually, they are clearing space at the negotiation table.
Brent retreats to 103.60, like a pawn pushed back to the sixth rank. The Strait of Hormuz is never an ordinary square; it is the d5 center square of the entire board: whoever pins it down controls the rhythm of the next twenty moves. The market treats "the agreement will be reached" as a forced move, so it first deflates the bulls’ momentum, cuts the premium, and lets the oil price fall for you to see. But Tehran’s statement that "the agreement is still far away" is a blitz hidden behind the sacrificed piece — it demands lifting the blockade first, removing sanctions first, unfreezing assets first. This is not a surrender; it is a forced draw tactic in the endgame: first pin all your pieces in place, then talk about exchanging pieces.
Washington has not immediately resumed large-scale strikes, but limited strikes near Hormuz have already been made. This is a typical reserved initiative: no check, but every move tightens the pressure. Negotiations, military risks, and actual shipping flows overlap to form a restraint line, where the bulls in oil prices have already lost spatial advantage.
The real winners are not those who take it step by step, but those who have calculated the position twenty moves ahead before making a move. They don’t focus on how much it fell today; they watch when this pawn chain breaks, which square falls first, and whether the opponent’s sacrificed piece is truly sacrificed or a trap. The $xNFLX linkage is just a flank pawn; the main battlefield is always that Hormuz square — if shipping really opens, it’s a passed pawn; if negotiations drag on, it’s a buildup of forces; if limited strikes escalate, it’s check.
Before a pawn crosses the river, it is always just a pawn; but once it crosses, it can promote to a queen. Beneath the surface of Hormuz, the real chess game is not yet complete — #oilpricesfallover7%Divergence. $LIT current price is 3.2827, short-term cycle is weak, long-term cycle is strong, and the two cycles have not given the same answer yet, so treat this as an unconfirmed direction.
Trading participation is extremely low, the price moved but the market did not follow significantly, which reduces the credibility of this trend. If the price cannot hold above 3.4571, is this short-term weakness a trend change or just a local pullback under the long-term strong background?
Current judgment: divergence, waiting for confirmation. Only if the price holds above 3.4571 with stronger participation can the short-term weakness be considered corrected; otherwise, treat it as a local pullback under the long-term strong background. Those who treat single-cycle signals as trend reversals usually pay tuition in larger cycles. The market is volatile, the above is only market observation and does not constitute investment advice.
#LIT$PONS
A new wallet withdrew 27 million USD from OKX within 12 hours
The address was created only three months ago. In these 12 hours, it withdrew 69.125 million PONS and also took 5,887 ETH along the way. At current prices, that's 14 million USD worth of PONS and 13.3 million USD worth of ETH.
Anyone who sees this would first think it's a whale bottom-fishing. I don't see it that way. A real accumulation wouldn't move so neatly all at once, and wouldn't conveniently bring along a load of ETH; it looks more like custody or market-making repositioning.
The data doesn't support a bullish view either. PONS current price is 0.2023, down 3% in 24 hours. OKX spot trading volume is 4.38 million USD per day, and perpetual positions only 8.34 million.
The batch withdrawn equals three times its daily trading volume. If it were dumped back, the order book couldn't absorb it.
For this kind of token, I’m just watching from afar for now. I'll wait for the wallet to move a second time before judging its intentions.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ This wave of predictions has already been reflected in yesterday's market.
Yesterday, the market first traded on the expectation of US-Iran peace talks. Once the news came out, BTC and ETH indeed rebounded.
But when I posted the market analysis last night, I said: I am not so optimistic about this round of negotiations.
The reasons are simple:
First, in previous rounds of talks, the core demands of both sides have never truly been agreed upon;
Second, although peace talk news has been continuously released this time, news does not mean an agreement has been reached;
Third, the market has already priced in the good news in advance. Whether the price can hold above key resistance levels is the more important test.
So my approach at the time was not to chase longs just because of the news, but to wait for the rebound to reach resistance areas and then look for opportunities to short.
After the price gave an opportunity last night, I followed the plan and took short positions on BTC and ETH, and woke up this morning with floating profits.
The core of this trade is not guessing that the news will definitely fail, but judging that:
Negotiation expectations can drive a rebound, but before the disagreements between both sides are resolved and the price fails to break through effectively, the rebound still carries the risk of being realized (i.e., reversed).
Trading is not about who sees the news first, but about how the price moves after the news comes out.
Make a judgment in advance, wait for the right position, then execute.
Direction judgment is one thing; actually waiting for the right position to act is another. $BTC $ETH $SOL #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ $ETH
ETH didn't follow the Nasdaq down today, which is quite interesting.
At 6 AM, ETH was still at 2293, now it's 2263. It does look like it's grinding down. But over 24 hours, it's still up 0.2%, with a low of 2241, currently about twenty dollars above that.
At the same time, CME Nasdaq futures dropped 1.5%, the Democratic Party is leading early counts in the US midterm elections, and Asian tech stocks are all in the red. Risk assets are generally shrinking, and ETH only lost a little.
At 8 o'clock, the hourly volume suddenly surged to 1.75 million contracts, while the previous few hours were only around 400,000. It was hammered down to 2258 but bought back, closing at 2273.
Perpetual positions still hold $1.43 billion, funding rate at 0.01%, longs are still paying. Leverage hasn't dispersed, and traders haven't left.
I don't think it will break down tonight. Chasing shorts before the vote count results are finalized isn't cost-effective. If anything happens, it will be right when the results come out.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ I don't touch high leverage. When I see news like this, I habitually separate "approved" from "bought." After holding spot for a long time, I tend to be a bit slow to react to hype. I just hold and don't move, and I care more about whether the reasons for long-term holding have changed.
According to Bitcoin News, the King of Bhutan signed a royal decree granting the Royal Monetary Authority full central bank powers, including monetary policy formulation and reserve management. The new central bank can invest in digital assets like Bitcoin beyond traditional reserves, but there is no mandatory purchase obligation.
My judgment is that this is a positive signal for the long-term recognition of $BTC, but its significance for immediate buying pressure is easily overestimated. Entering the optional scope of reserve management is different from simply discussing price; at least institutionally, it leaves an entry point. But allowing allocation does not mean allocation has already happened, and it certainly cannot be directly counted as new demand.
I will also pay attention to whether there is actual allocation disclosure later and how risk management is handled. If there is clear execution information in the future, then the weight of this news will further increase. This is my observation approach, not progress that has already happened, and we cannot overinterpret the authorization of the Royal Monetary Authority as the entire country of Bhutan having increased holdings.
Just take it slow. No matter how good the long-term narrative is, it can't withstand a single fluctuation under high leverage. For friends holding long-term, do you value this opening of reserve qualification more, or will it only count when actual allocation is disclosed? $NEAR is having a rough few days. The token has fallen below $4, and buyers haven't shown much strength yet. It is frustrating because the project has plenty going on, but the market clearly isn't rewarding every development. NEAR is trading around $3.82, down roughly 4.2% over 24 hours and nearly 15% over seven days. The interesting part is that NEAR just approved a major change to its token economics. Its House of Stake voted to reduce maximum annual token issuance from 2.5% to 1.6% over 24 m#BTC现货ETF资金反复，市场买盘能否企稳？ On Wednesday morning ETH: Yesterday afternoon posted still around 2259, touched about 2309 in the evening, hovered mostly between 2280–2300 at night, this morning fell back to around 2259 then slightly rose, current price about 2265, roughly +6 compared to yesterday afternoon. F&G rose from 26 to 34 (still Fear). The latest full ETF day is still 11/02: US spot ETH total net outflow about 139.7 million; on page 11/03 total about −10.9, but many entries still "-", not a full day. The election window is in the background, not the main focus.
The simulated position is still open, average price still recorded about 2320–2325, current price about 2265, about 55–60 below average price. Touched about 2309 overnight but didn’t clear the position, this morning’s pullback also didn’t add leverage to bet on a rebound. Reminder to set orders at 2295 / 2265 / 2259—overnight high area as upper boundary observation, current price as Wednesday morning observation point, this morning’s low about 2259 to watch for sideways or further probe. The above are observation points/planned reminders, not realized profit or loss.
With this unrealized loss, do you want to add a bit to average down, or keep waiting for the rhythm? $ETH Last week, Bitcoin and HYPE experienced completely different market trends. On October 30, the Binance hack incident caused Bitcoin to drop 4.12% in a single day, briefly breaking below the lower boundary of the descending channel intraday, hitting a low of $76,265, just about $135 above the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement level, then quickly pulled back, showing strong support at the lower boundary. On the same day, HYPE held the short-term watershed of $75, benefiting from positive news with a single-day maximum increase close to 20%, reaching near its all-time high. Bitcoin Daily Wave Analysis The daily correction starting from the high of $87,399 on September 21 is expected to unfold in a three-wave structure. Currently, it is in the ⅰ wave correction, which has lasted 41 trading days with a maximum decline of 12.73%. The lowest point of $76,265 is only slightly above the 0.382 retracement level of the previous five-wave rise (from $57,820 to $87,399), indicating that the ⅰ wave correction has basically met the conditions. The $75,000~$76,500 range is very likely to become the bottom, but a short-term rebound may be followed by a secondary bottom formation. 4-Hour Structure: Nine-Stage Decline On the 4-hour chart, the correction has extended from seven stages to nine stages, forming a descending pivot zone (range $82,556~$84,361). From the volume perspective, a bullish divergence has appeared, but momentum indicators have not yet confirmed, implying that the price may still fluctuate. However, the nine-stage downward structure has met the time requirements for the correction, and the probability that the daily ⅰ wave correction ends above $75,000 is very high. HYPE: New Structure After Breakthrough Since September 23, HYPEToday's market situation was already discussed yesterday
BTC has been trading since 7 AM when Nasdaq futures opened until now
If we seriously look at the 15-minute candlestick chart, it basically revolves around making choices.
Regardless of the outcome, whether 76000 can hold or if it quickly falls and can't recover, this is the key to watching the market, unrelated to who wins in this state.
Don't let minor news disrupt our trading logic and plan.
Stay steady amid all changes: BTC oscillates between 76000 and 79600, buy low and sell high. If the low area can form effective support and doesn't fall despite what we consider inexplicable negative news, then we must increase our long positions.
Conversely, if you think the news is positive or the market is completely calm without waves, but it falls sharply, the buy-low strategy is a trap and you should follow the trend and short.
It's that simple!!【Weather Bulletin】A strong convective cloud cluster from the stablecoin sector is approaching the front of the U.S. stock earnings season. Before the market opens on November 4, Circle (CRCL) will release its Q3 pressure data, and at this moment we are monitoring the continuous expansion of USDC circulation and the broadening of on-chain payment rainbands — this is not ordinary monsoon rainfall, but a systemic weather process requiring precise calculation of moisture flux and surface runoff.
Reserve income is the core warm and moist airflow of this storm, while distribution costs represent precipitation loss caused by orographic uplift. Forecasters never look only at total precipitation; what matters is precipitation efficiency. When USDC total volume rises like the northward shift of the subtropical high, what truly determines whether this rain moistens the soil or causes flooding is how much reserve income is locked per unit of circulation and how much leaks out at the distribution channels. Once the isobars of profit margins show a dense gradient, that signals the convergence of cold and warm fronts — wind shear in growth quality is about to appear.
Meanwhile, the market linkage of the U.S. stock token $xAMD should be incorporated into the regional weather model. The temperature advection of tokenized assets and the humidity field of stablecoins have a coupling effect, like sea-land breeze circulation: funds flow from traditional brokers to on-chain targets during the day and return at night to replenish reserves. When USDC payment channels expand, it widens this low-level jet’s moisture transport belt. As a related token, $xAMD’s volatility pressure trough may react ahead of the broader market. But our focus is not on individual cyclones, but on the movement speed of the entire front — if Circle’s earnings confirm controllable distribution costs and stable reserve income structure, then stablecoin ecosystem precipitation will continue to penetrate the payment layer, forming a pattern of continuous rain; if dry cold air invades the profit side, localized strong convection will quickly turn to clear-sky radiative cooling.
Looking again at the macro circulation background: currently BTC and Nasdaq show signs of decoupling, akin to polar vortex splitting causing mid-latitude weather system disorder. Stablecoins, as the boundary layer connecting traditional finance and on-chain liquidity, have their pressure gradient rearranging. Circle’s Q3 data essentially performs a sounding observation of this boundary layer — whether the temperature-dew point spread narrows and whether the wind profile reverses directly determines if subsequent precipitation is stable stratiform or explosive thunderstorm cells.
【Radar Echo Alert】The linkage intensity between $xAMD and the USDC ecosystem is currently in the yellow-orange zone; be alert for short-term heavy precipitation within two hours before and after the earnings release — i.e., liquidity pulses triggering sharp price surges and drops. Our station has increased observation frequency, updating stablecoin circulation anomaly maps and exchange capital flow vorticity fields every six minutes.
A final professional judgment: the core issue of this rainband is not the amount of rainfall but the raindrop size distribution — few large drops and rapid fall indicate speculation, many small and uniform drops indicate adoption. The USDC circulation isobars have already pushed north, but if reserve income isobars do not follow upward, that means a dry front is passing, a false humidity signal. #circleq3usdcgrowthU.S. Midterm Elections: Which Results Are Worth Watching?
For the stock market, the key is which party controls the Senate.
After the polls opened this morning Beijing time, U.S. media predicted that the Democrats took the Senate seat in North Carolina from the Republicans.
As of 9:30, on the prediction market Kalshi, the probability of Democrats taking the Senate rose from 74% before voting to 97%, and Nasdaq 100 futures fell 1.6% accordingly.
Midterm elections do not elect the president; they elect Congress.
All 435 seats in the House of Representatives are up for election, and 35 of the 100 Senate seats are contested.
Currently, both chambers are controlled by the Republicans; the Democrats need to gain 4 more Senate seats to hold a majority.
JPMorgan estimates that if Democrats take both chambers, the S&P 500 will fluctuate between a 0.25% decline and a 0.5% gain after the election.
If Democrats only take the House and the Senate remains Republican, the S&P 500 will rise between 0.5% and 1%.
If Democrats also take the Senate, investors worry that regulations on data centers and tech companies will tighten, and AI stocks might initially fall. However, JPMorgan believes that bills restricting AI are unlikely to override a Trump veto.
With the two chambers controlled by different parties, new legislation is hard to pass, so policy changes will be minimal, which is why JPMorgan projects a higher gain.
Including North Carolina, Democrats still need 3 seats; results from Ohio, Texas, Maine, and Alaska are pending.
If no winner is decided today, it may take several days, for example, it took 8 days to determine which party controls the House in 2024.#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Circle will release its Q3 earnings report before the market opens on November 4, with the core test being whether USDC's scale growth can translate into profits. Growth is still ongoing, but the main theme is "volume increases without profit growth": about 95% of revenue depends on reserve interest, with yields having dropped from 4.16% to about 3.5%, and distribution costs remain high—nearly 60% of revenue in the first half of the year was shared with channel partners, resulting in a net profit margin of only about 7%. Market expectations are for revenue of approximately $790 million and EPS of $0.38–0.40. Morgan Stanley maintains a reduce rating, believing that growth slowdown and rising distribution costs have outweighed the benefits of future earnings. The key is not whether USDC's scale expands, but how much profit remains after deducting yield declines and revenue sharing.$BTC's one-year post-election gains are once again under scrutiny! Historical statistics show a median return of about 63%. All three post-election cycles recorded gains!
But the halving cycle also influences the market.
Can 2026 develop its own counterattack rhythm?
This set of statistics shows that BTC rose 36.8%, 45.8%, and 80.8% in the 12 months following the midterm elections in 2014, 2018, and 2022 respectively; including data since 2010, the reported median return is about 63%.
The history of strengthening one year after elections indeed gives bulls hope, but these gains depend on specific statistical start and end points and cannot be directly taken as targets for this cycle.
I am more focused on whether the 2026 market rhythm will continue to advance earlier. The midterm elections and BTC's four-year halving cycle overlap in timing, and past gains may also come from cycle recovery after bear markets.
This year, BTC has already rebounded from a phase low before the vote. If subsequent pullbacks hold above previous lows and ETF buying continues to support, bulls have a chance to extend the recovery; if prices weaken again and funds do not return, the election outcome alone cannot sustain a rally.
Only if the pullback does not break new lows will bulls have a chance to extend the pre-election recovery into the post-election period.
When fund inflows and price breakthroughs occur together, this round of counterattack will have more momentum to go further!
#USMidtermElectionsAreComing, which results are worth watching? When I see this kind of message, my first reaction is to cover the "40x" before reading it again. People easily interpret a well-known player opening a short position as a bearish signal, but I actually think the more eye-catching the leverage multiple, the more you have to be careful not to mistake someone else's position for a market forecast.
Lookonchain monitoring shows that James Wynn opened a 40x short position of about 1.256 $BTC, with a liquidation price of $78,227.92. Thinking about it the other way around, I believe the directional reference value of this message is overestimated and is more suitable as a reminder of leverage risk.
One reason is that the material only shows this position, without his complete holdings and strategy; a single short position does not equal an overall bearish stance. Another reason is that high leverage amplifies both profit and loss and liquidation risk, but does not automatically increase the accuracy of judgment; if you infer the market will fall based on this, there is still a lack of market-level evidence.
I will continue to watch whether the market validates this direction and will not use someone else's liquidation price to boost my confidence.$ZEC rebounds over 11%, but contract open interest drops nearly 5%! On the eve of the upgrade, this rally feels a bit off.
ZEC surged from $1120 to $1244, currently around $1203, with a 24-hour contract turnover of $1.827 billion.
① Price rose, but capital didn’t keep up
4-hour open interest fell from 441,800 to 420,800 coins, a decrease of 4.8%.
Price increase with declining OI may indicate some shorts covering rather than new longs entering aggressively.
Funding rate remains +0.01%, longs continue to pay.
The rebound is strong, but its sustainability is questionable.
② NU7 upgrade countdown
Expected activation around November 5, block time shortened from 75 seconds to 25 seconds.
The positive news has been public for a while, and the market has been speculating in advance. The key after the upgrade is whether it can continue to attract capital.
③ Trading direction: short-term bearish
📉 $1225–$1250: rebound resistance zone
🎯 $1180: first target
🎯 $1120: second target
🛑 $1285: bearish view invalidated
If it can’t hold above $1250, expect further weakness and pullback; if it breaks and holds above $1285 with volume, cancel the bearish outlook.
The biggest risk before the upgrade is not that the positive news isn’t big enough, but that after the price rises, new capital does not follow.$BTC current price $76,881, WAIT, I'll wait and see first
Long positions on hand (average price $83,030) will not add more
The resistance above is the downtrend line at $77,543, dropping $641 daily
The $77,601 level has surged twice, fallen back zero times, broken through once, and no reaction once
A) Breaking below $76,326: $15.25 million long positions liquidated within 36.8 hours, the market is likely to continue weakening; invalid if it stands above $79,441
B) Only if it stands above and holds $79,742, I will look at $80,788; invalid if it falls back below $77,543
Open interest decreased 1.9% in 24 hours, price down 0.33% in 24 hours, indicating longs are closing positions
If it rebounds to $79,742, I will take profit on half first
Before the US non-farm payroll data on November 4, short-term trends may not follow historical patterns. Would you bottom-fish here? #Вероятность повышения ставок в США в декабре снизилась до 73%, сообщество активно обсуждает дальнейший путь 📉 This week, the DEX sector was recalculated by the market. With CEX risks spilling over, logically decentralization should reap the benefits, but capital only prices "real beneficiaries," not "conceptual beneficiaries." The positive effects fall on different models, causing clear differentiation.
🏦 $AAVE is approaching the 126 defense line. On Hyperliquid, whales dumped $109 million positions, ETH collateral is shrinking again, and lending income is under short-term pressure. Whether 126 holds or not will determine if this pullback is a shallow shake or a deep adjustment.
🛠 $GMX is being re-evaluated by association: its narrative has been taken over by Hyperliquid and new compliant players, its fees and token price continue to lag, and no clear bottom structure is seen around $8.
⚡ $ENA is benefiting from volatility dividends; its mechanism generates extra fees in an amplifying market, temporarily holding around 0.18; however, its vulnerability in extreme conditions remains, so it cannot be judged solely by sideways movement.
🧭 The same wind blows on different business models—some benefit, some are re-evaluated. DEX is not an overall positive, but a structural positive.一个朋友在$CORE开盘6U时冲了进去，群里喊着"百倍保底、千倍起步"，他一口气买了一万多枚，砸进几十万，以为要改命。第二天5U，一个月1U，半年0.5，一年0.05，现在只剩0.012。几十万变成一千块😰 真正扎心的不是亏钱，而是根本没有逃生的窗口——开盘那天就是最高点，之后每一天卖出都是割肉，越等陷得越深。这不是波动风险，是流动性只给你一次机会的结构性陷阱。 把这个故事和当下的市场叙事对照，会发现一个被集体低估的错位：所有人都在讨论新币的涨幅弹性，却没人给"退出权"定价。$LAB 的走势是同一套剧本的复刻——上线即巅峰，随后是漫长的单边失血，任何反弹都成了出货的流动性。当筹码高度集中在开盘瞬间，二级市场的买盘本质上是在为早期地址提供退出通道，而不是分享增长。 这也解释了为什么稳定币叙事在当下格外有吸引力。 这个问题背后是资金对"可退出性"的重新定价：$USDT 的规模扩张说明场内资金并未离场，而是在寻找不依赖单一开盘窗口的载体；$BTC 和 $ETH 的深度提供了新币永远给不了的东西——随时能以接近市价成交的能力。流动性的厚度，才是这个周期真正的稀缺资产。 我的判断是：新币的短期The SEC actually classified tokens as commodities 📜
The regulators have been biting the industry with securities laws for so many years, but in the end, the first golden pass of immunity was given to institutional consortium chains.
No profit sharing, no central entity, operated by code—according to these three criteria, more than half of the token projects on the market would be left clueless.
The best part is the disclaimer at the end: 'Represents only the staff's position, does not constitute a legal conclusion.' They take all the benefits but bear no responsibility 🤡
$BTC
$ETH #Circle's financial report is about to be released, will the growth of stablecoins translate into profits? My NO thesis on $CRCL ahead of Circle's Q3: stablecoin growth alone proves nothing. The $250M USDC mint on Solana is supply, not income. What matters is whether Circle retains more per dollar after distribution costs. If circulation grows but takerate falls, the growth is vanity. Q3 will settle it.
#CircleQ3USDCGrowth
#CircleQ3USDCGrowth Around $BTC 76,900, first see if it can be reclaimed, rather than rushing to name the pullback as an opportunity.
JONZi's bullish plan suggests an entry reference around 76,890, with invalidation around 76,575. These are his trading conditions, not my recommendation to copy the orders; no matter how tempting the distant target is, it cannot replace the immediate risk boundary. I prefer to first see if the price can re-accept the entry reference level above.
Kraken quotes about $76,838, below this entry reference but still above the invalidation reference. Price differences exist across trading venues, so this snapshot cannot be used to assert his actual position results. My personal market view is to wait for a close back above the reference level and a pullback that holds before re-evaluating the rebound; if the invalidation reference is broken and the rebound fails to recover, I will abandon this support assumption.
The area between the two lines is not necessarily a vacuum zone where action must be taken. I will not automatically increase position size just because the stop loss is near, nor will I write a single upward test as a trend recovery. The key judgment is whether the price can hold after reclaiming, not just where it touched intraday. Would you wait for the reference level to be reclaimed first, or for a pullback and support to appear? This is just a viewpoint exchange and does not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin has been fluctuating around $78,000 today, seemingly up by just over 1%, but the foundation is far from stable.
Binance's $6.3 billion hacker breach hasn't been fully patched yet, and ETF funds are flowing out again, with over $1 billion leaving in two days.
The Federal Reserve is holding interest rates steady between 3.75% and 4.00%, and the market is even betting on another hike in December, so $BTC can't really show strength.
On the other hand, the US stock market tells a different story; chip stocks have forcibly pulled the Nasdaq up, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rising 2.6%[reference:3].
Both $NVDA and AMD are up, but Apple is dragging behind due to poor iPad sales, causing the Dow to be in the red.
The A-shares market is even more conflicted; the index hasn't dropped much, but funds are all clustered in precious and minor metals, a typical zero-sum game.
Ultimately, with no easing in interest rates, the money supply is limited,
large caps can't drive the market, so investors turn to small caps and themes; virtual currencies and stocks are basically the same story now. To pour some cold water first, when I see big banks tokenizing assets, I don't directly translate it as "the crypto market has new incremental funds." What worries me more is that the market is hyping the financial backend efficiency upgrade as an income forecast for the entire RWA sector.
Morgan Stanley announced it is one of the first banks to adopt DTCC's tokenization service DTS after its launch, having converted U.S. stocks and U.S. Treasury bonds into tokenized forms. DTS was launched on October 28 and creates tokenized representations supported by securities held in custody by DTC. I am cautious for two reasons: first, changing the form of asset representation does not equal new asset demand; improving collateral liquidity and capital efficiency cannot be directly equated with capital inflow into the crypto market; second, the materials do not explain how public chains participate, how ordinary users gain access, or the value transmission path of related tokens. Banks adopting the service and whether RWA projects in the market can benefit are separated by several barriers.
However, those optimistic may also be right—actual adoption by large institutions is more solid than just conceptual. If subsequent disclosures show sustained business scale and actual connections with open-chain markets, I will change my view and admit this is more than just backend transformation. For now, I stand on "institutional application is positive, sector mapping is slightly negative." Are you bullish or bearish on this news? Share your reasons, especially which evidence proves that value will transmit to the related sector?Last night in the US vote, I was watching a number unrelated to the coin price
Trump's approval rating is 32%, the lowest for a president in a midterm election since World War II
Betting odds give the Democrats a 72% chance, House 95%, Senate 73%
This means the green light Trump gave to crypto in the past two years is basically over
The "Clear Act" was blocked once by the Democrats in September; it was supposed to hand digital asset regulatory authority to the CFTC, and now Warren is very likely to become chair of the Senate Banking Committee
Coinbase options market's one-month 10% downside protection cost has risen to the highest since April, institutions are buying insurance
But guess how the market reacted
BTC rose from 76386 back to 77870, up 1.34%, ETH 2288, up 1.6%, even standing back at the 2285 short liquidation zone
Lots of bearish news, yet the coins are rising; this is the most irrational yet most rational kind of rise
The rational part is that the election was priced in a month ago, so the actual outcome is a relief
The irrational part is that ETH is rising, not my position
My ZEC short at 739 is now 1233, up 6% again today
Tomorrow NU7, block time changes from 75 seconds to 25 seconds
Regulation is about to change, the market is rising, but my short is still rising
I only have one question now: will ZEC surge or crash tomorrow, and will ETH use this wave to directly touch 2305 The bulls don't even think about it. With millions of contracts plus coin-margined positions, if the price is pushed up, the market makers would lose millions of dollars. Unless there are hundreds of millions in spot buy orders or someone shorts millions of $TRUMP contracts, how could the price possibly be pushed up? Who has hundreds of millions not buying Bitcoin and Ethereum but playing this? So from the funding perspective, it must fall. From the market makers' unloading perspective, it must also be a downward unloading. There's still 80% of the supply left. This round will wait until these bulls get liquidated and then flatten out.黄金跌破4000的时候，我正盯着BTC的K线发呆 ✨ 你有没有发现，钱好像换了条路走？ XAU这波跌得挺干脆，4000整数关口和上升趋势线一起丢了，结构上算是确认转弱。只要还压在4170下方，空头叙事就继续有效，下方3400是下一个要盯的位置；反过来，站回4170才算第一丝回血信号，4540仍是上方大坎。说直白点，这轮修正看起来还没走完。 但真正让我在意的不是黄金本身，而是它和加密这边的强弱对比。黄金走弱，理论上会松动一部分避险仓位，可这部分钱未必马上冲进BTC。我观察到的是：BTC最近相对抗跌，ETH跟涨时弹性更好一点，山寨则明显分化，只有少数叙事还在被追。这说明风险偏好没有整体抬升，更像是存量资金在板块间挑位置。 偏多的路径是：如果黄金继续走软、美元不重新走强，部分资金可能从贵金属溢出，先照顾BTC和ETH这类大市值，再慢慢往山寨扩散。偏空的风险是：黄金跌也可能只是全局去杠杆的一部分，那样加密不会独善其身，山寨的弱势会先放大，BTC的抗跌也可能只是暂时的。 我自己的感觉是，现在不是全面进攻的节奏，而是看强弱排序的阶段。BTC稳、ETH跟、山寨挑，这个顺序没变之前，别急着把反弹当成轮#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？
Circle (CRCL) might exceed expectations in this Q3 earnings report, but my confidence in the stock price continuing to rise after the report is clearly lower than my confidence in revenue growth.
The screenshot shows the market giving a 72% probability of exceeding expectations, which I think is not unreasonable, but it should not be directly interpreted as a 72% probability of a price increase.
1. Circle's biggest contradiction: USDC growth does not equal synchronized profit growth
Circle's business model essentially relies on generating interest income from USDC reserve assets.
Its core logic is:
USDC circulation × reserve asset yield − distribution and operating costs = main source of profit.最近我在思考一个问题，为什么加密行业越来越难出现像以太坊、Solana那样，能够长期影响行业发展方向的天王级项目了，甚至打着“天王级”旗号的项目也不再有？$ETH 毕竟过去一个新概念、一笔大额融资，再加上知名机构背书，就可能迅速成为市场明星。如今，即使获得顶级资本支持，也不代表项目能够吸引真实用户，更不代表代币具备长期价值。 从比特币到以太坊，每一次技术突破都可能创造一个全新的市场。但如今，公链、L2和交易等基础设施越来越完善，新项目即使在技术上有所突破，也很难建立绝对优势。 一个重要变化是，市场开始重新审视项目的实际价值。过去不少项目的成长路径是先融资、讲故事、再通过交易所上市和社区营销扩大影响力。 但随着项目数量增加，估值过高、代币解锁和收入不足等问题的暴露，很多项目在融资阶段就已经获得较高估值，等到普通投资者能够参与时，未来的增长预期可能早已被提前计入价格。 这也是为什么市场不缺短期暴涨的代币，却很难出现能够穿越周期的项目。短期上涨可以依靠资金和情绪推动，但长期发展必须建立在真实需求和竞争优势之上。 仔细琢磨，反而觉得a16z Crypto更名是一个值得关注的信号。官方披露的逻$BTC BTC futures open interest surged 12.1%, but spot is quietly bleeding — is this 78,000 rally really backed by real money leveraged?
$BTC: Price dropped 5.3%, yet futures open interest surged to 694,000 BTC, funding rate annualized at 17%, leveraged longs are holding strong. But Bitfinex bluntly says buy orders in the 77,000-80,000 range are "passive," placing limit orders to catch the knife, not actively buying. Without spot ETF inflows, the rebound to 81,300 will face resistance.
$ETH: BitMine, the world's largest ETH enterprise holder, is underwater by over $4 billion, stock price only 0.88 times net asset value, buybacks of own shares are more cost-effective than buying coins — the largest spot buyer is stepping back. But 1.37 million ETH are queued for staking on-chain, with a 24-day wait and an in/out ratio of 137:1.3. The network is locking up, ETH/BTC fell to 0.029 approaching a three-month low.
$XRP: Today at UTC 14:46, XRPL activated the fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment, fixing the PaymentBurn token minting vulnerability, with 33 of 35 validators supporting it, native XRP supply remains unaffected. Event-driven, short-term funds are playing before the boot drops.
Summary: BTC is propped up by leverage, ETH whales are "defecting," XRP is waiting for the security patch to land. Are you holding futures longs or spot chips? Show in the comments, let's see who's swimming naked👇 This round of AI hardware is not a simple rebound but a repricing driven by earnings reports. AMD's adjusted Q3 EPS is $2.09, exceeding market expectations, and the revenue guidance is also impressive, with after-hours trading surging as much as 7%.
On the token side, at 5 AM, the hourly volume surged to 43,903 contracts, compared to previous volumes of only 900 to 2,900 contracts, consuming half a day's volume in one hour. The range low was 474.74, the high was 534.92, with a single candle amplitude of 12%, closing at 523, and the current price is 514.67, up 9.7%. What’s unusual is that the total position size is only $5.22 million. Even with a fifteenfold volume increase and a 12% large fluctuation, leveraged funds did not choose to stay, mostly engaging in quick intraday trades.
Looking at the market simultaneously, the triple-leveraged product SOXL rose 11.8%, SMCI closed up 10.3%, and the entire AI industry chain moved collectively. Meanwhile, BTC only rose 1.24% during the same period, with the price around 77,764. Also a risk asset, the current market shows a completely divergent trend: semiconductors are sprinting ahead driven by earnings reports, while the crypto market is waiting for the election results to be finalized. #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ The U.S. midterm election votes are being counted, and the results are not out yet, but Bitcoin has already risen back above 77,000.
Prediction markets give the Democrats over a 90% chance of taking the House, and the Senate is also leaning Democratic. Many worry that a Democratic win is bad news for the crypto space, but I think we need to look at it separately:
For the coin price, the short-term impact might not be as big as imagined. Everyone has already bet on this outcome, and the options market's volatility expectations only slightly increased around the election, with no panic.
What is truly affected is the regulatory progress. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (CLARITY) was stuck in the Senate in September at 49 to 50 votes, 11 votes short of the 60 needed. This Congress ends on January 3, and if it doesn't pass, the next Congress has to start over. If the Democrats control Congress, this will likely be delayed until after 2027.
So don't treat today as a "bad news crash day"; it's more like a signal that "regulatory benefits will be delayed." Wait for the official results before making moves; don't jump the gun.
$BTC #美CFTC推进加密市场规则，SEC拟调整托管框架 The only highlight for LTC is the halving in August next year. I made a prediction chart. When will this coin start? What do you think? $LTC The U.S. midterm election votes are being counted, and the results are not out yet, but Bitcoin has already risen back above 77,000.
Prediction markets give the Democrats over a 90% chance of taking the House, and the Senate is also leaning Democratic. Many worry that a Democratic win is bad news for the crypto space, but I think we need to look at it separately:
For the coin price, the short-term impact might not be as big as imagined. Everyone has already bet on this outcome, and the options market's volatility expectations only slightly increased around the election, with no panic.
What is truly affected is the regulatory progress. The Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (CLARITY) was stuck in the Senate in September at 49 to 50 votes, 11 votes short of the 60 needed. This Congress ends on January 3, and if it doesn't pass, the next Congress has to start over. If the Democrats control Congress, this will likely be delayed until after 2027.
So don't treat today as a "bad news crash day"; it's more like a signal that "regulatory benefits will be delayed." Wait for the official results before making moves; don't jump the gun.
$BTC #美CFTC推进加密市场规则，SEC拟调整托管框架 Seeing a 20x long position like this, my first reaction is not to guess the price direction, but to calculate how much drawdown it can withstand. I often tell newcomers: getting the direction right doesn't mean the position size can survive until realization.
Core Trader 14 (0x24fb65…bed0f) opened a 20x leveraged long on $TSLA, quantity 666, nominal value about $260,700, reference price $391.3836.
📌 My judgment: talk about risk budget first, then the reasons for going long. Roughly calculated at 20x, the initial margin is about $13,000; if the price moves 1% against the position, the unrealized loss is about $2,607, which is 20% of this margin. A 5% adverse move is not a safe line either; maintenance margin and other factors may cause liquidation to happen earlier, so it cannot be used as a stop-loss level.
Newcomers tend to mistake "not liquidated yet" for "can still hold on." Regarding this position, what you haven't understood is how margin is estimated, or the difference between stop-loss and liquidation? Leave a comment and I'll explain in detail.Seeing that validator commission income is expected to decrease by 36%, my first reaction was: reducing issuance isn't easy for everyone 🤔. This NEAR proposal has been approved by governance voting, but it still requires security council approval, completion of the preparation period, and validator upgrades before implementation.
My understanding is that this is a dilution reduction benefit for token holders, but the incentive changes for validators need closer attention. The allocation ratio of newly issued tokens remains unchanged; with less issuance, the rewards distributed to staking participants will also decrease. If validators' operating costs do not decrease accordingly, the income shrinkage may squeeze their operational space. This is my speculation and should not be directly equated with nodes exiting.
I haven't figured out yet whether the benefits brought by reduced issuance can offset the decline in staking attractiveness. Having been in the space for only a year, I remind myself not to automatically translate "reduced issuance" as "price will rise" and will observe the validators' feedback going forward.The U.S. midterm elections are an unavoidable variable in this year's crypto market.
After the last three midterm elections, BTC performed quite strongly in the following 12 months:
2014: up 24.5%
2018: up 44.9%
2022: up 92.3%
This time, the fate of the CLARITY Act is also highly anticipated.
The bill previously faced obstacles in the Senate, and if the balance of power in Congress changes, crypto regulatory legislation could see new uncertainties.
Meanwhile, the U.S.-Iran conflict, energy prices, and inflation issues may also affect short-term market risk appetite.
But what I’m more focused on is the market changes after uncertainty fades.
When macro pressures gradually ease, will capital flow back into crypto assets?
That is the key point to watch going forward.
$BTC A wallet just three months old withdrew $27.42 million worth of coins from OKX in 12 hours. My first reaction was: this address must be triple-checked before trusting it.
69.125 million PONS tokens worth $13.97 million, plus 5,887 ETH worth $13.45 million. The two combined are split almost evenly, quite balanced.
Interestingly, it’s not picky. Old wallets usually have preferences when withdrawing—either hoarding mainstream coins or gambling on small tokens. But this new one takes both $PONS and $ETH together, like moving all assets at once before making a move.
The only thing I can’t figure out is, why would a three-month-old address confidently hold $27 million in its own hands.There's a detail that's easy to overlook: the withdrawal wallet was created only three months ago.
In the past 12 hours, it withdrew 69.125 million PONS from OKX, equivalent to 13.97 million USD; during the same period, it also withdrew 5,887 ETH, worth 13.45 million USD. The total is 27.42 million USD, almost evenly split.
First, let's look at the structure. The 13.45 million USD in $ETH is just a regular large withdrawal; thousands of ETH are moved on-chain daily. The real anomaly is $PONS: a small token with 69.125 million units withdrawn in one go. Such a large amount leaving the exchange means there's less volume available for direct trading on the market.
Next, consider the motive. The new wallet has no historical baggage and no need to diversify holdings. Moving both assets together looks more like setting up a self-held position rather than short-term shuffling. Tokens in the exchange can be dumped anytime, but tokens in the wallet would have to be deposited back first to be sold, adding an extra step and time buffer.
However, I don't intend to treat this withdrawal as a bullish signal. A single 27.42 million USD withdrawal isn't decisive; withdrawing doesn't equal locking tokens, and depositing back is just another transfer. What really matters is what happens next: will this address continue withdrawing from OKX, will it transfer to other contracts, or will it deposit back within a few days?
If it stays quiet, it means someone is willing to hold the tokens at this price level. If there is a return flow within three days, then today's withdrawal was just a relocation. The judgment basis is not the withdrawal itself, but what happens after the withdrawal.Bitcoin has been tugging around $78,000 today, seemingly up just over 1%, but underneath it all, it's quite unstable.
Binance's $6.3 billion hacker breach hasn't been fully patched yet, and ETF funds are flowing out again, with over $1 billion leaving in two days.
The Federal Reserve is holding interest rates steady at 3.75% to 4.00%, and the market is even betting on another hike in December, so $BTC can't really show strength.
On the other hand, the US stock market tells a different story; chip stocks have forcibly pulled the Nasdaq up, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rising 2.6%[reference:3].
Both $NVDA and AMD are up, but Apple is dragging behind due to poor iPad sales, causing the Dow to be in the red.
The A-shares market is even more conflicted; the index hasn't dropped much, but funds are all clustered in precious and minor metals, a typical zero-sum game.
Ultimately, with no easing in interest rates, money is limited; when big stocks can't move, investors turn to small caps and themes. Virtual currencies and stocks are basically the same story now.I don't touch high leverage; holding spot is about not having to live day-to-day around a single price line. I hold and don't move, but even holding requires judgment—you can't just use the word "long-term" to gloss over all issues.
According to PANews, OKX market data shows $BTC just dropped below $77,000, currently at $76,999.90 per coin, down 0.90% intraday. The numbers look a bit sharp, but my judgment is: based on this quick news alone, it’s not yet a signal that the long-term value has changed.
First, 77,000 is a prominent round number; breaking below it easily stirs emotions, but the number itself doesn’t explain why Bitcoin is more or less valuable. Second, the material only provides price and intraday decline, without explaining the cause of the drop or offering evidence of changes in network usage, security, or long-term demand. I won’t spin a big story from this small fluctuation.
If later evidence shows sustained weakening of long-term demand, then I will reassess my holding logic; that’s my judgment criterion, not a conclusion drawn from this news. You have to watch the price, but also be patient with your judgment.
Spot can be thought through slowly, but leverage might leave no time to think—don’t take positions beyond what you can bear. For those holding long-term, with this drop below $77,000, which information would you prioritize verifying to judge if this is a long-term signal? #Circle earnings report is coming, can stablecoin growth deliver profits? Brother 800 really caught the bottom of $SOXL this time! 😭😭 It wasn’t easy at all! This time, you really won, dog dealer 😭 After breaking even, Brother 800 will never touch contracts again. This one semiconductor alone made Brother 800 go from a 10 million loss down to 5 million now, nearly halved!
SOXL current price is 71.42. After hitting a low of 67.66 in this wave, it started a slight rebound. Brother 800 positioned long near 69.8, targeting directly 120, betting this round is a phase bottom.
From the chip distribution perspective, it was smashed down continuously from 109 with heavy volume selling, clearing out many longs, and panic sentiment was fully released. The storage sector $SKHY $SNDK previously crashed simultaneously, now no longer making new lows, showing signs of resonance and stabilization with SOXL.
Previously holding big profits at high levels, a pullback returned those profits. Now afraid of losses, no reckless adding positions, only testing longs at low levels. This position belongs to a bottom after full realization of negative factors.
This is a tactical phase bottom, not a trend reversal bottom. The first resistance above is 74.69; if it can’t break through here, a second dip could happen anytime. SOXL with triple leverage is extremely volatile; even at the bottom, grinding and oscillation will repeatedly spike and shake out holders, making holding mentality very tough.
Negative factors have been fully hammered through, the sector has dropped into oversold territory, and funds are trying to catch here, betting on subsequent macro and earnings expectations warming up to pull a repair rally #AMD财报前瞻：HeliosAI系统商业化进展 A friend told me that historically, after the midterm elections, $BTC always declines.
This period is not suitable for leveraging or trading contracts.
Well, let's look at the price performance of $BTC in November of 2014, 2018, and 2022.
2014:
First, looking at 2014, in Figure 1, you can see that the 200-day moving average on the daily chart is still downward, and the price is still completely suppressed by the 200-day moving average.
Moreover, the price hasn't even broken through the downtrend line.
What does this have to do with the midterm elections? Isn't this still during a bear market?
2018:
In Figure 2, 2018 saw the sharpest decline, but the market performance was exactly the same as in 2014, with no signs of a bull market, it was all bear market.
How could it rise?
2022:
How is this different from the previous two?
Where is the price? Where is the yearly moving average? Where is the downtrend line?
2026:
Do you see what's different?
Where is the price? Where is the yearly moving average? Where is the downtrend line?
The price has broken through the trend line and quickly stood above the yearly moving average.
A completely different trend. It's like carving a mark on a boat to find a sword; the boat is no longer the same, so what's the use of carving?
So you tell me, now that the $BTC price has returned to the yearly moving average, will you act???$BTC The Democratic Party's sweep is basically sealed, and BTC consolidating around 77,000 is waiting for Warren's subpoena.
Data (this morning): Polymarket shows Democrats at 99.4% for the House, 98.1% for the Senate; Fox/Bloomberg has already declared the House flipped blue (223+ seats). BTC dropped from 85,500 to 77,075 over 30 days, about -10%, then sideways after election day—the market has basically priced in the sweep.
The real thunderbolt isn't the CLARITY Act, but the subpoena. Warren is very likely to take over as chair of the Senate Banking Committee, with subpoena power in hand. The first target will be OCC's approval of bank licenses for Ripple, Coinbase, and World Liberty Financial. This isn't legislation; it's a direct house cleaning.
TD Cowen's judgment: after the sweep, CLARITY will be stalled for at least two years, SEC/CFTC appointments will be blocked; in the short term, BTC is relatively resilient, with a median around 76,000.
But don't forget the other side: the bill won't pass, Trump's veto power is a backstop, and anti-crypto bills won't get through either—so the "bad news is fully priced in" scenario also exists.
Who do you think will be the first target of Warren's subpoena?
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ 🔥 Attention! There might be an interesting pattern between the US midterm elections and the historical trend of $BTC.
Looking back at the performance after the last three midterm elections:
📍2014: Bottomed about 71 days later, price around $170.
📍2018: Bottomed about 39 days later, price around $3,200.
📍2022: Bottomed about 13 days later, price around $15,500.
From these lows, the subsequent gains were:
🚀 $170 → $20,000, over 100 times
🚀 $3,200 → $64,000, about 20 times
🚀 $15,500 → $126,000, about 8 times
An interesting detail: the time to bottom shortened each time, being 71 days, 39 days, and 13 days respectively.
Historically, the most panic in the market often also breeds the opportunity for the next cycle.
Will $BTC repeat this pattern this time? 👀