Orbit Post Sitemap
At 22:00, that MSFT candle traded 3,302 contracts, 4.6 times the previous hour, dropping from 530.37 straight down to 522.00, then closing at 530.28 — fully recovering the 8.37-point loss by close.
The next candle only used 1,117 contracts, just over a third of the volume, pushing from 530.28 up to 536.91, gaining 6.63 points. It takes 394 contracts to push the price down by 1 point, but only 168 contracts to lift it. There’s no supply below 522, so those trying to push it down are shooting themselves in the foot.
The real peak was at 00:00: only 262 contracts created 538.82, a wick that lasted five minutes, never touched again afterward. From 01:00 to 07:00, seven candles with 1,284 contracts retreated from 536.65 down to 532.26, not falling back to the 22:00 close of 530.28.
Current price is 531.93, MA20 at 532.30, less than four cents overhead, hovering around this line all day. 24h turnover is under 10,000 USDT, US stock market closed on Saturday, this is a shadow price.
After Monday 22:30 open: 1H candle with volume (≥800 contracts) closing above 536.91, pullback to 535.5~536.0 to go long, stop loss at 533.0, target 538.82; 1H candle with volume closing below 530.28, rebound to 531.2~531.8 to go short, stop loss at 533.5, target 522.00, risk-reward ratio 3.1.
$MSFT
(Not investment advice, trade at your own risk)Strive disclosed a net profit of $509 million for the third quarter and purchased 15,124 BTC in October, bringing the total holdings to 43,124 BTC. I see this as somewhat positive for the corporate holding narrative, but I don't take it as a basis for short-term price chasing.
📌 Here's a knowledge point for newcomers: stock does not equal flow. Calculating from the data, the October purchase accounts for about 35% of the total holdings, indicating a significant amount of this increase; however, this is a past purchase and does not mean there will be the same buying volume going forward. The size of holdings can indicate exposure but cannot directly tell you the next price direction.
Newcomers tend to connect "company profits and increasing holdings" with "the coin price will rise immediately." Net profit does not equal cash available to continue buying coins; you also need to look at profit composition and cash flow. Especially when trading contracts, the patience of corporate holders and your own liquidation distance are two different things. I will continue to watch subsequent disclosures and will not substitute financial news for position management.A person who personally pushed a bill is now stepping forward to say they also bear responsibility — this matter is more worth watching than the bill itself.
Patrick McHenry, former chairman of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, publicly stated that the crypto industry missed the best opportunity to push market structure legislation through, and the "Clarity Act" ultimately did not complete the process. He laid out several reasons: the industry failed to form a unified demand, lawmakers' understanding of crypto remains at the enforcement level, and both sides underestimated the time cost.
Mechanically speaking, market structure legislation determines "who regulates and by what standards." Without this layer being implemented, the pricing of $BTC and $ETH can only revolve around expectations; every hearing and every statement is amplified into market movements. What is truly suppressed is not the price, but whether institutions dare to bring in long-term positions.
He also gave a timeline: the Democrats will take over Congress in January. This means the current gap is not an end but the starting line for the next round of competition; experiences from the old bill will be repackaged, and the pace may be faster.
It is worth considering that when a legislator begins to review "where we went wrong," it often means they are no longer at the table. The real question is whether the successor will repeat the same mistakes.Friday's session felt more like a breather from Thursday's AI panic rather than a full reversal. The S&P closed at 7376.86, up 0.31%; the Nasdaq closed at 24579, up 1.09%; the Dow closed at 51285, down 237 points, or 0.46%. The Russell saw a slight rebound. Over the week, the S&P still fell about 2.7%, the Nasdaq dropped 3.4%, and the Dow declined 0.9%. The Nasdaq failed to close green for the fourth consecutive week and remains in a technical correction zone—down more than 10% from the October 6 high. Thursday's drop was brutal. After the Democrats took both houses of Congress, the market suddenly started pricing in a potential slowdown in data center construction and tighter AI regulations. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell over 12% in one day, Nvidia dropped nearly 9%, AMD fell over 17%, the Nasdaq lost 5.5% in a single day, and the S&P lost nearly $3 trillion in market value in one day. The VIX jumped from around 16 to 28. That kind of drop was not ordinary profit-taking. On Friday, chip stocks recovered some of their losses. The tech sector led gains with about a 1.3% rise, and the semiconductor index rebounded just over 4%. Nvidia rose 2.8%, AMD surged 11%. Consumer staples and financial sectors lagged behind. On the surface, it looked like a buyback, but 70% of sectors still closed lower, and the indexes couldn't fill Thursday's gap. The market is actually trading two things. One is whether the AI regulatory narrative has been overpriced. After the election results, funds first dumped everything related to data centers and chips, but on Friday some thought the sell-off was overdone and started buying back. The other is employment data. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 165,000 in October, far exceeding the expected 65,000 South Korean KOSPI plunged triggering a circuit breaker, semiconductors collectively plunged, and risk appetite contraction is suppressing SPCX through linked sentiment. I judge this rebound as an oversold correction rather than a trend reversal. The 4-hour and 1-hour moving averages are still downward; the former has fallen 16.87% from the high, the rebound is blocked around 136.18, and 125.15 forms the key defense line this round; the top 10 order book buy-sell ratio is 1.01, with buyers only slightly dominant, and the funding rate at 0.0000% indicates neutral leverage sentiment and lack of momentum to chase higher, with weak volume-price coordination. Operationally, one can lightly short at 135.6 with a stop loss at 137.9 and a target of 128.4; if it pulls back to 126.3 and stabilizes, one can reverse to long with a stop loss at 124.7 and a target of 133.8, with single position size not exceeding 20%.
— For personal opinion only, not investment advice, wishing smooth trading. —
$SPCX#US stocks suffer heavy sell-off: Philadelphia Semiconductor Index records largest single-day drop since March 2020
#South Korean KOSPI plunges triggering circuit breaker, semiconductors collectively plunge
$SPCX DID (Decentralized Identity) claims to solve the on-chain credit issues of billions of people. But beneath the mechanism, most projects, after distributing airdrops, leave behind nothing but a mess and domain names with no trading volume.
Comparing these three targets:
$WLD (Worldcoin): A giant that exchanges iris scans for tokens. It has an extremely large user base, but the core value capture does not come from "identity verification" itself, rather from strong airdrop expectations and market maker games. Once tokens continue to unlock, the huge artificially created wealth bubble is very likely to burst.
$ENS (Ethereum Name Service): The absolute king of domain names. Mechanically, registration and renewal do consume ETH. But the pain point is: ENS tokens currently serve purely as governance symbols, the protocol’s huge renewal fee income is not mandatorily distributed to token holders, and domain renewal rates have dropped sharply in the bear market.
$ID (Space ID): The domain name service in the Binance ecosystem. Early on, it gained heat through Launchpad and airdrops. But as the airdrops ended, the real demand for domain registration and binding is extremely low, and the token suffers long-term high inflation and a lack of real consumption scenarios.
Conclusion:
WLD is "hijacking airdrop expectations through biometric features"; ENS is "has real income but does not empower the token"; ID is "peaked at token issuance."200,000 People "Carried Away": Is the Leverage Cleanup in the Crypto Market Just Beginning?
Overnight, the crypto world was sleepless. Bitcoin dropped to a low of $75,568, and Ethereum once approached $2,237, with a decline of nearly 9%. CoinGlass data is alarming: over $1 billion liquidated across the network within 24 hours, with long positions accounting for nearly 90%, about 200,000 traders "carried away" by leverage. The largest single liquidation occurred on Binance ETH/USDT, valued at nearly $10.94 million.
The trigger is not on-chain. Nasdaq plunged 5.52%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashed 12.25%, and AI concept stocks faced concentrated sell-offs. After the midterm elections, the Democrats swept Congress, and the market quickly priced in expectations of tighter data center regulations and a slowdown in AI capital expenditures. Risk assets began to tear apart from the highest beta end, with crypto as a high-beta asset taking the brunt, and leverage acting as an accelerator.
Currently, $BTC is repeatedly tugging around $76,000, and $ETH is close to the $2,200 psychological level. On-chain indicators have limited significance at this moment; what truly determines whether this deleveraging round is the end or a relay is whether the US stock market can stop falling.
A warning signal is that long liquidations account for nearly 90%, meaning the market was previously extremely crowded on the long side, and the leverage cleanup may not be over yet. When macro headwinds meet high leverage structures, every rebound attempt could fuel the next round of liquidations. For traders, surviving now is more important than "bottom fishing." #比特币承压，ETF近7日净流出约11亿美元 Liquidation table fully translated, the direction quietly changed sides
Before sleep, I scanned through the liquidation data; market sentiment is quietly shifting.
1. Shorts were liquidated first, longs took hits afterward
In the past 24 hours, total network liquidations reached 728 million, with shorts accounting for 60%, and 102,698 people liquidated; but in the last hour, 47.23 million liquidated, longs accounted for 94.3%, those chasing highs took losses first.
2. BTC positions reduced, ETH positions increased
BTC hovered at 79,677, positions reduced by 0.49%, 272 million liquidated, shorts accounted for 88.5%; ETH at 2,389.89, positions increased by 2.77%, 204 million liquidated, shorts 54.3%. SOL and ZEC also increased positions, shorts accounted for 65% and 69.8% respectively.
3. Long-short ratio appears balanced, but leverage is retreating
Long-short ratio is 48.95 to 51.05, BTC and ETH positions continue to decline over the past hour, only SOL is increasing. 59.31 million liquidated in 4 hours, 47.23 million in the last hour, 80% squeezed into one hour; at 21:01, 1.9083 million evaporated in one minute, longs were the majority.
4. Evening news leans hawkish
The central bank governor said not to treat this rate hike as the first of a series; the Middle East ceasefire may not be the last shot; initial jobless claims at 189,000 below expectations, employment not weak, tightening expectations hard to ease.
Watch two key levels tomorrow: whether BTC can hold above 80,000 and ETH can defend 2,400. If it can't hold, wait for a pullback; if it holds, then follow the longs. When the direction flips, don't rush to reach out first. Every time I see news like this, I’m stunned for a moment: OpenAI raised $11 billion, valued at $1.25 trillion.
Sounds like huge good news, but then I think, that money went into someone else’s company account, what does it have to do with the little $WLD in my wallet?
It’s like the housing prices in the neighborhood next door went up, but my old rundown place won’t increase in value. The excitement belongs to others.
So later I developed a habit: when I see "AI big good news," I first ask whose pocket the money actually goes into. Most of the time, the answer is—it’s not mine.OpenAI completed a $11 billion financing round, pushing its valuation to $1.25 trillion. The more important question about this news is not "how much money" but whether this $11 billion can be transmitted onto the blockchain.
First, let's analyze the nature. This is equity financing, which goes into OpenAI's own accounts and has nothing to do with any public blockchain. It doesn't change on-chain liquidity but rather the market's anchor on "how much AI is worth." When the anchor rises, the assets with the most ambiguous valuations are usually the first to be revalued, and AI tokens in crypto happen to fall into this category.
Next, consider the time lag. Equity pricing is on a quarterly scale, and secondary markets take a long time to digest after primary financing lands; meanwhile, the prices of $WLD and $TAO operate on a minute scale, with sentiment transmitting quickly but fundamentals slowly. Therefore, after such news, the first wave of AI token price increases is usually driven not by performance expectations but by narrative premium, which rises fast and falls fast.
My judgment: The $1.25 trillion valuation is a medium-term positive for projects like $TAO that focus on computing power and model layers, as it raises the upper limit of "how much AI infrastructure is worth." For $WLD, which leans more toward identity and applications, it acts more like a short-term sentiment catalyst. The logic for $BTC and $ETH is not on this line; they focus on liquidity and regulation.
A question to leave: OpenAI is already valued at $1.25 trillion; how much is the market willing to give a "decentralized version"?First, a chilling detail: Trump's media cut their Bitcoin position by 99.99%, 4,259 $BTC, which converts to 343.67 million USD. This isn't just rebalancing; it's basically slamming the table and walking away.
The timing is extremely sensitive. The Democrats are preparing to investigate the financial dealings between the crypto industry and Trump's family. The investigation hasn't even started yet, but he already sold his coins. Coincidence? Half of me thinks he sensed the regulatory storm coming early, the other half thinks he just wanted to cash out quickly. These two explanations conflict, and I’m too lazy to force a unified theory.
The market looks just as bad. $BTC slid to around 75,700, and $ETH followed down to 2,232. There's also the non-farm payroll report tonight; the US stock market has already turned red out of respect, and some are actually betting on a rate hike in December.
Political funds are starting to move, which is usually more honest than press releases. In the mid-term, I tend to read this as a signal of escalating game-playing — but with such a decisive position cut, I can’t say I fully understand it either.#软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ ⚠️仅前瞻推演，不构成投资建议
SoftBank Group Q2 Earnings Preview
✅ Probability of exceeding expectations: 55%
✅ Probability of closing up on the first full trading day: 50%
Positive factors
1. OpenAI revalued at the latest valuation, fair value changes are the largest source of profit elasticity; Stargate computing power project continues to advance, AI narrative is strong
2. Arm's stock price stabilizes and rebounds, which can hedge part of the portfolio volatility; telecom main business cash flow is stable, supporting basic revenue
3. Market focus is not on the telecom main business, but on Vision Fund NAV, OpenAI valuation updates, and subsequent funding pace
Key constraints
1. Profits highly dependent on unrealized gains, not operating cash flow, very volatile; if OpenAI valuation is downgraded, profits will shrink rapidly
2. Continued large investments in OpenAI, debt-financed, LTV and debt pressure are long-term risks
3. Large amount of primary market assets in the portfolio, valuation is highly subjective; AI sector corrections easily lead to valuation cuts
4. Telecom business growth itself is flat, hard to contribute incremental gains beyond expectations
Three key points to watch
① Vision Fund NAV changes and OpenAI's fair value increase this quarter; ② Arm's market value contribution; ③ Management's statements on Stargate project progress and subsequent funding pace.Record the actual operation methods and progress of earning 20 Bitcoins in the Bitcoin ecosystem.$BTC This wave really feels like a bucket of cold water poured down.
After closing my long positions near 80400 earlier, I didn’t rush to chase back. Looking back now, that decision at least helped me avoid the sharp drop that followed.
It smashed down from around 81199, hitting a low of 74800. After consecutive large bearish candles, although there was some small rebound, it hasn’t yet reclaimed the middle Bollinger band. We can’t assume the market is stable just because of a few small bullish candles for now.
This decline isn’t just about issues within the crypto space itself.
After the US midterm elections, BTC once surged to 81000, but then $SPY and the semiconductor sector suddenly took a heavy hit, and $QQQ also dropped sharply. Risk capital started to retreat, dragging BTC down with it. What’s worse, leveraged long positions were heavily liquidated, with over $1 billion cleared across the market in 24 hours, mostly longs.
In short, the brief optimism brought by the elections was quickly crushed by the market’s risk aversion.
I’m not rushing to guess the bottom now; I’m focusing on three key levels:
74800: The low point of this drop, whether it can hold is critical.
73886: The 4-hour Bollinger lower band; if it breaks further down, the correction might not be over.
77677: The Bollinger middle band; only if it reclaims this level can we say there’s some short-term recovery.
No need to give back the profits I’ve made just to prove I was right.
A market drop isn’t scary; what’s scary is reaching out to catch every fall. Opportunities will always come; first, stabilize the rhythm. Three forces are at a stalemate, waiting for two signals
This morning BTC is still hovering around 75,200, with 76,000 not yet reclaimed. There is a divergence on the options side: BTC open interest is 57.89% bullish, but 24-hour volume is 51.19% bearish; ETH is similarly conflicted, with 59.99% bullish open interest and 56.02% bearish volume. Open interest reflects expectations, volume reflects the present, and the two sides are not aligned.
The resistance above is also clear. The biggest pain point for BTC expiring today is 79,000, about 3,000 points from the current price; for ETH it corresponds to 2,350. Looking ahead, the November 27 contract is at 80,000, the year-end contract at 76,000, and the current price is right in between.
The buying side has not retreated. Within a 1% range up or down, buy orders for the four coins are all thicker than sell orders: BTC long 50.04 million, ETH long 3.36 million, SOL long 2.54 million, ZEC long 990,000. Although shorts account for 51.41% and appear strong, there is still support.
Two things are still pending: ZEC’s NU7 is 189 points off; tonight at 21:30 the nonfarm payrolls will be released, expected to add 59,000 to 65,000. The result is not out yet, so no early bets.
Conclusion: bullish open interest is the confidence, bearish volume is the sentiment, thick buy orders are the floor, and the three forces have yet to determine a winner. Do not chase shorts if 75,000 does not break; if it breaks, go half short and first watch 75,000; if it rebounds to 77,000, then go long again. This is my personal account; if wrong, admit it and adjust after the fact.Today's volatility list, the most eye-catching is not the price increase, but the trading volume.
The biggest gainer is $ONE, up 14.72% in 24 hours, with trading volume increasing by 3090.53%—thirty times. On the same list, $UAI dropped 26.95%, with trading volume up 557.56%. One is in the sky, the other underground, but the volume surge is on the same scale.
Looking at the others that rose: $IDOL up 8.8%, trading volume only increased 23.62%; $BTW up 8.1%, up 64.01%. $LYN down 7.06%, $ANTHROPIC down 6.32%, volume increases are around 20-30%. This group’s price and volume basically match, representing normal turnover.
The difference is here: IDOL and BTW have people rotating positions, while ONE and UAI have people competing aggressively.
The trading volume increase far exceeds the price increase, meaning the same batch of chips is being repeatedly bought and sold in a very short time. The price only rose 14%, indicating there are always sellers above; bulls are not crushing the market unilaterally. UAI dropped nearly 27% with five times the volume; some keep selling, while others think it’s cheap and are buying in.
My judgment: The money rolling in ONE is short-term money; trend money hasn’t entered, chasing in is too costly; UAI’s liquidity is withdrawing, rebounds will be discounted.
When both the gainers and losers lists show volume surges simultaneously, it usually means a zero-sum game. At this time, it’s not about who is more accurate, but who has a lighter position.流动性深度正在成为这轮行情里最被低估的胜负手。一张最新盘口快照显示，$XAU 买卖价差仅0.002%，前五档买盘深度高达77.23万美元；$ZEC 价差低至0.001%，但前五档买盘深度只有2.43万美元；$ALLO 价差0.021%，买盘深度仅549美元。三组数字放在一起，价差和深度出现了明显背离，这才是真正值得盯住的信号。 多数人看流动性只盯价差，觉得越窄越安全。但快照给出的答案恰恰相反：$ZEC 的0.001%价差是三者的最优，可一旦遇到快速波动，2.43万美元的买盘厚度意味着大额卖单能轻易击穿前五档，滑点会在瞬间放大。价差是静态的“表面价格”，深度才是动态冲击下的“真实承接力”。$XAU 之所以在这组数据里最稳，不是因为价差最小，而是因为77.23万美元的买盘深度给了它缓冲空间。 这背后是一条更硬的逻辑：在剧烈波动中，决定你成交质量的不是报价多漂亮，而是盘口能吃下多少量。$ALLO 的549美元深度几乎等于没有缓冲，任何稍具规模的订单都会把价格推离报价区间。这也解释了为什么同样是“低价差”，三者的实际风险等级完全不同。 我的判断是：市场对流动性的定价仍停留在价差层面，而真正的分Some traders short sell to profit from price declines. But this whale's position is also worth studying from another perspective: funding fee income. According to published trading records, the total value of its perpetual contract positions is about 620 million U, with BTC, ETH, and SOL all using a full-position short strategy. 📊 Three main positions: 🟢 BTC: 5x short, holding 2354.6 coins, entry price $76,390.2. Unrealized profit 1.1754 million U, cumulative funding fee income 3.7306 million U. 🟢 ETH: 5x short, holding about 78,100 coins, entry price $2,322.72. Unrealized profit 7.1943 million U, cumulative funding fee income 4.7336 million U. 🟢 SOL: 7x short, holding about 684,800 coins, entry price $94.3346. Unrealized profit 2.943 million U, cumulative funding fee income 4.0062 million U. 💰 Total unrealized profit for the three positions is 11.3127 million U, cumulative funding fee income 12.4704 million U. Most notably, the cumulative funding fee income even exceeds the current unrealized profit. However, these two figures cannot be directly interpreted as final net profit; trading costs and actual account settlement must also be considered. Funding fees can be an important component of position returns but cannot guarantee positive returns in the future. I think what truly tests such positions is the change in funding fees, margin management, and the ability to withstand adverse market fluctuations. What do you think—does such a huge short position resemble directional trading more or... Is the market rescue starting? Taiwan stocks have fallen sharply this time.
On November 6, the Taiwan Weighted Index plunged 9% intraday, entering a bear market and marking the largest weekly drop since 2001. After the close, Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission announced that starting November 9, short selling would be restricted, with the daily short sale order limit set at 3% of the stock's average daily trading volume over the past 30 days; the finance department stated it is prepared to deploy a stabilization fund of 500 billion New Taiwan dollars (about 15 billion USD). BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes retweeted a report saying "the market rescue has begun."
This is a concentrated release of global trading congestion: leading sectors collectively retreat, leveraged funds are forced to liquidate, and programmatic and passive funds follow the decline, causing the daily drop to amplify to 9%. Regulatory short-selling restrictions plus government fund support can suppress panic selling in the short term but cannot change the narrative or the direction of repricing.
There is no direct corresponding token in the crypto market; the transmission path is risk appetite: if deleveraging continues in semiconductors, BTC and ETH will find it difficult to remain unaffected in the short term; if stabilization tools are effective and risk assets stabilize, crypto is highly likely to follow the rebound.
Are you more concerned whether the short-selling restrictions and stabilization fund can stop the continuous decline of Taiwan stocks, or whether US Treasury yields and the Nasdaq can stabilize simultaneously?
Source: PANews#SoftBank's Heavy Bet on OpenAI: Can the Q2 Earnings Report Deliver Impressive Results?
✅Key Features: SoftBank is a holding investment group whose profits mainly come from changes in the fair value of equity holdings (unrealized gains), not from main business revenue; OpenAI is an unlisted company, and valuation fluctuations directly determine the Vision Fund's returns
1. Actual Situation of Q2 Earnings Report
1. Profit Exceeded Analyst Expectations, but OpenAI Did Not Continue to Contribute Significant Appreciation This Quarter
Q2 net profit was ¥347 billion (approximately $2.19 billion), significantly higher than market estimates; however, the highlight of this quarter's performance mainly came from the rise in Arm's stock price. OpenAI's valuation did not continue to rise significantly during Q2 and could not bring SoftBank a large incremental unrealized gain as in previous quarters.
Key Point: OpenAI is private equity, and its valuation is not necessarily adjusted every quarter; once revaluation is paused, investment gains cannot continue to be realized.
2. Net Asset Value (NAV) Reached a Historic High
Thanks to the strong performance of Arm's stock price, SoftBank's net asset value rose from ¥40 trillion at the end of March to ¥72 trillion at the end of June; however, after July, the global AI sector experienced a correction, causing NAV to decline accordingly, bringing uncertainty to future performance. Leverage is back before conviction is. After a 5.1% drop in 24 hours from $80,315, $BTC bottomed at $75,511 and then went sideways, yet perpetual futures positioning has already risen 6% and funding has reset to 0.01% with no meaningful premium. That combination tells a precise story: traders are rebuilding exposure, not rebuilding appetite. Volume has collapsed to roughly one-seventh of its earlier level, and nobody is rushing to buy. The technical map is unusually clean. $76,155 is the short-t#Berkshire's Massive Cash Reserves, Latest Developments to Be Revealed in Earnings Report Berkshire now holds a frightening amount of cash and Treasury bonds, and for a long time had been aggressively net selling. But the latest data shows they seem to have ended net selling and are starting to look for opportunities again. Interestingly, some smart people in the community dug out that their Google shares bought at $350 are now nearly 20% underwater, showing short-term risk of being trapped. Even the stock market god is standing guard at a high level, which indicates that US tech assets are indeed ridiculously overpriced right now. On the market, tokenized Berkshire stock BRKB dipped slightly, with funds waiting for the next moves in the earnings report. My personal view is: Buffett hoarding cash like crazy is definitely an extremely dangerous macro signal. This old master is best at "being fearful when others are greedy." He now holds a large amount of cash and does nothing, earning high interest from Treasuries daily, which means he is waiting—for a big crash, for a revaluation of asset prices. Considering the current major changes in US politics, inflation rebounding from the ashes, and the Fed possibly continuing to raise rates at any time, even the traditional financial leader is so cautious, which itself shows the market is extremely lacking in confidence. What impact does this have? In the short term, it purely suppresses sentiment negatively. Old money is lying low in cash and Treasuries to avoid risk, unwilling to enter the market to buy, indicating a severe lack of incremental funds. Our crypto space is already anemic, and with external funds on the sidelines, the broader market will find it even harder to rally broadly, only able to continue oscillating at the bottom, wearing people down. But looking at the medium to long term, inside this... Numbers First: US October nonfarm payrolls about +165,000 (expected about 65,000), unemployment rate unexpectedly at 4.1%. CME FedWatch raised the probability of a December rate hike to about 77% within one day. On the same window contract side, media citing Coinglass data: about 1.2 billion in liquidations across the entire network in approximately 24 hours, with longs accounting for about 90%.
Why it matters: Stronger employment → tightening expectations rise → risk assets resonate; liquidations are the result of leveraged positions unable to hold, not a directional prediction. The macro calendar combined with leverage structure is clearer than looking at a single candlestick.
Confidence level: Employment data is officially disclosed; liquidations/FedWatch are media and tool rolling data, with slight discrepancies among sources. Liquidations ≠ a bottom-fishing signal. Are you focusing more on the macro calendar or the position structure this round? Feel free to chat often.
$BTC $ETHAI stocks collectively plunge: A lawmaker's post triggers an emotional pitfall
Less than 24 hours after the Democrats took control of both chambers of Congress, Arizona Representative Ansari posted that on the first day in office, advanced AI development should be paused, the "out-of-control industry" regulated, and artificial superintelligence banned. The market quickly interpreted this as the new Congress slamming the brakes on AI, with the Nasdaq, Nvidia, memory, and optical communications all falling in unison, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropping more than ten points in a single day.
📊 Event Breakdown
Political signal: A lawmaker's post ≠ a ban enacted
Actual bill: The "Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act" was submitted in September, still in committee, not yet voted on
Market reaction: Sentiment leads, AI chain collectively under pressure
Core
In the short term, this is an emotional shock caused by political tough talk. Winning the election just now, setting up a persona first and then attacking political opponents is nothing new. More importantly, AI concerns the fate of the United States; no one would truly gamble with the nation's destiny. In the mid to long term, as long as the U.S. wants to win this competition, the AI mainline will not be strangled by itself. The pit created by sentiment is actually worth calm observation. $SNDK #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股遭大幅抛售：费城半导体指数创2020年3月以来最大单日跌幅 #美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势 Solana Labs has released an iPhone app called Leap, currently in beta, for trading cryptocurrencies and tokenized assets. The news is minor, but the direction is worth a look: public blockchains are starting to develop their own terminals.
Previously, the division of labor was clear. The chain handled settlement, while the interface was left to wallets and aggregators within the ecosystem. What users actually saw was not the chain itself, but frontends made by others. Leap takes back this interface into its own hands, directly installed on Apple phones.
The term tokenized assets deserves special attention. The cryptocurrency sector is about competing for existing market share—who does a bit more or less, the ceiling is fixed. Tokenized assets are a different matter—if things like stocks and funds can truly be traded in a mobile app priced in stablecoins, Solana isn’t competing for exchange orders but for the brokerage segment.
Judgment should be cautious. A beta version does not equal user volume, nor regulatory approval; currently, there is no data to indicate whether it will succeed. Directionally, this is a step from underlying infrastructure toward consumer-grade products, more worth following than just adding another scaling solution.
One question remains: if a public chain builds the best trading app itself, what role is left for wallets and aggregators that rely on the ecosystem for their livelihood?#伯克希尔巨额现金储备，财报将披露最新动向
Reviewing 2026, the cash reserve trend clearly outlines Abel's strategic shift:
· Q1 (Peak): Cash reserves soared to a historic high of over $397 billion, continuing the previous 14 consecutive quarters of net stock sales.
· Q2 (Turning Point): Cash reserves dropped to $365.5 billion, marking the first significant decline since early 2022. Abel clearly ended the net selling cycle, switching to a net purchase of about $20 billion in stocks, investing tens of billions to build positions in Alphabet, and increasing its own stock buybacks.
🎯 Three key highlights of this earnings report
Beyond the cash figures themselves, the market will scrutinize the flow of funds more strictly:
1. Offensive capital allocation
Abel has clearly stated that cash is "dry powder" for acquiring quality companies, not long-term holdings of U.S. Treasuries. After the recent sharp pullback in tech stocks, the market expects Berkshire to leverage its financial strength for private investments, structured financing arrangements, or further increases in public market stock holdings. However, the September 30 balance sheet does not reflect market turmoil since October, so any large-scale operations during this period will have to wait for subsequent disclosures.
2. Pace of M&A and buybacks
Specific capital actions have already taken place in Q3, including the $6.8 billion acquisition of homebuilder Taylor Morrison completed in July, as well as the disclosure of building positions in homebuilders at the end of the quarterEveryone says retail is dead.
Yet Bitcoin’s retail cohort has added 2.46 million wallets over the past year, bringing the total to over 57 million.11.10 CPI, BTC's Life-or-Death Crisis
The market views the November 10 CPI as a short-term life-or-death threshold for BTC. The core reason: the current market is stuck oscillating around 75,000, ETFs continue to see outflows, leverage has not been fully cleared, and the bulls are inherently fragile. The CPI data will directly reprice rate cut expectations, which can easily trigger intense volatility.
Two scenario simulations:
✅ CPI below expectations (bullish): Inflation eases, rate cut expectations heat up again, US Treasury yields decline, and BTC sees a corrective rebound. However, note that if ETFs continue to maintain net outflows, the rebound space is limited and will most likely be just a sentiment-driven rally, making it difficult to directly reverse the mid-term trend.
❌ CPI above expectations (fatal bearish): Inflation stickiness exceeds expectations, the market further lowers rate cut expectations or even reprices for rate hikes, the US dollar and Treasury yields rise, and highly leveraged BTC will face a new round of sell-offs. The 75,000 support becomes precarious, with downside space opening toward 73,000, and the risk of cascading liquidations significantly increases.
Volatility will sharply increase before and after the CPI release, so it is most taboo to heavily bet on a one-sided move. During high volatility phases in the broader market, altcoin risks are amplified. Coins like CORE, which suffer from fundamental cascading defaults and liquidity shrinkage, have much higher drawdown elasticity than BTC.
The essence of this life-or-death crisis is not the data itself, but whether macro expectations and ETF funds can resonate. Prioritize position control before the data release and avoid gambling on news-driven moves. After the halving, miners shift to AI computing power—what is happening in the BTC on-chain ecosystem?
After the halving, block rewards were cut in half, putting mining profits under pressure. The electricity return per unit of AI computing power is significantly higher than mining, leading many publicly listed mining companies to convert their existing mining farms into AI hosting centers. The industry is undergoing structural changes, which profoundly impact the Bitcoin ecosystem and the BTCFi sector.
First, the total Bitcoin network hashrate is experiencing a phased adjustment, accelerating industry consolidation. High-cost computing power is prioritized to shut down and shift to AI, concentrating hashrate among top miners with access to low-cost electricity, increasing mining industry concentration. The protocol’s built-in difficulty adjustment mechanism will automatically adapt, so this does not directly cause network security risks, but the structural migration of hashrate prolongs the hashrate recovery cycle during the bear market.
Second, the role of mining companies is changing: from purely BTC producers to "AI computing power landlords." Many mining companies are selling their existing BTC holdings to raise funds for transformation, causing short-term selling pressure on the market. In the long term, mining company revenues will no longer be fully tied to coin price cycles, rewriting the logic of rigid selling pressure.
Most importantly, this disrupts the BTCFi sector: many BTCFi projects (such as CORE) have narratives tied to miner resources. When a large number of miners shift focus to AI, the originally expected miner traffic and computing power synergy narratives will be significantly weakened.
It is important to distinguish that not all miners are exiting mining; capital is simply prioritizing the higher return AI business. Future developments should be closely watched, focusing on changes in total network hashrate concentration and the scale of continuous BTC selling by mining companies. The comparison to 2015 still holds up.
Downtrend has broken to the upside, and a higher high was made. And yet, in August 2015, under the same circumstances Bitcoin still found a way to make a new low.
A clear demonstration of how a new low could be possible in the next 3 months.#Cerebras晶圆级AI芯片商业化步伐受关注
UBS believes 2027 will be a turning point year for $CBRS, with revenue expected to grow about 4 times to $3.3 billion, and projected to reach around $23 billion by 2030, with an operating margin of 46%.
Interestingly, as AI agents call dozens of models per task, Cerebras' on-chip memory advantage becomes even more valuable. The CS-5 aims to achieve processing speeds of 10,000 tokens per user per second by 2027.
Additionally, approximately $25 billion in contract backlog already amounts to nearly half of the expected revenue from 2027 to 2030, and the stock is currently trading below 20 times the 2028 earnings.$BTC longs are paying the highest rent of the week while sitting just above their own liquidations.
Funding 0.0269, price flat at 75.75K. OI is back to 27.5B from 26B after the flush.
Lose 75.2K and those longs get force-closed. Price drops fast.ZEC is currently trading at about $1,267, down 4.16% in 24 hours. Against the backdrop of BTC falling below 80,000 and over $1 billion in liquidations across the network, its decline is smaller than that of similar sector coins like NEAR, but resilience does not equal reversal. Technically, it is a zone of divergence with bulls and bears holding opposing views. One side sees the 4-hour MACD above the zero line and the price above the 50-day EMA at 1,216, indicating a sound mid-term structure; only a volume breakout above 1,340 can open the space toward 1,500. The other side notes the daily RSI at only 46.2 and MACD histogram at -0.4672 confirming short-term bearish momentum, with the lower Bollinger Band at 1,219.64 as the key support. The short-term watershed is at 1,242; breaking below 1,175 targets 1,100 to 1,150. The core conflict in the news is the direct clash between "upgrade implementation" and "capital withdrawal." NU7 mainnet was activated on the morning of November 6, reducing block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, with 60% of fees going into long-term reserves, and about $16 million worth of ZEC permanently locked in the Sprout pool. Infrastructure improvements are real. However, Grayscale ZCSH saw a net outflow of $10.99 million in a single day and $14.77 million so far this week, indicating institutional redemptions. Meanwhile, a whale holding 65,158 ZEC longs at an average price of about $1,509, with an unrealized loss of about 7%, is still adding to their position, with a total value exceeding $91 million—losing money but buying more is not something retail investors would do.
The daily close direction between 1,219 and 1,242 is more worth watching than the NU7 activation itself. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股遭大幅抛售：费城半导体指数创2020年3月以来最大单日跌幅 Every time the US stock market plunges, even crashes, it eventually recovers and hits new highs. However, as investors, can we accept the preparation for a prolonged battle? A few months of decline is actually nothing.
If we encounter something like the 2000 internet bubble, with continuous crashes for three years and prices cut in half, would we still have the confidence to keep buying and holding? Probably not, because at that time, negative news would be everywhere, and countless people would be cutting losses and exiting.
The financial market is that ruthless. Right now, I am mentally prepared for a long-term battle. I am very patient. I don't trade US stocks, but the US stock market is the father of Bitcoin; if the US stock market is bad, Bitcoin will also be bad.
If the US stock market continues to fall, Bitcoin will most likely follow. I will buy Bitcoin below 60,000 and definitely will not bottom-fish with everyone at 75,000. If it doesn't drop below 60,000, then I will keep waiting. Low prices represent higher probability, risk-reward ratio, odds, and mean sufficient margin of safety A lawsuit that seems unrelated to the crypto world is quietly pricing risk assets.
On Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook's lawyers submitted a joint report to Federal Judge Jia Cobb, requesting to suspend the removal lawsuit until the White House hearing next month, and also suggested postponing the upcoming deadline, with progress to be reported in early January.
To straighten out the timeline: The Supreme Court ruled this summer that when Trump first removed Cook last year, he did not give her a chance to defend herself, so she was allowed to stay temporarily and the case was sent back to the district court. By August, Trump restarted the removal. Now both parties are asking to pause first, indicating no short-term resolution.
Why should holders of $BTC and $ETH pay attention to this? The personnel of the Federal Reserve Board directly determine who votes on monetary policy. When a board member's tenure is dragged into litigation, it adds another layer of uncertainty to interest rate path expectations. Crypto assets are most sensitive to liquidity; this uncertainty won't immediately be reflected in prices but will show up as increased volatility and reluctance to leverage.
My judgment: In the next month, this is a "low probability, high impact" tail risk, not the main storyline. If there is a real outcome, it will come in early January. High beta assets like $SOL will feel the sentiment earlier and are more easily misread as a trend.
Worth considering: The market is used to treating the central bank as a stable black box. Once the personnel inside that black box become a legal dispute, the "policy continuity" assumption in pricing models loosens. It doesn't announce itself but seeps into every position choice.DOGE is currently trading at about $0.0727, up slightly by 1.63% in the last 24 hours, but it has dropped 22.4% over the past month and over 55% in the past year, making it the deepest retracement among mainstream coins.
Technically, it is oversold, but the trend has not reversed. The price is hovering just above the lower Bollinger Band at 0.0709, with resistance at the MA20 of 0.0752 overhead. Further above, the 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages all point to the 0.08 to 0.09 range, indicating a clearly bearish medium-term structure. The RSI is between 31.9 and 32.99, close to the oversold line but not yet crossing it; the MACD histogram at -0.00047 remains bearish, with downward momentum marginally converging—just converging, not a golden cross. The 0.0709 level is currently the last meaningful line of defense; a daily close below it leaves almost no clear reference below. To repair the structure upward, volume must first pick up to reclaim the MA20 at 0.0752. The bluntest message from the news side: whales are selling, retail investors are buying, and ETF inflows are negligible. Wallets holding between 10 million and 100 million DOGE have sold about 120 million DOGE since last Thursday, with retail investors taking the other side, resulting in an excess selling pressure of 20 million DOGE. DOGE ETFs have seen net inflows for three consecutive weeks, but the total over these weeks is only $3.5 million—correct direction but negligible volume.
There is an uncomfortable mismatch on the derivatives side.
The daily close direction at 0.0709 is more worth watching than the RSI at 32. Holding this level means there is still room for oversold recovery; breaking below it puts the next psychological support at the 52-week low of 0.067.Is Bitcoin 75,000 the bottom or just a consolidation? History tells you the answer
Looking back at history, a 35%-40% retracement during a bull market is not uncommon; many times it is just a deep shakeout within the bull market and does not mean the trend has ended directly. But historical patterns can only serve as a reference and cannot be taken as direct proof that 75,000 is the bottom.
Historically, a stable intermediate correction often comes with two characteristics: concentrated leverage clearing and no sustained outflow of incremental funds. The biggest variable now comes from spot ETFs. Currently, ETFs are experiencing continuous net outflows, institutional funds are actively withdrawing, combined with non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations which raise rate hike expectations, and a weakening macro liquidity environment. This is fundamentally different from past corrections caused purely by profit-taking.
Two scenarios: If buying support around 75,000 is strong and ETF outflows slow down, this could be a phase bottom; if support is repeatedly tested and broken with volume, then 75,000 is merely a downward consolidation, with the next target near 73,000.
History also warns: true major bottoms rarely appear when the market is collectively debating "is this the bottom." Bottoming is often a process of repeatedly testing bulls. During market pullbacks, altcoin risks increase; coins like CORE with fundamental chain reactions of defaults and liquidity shrinkage have much higher downside elasticity than BTC. Do not just buy heavily on the basis of "it has dropped a lot"; ETF fund flows are the most critical indicator to verify turning points.Capital Review｜Synchronized Net Outflows in Three Major Cryptos, Dominated by Large Sell Orders📌
Pre-market summary of daily capital flows for BTC, ETH, and SOL shows consistent direction, signals worth noting.
BTC inflow: 5183.7 BTC, outflow: 7224.74 BTC, net outflow: 2041.04 BTC, with large orders as the main selling force. ETH inflow: 108,200 ETH, outflow: 144,100 ETH, net outflow: 35,900 ETH, large funds continue to withdraw. SOL inflow: 435,400 SOL, outflow: 533,900 SOL, net outflow: 98,600 SOL, selling pressure also strong.
The common point is clear: all three cryptos show net outflows, dominated by large orders on the outflow side, reflecting that major funds are currently more defensive. Meanwhile, leveraged longs remain crowded, creating a divergence between capital withdrawal and bullish sentiment. This structure calls for heightened caution. Capital is the underlying support for market continuation; sustained bleeding often limits the persistence of rebounds.
The above is only a summary of capital traces on the market, not a directional judgment; before capital clearly returns, it is advisable to watch more and act less, waiting for clearer signals before considering action.
This article is a personal review note and does not constitute any investment advice.
$BTC $ETH $SOL #美股遭大幅抛售：费城半导体指数创2020年3月以来最大单日跌幅 #美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势 U.S. stock market crash + interest rate hike expectations hit hard, BTC bulls evaporate $850 million overnight
Cross-market panic resonance strikes, U.S. tech stocks plunge sharply, combined with non-farm payroll data pushing up interest rate hike expectations, liquidity easing hopes cool down again, BTC bulls liquidate and evaporate $850 million overnight, with the price quickly falling back to the key 75,000 level.
This round of decline is a chain deleveraging driven by macro risk appetite reduction: after ETFs connected traditional capital with the crypto space, the correlation between BTC and the Nasdaq index has significantly increased. When U.S. stocks sell off, institutions simultaneously reduce exposure to crypto and other high-volatility assets; rising interest rate hike expectations push up U.S. Treasury yields, making capital more risk-averse and unwilling to hold risky assets. After the price breaks key levels, bull stop-losses and forced liquidations surge, further amplifying the decline.
The current core battleground remains the 75,000 support; if this support fails, the next observation point is 73,000. A short-term rebound alone should not be taken as a bottom signal; the real turning point depends on ETFs stopping outflows and full release of leverage selling pressure.
Under the systemic market correction, altcoins face even greater pressure. Tokens like CORE, which have experienced consecutive crashes and liquidity shrinkage, have much higher downside elasticity than BTC. Do not rush to bottom-fish; until macro expectations ease, market sentiment is unlikely to recover quickly. If $ZEC does not break 1400 in the next 7 days and stabilizes above 1400, it may later fall below 1000. The narrative plus BTC's surge means it has already benefited a lot upfront. Now that BTC is starting to pull back, the macro environment is unfavorable for BTC and a positive catalyst is needed to stabilize the situation. Regarding ZEC, my view is that the Democratic Party will not be so friendly to the privacy sector; they have always been strict on cryptocurrency regulation, such as the Clarity Act, and SEC oversight may even increase. In terms of price movement, it is similar to when ETH first came out—after a surge, it pulled back before rising again—but ZEC's sector is different and may be targeted. Going forward, the outlook is still bearish with gradual positioning. Yesterday it detached from BTC's surge but fell back after reaching 1388, which I think is a bull trap. The narrative is settling, and the rise is driven by sentiment, but it still depends on whether it can hold above 1300 and break 1400.From 126,000 to 75,000, BTC dropped 40% — is the bull market over?
Falling from the high of 126,000 to 75,000, a retracement close to 40%, many panic that the bull market has ended. However, judging solely by the retracement magnitude cannot directly determine the death of the bull market. Historically, bull markets have also experienced deep retracements around 40% mid-cycle. Essentially, this adjustment is driven by profit-taking, combined macroeconomic headwinds, and leveraged liquidations, which does not equal a complete trend reversal.
The core contradiction now: the largest incremental capital source for this bull market is spot ETFs. Currently, ETFs are experiencing continuous net outflows, institutional funds are choosing to hedge, and combined with stronger-than-expected non-farm payrolls suppressing rate cut expectations, the high interest rate environment continues to pressure risk asset valuations. This is the main driver behind the current decline.
✅ To judge whether the bull market has ended, focus on two key signals: first, whether ETFs can shift from continuous outflows to stable net inflows; second, whether the price can hold key support zones and retake important resistance levels. If the capital withdrawal is only a phase caused by macro disturbances, it is a major shakeout within the bull market; but if institutional funds continue to flee long-term and prices keep hitting new lows, then the bull market will truly be declared over.
During deep market corrections, altcoin risks significantly amplify. Coins like CORE, which suffer from fundamental chain reactions of bad news and liquidity shrinkage, have much higher downside elasticity than BTC. Do not let the 40% retracement figure dictate your emotions; the life or death of the bull market is ultimately decided by capital flows.#美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势 The Democrats won the midterm elections, but the US-Iran situation will not cool down because of this; instead, it will become more dangerous.
The logic is simple: the new Congress will not take office until January 3 next year, and before that, the Democrats cannot play their "money bag" card at all. According to the rules, the president has the authority to launch military operations lasting 60 days without congressional approval. This means Trump faces an almost two-month "legal window for military action"—the lame-duck period, which is precisely when he is least constrained.
Some analysts have bluntly stated that the election loss might actually prompt Trump to launch larger-scale military actions before the window closes to create a fait accompli. Just around the midterm elections, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard fired missiles from Qeshm Island at US military aircraft, and the US military immediately destroyed Iran's air defense launchers. Trump himself expressed "satisfaction" with the current deadlock while hinting at possible further military action. At the negotiating table, the US-Iran divide remains "difficult to bridge."
So, don't be fooled by the narrative that the "Democrats are restraining the White House." The real risk is not after January next year but during this vacuum period from now until January. Appropriations are a slow blade; the military window is a fast blade. By the time the new Congress sits down to meet, the bombs may have already fallen.
#美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势BTC returns to 75,000 overnight! $1.1 billion liquidated, who is behind the dump
Overnight, BTC fell back to the 75,000 mark, with a total liquidation volume across the network reaching $1.1 billion, the vast majority being long positions. The sharp market drop is not due to a single major player deliberately dumping, but the result of multiple selling pressures resonating.
First, a reversal in macro expectations led to institutional redemptions. Non-farm payroll data exceeded expectations, significantly cooling rate cut expectations, U.S. Treasury yields rose, spot ETFs saw continuous large outflows, and institutional funds actively reduced high-risk exposure. This is the core source of the current adjustment.
Second, a chain of leveraged liquidations created a negative feedback loop. After the price broke the key support at 76,000, a large number of longs triggered forced liquidations, which further pushed prices down, triggering more stop losses and amplifying the decline—commonly known as "self-reinforcing decline."
Third, panic selling by retail investors following the herd. After the support level was lost, stop-loss orders flooded out, further intensifying market volatility.
Key focus now: whether 75,000 can hold. If it breaks down again with increased volume, the next target is 73,000. As long as ETFs do not shift from outflows to inflows, a short-term rebound is likely a bull trap. During market correction cycles, altcoins like CORE, which have fundamental issues and shrinking liquidity, have much greater downside elasticity than BTC. Don't simply speculate on "whales dumping"; changes in liquidity expectations plus leveraged liquidation are the main drivers of the market.#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 Nonfarm payrolls in October increased by 165,000, double the expectation, with the previous two months revised up by 84,000. The unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%. The data is impeccable, and the market immediately voted with its feet: the probability of a rate hike in December soared to 85%.
But the label of "strong" is unstable.
First, wages are exposed. Hourly wages rose 3.1% year-over-year, which sounds good, but inflation is still there — for most of the past year, wage growth has not outpaced prices. No matter how hot the job market is, workers' real purchasing power is shrinking. How is that strong?
Second, the data itself is unreliable. August and September were revised up by 84,000 at once, with monthly fluctuations ridiculously large. A report that is repeatedly revised has already tired the market. Bond reactions were muted; the two-year yield moved only a few basis points. Traders know clearly: this is not a trend, it's noise.
Third, rate hikes are the real deal. The more "resilient" the labor market, the harder it is to reduce inflation, giving the Fed more reason to pull the trigger in December. The US stock market just endured an AI sell-off; with another rate hike expectation, what will support valuations?
In short: the data is hot, wages are cold, and the market's celebration is borrowed. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温Looking at liquidation data, I think we shouldn't just focus on the 24-hour total amount. Shortening the statistical period to the recent 1 hour or 4 hours reveals that the liquidation direction for the same coin can be completely different. 📊 Let's first look at BTC: The total liquidation in 24 hours is about 110 million U, with long liquidations at 89.6665 million U and short liquidations at 19.0729 million U. In the recent 12 hours, long liquidations are 40.5426 million U, still clearly leading. But in the last 1 hour, the situation reverses! Long liquidations are only 10.9 thousand U, while short liquidations reach 44.8 thousand U. In long-term statistics, bulls are under pressure, but in the short term, bears also face a counterattack. 🔵 Now let's look at ETH: The total liquidation in 24 hours is 68.3385 million U, with longs at 58.0194 million U. In the recent 4 hours, long liquidations are 1.153 million U, significantly higher than shorts at 276.3 thousand U. But in the last 1 hour, short liquidations are 6,260.37 U, higher than longs at 1,193.34 U. 🟠 CORE: Smaller scale In the listed 1-hour and 4-hour data, the liquidation amount is 2,806.15 U, all from longs. 💡 My observation: The 24-hour data reflects leverage shocks over a longer period, while the 1-hour data better reflects the latest short-term changes. Different directions in the two periods are not contradictory. The market may be experiencing a local rebound after a decline, but a short-term liquidation reversal alone cannot confirm a trend change. To judge whether the market is truly stabilizing, we also need to observe if the price can sustain a rise. Everyone take a look Sentiment slightly warms, short-term still waiting for three confirmations
The Fear and Greed Index rose from 26 to 34, with the market still in the "fear" zone; $BTC dominance is close to 60%, indicating that capital risk appetite remains defensive.
When $ETH weakened, large addresses were accumulating: about 320,000 ETH (approximately $1.12 billion) were bought in the past two days, and another address built a position of over $14.76 million ETH in three days, at an average price of about $2352. However, stablecoin supply shrank by about $7.5 billion in October, and DeFi TVL dropped 10.87%, so incremental funds remain tight.
Short-term focus on three lines: first, whether BTC can hold above $80,000; repeated breaks below would likely trigger liquidation zones below; second, whether IBIT redemptions will continue—if Fidelity inflows cannot offset BlackRock outflows, ETF "bleeding" might just be single-day noise; third, whether stolen funds from THORChain have started to be cashed out off-exchange in batches—Elliptic says the stolen funds have not yet been largely liquidated.
Overall, sentiment recovery and whale accumulation provide a buffer, but liquidity contraction and repeated ETF capital outflows remain suppressive factors. Single-day inflows or rebounds should not be taken as reversals; all three lines need to be confirmed simultaneously. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股遭大幅抛售：费城半导体指数创2020年3月以来最大单日跌幅 #美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势 The current index is 28, directly falling into the "panic" zone, and dropping 3 more points would mean "extreme panic."
Compare how fast the change is: yesterday it was still "normal," last week it was already "panic," and a month ago it was "greed." In one month, the sentiment shifted directly from greed to panic, a change even sharper than BTC's price drop.
Looking at the chart makes it clearer: a month ago, the index was fluctuating between 55 and 65, which is relatively optimistic; at the end of October, it first dropped near 30, then rebounded to 50; these past two days, another steep large bearish candle pushed it down to 28.
I've been trading for fifteen years, and this indicator is a contrarian indicator—greed often signals a top, panic often signals a near bottom. At 28, this level is already close to the historically phased bottom sentiment range. Historically, when the panic index falls below 25, it is often when retail investors cut losses the hardest, and institutions quietly accumulate.
But brothers, note that panic does not mean an immediate rebound. Panic can last a long time; it’s possible to drop from 28 to 20. Don’t bottom fish just because you see panic; wait for price stabilization signals before acting.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 $BTC $ETH $SNDK 800 USD is the "psychological support test level" after the valuation reset, not the trend bottom. The current price is about 835 USD, more than 60% retraced from the one-year high of 2354 USD, and has been fluctuating repeatedly between 800–850 in the past month, with intraday lows having touched 816 USD. 800 is a round number threshold and also a concentrated projection of the market's concern about the "cycle peak".
Valuation has been pressed to an extremely low level, but "cheap" itself is not the bottom. The TTM P/E ratio is only 6.67 times, and under the 2028 fiscal year EPS metric it is even less than 6 times. Based on this, Morgan Stanley believes the risk-reward "remains attractive."
The quality of 800 depends on two things: whether the daily close holds above it, and whether the NAND supply-demand narrative will be overturned. JPMorgan's latest judgment is that DRAM/NAND supply and demand remain tight, and fundamentals are expected to be strong through 2028. SanDisk's data center business share has risen to 44%, and bit demand is expected to increase by about 40% by 2027. If this framework holds, 800 is the oversold resistance zone; if the warning of "2028 capacity expansion causing price decline" begins to be priced in, there is room below 800.
Operational tone: If 800 does not break, observe with a very light position; if it breaks, then wait for 760–780 to reassess; a volume breakout and recovery above 870 is the right-side signal. Guessing the bottom at this position follows the same logic as before with ETH 2250 and Intel 60 USD — falling a lot is not a reason to buy, the narrative must not be falsified.
$SNDK $ETH $BTC #闪迪MSCI调仓生效，NAND估值受关注 On next week's calendar, besides Tuesday's CPI, there's another marked date: November 11, when MSCI will announce the final exclusion list of "non-operating companies," effective after market close on November 30.
The facts: The framework was finalized on October 15 — first checking for substantial operating assets, then passing 5 financial ratios, with disqualification triggered if 4 are failed. The preliminary potential exclusion list includes 5 companies, among them three crypto financial companies: Strategy, Metaplanet, and Upexi, plus 17 others on the watchlist.
The expected impact: JPMorgan once estimated that if MSTR were excluded, about $2.8 billion might be passively sold off, but that was based on the old proposal; Strategy disclosed that MSCI-linked funds hold only 3.1% of its shares, and Saylor said "it's not that important to us."
An easily overlooked buffer clause: existing constituents must fail to meet standards for two consecutive annual reporting periods before actual removal. Being on the list ≠ being out.
A year ago, the debate was about "holding over 50% coins," now it’s about "whether you actually count as an operating company." The yardstick changed, but the measured group remains the same.
#BTCWhat kind of "Congressional turnover changes diplomacy" is this?
Really thinking that the Democrats flipping the 2026 midterm elections can pull the US and Iran back to a peace agreement is definitely underestimating the disconnect between Washington's executive power and the Middle East situation.
Although Vice President Pence admitted that "losing the election was because of the war and oil prices," causing the whole internet to shout "the Middle East turning point has arrived," the reality is much harsher:
1. Congress can tighten the purse strings but cannot control the president's red button
While the Democrats control Congress and hold the War Powers Act and budget restrictions, as long as Trump uses the presidential veto, it is extremely difficult for Congress to get a two-thirds majority to override. As long as US aircraft carriers remain in the Middle East, the White House can carry out precise strikes under the pretext of "self-defense," and Congress simply cannot hold back.
2. Oil prices force negotiations, but the nuclear red line makes ceasefire extremely fragile
The real pressure comes from oil prices and supply chain costs pushed up by the Strait of Hormuz situation. Although Qatar is mediating sanctions and fund unfreezing, the US side's "never allow Iran to have nuclear weapons" and Iran's "complete lifting of sanctions" bottom lines have no room for compromise. Negotiations pressured by elections can be torn apart by accidental clashes at any time.
The Middle East trajectory has never been decided by votes in the Capitol but by the routes of US aircraft carriers and Tehran's tolerance limits for sanctions. The only indicator to watch next: whether Congress's specific restrictions on Middle East arms sales in the appropriations bill can withstand the White House veto. Before that, any optimistic prediction of a "major reversal of the situation" is too early. #美国新旧国会交接或影响美伊局势