Orbit Post Sitemap

Bitcoin’s Short-Term Holder Cost Basis stands at $73.3K, with BTC trading around 13% above it, meaning recent buyers are currently in profit. During the 2023 and 2024 uptrends, Bitcoin stayed above this level for months. A drop below it could push recent buyers back into losses, similar to much of the first half of 2026. #SepCPIHikeWatch #TSMCOct15Earnings #KOSPIDropsOver6% $APT Observation: APT's attempt to surge to 1 failed, unlocking completed becomes an excuse to sell APT surged sharply from 0.69 approaching 1 dollar, but instantly crashed back to 0.82. News says the initial token unlock for core contributors and investors was fully completed yesterday. Logically, the release of selling pressure should be a long-term positive, but the market interprets it the opposite way. Early investors endured four years to fully unlock, seeing the surge, if not cashing out now, then when? The so-called positive news directly turned into a smokescreen for selling. Now the overall market is still waiting for CPI guidance, and off-market funds are tight. Without fresh support, the solo attempt to reach 1 failed, and it can only roll back into the mud with the market. This roller coaster is more thrilling for spectators than for the riders.$ZK Bullish News: ZK rallies against the trend, adding fuel to the ecosystem applications In a market full of green, ZK stubbornly pulled off a big bullish candle of over 8 points, jumping directly from 0.0139 to 0.0165, which is indeed eye-catching. The news reason given is that Rain Wallet now supports 12 chains including ZKsync. Actually, this isn't a huge bullish catalyst, but in this current low-volume, CPI-awaiting vacuum period, even a small ecosystem expansion can become an excuse for speculative traders to band together and hype. Plus, after a deep drop, even a little capital can leverage a rebound. But looking at the bigger picture, BTC is still stuck around 83,000, ETH is struggling at 2,500, and the shadow of the Korean stock market crash hasn't lifted yet. Without volume support from the broader market, a solo surge is most likely just funds shifting pockets within the market. Such counter-trend rallies are best just observed; don't get easily hooked in.TSMC's Q3 revenue hits a new high, why should the crypto world care?📈 TSMC's Q3 revenue reached 1.49 trillion New Taiwan Dollars, up 50% year-on-year, with the full financial report due on October 15. You're probably wondering: what does this have to do with the crypto world? It's a big deal. Today BTC dropped to 81772, triggered by an AI scare: South Korean chip stocks crashed, BTC followed the AI narrative, the Nasdaq sneezed, and BTC caught a cold. So TSMC's financial report is the "money detector" for AI bulls. The 50% revenue growth is already confirmed; on October 15, we'll see if profits keep up and if the gross margin holds. If the report beats expectations and the earnings call signals strong demand, it will extend the AI narrative's life. BTC and other high-beta assets that were wrongly punished today can recover. Looking at BTC, it just turned green; ETH is still weak. The BTC 13/34-week EMA golden cross formed on October 12, the first in three and a half years, indicating a bottom. But don't pop the champagne yet. October 15 is a double whammy day: TSMC's report and PPI on the same day. If the report disappoints and PPI exceeds expectations, BTC might get pushed back down. Strategy: don't act before the report. On October 15, watch for two things: ① What the earnings call says about demand; ② The PPI figures. If both are good, and BTC breaks above 84000, I'll add; if one disappoints, stay cautious. In short, the crypto world is now a shadow of the US stock AI trade. This mirror's answer will be revealed on October 15. #台积电Q3营收创新高，盈利表现待揭晓 #Microsoft releases next-generation AI chip, stock price hits yearly high Microsoft launches self-developed Maia 300 AI inference chip, news drives stock price surge to a new annual high. This new product focuses on long context, AI intelligent agents, and other inference scenarios, with energy efficiency about 40% higher than current mainstream GPUs. It is planned to enter multi-gigawatt large-scale deployment starting in 2027, aiming to gradually make the Maia series the main computing power for businesses like Copilot, reducing long-term reliance on external GPU vendors and diluting AI cloud service costs. Key point: Maia 300 focuses on inference, not a training chip, and will not directly replace high-end GPUs used for large model training in the short term. The impact on NVIDIA is more of a long-term expectation, with short-term order patterns unchanged. The market is willing to give Microsoft a premium, recognizing its integrated "model + cloud + self-developed chip" approach, with AI business profitability expected to continue rising. Market differentiation impact: Positive for Microsoft itself, but as a narrative of computing power autonomy, it tends to suppress third-party GPU and HBM-related stocks, which is also the reason for recent differentiation within the semiconductor sector. The Nasdaq tech sentiment recovery will indirectly support high-beta assets like BTC, ETH, and ZEC, but this is sentiment-driven and limited in strength. Follow-up focus: Maia 300 deployment progress, mass production yield, and subsequent Azure cloud revenue and gross margin guidance. If deployment falls short of expectations, this wave of positive impact may easily reverse. $BTC $ETH $ZEC Here's a data point you might not believe. The net assets of the SOL spot ETF have already reached $1.9 billion, and Bitwise's staked ETF BSOL has accumulated net inflows exceeding $1.2 billion, with one person accounting for about 80% of all Solana ETF inflows in the US. Even more intense, the short liquidations on the futures side once approached 96%. I was stunned staring at these two numbers for a while. In plain language: a staked ETF means that when you buy in, you're not just betting on price movements, but also earning staking rewards on the side. People who buy these products are in it for the long term, not for short-term speculation. And what does a 96% short liquidation mean? Those betting on a price drop were almost completely wiped out. Now I think I understand. Short-term ETF outflows of a few million are just a drop in the bucket compared to $1.2 billion in cumulative net inflows. The real big bets are bullish, and holders are willing to earn interest from staking while holding. $SOL has never even given shorts a break. I’m not guessing if it will rise tomorrow, but the fact that people are willing to put money in for the long term to earn interest shows the solid foundation. Holding on is better than anything else.Interactive Brokers has started allowing clients to stake $ETH. Sounds big, the veteran broker is finally entering the field. But on closer inspection, this service is provided by ZeroHash. Interactive Brokers is just lending its name. In simple terms, money comes in to buy $ETH, then it’s used to earn interest. Previously, broker clients could only watch the crypto space earn interest. Now they can get a share too. The problem is, this share is fed by ZeroHash, not done by Interactive Brokers themselves. Traditional institutions want to get involved but don’t want to get their hands dirty. They outsourced it and put their brand on it. How is this different from those brokers who "support cryptocurrencies" back in the day? So this news is a positive sentiment boost. But if you ask how much $ETH can rise because of this? I think that’s wishful thinking. The real question is: who will be the next broker to actually enter the staking business themselves? #BTC and ETH spot ETFs see simultaneous outflows, is institutional demand weakening? #$ETH #ASML Earnings Preview: EUV Orders Are the Key Focus $ASML quarterly revenue reflects orders placed in the past. ▪️ Q3 revenue guidance is €11–12 billion, gross margin 55%–57% ▪️ Full-year guidance has been raised to €43–45 billion; Q2 revenue was €9.326 billion, net profit €2.918 billion ▪️ Strong order intake last quarter is the premise for this guidance upgrade ▪️ TSMC Q3 revenue is NT$1.49 trillion, +50% YoY; upstream equipment benefits indirectly ▪️ Earnings report to be released on 10/14; EUV capacity is still expanding The divergence is not about whether this quarter beats expectations, since revenue reflects past orders, but orders reflect customers' outlook for the future. The equipment industry has a delivery cycle: from customer order, production, installation, to revenue recognition spans several quarters. So strong quarterly revenue may just be digesting backlog orders; to gauge market health, we need to see if new orders keep pace. Capacity planning does not equal orders; the company's EUV capacity expansion reflects demand judgment, not signed customer contracts. The stance is to wait and see — revenue meeting targets and continued strong new orders are solid; relying only on existing orders means weakening mid-term.$SKHYNIX Watch: SK Hynix falls below 1100, ASML stabs in the back This trend is indeed frightening, dropping from 1386 all the way down to 1096, a daily plunge of over 6%. The panic from the Korea Exchange circuit breaker has directly transmitted through the internet. ASML is reported to raise spare parts prices for Korea starting in 2027. Memory chips are already in a price war, with Chinese manufacturers pressing hard step by step, and now the upstream equipment giant is coming to cut in, squeezing profit margins from both ends. The Short-Term Holder Cost Basis, the average price paid for coins held less than 155 days, sits at $73.3K. Price trades about 13% above it, so recent buyers are in profit. In the uptrends of 2023 and 2024, price spent months above this line, shaded green on the chart. A fall back below it would put recent buyers at a loss again, as they were for most of the first half of 2026.Options trading volume has hit a new high, retail investor sentiment has also returned to the level of back then. But this is not a signal for a price increase. We only realize the market has finished its move after the fact. Because sentiment comes from unrealized profits and losses. Those who have made money feel confident, those who lost want to exit. So when it's hottest, the price has already completed its move. It wasn't retail investors pushing the price up back then, it was money. Retail sentiment is always the result, not the cause. Every year we use the result to push the cause. This time, I only look at two things: Is the position right, and can I sleep well. I can't predict the market, nor do I want to. But any position that wakes you up at midnight to check the market, no matter how lively, is wrong. The excitement belongs to others. Being able to sleep well is mine. In summary: Retail sentiment and options trading volume have returned to 2021 levels, but Bitcoin hasn't kept up this time. Whether it can repeat that doubling depends on whether that money really flows into crypto. Most likely, it won't.First, let's reconcile accounts; I'll tentatively count the evening transaction as correct. In the evening, I wrote that BTC tonight would test 84,166 but fail to hold; this is falsified if it closes above 84,166 and ETH/SOL simultaneously turn green. The 24-hour high was 84,166.3, it tested but didn't hold; now at 83,220, no falsification triggered. Tonight's market shows divergence. BTC +0.71%, ETH -1.07%, SOL -3.4%. The phrase "only BTC is performing" written in the evening fits even better tonight. The trending topic "Bitcoin market dominance rises to 60%" is lively, and the data indeed reflects this. The fee rates deserve a closer look. ETH fees turned negative at -0.0015%, meaning short sellers of ETH are starting to pay interest to the bulls; the number of bears is increasing. SOL fees at 0.0002% are near zero; no one is willing to pay to go long. BTC +0.0054%, down from last night's 0.0083%, fewer are paying premiums to chase higher prices. Open Interest is 29,613 BTC, about 2.46 billion USD; participants haven't left, all still at the table. New judgment for tonight through tomorrow morning: BTC will range between 82,500–83,500; breaking below 82,500 targets around 81,600. Falsification: closing above 84,166 with ETH/SOL simultaneously turning green invalidates this immediately. Before tomorrow night 20:30 CPI release, I won't treat daily price changes as trends. This might be my misjudgment; we'll reconcile accounts tomorrow.This morning the market looks lively, but underneath it's actually quite empty. Do you think it's a broad sell-off, or is someone using panic to rotate positions? I woke up and glanced at the screen, and it was all neatly red. ETH dropped nearly 100 points, BTC didn't hold up either, and ZEC was even more extreme, wiping out about 200 points. Small coins fell harder than the mainstream ones. This kind of "surface collapse together, but underlying each has their own agenda" scenario, my first reaction isn't to bottom-fish, but to see who's catching the fall. Data snapshot: - ETH fell about 100 points, short-term buying is thin - BTC weakened in sync, with a stronger sense of risk aversion than aggression - ZEC plunged about 200 points, altcoin volatility amplified inversely - CPI and PPI announcements are imminent, and rate hike expectations are back on the table Momentum signals and risk signals need to be viewed separately. On momentum, the synchronous drop of mainstream coins often means leverage is being forcibly cooled down, not just pure emotional selling. On risk, the larger drop in small coins indicates that the support is moving toward certainty, and fewer people are willing to catch the falling knives. My own understanding is that the market is not trading "how much it has dropped," but "who still dares to add positions before the data." Before CPI and PPI are released, any rebound is easily seen as a window to reduce positions, not a trend reversal. This is why lightly testing ETH rebounds is understandable, but heavy positions are somewhat speculative. The bullish path depends on the data not blowing up, expectations stabilizing, mainstream coins recovering first, and then altcoins having a second wave of transmission. The bearish risk is that expectations are priced in early, and when the real data comes out, the good news is already fully priced, causing small coins to continue losing.Bearish Warning: Harker Turns Hawkish, Stagflation Alarm Rings Before CPI Harker clearly supports further rate hikes, completely disregarding the market expectation of no change in October (79.5% probability). Overall CPI expectations have surged to 3.7%, driven by energy. If core CPI rises instead of falling, the stagflation gray rhino will truly charge. The world tightens liquidity along with the dollar, draining liquidity completely. The market has already moved to hedge in advance. BTC holds firm at 83,275, slightly up 0.71%, with funds fleeing to Bitcoin. ETH is precarious at the 2,505 level, down 0.92%. Projection: If core CPI cools as expected to 0.2%, BTC could reach 84,000-85,000, ETH may test 2,600. If data blows past expectations, BTC will likely break below 80,000 to find support at 78,000, ETH will lose 2,400. The verdict comes tomorrow night at 8:30 PM; the climax of this macro drama is still ahead. #9月CPI公布在即，哈玛克称仍需进一步加息 Having lunch at noon, a group friend suddenly threw a question: Can I get on board with RSR? I was stunned for a moment. This coin just appeared on the hot list, up 25% in 24 hours, with trading volume 27.8 times the usual, current price 0.00207. But when you ask what it actually does, none of the usual daily tipsters in the group can give a proper story. No narrative, no new features, purely a fund gamble inside, whoever is slower to take it gets hit.Under the surgical light, a pacemaker with firmware rewritten twice is discharging. Ledger confirms that the theft case currently focuses on devices sold by the Southeast Asian distributor CryptoBilis, with a few machines affected; one was found to have unauthorized implantation, but no intrusion was detected in the official system or direct sales channels. Researchers estimate suspected losses exceeding $86 million, but the total amount and causal link to the implantation have not been verified; European buyers also report suspicious components, likewise unverified. The issue is not "whether it hurts," but whether the infection is still confined to the puncture site. From a surgical perspective, a hardware wallet's private key is like the sinoatrial node, the firmware is the atrioventricular node and conduction bundle, and the supply chain is the sterile extracorporeal circulation loop. Once the distributor link is contaminated, it’s not a simple matter of replacing an electrode but a breach in the entire sterile chain. Local debridement can resolve a single abscess, but if the European samples also culture homologous pathogens, it indicates emboli may have detached and entered systemic circulation. What is needed now is intraoperative frozen section, blood cultures, and transesophageal echocardiography—not pushing vasopressors on the patient based on fear indices. The market is the same. The vital signs of $xGOOGL have been compared with the Ledger incident, but anatomically there is no direct coronary connection between the two. Ledger’s lesion lies in the cold wallet supply chain, while $xGOOGL’s myocardium is the cash flow, advertising, and computing power expectations of tech stocks. If it shows hypotension, it is more likely due to risk appetite—the autonomic nerve—being stimulated, causing compensatory tachycardia and subsequent perfusion insufficiency, rather than myocardial necrosis. The real danger is mistaking peripheral infection for primary heart disease, stenting a healthy ventricle while allowing mediastinitis to spread. The suspected $86M loss is only the volume of pericardial effusion; draining it without verification could puncture a coronary artery. Is the risk limited to one channel? The answer depends on whether the suspicious European components are homologous. If homologous, the single-channel conclusion is a mistaken thoracotomy; if not, local debridement plus device recall can control it. For $xGOOGL, only when the overall bleeding of crypto risk assets causes a sudden drop in liquidity perfusion pressure will linked low cardiac output appear, not from Ledger directly blocking its coronary arteries. If the suspicious European components are confirmed, this is not a local abscess but hematogenous dissemination; before that, stitching the Ledger implantation incident onto $xGOOGL’s coronary arteries is equivalent to opening the chest without angiography. #ledgerresellersecurity🔥 $SKHYNIX vs $SOXL : Shorts are making millions! 📉 $SKHYNIX: Down 10.4%. Shorts hold $179.26M vs $100.14M longs. Shorts are up +$22.81M, while longs are down -$14.43M. 🔴 $SOXL: Down 13.4%. Shorts hold $38.62M vs $28.46M longs, with +$4.16M profit. 👀 Fresh 30m flow: $SKHYNIX: $1.92M buying vs $1.74M selling. $SOXL: $4.56M buying vs $4.22M selling. My pick: $SOXL for a potential rebound. Buyers are returning, but shorts still dominate.The most dangerous moment on the chessboard is never the instant the opponent shouts "check," but when you have just made a brilliant sacrifice, hold a huge material advantage on the board, and the audience begins to applaud. Because that is when your calculation is most likely to slacken, while the opponent is calculating the loose pawn chain on your kingside. TSMC was just that player who made the sacrifice. Third-quarter revenue was about 1.49 trillion New Taiwan dollars, a year-on-year surge of 50%, setting a historic high—the move has been made, and the scorekeeper has finished recording. But the person truly sitting opposite on the board is now not focused on revenue, but on whether the gross margin can reach the 65% to 67% square. Revenue is the rook, profit is the queen. The rook reaching the seventh rank is beautiful, but if the queen can’t keep up, the entire offensive is a castle in the air. The mistake I most often make in the middle game is miscalculating exchanges when in an advantageous position. In this game, the bulls hold the trump card of record-high revenue, while the bears clutch the invisible costs of capital expenditure, exchange rates, and overseas factory construction. Both sides are waiting for the move on October 15—the earnings report and conference call. The real killer move isn’t in the numbers themselves, but in the tone of management’s guidance for Q4. If the tone wavers even slightly, the opponent will immediately launch a whole series of forced tactical combinations. Now look at the off-board linked chessboard. The Fear and Greed Index is an honest referee; it doesn’t understand fundamentals, only popularity. When sentiment reaches extremes, any good move will be interpreted as "good news fully priced in." Tokens like $xUSAR essentially compress a slow game into a fast one—the endgame of the U.S. stock market during the day hasn’t finished, and at night the chain starts a new round of middle-game battles. When the pace speeds up, the most common mistake isn’t being checkmated by the opponent, but making a blunder yourself. The liquidation data from SK Hynix, the widening AI credit spreads, Apple’s market cap surpassing Nvidia—these aren’t isolated squares. They are linked constraints on the same board. Once a credit-level crack appears on the AI mainline, the storage and foundry branches will be swept simultaneously. Foundry is the foundation; if the foundation is lost at the gross margin level, all offensive formations based on "unlimited computing power expansion" above will face upgrade obstacles. My current position is delicate: I’m neither opening new positions nor rushing to close. Because before October 15, all positions are blind moves. A true grandmaster won’t rush an attack before the opponent reveals all their pieces, but will first complete their kingside pawn chain and calculate the endgame clearly. If the gross margin guidance is 66% or higher and strong, that’s a real check, and the bears must respond; if the gross margin just barely passes and the guidance is vague, then this game will drag into the endgame, competing over who has more pawns and whose squares are more secure. The endgame phase is never about talent, but about whose pawn structure is healthier. #TSMCOct15Earnings Positive news: Economic data cools down on both fronts, BTC holds strong to keep ETH alive The US September NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell to 97.9, and ADP employment figures were also below the previous value, both indicating an economic slowdown. This is an implicit positive for the crypto market; weakening employment and real economy confidence mean the Federal Reserve lacks the confidence for further rate hikes, and the market's expectations for rate cuts may rebound. On the charts, BTC steadies at 83275, up 0.71%, with funds clearly moving to BTC for risk aversion. ETH is weaker, currently at 2505, down 0.92%, repeatedly testing the 2500 level. Price projection: If inflation cools as expected, BTC is likely to push up to 84000-85000, while ETH needs to first hold above 2500 to have a chance to test the 2600 resistance level. If data surprises on the upside, BTC will likely retest support at 82000, and ETH will probably break below 2450 to find support. Tomorrow night’s CPI is the final verdict day; the market has already started positioning in advance, with bulls and bears battling fiercely around 2500 and 83000, waiting to see how the market digests this data. #9月CPI公布在即，哈玛克称仍需进一步加息 Tomorrow night at 8:30, September CPI lands, and it is the single most important input before the Fed's October 28 meeting. Institutions expect energy prices to push headline CPI from 3.4% to 3.7% year over year, while core CPI month over month may cool from 0.3% to 0.2%. That split matters enormously: headline inflation gets lifted by oil, but core inflation is quietly decelerating. If core CPI truly slows, it signals price pressure is not broad-based, and the market will lean harder into the pSNDK at $1440, do you dare to buy the dip? From 2354 down to 1440, 39% lost. A single progress report from China's Changxin, and the three major storage giants are collectively dumped, with SanDisk plunging 6% in one day—but while everyone panics and cuts losses, have you thought: SanDisk makes NAND, Changxin targets DRAM, so the cut hit the wrong target? First, look at the surface: the structure is broken, the downtrend hasn't stopped. The stock closed at 1487 on October 12, perpetual futures continue to fall today, touching 1410 intraday. The 1440 you see is a low-level rebound, not a new trend. On Binance charts, MA7 is at 1570, MA25 at 1700, 50-day moving average at 1580—the price is below all short- and mid-term moving averages, a classic descending staircase: 1720, 1660, 1600, 1580, 1487, 1410. Daily RSI is about 38, weak but not extremely oversold. Hourly level was oversold before, so there will be rebounds, but a rebound does not equal a reversal. But wait. The 200-day moving average is around 1180, the large-scale uptrend is not yet broken. From the 52-week low of 121 to the high of 2354, this is a typical memory supercycle revaluation. The question now is not "will it rise," but "how far will this valuation cut go." First point: Changxin targets DRAM, SanDisk makes NAND—this cut hit the wrong target. Today's sell-off was directly triggered by progress in next-generation DRAM density by China's Changxin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The market used this to hit the entire storage sector, dumping Micron, SK Hynix, and SanDisk together. But SanDisk makes NAND, not DRAM, and is not a direct competitor to CXMT. There is panic, and fundamentals are being exaggerated. The real pricing node is the earnings report on October 29—about two weeks away. Before that, any rebound should be considered emotional repair, not a fundamental reversal. Wall Street target price midpoint is about 2170, range 1400-3600, with an overall buy rating. But target prices are slow variables and cannot stop short-term valuation cuts. Second point: P/E ratio is only 7 times, so why is the stock still falling? SanDisk is one of the world's major NAND suppliers, partnered with Kioxia in a joint venture, benefiting from AI data center enterprise SSD and storage price hike cycles. Revenue and profits have exploded in the past year, TTM P/E is about 20 times, forward P/E compressed to single digits. The bulls' story has always been: "The cycle is not over, valuation is already cheap." But the problem is—the stock price has already priced in this story fully. From 121 to 2354, it rose 19 times in one year. Now the market is trading two things: whether price hikes can continue, and whether the Chinese capacity narrative will suppress valuation. There are no new answers to these before the earnings report. Cyclical stocks can get cheaper even if cheap. A 7x P/E is not the bottom; the market is pre-pricing a "cycle peak." Third point: You are playing by different rules. This is a high Beta tech stock, not a coin with an independent narrative. AI capital expenditure expectations, US stock risk appetite, and interest rates influence direction more than crypto funding rates. Bull vs. bear, you decide: On the bull side: - 200-day moving average at 1180, large-scale trend intact - Forward P/E in single digits, valuation not expensive - AI data center SSD demand still present, price hike cycle not disproven - Wall Street target price midpoint 2170, rating leans buy - Changxin targets DRAM, not direct competition with SanDisk NAND On the bear side: - Retraced 39% from 2354, structure broken, not a shakeout - Below all short- and mid-term moving averages, clear descending steps - Chinese storage capacity narrative suppresses valuation - No new answers before October 29 earnings Trading strategy Two weeks before earnings, this is a "falling volatility," not a "rising trend." Short term: - Around 1440 is not suitable for opening new longs. To go long, only do so with confirmation of "holding 1400-1410 + volume contraction + reclaiming 1480," target 1500-1550, stop loss below 1390. - If 1440 rallies to 1480-1500 but meets resistance and volume is insufficient, that is a better short position, target 1410, break 1400 target 1350. Stop loss above 1510. Medium term: - Qualification for mid-term longs is daily close back above 1550-1580 and holding. Before that, all rebounds are treated as pullbacks. The real large-scale buying point is not guessed here. Either wait for direction after the October 29 earnings or wait for price to return near the 200-day moving average (currently far below) to see support. Entering now is betting against the earnings two weeks later. For existing longs: the 1480-1500 rebound is a reduction zone, not an add zone. If it breaks 1400, accept the loss; do not average down on perpetual futures. What not to do: - Do not go all-in during the decline just because "forward P/E is only 7 times." - Do not treat Binance perpetual prices as Nasdaq transaction prices. Pre-market, after-hours, weekends, basis is your cost. - High leverage is not suitable for this asset. Positions still held, funding rates still punish longs, one earnings report or one Chinese storage news can cut another 10%. SNDK now is like Micron in 2022— Everyone shouting "cycle bottom, cheap valuation, AI demand explosion." What happened? Halved from the high, then halved again. The bottom of cyclical stocks is never calculated by P/E, but hammered out by capacity clearing. The pre-earnings rebound is not for you to get on board, but to reduce positions. $BTC $MU $SNDK Today, the watchlist is basically all red, but whose hands are the whales' money in, and how it moves, is completely three different scripts: BTC has whales bottom-fishing, forcibly pulling it back; HYPE is all contracts playing, repeatedly oscillating and tugging; OKB is just influenced by sentiment, waiting for a hype opportunity. 1. $BTC is real money exchanging chips: Coinbase's BTC premium is negative, indicating institutions are indeed discounting and selling; but on-chain whales have withdrawn over 30,000 coins this month, also hoarding real coins. This divergence point often signals BTC is about to choose a direction. After this round of chip exchange, a new trend will emerge. 2. $HYPE is a life-and-death duel of big players on contracts, while the spot market basically has no players. Currently, Hyperliquid whales have a net short position totaling $225 million, with some accounts short since last September, enduring a floating loss of 23 million and still holding firm. So don’t be fooled by HYPE’s fierce rise now; after all, it’s mainly speculation without a spot base, and it could crash anytime. 3. $OKB has a fundamental base and narrative support but hasn’t been hyped up; RSI is only 41, so it can only follow the market’s slow decline. But note, there is capital accumulating around 125 for OKB, indicating some whales still believe in its story of evolving from an exchange token to a stock settlement infrastructure token. Whales most likely aren’t hoarding OKB; they’re probably betting on the next wave of hype driven by sentiment. #TradingVoice: Your experience deserves to be heard Wall Street's "Price Ladder" for Bitcoin: From Basement to Ceiling, Just One Federal Reserve Away Wall Street's constructed Bitcoin price ladder is based on USD liquidity at the bottom, with the Federal Reserve controlling the ladder's switch. The basement at the bottom of the ladder is around $40,000, and the ceiling at the top reaches as high as $180,000—a huge price gap that fundamentally depends on the direction of interest rates. The ladder's ceiling ($100,000 to $180,000) assumes inflation recedes, the Fed cuts rates as expected, and U.S. Treasury yields decline. Funds flow out of low-yield Treasuries into high-elasticity assets. Spot ETFs continue to see large net inflows, fully realizing the narrative of supply contraction from halving. Optimistic targets from VanEck, Bernstein, and Citi are all based on this easing scenario, representing the upside potential when liquidity is ample. The ladder's basement ($40,000 to $46,000) assumes sticky inflation, delayed rate cuts, or even resumed hikes, with Treasury yields remaining high. The opportunity cost of holding Bitcoin soars, institutions actively reduce risk exposure, and ETF funds continue net outflows. Galaxy's bottom range represents the extreme downside under a liquidity tightening scenario. Bitcoin itself does not simultaneously have valuations at both $40,000 and $180,000; rather, the Fed's interest rate decisions determine which rung of the ladder the market stands on. When rates fall, the ladder extends upward; when rates rise, the ladder collapses downward. Currently, with Treasury yields surging and the dollar strengthening, the market is repricing rate cut expectations, volatility is increasing, and leverage cascades are easily triggered during midnight hours. Do not treat the ladder's ceiling as an inevitable target [Korean Peninsula Trough Breaks, 6% Vertical Wind Shear Appears Over Seoul] On October 13, in the morning Seoul time, Jeju Island radar echoes showed the KOSPI index plummeting suddenly without warning, with an intraday drop exceeding 6%, directly breaking through the 6000-point louver scale. This is not ordinary convective precipitation; this is a textbook-level extratropical cyclone outbreak—the sidecar mechanism forcibly paused programmed selling pressure within five minutes, equivalent to the meteorological agency imposing emergency airspace control, but the precipitation had already fallen and water accumulation had formed. Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are the two major rain cloud nuclei of this storm. Foreign net selling is like a northeast monsoon pouring in from the Yellow Sea, continuously pushing the semiconductor sector's dew point temperature below freezing. The weak ridge precursor of U.S. chip stocks was transmitted overnight through the upper-level westerly jet stream to East Asia; Seoul's reaction is just the inevitable flood peak of the downstream basin. The market is reassessing the return on AI investments—this is not short-term heavy rain, but a climate-scale circulation adjustment; the memory supply-demand outlook has been urgently revised from "cloudy to clear" to "persistent rain with localized heavy showers." Tom Lee from BitMine sent a rainfall warning for the crypto basin: losses in the Korean stock market may spill over into the digital asset field through margin-driven liquidation chains, forming cross-basin flood linkages. However, so far, the measured rainfall of this warning has not been verified by any ground station and belongs to the uncertainty zone of numerical forecasts. I have seen many similar situations in the weather briefing room—upstream dam breaks, downstream may not necessarily breach, but soil saturation is already maxed out. What really needs to be watched is the subsequent evolution of the pressure gradient. The sidecar mechanism only stopped for five minutes, like a temporary dam that cannot block the entire front passage. The K-line cloud top heights of Samsung and Hynix are still falling, and the convective available potential energy has not been fully released. There is an invisible jet stream channel between U.S. stock Token targets and Seoul semiconductors; when wind shear intensifies, linkage accelerates. For digital asset observation stations, the current key is not to look at the rain gauge but the barometer—the heavy rain in the Korean stock market is either an isolated convective bubble or a vanguard of the monsoon trough's overall northward lift. The foreign capital flow in the next seventy-two hours will provide the answer. This rain cloud over Seoul is moving eastward. #KOSPIDropsOver6% Core contradiction: On the eve of CPI, institutions hedge instead of selling off ① Tomorrow's CPI is the only significant catalyst The market expects the September CPI year-on-year to rise from 3.4% in August to 3.7%, with Middle East military conflicts pushing up fuel prices as the main driving factor. Core CPI is expected to slow from 0.3% month-on-month to 0.2%. CME FedWatch shows the market expects an 81% probability of no change in October, but the probability of a 25bp rate hike in December remains as high as 70.6%. ② Subtle changes in institutional behavior Market observers note that some institutional investors choose to use hedging tools before the CPI release rather than directly selling crypto assets. This contrasts with the passive reduction in positions in previous weeks, suggesting institutions prefer to retain base positions and manage short-term risks rather than adopt a trend bearish stance. ③ Oil price is the biggest "X factor" for CPI During today's Asian session, a decline in South Korean semiconductor stocks and weakness in Nasdaq futures triggered a risk appetite contraction, with BTC falling below 110/barrel and retreating to about $103/barrel. If oil prices continue to fall, it will directly ease inflation expectations, benefiting CPI data. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #9月CPI公布在即，哈玛克称仍需进一步加息 #Morning session completed a two-way washout of longs and shorts, followed by a rapid reversal and rally The morning session completed a two-way washout of longs and shorts, followed by a rapid reversal and rally. This time, the one-hour continuous bullish close completed a K-line reversal engulfing pattern, with no corresponding fundamental information driving it throughout. The market speculates that after the price touched the whale liquidation point near 80400, short covering brought buying pressure that pushed the market up. This hypothesis assumes that the funds for this rally came from liquidation replenishment. From another perspective, this upward move led Ethereum to strengthen in sync, but some coins showed weak rebounds after morning pullbacks, with a clear divergence in strength. Short orders concentrated at resistance levels were triggered for stop losses, continuously pushing prices higher. If the price holds above the previous high, short strategies will face significant risks. Going forward, it is necessary to track CPI data, interest rate statements, TSMC earnings reports, and spot ETF capital flows. The market is like a rudderless boat, with short-term fluctuations entirely driven by leveraged funds within the market. $BTC $ETH $SOL #SanDisk and Micron decline, ChangXin's technical progress draws attention. Folks, last night this chart fully captured the current anxiety in the storage sector. SanDisk plunged nearly 6 points, Micron dropped nearly 4 points, and Samsung Hynix also came under pressure. On the surface, it looks like foreign investors are reducing holdings, after previous gains were too high, plus Samsung and Hynix's large-scale stock buybacks are about to end, so without buyback funds to support, short-term pressure naturally emerges. But what really makes the market nervous is ChangXin. ChangXin just disclosed progress on the 4F² DRAM architecture and plans to launch server memory products by year-end. Although mass production capability hasn't been verified yet, the expectation that "Chinese manufacturers are breaking into the high-end market" directly shakes the valuation logic of Korean and American giants. The biggest fear for cyclical stocks is increased supply; once expectations change, valuations must be recalculated. What does this have to do with our BTC? A lot. AI infrastructure is the core engine of this tech stock cycle, and storage is the fuel in that engine. If storage starts to weaken, it means the market's patience for AI returns is declining. Tech stocks are being drained, and high-volatility assets like BTC definitely can't escape short-term impacts. This is also one of the reasons why BTC is still struggling around 83,000. CPI will be announced tomorrow, BTC stuck between 83,000 and 84,000, how should we play tonight? Tomorrow (October 14), the US September CPI data will be released, which is the last key inflation data before the Fed's rate decision at the end of October. The market expectation is roughly: overall CPI year-on-year rising from 3.4% to about 3.7%, with the core being relatively mild. Cleveland Fed President Mester recently stated support for "small but faster" rate hikes to curb inflation. On interest rate futures, the probability of a rate hike in December once surged quite high. The current market situation is very typical: • $BTC is fluctuating around 83,000, after dipping near 80,000 a few days ago and bouncing back, oscillating repeatedly between 81,300 and 84,500. • ETFs have seen outflows this week, and spot buying is not strong. • The Fear and Greed Index has fallen from a higher level but is still in the greed zone. My own observation is: before the data is released, the market will most likely continue to oscillate to digest expectations. The real direction will be determined by how much the data deviates from expectations. If the core data is softer than expected, there might be a short-term push above 84,500, next looking at around 87k near the beginning of the year opening price. If both overall and core data are hotter, the 81,300 support will be retested, and if broken, there will be more downside space. These days, high leverage longs and shorts are being swept back and forth; position size and stop-loss are more important than direction. Personally, I am temporarily holding a light position and waiting for the data to land before deciding. After the data comes out tomorrow, do you lean more towards breaking 84,500 and continuing up, or first retesting 80,000? #微软发布新一代AI芯片，股价触及年内高点 $MSFT chip released today, deployment scheduled for 2027. ▪️ Maia 300 announced on 10/12, planned for actual deployment in 2027 ▪️ Single cabinet contains 96 chips, double the previous generation Maia 200 cabinet ▪️ Token throughput of a 96-chip cabinet is up to 7 times that of Maia 200 ▪️ Tokens processed per megawatt of power are 40% higher than leading GPUs ▪️ 2nm process + HBM4; analysts expect it to account for about 10% of Microsoft's AI chip spending in Q1 2027 The disagreement is not about the chip's strength, but the full year gap between "release" and "deployment." Microsoft clearly positions the Maia series: mainly for inference, training still in cooperation with Nvidia and AMD. In other words, this self-developed line does not yet touch the most expensive segment. The real variable is not the parameters of today's chip, but whether the deployment scale starting next year and the 10% spending share given by Evercore can be realized — the chip release is just the starting point. The direction is to wait and see — deployment volume and share increase as planned will count as fulfillment; delays mean this line is still just a declaration.Ant Daily | Liquidations of 800 million, long and short both hit, harvesting starts again $815 million liquidated across the entire network in 24 hours, 170,000 people buried, long positions liquidated $689 million. $BTC (short): Opened at 83111.9 / Marked at 83339.64, unrealized loss -56.02U. 81000 is strong support at the 400-day moving average, big long-short divergence before CPI. If core CPI tomorrow exceeds 0.3%, may retest 80000; if below expectations, rebound to 85000. $XRP (short): Opened at 1.4167 / Marked at 1.3646. XRPL today patched a high-risk vulnerability, theoretically could have abnormally generated 18.45 trillion tokens, bounty only 250,000. Vulnerability not exploited but technical risk repriced. $DOGE (short): Opened at 0.08828 / Marked at 0.084360. Crypto ETFs saw a weekly net outflow of 1.25 billion, XRP ETF attracted 11.31 million against the trend, funds are shifting. Shorts covering after deleveraging. Hotspot: Bitcoin ETF net outflow of 65.4 million yesterday, BlackRock IBIT is the only product with unusual activity. Tomorrow October 14 CPI expected annual rate 3.7%, energy prices are the driver. Summary: 800 million liquidated, long and short both hit. XRP vulnerability fermenting, deleveraging, BTC and CPI. See you at the table. #Semiconductor sector concentrated sell-off, South Korea KOSPI down over 6% #September CPI release imminent, Hamarq says further rate hikes needed #SanDisk and Micron down, Changxin Technology progress under focus If the US stock market officially launches 23-hour trading on weekdays this December, the liquidity of altcoins may further decrease, and many altcoins will go to zero in the future. Therefore, before December is the golden window for trash altcoin pump-and-dump schemes to unload to willing buyers. For me personally, besides allocating a few particularly promising blue-chip altcoins, I will also allocate part of my position to stocks of $CRCL and $COIN. In the future, the returns of these two coin stocks are very likely to outperform 95% of altcoins. $SNDK In the next month, SanDisk is very likely to experience a volatile trading range, with low probability of a strong one-sided rise or fall. The core contradiction in the stock price is the market expectation gap. The previous surge was huge, and the market has already priced in the benefits of AI and NAND price increases. The latest quarterly guidance in the financial report fell short of expectations, causing capital to worry about the cycle peak. Here, two things need to be distinguished: Enterprise-level NAND and AI server storage are the main drivers of its stock price increase. Consumer products like USB drives and TF cards that we see daily have limited impact on the stock price. Short-term negative factors: First, profit-taking pressure is heavy, and even slight disturbances can trigger concentrated profit-taking. Second, the market is beginning to question the sustainability of AI demand, with bears continuing to ferment the "AI bubble" narrative. Third, overseas major manufacturers' capacity strategy adjustments, combined with the DRAM pricing impact brought by Changxin Storage, will affect the sentiment of the entire storage sector. Short-term supporting factors: NAND contract prices have not collapsed rapidly, and the supply-demand pattern has not immediately reversed. The company still has large stock buybacks, which can provide a bottom support during sharp declines. If inventory destocking exceeds expectations or major manufacturers announce production cuts, it can easily trigger a short-term rebound. Two scenario forecasts for the next month. Scenario one: Weak volatility. AI expectations continue to cool, storage sector sentiment weakens, stock price repeatedly under pressure, prone to rise and fall. Scenario two: Rapid rebound. If news of NAND contract price increases or major manufacturer production cuts emerges, short-term funds will quickly push prices up. But this rebound is more of an emotional repair and is unlikely to replicate the previous main upward trend. Key signals to watch: NAND spot/contract prices, major manufacturer production cut announcements, US Treasury yields, AI capital expenditure guidance. Operational suggestions: Do not heavily bet on one-sided moves. Those bullish should not chase highs; wait for a pullback and stabilization before considering; those bearish should not short fully, as the storage sector's rebound potential is very strong. Distinguish between consumer flash memory and server storage; do not equate USB drive price drops directly with a collapse in the company's fundamentals. $SNDK Many people think that SanDisk product price cuts are caused by the burst of the AI bubble. But this logic actually doesn't hold up. AI mainly drives high-spec DRAM, HBM, and enterprise-level large-capacity NAND on the server side. It affects the pricing of industrial and server-grade chips. SanDisk, however, produces consumer-grade storage like USB drives, memory cards, and portable SSDs. These two markets are basically separate. The core reason for this round of price cuts is not the decline of the AI concept. It is the capacity release from ChangXin Memory impacting the pricing power of overseas DRAM manufacturers. International storage giants, to protect their market share, are adjusting their overall capacity strategies, which leads to increased supply and price declines of consumer-grade NAND chips. AI is just a thematic bonus for the storage sector, not the root cause of consumer-grade storage price drops. It is recommended not to link all storage market trends to AI stories. Distinguish between enterprise and consumer markets, understand the real supply and demand, and don't let trending narratives mislead your judgment. There is a common trap when looking at capital flows: only looking at single-day figures. $BTC spot ETF this week is a perfect example. On October 8, the single-day net outflow was $244 million, which looks scary; on October 9, it turned positive with +$21 million, seeming like the money "came back." But if you extend the period to 5 trading days: from 10/5 to 10/9, the cumulative net outflow was about $681 million (the largest single-week outflow since June). A single-day positive figure is barely a ripple in the weekly context. $ETH is even more typical: as of October 12, it has had 10 consecutive trading days of net outflow (no positive days since September 29), with a single-day outflow of $85 million on October 12, totaling about $783 million. The single-day outflow of $202 million on October 6 remains the largest day in this round. When these two perspectives conflict, my view is: single-day figures represent the buying and selling strength of that day, while the weekly perspective shows whether the trend has changed. A single-day positive figure with the weekly still showing outflow means "selling pressure has eased," but does not mean "money has returned." Next to watch: if the BTC spot ETF turns positive for 3 consecutive days and the single-day scale returns above $100 million, then we can talk about "capital inflow." Before that, treat the rebound as emotional repair. This is my personal observation framework and does not constitute trading advice. Do you usually look at capital flows on a single-day or multi-day basis? Have you ever been fooled by single-day data? #BTC #ETHAt 9:30 when the US stock market opened, the Dow Jones pushed up, the Nasdaq directly sank, and the S&P pretended to be dead and didn't move. Simply put, money ran out from those high valuation stocks like chips, storage, and optical communication, and hid in old sectors like banking, energy, and healthcare. Bitcoin just finished a deep V during the day, originally drawing a cross above 83000 waiting for direction. With this US market situation, the Nasdaq weakness is like putting a rope around crypto's neck—wanting to surge but unable to; fortunately, the Dow is holding, so it's not a systemic sell-off. Bitcoin won't be dragged down, just grinding along with the Nasdaq. What we really need to guard against is the Nasdaq kicking down again near the close, or a sudden spike at midnight on CPI day. But as long as the 83000 middle band doesn't close below in real terms, the daytime bullish structure remains, and after grinding, it still has to go up. $BTC $ETH Just saw an important message! An OG address dormant for many years transferred out 4582 $BTC (378 million USD) in one go, On the surface, it looks like a whale awakening, but in fact, it's old money doing liquidity swaps at a high level. Combined with the ETF withdrawals, I lean towards this being a "macro hedge + early profit-taking" resonance. OG moving coins doesn't mean dumping, but coupled with the short-term ETF retreat, selling pressure on the market is definitely expected to heat up. The key is whether these 4582 coins went into exchanges. If it's just a cold wallet transfer, no big deal; The long-term logic remains intact, but the October deleveraging is not over yet, don't get carried away! $ETH $ZEC #September CPI announcement is imminent, Harker says further rate hikes are still needed #BTC and ETH spot ETFs see simultaneous outflows, has institutional demand weakened? Cousin's Diary: October 13, 2026, 21:30 $SNDK opened continuing to drift down, semiconductors keep plunging. The worst part isn't the drop itself, but that you clearly favor A storage, just thinking about adding on a pullback, yet at the open it got smashed again leaving you stunned! But I still want to say: a collective pullback in semiconductors does not mean SNDK's long-term logic is over! First, why is the sector falling? Recently, storage stocks have been under pressure. Samsung's preliminary results fell short of market expectations, plus competition concerns triggered by technological progress from Chinese storage manufacturers, the market started to reassess the high expectations for storage stocks. SNDK, MU, Seagate, etc. are all affected; it's not just SNDK falling. Second, where is the confidence in being bullish? A data centers still require massive storage. SNDK previously announced a 175% year-over-year revenue growth for fiscal 2026, with significant growth in data center business. Fundamentals support it, but high expectations also mean the stock price will be more sensitive; don't take good news as a guarantee it won't fall. Third, what to watch next? First see if it can stop falling around 1400, then if it can reclaim 1450. Holding and rebounding with volume gives bulls a chance to recover; if volume continues to break down, control your position and don't hold stubbornly. I remain bullish medium to long term, but short term watch for signs of a bottom! SNDK dropped from 1834 to 1412, the 1-hour chart already shows volume breakdown, the 1427-1437 range is being tested. If it can't hold, there is room to fall further. When it was rising, everyone talked about AI and storage surging, wishing SanDisk would skyrocket tomorrow. Now with a big bearish candle, we realize the stock rose too fast and is also getting hammered by the market. Hynix was directly hit by DRAM competition news, SanDisk deals in NAND, they are different. SanDisk falling with the storage sector this time is mainly due to weakening market sentiment and profit-taking after previous gains. Also, the earnings report on October 29. The more storage prices rise, the higher the market's profit expectations. If future price increases fall short, the stock may adjust early. So I am watching short-term breakdowns and pre-earnings capital withdrawal, not saying SanDisk has no future. #CPI and PPI announcements are imminent, interest rate hike expectations face a test At the same time, some see $180,000, while others only offer a $40,000 floor: Has institutional consensus on Bitcoin completely collapsed? On one side, VanEck optimistically projects $180,000; on the other, Galaxy warns that macro deterioration could push it down to $40,000–$46,000. The huge price gap easily leads people to mistakenly believe that institutional consensus has broken down. But the truth is not a collapse of consensus, just two completely different scenario assumptions. Optimistic institutions (VanEck, Bernstein, Citi) target $100,000 to $180,000, based on: the Fed cutting rates as expected, U.S. Treasury yields falling, continuous large net inflows into spot ETFs, no major regulatory negatives, and supply contraction from halving continuing to push valuations higher. This is the ideal bull market scenario. Pessimistic institutions giving a bottom near $40,000 represent an extreme tail risk scenario: persistent sticky inflation, U.S. Treasury yields remaining high, rate cuts delayed or even rate hikes resumed, continuous net outflows from ETFs, and risk assets collectively devalued. This scenario has a low probability and is not the baseline expectation. The underlying institutional consensus has not completely disappeared: everyone agrees Bitcoin is a high-beta risk asset, with its price highly tied to U.S. dollar liquidity; the disagreement lies only in which macro path will unfold. It’s not that institutions contradict each other, but that their forecasts of Fed policy and capital flows differ. Many social media deliberately juxtapose the “optimistic upper limit” and the “extreme risk bottom” to create conflict and attract traffic. Do not simply interpret it as half the institutions bullish at $180,000 and half bearish down to $40,000. $SNDK Many people think that the price drop of SanDisk products is a result of the AI bubble bursting, but this logic does not hold up. The AI demand mainly drives high-spec DRAM, HBM, and enterprise-level large-capacity NAND, affecting the pricing of server-side chips; SanDisk targets consumer-grade USB drives, memory cards, and mobile SSDs, and the two markets are completely separate. The core driving force behind this round of price cuts is the volume increase from Changxin Memory, breaking the overseas manufacturers' DRAM monopoly and forcing international storage giants to adjust their overall capacity strategies, which in turn increases the supply of consumer-grade NAND chips and drives prices down. AI is just a positive narrative for the storage sector, not the root cause of this round of consumer storage price reductions. It is recommended not to link all storage market trends to the AI concept, to distinguish between enterprise and consumer markets, to differentiate cyclical supply and demand from thematic speculation, and not to let a single hot topic obscure the real supply and demand changes in the industry. This round of SK Hynix's sharp pullback is an expected valuation cut under multiple negative factors resonating. On one hand, ChangXin's 4F² DRAM architecture has made a breakthrough and plans to launch server DDR5, with the market beginning to price in mid-to-long-term supply competition, raising concerns about subsequent compression of Korean manufacturers' storage premium space. On the other hand, executives from Broadcom and Intel have successively indicated signs of tightening AI capital expenditure, causing funds to start doubting the narrative of sustained high growth in HBM and no longer assuming computing power investment will keep increasing. Coupled with high U.S. Treasury yields, foreign capital has concentrated on selling Korean storage leaders, triggering a sidecar circuit breaker on the Korea KOSPI, amplifying volatility due to programmatic selling pressure. It is important to distinguish: HBM orders are not disappearing immediately; short-term long-term contract orders remain full. This is a downward revision of long-term profit expectations, not a direct deterioration of fundamentals. SK Hynix is a core AI HBM target and a barometer of global tech risk appetite. This semiconductor sentiment weakening will indirectly transmit to high-beta assets like BTC and ETH, easily causing correlated pressure. Key points to watch going forward: HBM long-term contract order guidance, DRAM spot prices, and whether more storage giants simultaneously lower earnings forecasts. If it is just an emotional sell-off, there will be opportunities for recovery later; if multiple companies cut capital expenditure, the negative impact will continue to ferment. $BTC $ETH $SKHYNIX #SemiconductorSectorMassSelloff, Korea KOSPI down over 6% The market has priced in nearly 80% chance of no action in October, which means if CPI just meets expectations, it won't change much; the real killer is the chain reaction after exceeding expectations. BTC ETF saw a net outflow of over 700 million in the first week of October, and this negative factor has already been absorbed by the market. If core CPI month-on-month is only 0.2, the market will realize it has overreacted before, and a rebound will be imminent. If core CPI jumps above 0.3, then breaking 80,000 comes first. ETH spot ETF had a net outflow of over 500 million last week, with BlackRock alone withdrawing more than 400 million. The Ethereum Foundation's related wallets are also transferring coins to exchanges. Both capital flow and on-chain activity are moving out, and the price is struggling around 2,400. But its current price has already priced in much pessimism; if it gets hammered again due to data exceeding expectations, it might actually be a short-term trading opportunity, provided you dare to go against the sentiment. Gold $XAUT has seen central banks increase holdings for 23 consecutive months, buying over 700,000 ounces in September, and global gold ETFs had a net inflow of 10 billion USD in a single month. Harmack said inflation expectations show early warning signals, which is solid support for gold. Don't bet on the data itself, bet on the panic and recovery after the data. Hold your BTC and ETH spot positions steady, don't move in the short term, keep watching gold. When the data comes out, don't chase the first candlestick; wait for the sentiment to settle before making a move. #9月CPI公布在即，哈玛克称仍需进一步加息 $SNDK Many people wonder why Changxin Storage, which focuses on DRAM memory, has driven down the prices of SanDisk's products. Essentially, although the two operate in different sectors—Changxin produces DRAM for running memory, while SanDisk relies on NAND flash for USB drives, memory cards, and SSDs—the storage industry is a strongly cyclical sector where capital and supply chain expectations influence each other. Changxin's mass production and volume expansion have broken the long-term monopoly of overseas manufacturers in the DRAM field, forcing international storage giants like Samsung and Micron to lower DRAM prices; meanwhile, the overall capacity strategy and inventory plans of these giants are interconnected. To maintain overall market share, they simultaneously increase NAND flash supply and reduce NAND chip prices. SanDisk's USB drives and portable SSDs use NAND chips as core raw materials; as chip costs decline, end retail prices naturally follow. Simply put: Changxin itself does not directly compete with SanDisk, but Changxin's challenge to the pricing power of overseas storage giants causes these giants to lower NAND chip prices to protect their market, ultimately leading to price reductions in SanDisk's consumer storage products.Haha, the bulls are still hoping to push up, but what happened? It dropped again. Look at this short on $W, entered at 0.02375, now the mark price is 0.018274, a return of +69.17%. It smashed down all the way from the high of 0.0317, the bearish trend is clear, and the profits are comfortably made. Why do I say this short is comfortable? First, the target was chosen correctly. Wormhole surged from 0.017 to 0.0317, an 86% increase in one day, all short-term hot money speculation, no sustained buying support. This kind of pump means the peak is a shorting opportunity. Second, the order book was constantly baiting bulls. Bids 38% vs. asks 62%, heavy buy orders but price couldn’t move up, a typical setup for offloading. Bulls were waiting for a breakout, but what came was a dump. Third, the unlock pressure on October 16. About 58.33 million W tokens unlocked, the market priced in the selling pressure in advance, and the whales took advantage of the pump to distribute. Once the short is placed there, no need to watch the market every day, no shaky hands, the profit will run itself. In this altcoin market, those chasing longs get buried, shorts get the meat. Don’t fight the trend, pick the right target, short with the momentum, and make steady profits. Brothers, did you get your short this round? $BTC $ETH #SeptemberCPIannouncementcoming, Hamark says further rate hikes are still needed Why did $SNDK's stock price fall even though the storage gap is clearly expected to last until 2028? 🤔 Ultimately, the fundamental logic hasn't changed; what has changed is the market's expectations for the future! Previously, the market was optimistic about the tight supply and demand of NAND storage, believing the gap would be hard to fill in the short term. But after Changxin announced a breakthrough in 4F² technology, investors began to worry: if the manufacturing efficiency of storage chips continues to improve, will the future supply and demand landscape change? Could chip prices peak earlier than expected? What really makes the market nervous isn't necessarily current poor performance, but that investors are starting to trade based on expectations of profit peaking in 2027! 📌 A few key points to clearly understand: Fundamentals: The logic of tight supply and demand for NAND storage hasn't been completely disproven; the original judgment was that the supply gap might last until 2028. Market expectations: Stock prices trade on the future, not today. Even if current fundamentals are good, as long as the market worries about slowing future profit growth, stock prices can still pull back early. Key price level: 1450 is a short-term support level to watch closely; if it breaks down effectively, the next risk to watch is around 1200. My view is: just because the logic hasn't changed doesn't mean the stock price won't fall; look at supply and demand long-term, but expectations and capital short-term! If you hold a position, focus on whether 1450 can hold; don't ignore technical risks just because you are optimistic about fundamentals. If support fails, reassess promptly instead of stubbornly holding on. What do you think, is this $SNDK drop signaling 👇 Searched the web, read a page $SOL has led DEX volume five straight weeks, but stablecoin supply on Solana slid from $17.45B (Sep 25) to $16.33B (Oct 11), down 6.4%. Volume up, dollar base down. That looks like the same capital turning faster, not new capital arriving. My read: neutral, leaning cautious for the next 2 weeks. Levels I’m watching: ~$109-110 (Oct 10-11 range) and ~$115-118 (Oct 8, Sep 30 prints). Invalidation: supply back above $17.4B with SOL over $118.What’s the next move? This isn’t me asking myself, but asking on behalf of those still holding long positions. A three-day rise, then half a day to fall back. When prices rise, everyone says "this time is different," but when they fall, they start hesitating about whether to cut losses. The market waits for no one’s hesitation. Regarding the NU7 upgrade, the market hasn’t fully digested one risk yet: the November upgrade may lead to the deactivation of v4 trading functions. For ZEC, which relies on privacy narratives to support its price, this is definitely not good news, but a warning signal for holders. Before the news is finalized, capital won’t dare to heavily invest, and that’s the biggest bearish factor. With a 136% unrealized profit in my account, I remain calm and haven’t rushed to close positions. It’s not greed, but I believe before the trend reverses, the rebound could still be an opportunity to add positions. Key levels: * Current focus: 1213 * Rebound add-on zone: 1250–1280 * Stop-loss level: above 1350 * Target price: 1100 Remember, 1213 may not be the bottom. The market shows no mercy to anyone, only rewarding those who see the direction clearly and strictly follow their trading plan. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #ASMLearningsPreview: EUV orders are the key focus [Pharaoh's Market Watch] Strategy's accumulation slows down, is the corporate treasury strategy changing? Private messages exploded, everyone is asking Pharaoh why Strategy suddenly stopped buying aggressively—is it backing down? Pharaoh says directly, it's not backing down, it's the "accounting mode" kicking in. Last week, only 250 BTC were bought, spending 21.5 million, a procurement drop of 85% within two weeks. Where did the money go? All used to buy back their own preferred shares. In the same week, Strategy spent 176 million USD to repurchase STRC preferred shares, more than six times the amount spent on buying coins. Seller's calculations are precise: when MSTR stock price falls below net asset premium, issuing new shares to buy coins dilutes shareholder value. What does this mean for Bitcoin? The corporate treasury's "infinite ammo" mode is slowing down. Strategy still holds 4.9 billion in cash and 18.8 billion in available stock issuance capacity, but Seller clearly said—no new shares will be issued to buy coins if the stock price has no premium. But Pharaoh must say fairly, this is not a retreat, it's a gear shift. Robinhood just bought 25 million BTC, Strive increased holdings by 2,000 coins, Metaplanet sold 10,000 then repurchased 11,000 to prove liquidity. Big buyers have shifted from "blind charging" to "price-watching buying," with less strong buying pressure short-term but more rationality long-term.‌‌‌ $BTC $ZEC #Strategy's accumulation slows down, is the corporate treasury strategy changing? BTC is currently at $83,441! Yesterday was bearish, today the price dropped to a low of 80,961, then strongly pulled back above 83,000! The bears created room for a decline but failed to hold their gains! Today we must face reality: the daily chart is still under pressure, but the 4-hour bulls are counterattacking! 【Yesterday's Review: Decline Realized, Rebound Exceeded Expectations】 Yesterday was clearly short-term bearish, planning to short on resistance between 83,050–83,350 with a stop loss at 83,950, and three take-profit targets at 82,450, 81,770, and 80,990. Today's low was 80,961, all three targets were hit, indicating the downward space assessment was valid! However, the high of 84,131 also broke yesterday's stop loss at 83,950. Based solely on the 24-hour high and low, it is impossible to confirm an effective entry signal or determine the order of stop loss and take profit! Therefore, it is never claimed that all three take-profit targets were executed, nor is any profit fabricated. The bearish bias yesterday captured the downside risk but underestimated the strength of the bulls' counterattack, which must be acknowledged! 【Technical Analysis: 4-Hour Chart Turns Bullish Again, Daily Chart Not Yet Bullish】 The 4-hour candle closed at 83,327, reclaiming above MA5 at 83,016, MA10 at 83,237, and MA20 at 83,166! MACD DIF is -27.82, DEA is -74.03, histogram +92.41, indicating short-term bulls have regained some advantage. But compared to yesterday's +300 histogram, the rebound momentum has clearly weakened! The daily close was 82,684, slightly above MA5 at 82,678, but still below MA10 at 83,775 and MA20.The Sui Foundation has just made a strategic investment of $30 million in DATA Network, which is planning to migrate its protocol and tokens to Sui. At first glance, this news seems like a positive for $SUI, but the reality is that the foundation spending money to attract projects is an ecosystem investment, not money already paid by users, and it will not directly translate into token price. To avoid arbitrage traps from this kind of information, it is still necessary to observe whether.Two tokens tracking NVIDIA can give holders different legal rights. The structure determines ownership, dividends, and redemption. From the report Alea co-authored with @redstone_defi and Four Pillars. Free to read: #DailyOrbit