Orbit Post Sitemap
#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus Many people are focused on whether the Federal Reserve will raise rates in October, overlooking the other side: European Central Bank officials have already clearly leaned toward a rate hike in December, making policy trade-offs increasingly complex.
This is a signal that global central banks are collectively moving toward tightening, not just a solo act by the Fed. The liquidity taps on both sides are being turned down simultaneously, and the first to suffer from oxygen deprivation will always be risk assets.
Against this macro backdrop, why do I hold short positions on $BTC and $ETH without letting go? It’s not about predicting how much they will drop tomorrow, but about the odds being in my favor. At the table, you don’t have to win every hand; you just need to patiently raise bets in the direction where your opponents keep making mistakes. Those who go all-in chasing longs are like fish who stubbornly follow their opponents to the river card, knowing full well that rate hikes are coming.
Do you think the world will raise or cut rates in December?Bitcoin has now surged to become the 12th largest global asset, and everyone is guessing if the next target is silver?
Currently, Bitcoin has forcibly pushed Saudi Aramco down to 13th place. Keep in mind that in 2020, Saudi Aramco was the undisputed global market cap leader. To break into the global top ten, Bitcoin still needs another big surge. But looking further up, silver at 6th place has twice the market cap of Bitcoin. And gold, at the very top, has 18 times its market cap.
Bitcoin's current situation is quite delicate; it has surpassed almost all the giant companies, but it still lags behind the true precious metal leaders by an order of magnitude.
Look at what happened in the market this week. Tech stocks collectively pulled back 6 to 10 points, silver dropped 6.5%. But Bitcoin? It only dipped slightly by 1.4%. Among the global top ten, six assets fell more than it did. What does this resilience indicate? It shows that capital is treating it as a different kind of asset. You can even see some traders shorting tech stocks and simultaneously going long on Bitcoin. $BTC
So the question is, will Bitcoin's next surpassing target be silver? How long do you think it will take to double again? $ETH #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins The most frustrating thing about this weekend's market isn't how much it fell, but the slow grind downward.
BTC actually hasn't moved much, hovering around 80,000, about 1,000 less than Friday. This week it touched 84,000, then dropped below 80,000 to a one-month low, bounced back near 83,000, then got pushed down again—just going in circles, stuck in place.
Altcoins are in a worse spot. Comparing prices from Friday evening to now: ZRO dropped 15%, WLD, ARB, and APT are down about 10%, NEAR fell 8%, AAVE dropped over 7%. The rebound from Friday was completely wiped out in two days. ETH and SOL did a bit better, each down around 3%. The total market cap is 2.74 trillion, with BTC making up about 60%. The altcoin season index is at 56, still far from the 75 threshold.
Ultimately, money is flowing out. Last week, US crypto ETFs saw a total outflow of $610 million, with Ethereum alone accounting for $320 million. BTC at least has institutional support, altcoins don't. On weekends, with thin order books, even a small sell-off can trigger a big red candle.
I'm watching three things going forward. First, the US stock market opening on Monday—Nasdaq dropped over 2% last Friday, semiconductors fell 10% over the week, and crypto is basically following Nasdaq now. Second, oil prices—Brent closed near 110 on Friday; if oil doesn't drop, expectations for rate hikes won't ease. Third, the rate decision on the 27th and 28th, likely unchanged, but the December hike is still looming.
Until BTC can reclaim 83,000-84,000, I treat altcoin rebounds as short-covering and don't hold them. Bottom-fishing altcoins now is basically fighting liquidity. If you're itching to trade, keep your position light and avoid leverage. $BTC 特斯拉这次财报
我在 OKX 预测里选了 Yes，301.24 份额。
用的是免费的 XP！
作为 Tesla 老车主，
正好借这次活动认真看看
它卖出去的车到底能留下多少利润。
查了一下，三季度交付了 486,532 辆
比特斯拉此前汇总的分析师预期 461,974 辆高约 5.3%。
这给了我一点支持 Yes 的理由：
卖车数量比预想的好，如果单车利润能守住，盈利就有机会好于预期。
但另一组数据也得看：储能部署是 13.7 GWh，低于此前预期的 15.9 GWh。所以不能因为自己选了 Yes，就把所有消息都往利好上解释。
现在最关注汽车业务毛利率，尤其是剔除监管积分收入后的表现。如果交付靠更大的优惠换来，或者费用增加得更快，卖得多也未必赚得多。
最近新车的话题很热，但那和三季度已经赚了多少钱是两回事。这笔 Yes 能不能答对，最终还得按题目的结算规则，看财报里的实际数字。
财报定在 10 月 21 日美股盘后，北京时间 22 日凌晨。先把这次判断记下来，等结果出来，再看看自己哪里看对、哪里想简单了。
#OKX美股财报季 #Tesla #TSLA #美股1. Long upper shadow spike, surge then retreat
On the 4-hour chart, a long upper shadow just formed at 110.34, representing a one-time bullish sprint triggered by news. After encountering heavy selling pressure at the high, profit-taking occurred, and the price retreated to oscillate around 107.
This long upper shadow is very important: there is heavy selling pressure above 110, making a one-time breakout difficult. It is a surge to test the market, not a sustained one-sided rally.
2. Bullish moving average alignment, solid support below
Short-term WMA5, WMA10, and WMA20 are all trending upward, with the price firmly above all moving averages; SuperTrend is at 104.46, which is the watershed level for this rally.
As long as the price does not effectively break below 104.46, the bullish structure of this crude oil wave remains intact, maintaining a high-level oscillation pattern.
Two branches
1. Base scenario: $BZ Brent oscillates widely between 104 and 110
If geopolitical news does not escalate further, the range-bound oscillation will continue. Energy inflation continues to exert chronic pressure on risk assets, $BTC continues narrow weekend oscillation, awaiting Monday's liquidity window.
2. Bearish escalation scenario: news worsens (Middle East conflict escalates), volume breakout above 110.34 holds, oil price opens upward space, inflation expectations heat up sharply, directly compressing B-wave bull trap space, possibly skipping the oscillation and accelerating the start of C-wave. US tech stocks were slaughtered like this but BTC didn't crash along?
This phenomenon is quite interesting👀
Last week, the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%, with significant selling pressure on semiconductor and AI-related stocks.
In contrast, although BTC once fell below 80,000 USD, it later bounced back to fluctuate around 81,000 to 82,000.
What I think is worth noting this time is not just the drop, but that market funds are starting to reassess risk.
AI companies are investing heavily in capital expenditures, and investors are beginning to doubt whether future profits can keep up, while the crypto space simultaneously faces pressures from inflation, interest rates, and liquidity.
But BTC not falling in the same magnitude as tech stocks does not mean it has decoupled.
What I want to observe next is whether this relative strength can continue when the US stock market reopens.
If BTC can stabilize first and ETH and SOL start to follow, then market sentiment might truly improve.
Do you think BTC is beginning to show resilience or is the real test of weekend liquidity shortage waiting until Monday?🤔
$BTC $ETH $SOL #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ A group member just asked me if they could bottom-fish ARB, and I directly threw the contract data in their face. The main players already took the money and disappeared, and you still want to catch the falling knife halfway down the mountain?
Don’t just stare at the K-line tonight, dig into the data directly: first look at the worst-off $ARB, current price 0.1839, plummeted nearly 8%. Guess what? The long-short ratio actually surged against the trend from 0.75 this morning to 1.80! Meanwhile, open interest dropped from 22 million to 17 million. The signal is very clear: the main players are retreating, retail investors think it’s oversold and are frantically bottom-fishing, but these people are all catching the fall halfway down.
Next, look at $UNI, current price 7.10, down 4%. The long-short ratio is even more extreme, hitting 2.07. Funding rates occasionally turn negative, meaning longs are losing even on interest. Retail investors are stubbornly buying more as it falls. All the chips above 7.4 are trapped positions, and the rebound has no volume at all.
Finally, look at $NEAR, current price 5.01. Long-short ratio 1.47, and open interest is increasing against the trend. The bulls are still holding on hard. With this structure, unless the bulls are completely crushed into despair, the market won’t bottom out.
My view is very firm: these are all bull traps. Going long now is just giving your head away, and shorting is easy to get squeezed. The cost-performance ratio is extremely poor. Wait until the market volume shrinks and stabilizes completely, then consider catching a bit.
#Tesla releases new generation Roadster, market rallies
#US CPI and PPI both exceed expectations, will there be another rate hike this year?
#SpaceX’s first full quarterly report after IPO will be revealed $BTC #Currently trapped in a consolidation range, bulls and bears have entered a stalemate phase. The current area around 81350 is the middle of the range, not suitable for heavy position entry for speculation.
The upper resistance range is 87000–88000, a zone of multiple overlapping pressures.
The 20-month long-term moving average and the 2026 opening price level, combined with the average cost concentration of medium- to long-term holders, are all located here. Once the price rebounds to this area, a large amount of previously trapped positions will choose to sell to break even, releasing concentrated selling pressure, making a one-time breakthrough very difficult.
The lower support range is 78000–81500, the defensive bottom line for funds.
Glassnode on-chain data shows the market's real average holding cost is 78000; spot ETF institutional holding cost is around 81500. Recent market action has repeatedly briefly pierced 81500, with buy orders quickly stepping in to pull back, proving strong defensive power at this level.In a recent interview, Sun Yuchen explicitly said he is "more bearish on BTC," citing AI and quantum computing as reasons. He believes AI algorithms could, within 1 to 1.5 years, pose a substantial threat to elliptic curve cryptography, turning those two million BTC with lost private keys into potential selling pressure. Interestingly, although he verbally expresses bearishness, he hasn't reduced his core holdings at all; he just moved them into a new cold wallet without signatures for isolation. This indicates he is warning about tail risks in extreme scenarios, not advising you to liquidate now.
As for "listening to Sun's cuts," he indeed nailed the storage sector and did so aggressively. In November 2025, he predicted "perpetual storage shortages," after which SanDisk (SNDK) surged from $35 to over $1400, a multiple-fold increase. This was no blind guess but a sharp insight into the industry's supply-demand cycle.
However, it's important to see that this bearish stance on BTC and the previous bullish stance on storage operate on different logical levels. Storage is an industry necessity, while bearishness on BTC stems from long-term cryptographic security concerns—currently, there is no concrete case of AI breaking Bitcoin. Moreover, he previously said "AI and crypto are complementary," so this time it seems more like risk hedging.
Therefore, his words should be heeded, but what you should listen to is his framework for analyzing industry trends, not directly copying his conclusions. AI breaking BTC is currently a "ghost story" that requires long-term monitoring; don't be scared off by a single statement. $BTC $ETH 今日持仓日报
观点信号：孙宇晨最新访谈释放偏空信号——看空$BTC ，理由是AI与量子计算冲击、硬分叉难达共识；自曝去年3600—4000美元区间减持八九成$ETH ，资金转向美股；对纳指中线谨慎，但尚未实际做空。
言行拆解：嘴上称BTC仍是底仓未减，实际却大幅调仓ETH、增配美股。名人观点可作参考，但不能替代价格与资金数据；尤其要区分“公开表态”和“真实仓位”。
盘面含义：这类访谈更多影响情绪，不构成趋势确认。BTC底仓未减说明其并未彻底离场；ETH减仓则反映部分资金对短期性价比的重新评估。纳指“看空未做空”也说明机构同样在等信号。
持仓结论：不因大佬唱空就恐慌清仓，也不因“底仓未减”盲目抄底。重点看BTC关键支撑、ETH资金流向及美股科技股走势#纳指100周跌5.5%，芯片股八连跌 #Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓 布伦特原油冲上110美元
这次通胀恐怕更难降了！
布伦特原油昨天盘中触及110美元，收盘报109.86美元，WTI原油也重新站上100美元。这次上涨有几个直接原因。
沙特通往红海延布港的能源运输路线受到导弹袭击威胁，霍尔木兹海峡附近的袭击也在增加。与此同时，俄罗斯炼油厂再次遭到无人机攻击，进一步加剧了供应担忧。
更值得留意的是，国际能源署已经同意额外释放超过2000万桶燃料，美国也准备从战略石油储备中安排最多1700万桶原油交换供应。
前面美国CPI、PPI已经偏热，现在油价又涨到这个位置，对通胀显然不是好消息。如果高油价持续，美联储就更难放心降息，而企业还要承担更高的运输和生产成本。
短期我对美股和加密市场依然比较谨慎。油价如果继续往120美元靠近，市场可能还要重新调整对利率的预期。
$CL $BTC $XAU
#布伦特触及110美元，油轮遇袭加剧供应担忧 #SpaceX's first full quarterly earnings report after listing will be revealed
Personally, I am bullish for the following reasons:
1. The market is not focused on revenue, but on cash burn: Q2 capital expenditure was 18.4 billion (twice the revenue), with the AI segment alone burning 15.8 billion. If capex continues to spiral out of control this time, or if the 2027 computing power pricing (Evercore model is $30/W) falls short of expectations, even a beat will still see the stock decline.
2. Lock-up expiration looming: On the second trading day after the earnings release, about 911.5 million internal shares will be unlocked (accounting for 20%). The stock price has already halved from the June high, and there is a significant probability of profit-taking after a beat due to the good news.
Conclusion: The numbers will most likely beat. Institutions of Evercore's scale rarely raise target prices a week before earnings without good reason. However, if you make earnings predictions on OKX Prophet, betting on "exceeding expectations" is fine, but be cautious about betting on "stock price rising after earnings"—watch for three key terms in the earnings call: computing power capacity, 2027 pricing, and Starship reuse progress. These three factors determine mid-term expectations and are more important than the Q3 numbers themselves. $BTC $ETH Big Brother Maji's total position is 58.86 million USD, hedging longs and shorts, but the profit and loss are like fire and ice.
Big Brother Maji holds simultaneous positions: short BTC, long ETH, and short $HYPE, clearly a hedged long-short account.
Breaking it down:
$BTC short, 40X full position, opened at 84070, currently floating profit +571,900, liquidation price 105,963. The most comfortable of the three trades.
$ETH long, 25X full position, opened at 2500.18, floating loss -565,500, liquidation price 1576.21. Holding the long position through tough times.
$HYPE short, 5X full position, opened at 66.2399, floating loss -3,662,000, liquidation price 100.17. The most painful short trade.
Totaling up: BTC short profit of +570,000 is basically offset by ETH long loss (-565,500), the real drag on the overall account is the $HYPE short loss of -3,660,000. So Big Brother Maji's 58.86 million position is actually a net floating loss of about 3.65 million, not as good as it looks on paper.
In short, he’s not all-in on one side but using a long-short combo to hedge. But with 40X and 25X leverage, net value can swing wildly with the market, so ordinary people really shouldn’t copy this.
#特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？
#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 Watching the storage sector closely at the market open made my heart tighten. Is this pullback more grueling than expected? SK Hynix has dropped over 30% in ten days, just a step away from the late July low, and the Korean memory chain has been knocked back to square one. Turning to Micron, the paper loss is about 20%, still some distance from the previous low of $706, showing a different level of resilience. Musk's endorsement is still supporting sentiment. But what really made me pause and take note isn't who fell the most, but the rhythm of this volatility: a fast drop, hesitant rebounds, and repeated probing of lows—a classic case of emotions collapsing first, with prices confirming later. For high-beta stocks like memory, once entering this phase, the correlation with BTC and ETH may not be synchronous, but the contraction in risk appetite will first transmit to altcoins and high-volatility narratives. Those with heavy positions will be forced to reduce exposure first, rather than actively rotate. I personally made a very real mistake: buying Micron around 900, quite a bit, and now stuck there—neither moving nor staying still feels right. Reviewing it, the problem wasn't misreading the direction but the rhythm—mistaking "a big drop" for "the bottom is in," ignoring the fact that lows will be repeatedly tested during volatile phases. There is also a bullish path: Micron is relatively resilient, the previous low hasn't been broken, and the AI storage demand narrative remains intact. Once sentiment recovers, the leaders will bounce first. The risks are clear too: continued breakdowns in Korean stocks will drag down the entire sector's valuation, and Micron's catch-up drop is only a matter of time, making heavy holders more passive then. So the move now isn't to add, but to first calculate how much volatility you can withstand and break down the pace of averaging down.Short sellers think they are harvesting the trend, but they are actually handing a matchstick to the next needle.
The screen is full of “longs being killed,” with 222 million long positions liquidated, which is unsettling. But the liquidation heatmap tells a different story—a story that chills the backs of shorts: Above $ETH, the traps laid by shorts are much bigger than the pits under the longs’ feet.
On the news front, the bearish factors are real, but a “systematic retreat” is false. Brent crude oil surged to $110, and core CPI at 2.6% exceeded expectations, so the macro environment is indeed unfriendly. ETF net outflows of 82.41 million and BlackRock IBIT outflows of 71.8 million yesterday look scary, but the same batch of funds had net inflows of 175.7 million on October 13. Single-day, single-product outflows are a different matter from institutional systematic withdrawal. The more critical signal lies in derivatives: $ETH open interest has shrunk from 20 billion to around 15 billion, with leverage on the long side being genuinely washed out, while shorts have been piling up thicker and thicker as prices weaken—this asymmetry in position structure is what really deserves attention.
$BTC at 81,000 has held support after three retests, corresponding to a cost zone of about 2.31 million $BTC short-term holders, a dense area of real capital. $ETH is more subtle: 2400 is not just a psychological barrier but also a trigger for short liquidations. Standing above and holding it, the liquidation engine will eat up the short positions above; the buying pressure is driven by forced liquidations, and short squeeze pulses are always faster than declines.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#US CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations; will there be another rate hike this year? 🌌 Early Sunday morning, gold, BTC layer 2, and audio micro futures come together for a look
$XAUT 4154, this round it diverged from BTC 🥇XAUT quietly lifted to 4154, up 1.7%. Normally gold moves in tandem with risk assets, but this round with CPI+PPI both exceeding expectations, BTC was hammered while gold didn’t fall but rose, indicating the money buying gold isn’t from trading risk but from separate hedging allocation. Strategy earnings preview says BTC’s book profits rebounded sharply, the company is fully invested in BTC, and the funds on the gold side are completely separate from the company’s BTC holdings logic, two lines moving independently.
$CORE 0.0186, an independent public chain running in the BTC ecosystem 🟠Core DAO is a public chain built on Bitcoin, with its own validation network and ecosystem applications. This round is not weakness, but a short-term sentiment decoupling from BTC, following its own ecosystem development pace. Strategy’s book rebound is a BTC spot-level matter; CORE will move when its own ecosystem has new progress.
$BEAT In the thin early morning session, other micro futures are easily pulled into bearish candles by a few orders, but BEAT only moved 0.27 points, hovering at 0.0776. It’s not that there is capital protection, but the sell side is completely exhausted, with hardly anyone wanting to push it down. This static state itself indicates short-term funds have already cleared out.
This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice.
#Strategy earnings preview: BTC’s book profits rebounded sharply Inflation is off the charts, but the Federal Reserve is hitting the brakes? The probability of a rate hike in October has plummeted to 15%
US inflation data exploded again, but the Federal Reserve seems to be watching and waiting.
September PPI rose 6.3% year-on-year (expected 5.3%), and 1.3% month-on-month; core PPI also exceeded expectations. Coupled with the earlier September CPI rising to 3.7% year-on-year, two consecutive inflation data points are flashing red, indicating that price pressures have not eased.
However, Federal Reserve Chair Powell was evasive throughout October 16, neither predicting rate decisions nor revealing whether there will be a rate hike in October. Officials like Daly and Goolsbee also hold cautious attitudes toward immediate action.
Hot data, soft officials. The market quickly reacted: bets on a 25 basis point hike in October dropped to 15%, but there is still disagreement on whether further hikes will occur this year.
What does this mean for the crypto market?
In the short term, it’s good news. Expectations for no rate hike in October are rising, US Treasury yields and the dollar temporarily lose upward momentum, and risk assets get a breather. This is also the macro foundation for BTC and ETH stabilizing after recent deep declines.
But don’t celebrate too soon. PPI and CPI have consecutively exceeded expectations, showing strong inflation stickiness. Not hiking now only delays the "boot dropping" moment. As long as inflation doesn’t come down, the sword of high interest rates will keep hanging.
In short: short-term macro pressure eases, bulls have room to rebound; but the inflation ghost hasn’t disappeared, and the long-term tightening curse remains. Don’t mistake "slowing rate hikes" for "stopping rate hikes"—the strategy of selling into rallies still applies, so manage your positions carefully. ETH has once again fallen below 2400, and this time I side with "truly weak".
ETH is currently quoted at $2,407, with a 24-hour low hitting 2,393 (OKX spot real-time price).
The price is simultaneously below the 20-day moving average (2,561) and the 50-day moving average (2,553), leaving only the 200-day moving average (2,146) as support; the daily RSI is 35.4, already in the weak zone.
Meanwhile, BTC is still above 81,300, having only dropped 0.3% in 24 hours.
This year, ETH/BTC has fallen nearly 20%, with institutional money increasingly favoring BTC.
On October 17, the entire network saw $334 million liquidated in 24 hours, with long positions accounting for $223 million—basically, those chasing longs took the hit.
I think this drop in ETH is not just following the market down, but a structural lag.
However, the Bollinger lower band at 2,336 and the 30-day low at 2,317 are right below; shorting here has low cost-effectiveness.
No catching falling knives, no bottom fishing: only if it effectively breaks below 2,317 should we look further down toward 2,146.
If ETH recovers above 2,553, my "lagging behind" judgment becomes invalid.
For this round, do you see ETH as completely lagging behind, or as oversold with a rebound around 2,300? $BTC $ETH $SOL
#Ethereum #MarketAnalysis💡 Justin Sun's latest cards are laid out, and the signals are more glaring than they appear on the surface — he's cutting ETH not because ETH "is failing," but because the battlefield for offense has shifted.
$BTC 🛡️ It's not bullish, but "isolation": no reduction in holdings for a year, but simultaneously transferring BTC into new cold wallets that have never been signed. What he's truly defending against isn't volatility, but the potential impact of quantum computing on early wallet cryptography. The base position remains, but the stance is defense-first.
$ETH 🔄 The reduction is in "position size," not "belief": cutting 80-90% of the offensive position in the 3600–4000 range, leaving only 20% as a base position to observe, and has not yet bought back. Where did the money go? Into Nvidia + Nasdaq 100, holding a heavy base position in AI without moving. ETH is under short-term pressure, true, but more importantly, he proactively shifted risk exposure from crypto beta to the US stock AI narrative.
Macro factors pushed from behind 🔥: US September CPI at 3.7% and PPI at 6.3%, both exceeding expectations, with the year-end rate hike probability once approaching 90%. High interest rate environment suppresses valuations, and offensive assets take the brunt first; the timing of ETH position reduction is no coincidence.
In short: BTC holds the baseline, ETH yields the offensive position, and US stocks take over. Don't be scared into chasing blindly by the words "position reduction"; see clearly where the money is flowing 🧭.Currently, BTC is oscillating below a key resistance level, and directly going all-in on a high-risk trade has an unfavorable risk-reward ratio. As of October 18, 2026, BTC is priced around $81,351, with market sentiment in a "neutral" range. For investors looking to enter, a more reasonable approach is to wait for a confirmed breakout above the key resistance before entering on the right side, or to build positions gradually on the left side within the core support zone below, rather than blindly trading in the middle range.
Core conflict in the current market
At present, BTC is trapped between two key moving averages/cost lines, facing selling pressure above and support below:
· Strong resistance above: approximately $87,000 to $88,000. This is not only where the 20-month simple moving average (around $87,165) is located, but also coincides with the 2026 opening price ($87,490). Additionally, investors holding for 6 to 12 months have an average cost near $88,000, making the price near this area prone to triggering sell-offs to break even.
· Core support below: approximately $78,000 to $81,500. Glassnode data shows that the "real market average price" for active investors is about $78,000, while the average holding cost for the US spot Bitcoin ETF is around $81,500. Recently, the price has repeatedly fallen below $81,500 but has been pulled back each time, indicating buying support in this area.ETH空头逻辑拆解：流动性撤离比技术回调更致命
ETH从2807一路摔至2325，一位交易者在2509布局的空单已顺利止盈，目前正等待第二空单的合适入场点位。评论区里天天喊"牛回速归"的声音，这两天明显安静了。
下跌的根源不在技术面，而在流动性。现货ETF连续9个交易日失血，上周净流出5.42亿美元，创1月以来最大单周流出，贝莱德ETHA一家就占了大头——是机构在撤，不是散户在砸。与此同时，CPI、PPI连续超预期，年底加息概率被推至96%，降息预期基本落空。高利率环境压制下，高估值资产首当其冲。
这不是一次普通的技术回调，而是资金在系统性撤离。
该交易者的策略清晰：暂不开空，若ETH反弹至2450至2480区间则加仓，目标先看2380，跌破直接看2300。核心纪律是"不到点位不开单"，不手痒、不追单，把眼光放远——活下来才有资格谈吃肉。
行情确实没给多头留太多活路，但空头同样需要耐心。关键不在于嘴硬，而在于等价格走到自己预设的位置再动手。
本文仅为行情分析，不构成投资建议。
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ Explanation: The market conditions and data mentioned in the text are all recent publicly available market conditions and qualitative descriptions of public statistics at the time of writing. Please refer to the exchange and official releases for specific values. 1. This round of correction: Risk assets collectively "cool down" Recently, major global stock markets have experienced a relatively significant correction. According to recent public market data, the three major U.S. stock indices generally closed lower for the week, with the technology and semiconductor sectors leading the declines. AI-related stocks, which had previously seen substantial gains, experienced even more pronounced pullbacks; the Asia-Pacific markets were under pressure simultaneously, while European stock markets showed relative resilience. Meanwhile, the volatility index, regarded as a "fear gauge," rose to a recent high, and market breadth weakened significantly — the number of declining stocks far exceeded advancing stocks, a typical characteristic of risk-off trading. Changes in sentiment are more noteworthy than the index declines: the previously consistent expectation of "buying the dip" began to loosen, with funds withdrawing from high-valuation, high-leverage sectors and shifting toward cash, short-term debt, and some safe-haven assets. This "sell first, watch later" behavior often indicates the market is transitioning from trend trading to risk repricing. 2. Driving factors: Triple overlap rather than a single negative factor The first layer is macro data. Recent U.S. inflation readings exceeded market expectations, and producer prices also saw a monthly jump, challenging the narrative of "inflation easing." The data itself is not alarming; the key is that it changes expectations for the interest rate path. The second layer is interest rates and liquidity. Against the backdrop of sticky inflation, market pricing of the next moves by major central banks has fluctuated, with long-term government bond yields remaining near multi-year highs. Rising real interest rates directly compress high-valuation assets.This time, inflation is likely to be even harder to reduce! Brent crude oil touched $110 intraday yesterday and closed at $109.86, while WTI crude oil also climbed back above $100. There are several direct reasons for this rise. Saudi Arabia's energy transport route to the Red Sea's Yanbu port is threatened by missile attacks, and attacks near the Strait of Hormuz are also increasing. Meanwhile, Russian refineries have been attacked by drones again, further intensifying supply concerns. What is even more noteworthy is that the International Energy Agency has agreed to release an additional more than 20 million barrels of fuel, and the U.S. is also preparing to arrange up to 17 million barrels of crude oil swaps from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Previously, the U.S. CPI and PPI were already on the hot side, and now oil prices have risen to this level, which is obviously not good news for inflation. If high oil prices persist, the Federal Reserve will find it even harder to ease interest rates comfortably, while businesses will have to bear higher transportation and production costs.When discussing the logic behind Tesla's profit recovery, we cannot overlook the key variable of regulatory credit revenue. This source of income, which once provided significant support to Tesla's profit statement, has now shrunk considerably.
According to Tesla's 10-Q report for Q2 2026, its automotive regulatory credit revenue was only $146 million, a sharp year-on-year decline of 67%. The company also clearly indicated in the report that changes in regulatory policies may affect related projects and future revenue recognition. Although the Q3 delivery data performed well, this does not predict the future trend of regulatory credit revenue.
Therefore, I actually believe this provides a more solid and purer benchmark for the next financial report: to observe whether Tesla's core profitability in the automotive business can achieve organic growth without relying on credit revenue improvement.
By excluding regulatory credit revenue and then comparing gross margins, we can more clearly reflect the profitability changes of Tesla's car sales themselves. If the continuous reduction in costs and optimization of product structure can still drive overall profit growth despite weak credit revenue, then this kind of recovery is more valuable and more worth our anticipation. #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #Netflix growth may slow down, advertising business becomes a new highlight
Membership acquisition gradually peaks
Pure subscription-driven growth enters a slowdown phase
New growth curve bets on advertising business🔥
2026 advertising revenue target directly doubles to $3 billion
Advertising package monthly active users have exceeded 250 million
Continuously expanding overseas new markets, live sports content drives advertising sales
⚠️Shortcoming: advertising revenue proportion is still relatively low
Still in the early volume expansion stage, difficult to carry the load alone in the short term
Market highlights:
Mid-to-long-term focus is on advertising monetization space
Each quarter's advertising business realization data is a key point in capital competition
Advertising has cyclical attributes, watch out for advertiser budget contraction risks #Sony Earnings Preview: How Are the Gaming and Music Businesses Performing? Sony's FY2026 Q2 earnings preview before market open on November 5. PS5 hardware growth is weak; focus is on game software, digital revenue, and PS+ subscriptions. Music copyright business cash flow is stable, serving as a defensive foundation.
This quarter's market flexibility mainly depends on gaming segment data; if gaming falls short of expectations, the stock price will be under pressure; the music business mainly acts as a floor. ⚠️Personal opinion only, not investment advice. $DOGE Damn it! DOGE's order book is making my blood pressure spike. There's no movement outside, but the dogs are fiercely biting each other on the order book. The 0.0792 level is clearly being strongly supported by funds, the dog market makers have their sickles raised high 🔥
Looking at the candlesticks, it's obvious: volume doesn't match the price, a typical prelude to a shakeout. This kind of quiet strong pull-up is most likely a trap waiting for people to jump in.
My idea is simple: around 0.0792 you can lightly short, set stop loss above 0.0825, don't be greedy, only a break below 0.076 counts as a real breakout. Control your position size and always use stop loss.
If you want to secretly ambush with me, click the token market card below to check the order book yourself 👇👇👇
Content is only my personal review and does not constitute investment advice. #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins 老韭菜看$BASED 这单多单，赚的就是"砸过头"那一口。
0.04693开的多，现在0.05037，浮盈+146.60%。数字看着不错，但20倍杠杆下，多单最考验的不是开仓，是别坐过山车。
这波从高点砸下来，利空消息一个接一个，盘面却没跟着继续破位，低位反而有承接。典型的利空出尽，资金开始抄底。我就在0.04693跟了一笔多。
现在反抽到0.05037，收了根小阳线，上方有抛压，但反弹力度不算强，更像超跌后的喘息。
策略很简单：0.05站稳了继续拿，要是跌回0.047以下，先落袋。反抽行情不恋战，别把利润又坐回去。$ZEC $SOL convenience store at 3 a.m. But this spot is interesting — the 6.5M long liquidation record below acts like a magnet, with the price sticking close to it, either bouncing off or being pulled down.
Why am I bearish? One divergence is enough: the proportion of long positions in all market accounts is 64.3%, but active long trades only make up 47.9%. In plain terms — retail investors are holding longs, but real money is selling. Under this structure, rebounds are often "passive cover-ups,".$PONS I need to start considering reducing my position. The cost here at 0.34 is still acceptable, but the cost of the neighboring position at 0.5 is already making me a bit anxious, so I have to cut some of my holdings! Currently, $PONS still shows a downward trend with no signs of stopping the decline. Previously, I judged it might bottom at 0.25, but now I think it could even go down to 0.2! Last month, I could almost compete with $PUMP in income, but now it barely generates any income—it's like night and day, with expectations dropping by 99%! The worst case is a big bearish candle hitting soon, followed by several months of continued decline. The logic and fundamentals are indeed broken now. I suggest brothers who are stuck to get out first; we might not see the day it rises again!#SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 The core contradiction of the Q3 earnings report is not about "revenue exceeding expectations by several hundred million," but whether Starlink's cash flow can support the company's overall valuation during the ARPU decline cycle, and whether the progress of Starship's orbit insertion and deployment is enough for the market to start pricing in a "structural reduction in launch costs." EPS turning positive is an emotional catalyst, but the $10.8 billion single-quarter cash burn and $19.3 billion capital expenditure plan mean that SpaceX is still some distance from self-sustaining. The "quality" of profitability rather than its mere "existence" is the key to whether valuation divergences can converge after this earnings report.#NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins
This is the swing factor. Netflix is guiding ~$3B ad revenue in 2026, roughly double 2025's >$1.5B. S&P Global estimated Q2 ads at $618M, up almost 80% YoY. US Upfront commitments nearly doubled.Yan Yan will clarify it for you
The storage sector as a whole weakened in October for two reasons: first, the market worries about intensified competition in China; second, high-valuation stocks are under interest rate pressure, so funds are reluctant to stay long
But the key point is at the end of the month—SanDisk will announce next quarter's results on the 29th, which is likely to be the most important catalyst recently.A spoonful of a full stock acquisition stew is served, 0.7 shares of SpaceX for 1 share of Tesla. At first glance, this ratio looks like pouring a whole bottle of soy sauce into a small stir-fry pan, with the saltiness entirely controlled by Musk alone! He holds about 37% of the equity and 56% of the voting rights; the stove's heat and seasoning are all decided by his hands. The so-called "synergy" signature dishes of AI, robotics, energy, and space currently don't even have a prep list. The board hasn't convened, regulators haven't checked in, and the timeline and deal terms are all drafts on the kitchen blackboard—beautifully drawn, but the ingredients haven't been stocked yet.
My professional intuition is: this dish is still a "planned plating," not "freshly served." From June to December, even before the annual shareholders' meeting on December 6, it might just be the chef teasing the appetite. Real valuations, minority shareholder rights, and regulatory reviews are three strict heat controls—too hot and it burns, too low and it's undercooked. If any one fails, the whole dish must be redone.
Dear diners, remember: mainstream assets are the main course, filling and stabilizing the table; altcoins are the seasoning, too much ruins the flavor; leveraged contracts are the extra spicy chili, a slice or two perks you up, but throwing the whole bunch in will burn your intestines. This "buy one, get zero point seven" merger fantasy is like using chili oil as broth—smells pungent, but deadly to drink. Wait until the kitchen actually stocks ingredients and starts cutting before discussing the taste.
So my judgment is: this dish is still on the back of the menu, listing visions and tasting risks. #spacextesladealscenario October 28 (Federal Reserve meeting): The market prices in about a 71.8% probability of maintaining the current interest rate, with only about a 15% chance of a rate hike. However, the acceleration of the September CPI and the PPI year-on-year increase of 6.3%, the largest since 2022, make an "early action" in October an unavoidable tail risk. Bank of America is the only major brokerage predicting a rate hike in October. November U.S. midterm elections: Rate hikes have already suppressed employment, and after September's nonfarm payrolls fell significantly short of expectations, the probability of a rate hike in October sharply dropped. Political pressure from the elections and inflation constraints create a tug of war, but historical experience shows that the Federal Reserve tends to implement previously politically delayed policy moves between the election and the new Congress's inauguration. December 8-9 (Federal Reserve meeting): This is currently the market's strongest consensus for a rate hike, with CME pricing the probability as high as 89.5%. Among 13 major brokerages, 12 bet on a 25 basis point hike in December to 4.00%-4.25%. December European Central Bank and Bank of Japan: The ECB deposit rate is expected to rise to 2.75%, with nearly 90% of economists betting on a rate hike in December; the Bank of Japan raised rates to 1.25% in September, and the probability of another hike before year-end approaches 90%, with the policy rate expected to rise to 1.5%. Franklin Templeton clearly expects the three major central banks in the U.S., Europe, and Japan to each raise rates by 25 basis points in December. The hidden variable throughout — data vacuum: The U.S. government shutdown has caused October CPI and employment data to "possibly never be released." The Federal Reserve's decision in December mayWeekend liquidity is as thin as a convenience store at 3 a.m. But this spot is interesting — the 6.5M long liquidation record below acts like a magnet, with the price sticking close to it, either bouncing off or being pulled down.
Why am I bearish? One divergence is enough: the proportion of long positions in all market accounts is 64.3%, but active long trades only make up 47.9%. In plain terms — retail investors are holding longs, but real money is selling. Under this structure, rebounds are often "passive cover-ups," not trend reversals. Adding to that, in the past 24 hours, BTC short liquidations reached 5.44 million, meaning short-term bears have been cleared out, making the upside lighter. On the macro side, CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, raising rate hike expectations, weighing down risk assets like a stone.
My personal take: this is not a bottom-fishing spot, but a "wait for it to bounce then short" spot. The short-term resistance is at 82,600; as long as the rebound there lacks volume, I will gradually enter shorts with stop loss at 80,800–80,800, next target 79,800.$BTC
Bearish bias, but no chasing shorts; wait for rebound, short resistance. $BTC
One last question: do you think 81,400 is an "iron bottom" or a "paper bottom"? Comment "iron" or "paper" below, and I'll check the answer around this time tomorrow morning. #特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ #纳指100周跌5.5%，芯片股八连跌 📈 流动性窗口开启：BTC死守8万，ETH仍偏弱
1️⃣ 宏观与黄金：美9月CPI、PPI双双反弹，通胀韧性再引关注；但沃什在IMF年会上弱化前瞻指引，市场把10月加息概率压到29%。DXY回落至101.65，美债收益率同步走低，风险资产获得短暂喘息。黄金在4177美元附近高位拉锯，避险与紧缩预期互相牵制。🌍
2️⃣ 大饼（$BTC ）：8万关口先破后立，V型反弹回到82100。链上新晋巨鲸（UTXO<155天）已实现市值升至786亿美元，占比33.06%，筹码集中度抬升。ETF资金在7.7万均值附近完成换手，8万成短线强支撑，上方8.4万—8.5万压力密集。🐋
3️⃣ 二饼（$ETH ）与山寨：ETH现货ETF仍净流出，ETH/BTC跌至0.0297，约2440美元，资金虹吸下走势偏弱。存量博弈里山寨季尚未到来，别盲目追高；可关注SEC破局线索（如INJ）及PayFi/RWA等高Alpha叙事。⚠️#特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ The monitor is still beeping, but the real lesion is not in the subscription curve; it lies in whether the newly built collateral vessel of ad revenue can sustain the 33.2% perfusion pressure. Netflix’s Q3 preoperative assessment is very clear: revenue about $12.86 billion, year-over-year growth about 12%, operating margin 33.2%, compared to 28.2% in the same period last year. This is not simply a “better complexion,” but myocardial perfusion rising from 28.2% to 33.2%, which is equivalent to rebalancing stroke volume and oxygen supply without reducing cardiac load. Subscriptions are the main coronary artery; advertising is the collateral circulation. The main coronary artery determines the baseline blood flow, while the collateral circulation determines whether the ischemic border zone can survive. When the advertising layer was just built, two things were most feared: first, inventory expansion like postoperative bleeding, with stable vital signs on the surface but continuous blood loss in the surgical field; second, content costs like inflammation after extracorporeal circulation, delayed and diffuse, eventually swallowing the slight improvement in profit margin.
$xDELL and similar US stock token targets, in my view, are more like peripheral oxygen saturation: quick to respond, noisy, obviously influenced by sympathetic nervous system emotions, can indicate distal perfusion changes but cannot replace central venous pressure. Price linkage is just a waveform on the monitor, not the cardiac output itself. To judge whether Netflix can continue to grow, one must look at subscription retention, ad fill rate, ad revenue per user, and content amortization moving in the same direction; to judge whether profitability can continue to improve, one must see if the 33.2% is sinus rhythm or a transient rhythm after defibrillation. If the 12% revenue growth relies on low-price ad volume, it is like using vasodilators to artificially support blood pressure, possibly worsening microcirculation; if subscription price increases and ad monetization are synchronized, it is like a patent bypass graft with unobstructed bridge vessels, truly restoring blood flow to distal myocardium.
The most dangerous misjudgment is to equate “margin improvement” directly with “cardiac recovery.” Early postoperative hidden bleeding and low cardiac output are most feared; the market most fears mistaking ad growth for unconditional collateral circulation. If this collateral circulation of advertising cannot sustain perfusion pressure, the beautiful 33.2% figure is only intraoperative rhythm, not a discharge criterion. #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins 🔥$FIL Major news: The PL team's 6-year token release will officially end in mid-October. The annual new tokens entering the market will decrease by about 75% (not a reduction in total supply), the biggest selling pressure phase has passed.
Additional note: Team release ending ≠ no new tokens; miner mining rewards are still distributed daily.
FIL is the leader in decentralized storage, once extremely popular, with a huge drop from its historical high.
Long-term bullish position, target seen at $2, stop loss set at $0.6.
Bullish logic: Premise is steady growth in enterprise storage business. AI requires massive cold data archiving, FIL's storage orders are slowly increasing; new token selling pressure has significantly decreased, current price is at the bottom range.
Risk control: If it effectively breaks below $0.6, it means the market is not optimistic about storage business development, the long-term bullish idea fails, exit immediately.
Simply put: betting on the AI storage sector opportunity + reduced token supply, slowly build a small position.
⚠️ Risk reminder: Personal trading idea only, not investment advice, crypto assets are highly volatile, strictly control position size. #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 大饼市占率又爬回60%，山寨这日子是真没法过了！
这波盘面有个特别扎眼的细节：大饼砸下去能立马被人捞回来，一堆山寨跌下去就趴那儿，连个接盘的都没有。
现在BTC市占率稳在60%附近，等于整个加密市场每100块市值，差不多60块都堆在比特币身上。
钱全往龙头挤，像$TRUTH 这种前期被炒过一波的小币，跌下去就再没人接，我在0.02279 开的10倍空，现在标记价0.019078，浮盈+162.87%。市占率越高资金越挤龙头，龙头一旦短线见顶，被抽血的山寨跌得更狠。
结论很直白：短线资金还是围着BTC转，山寨一时半会儿别想集体翻身。
一堆散户还在喊山寨季，但盘面说了算——强的还是大饼。大饼涨，山寨跟不上；大饼一回头，山寨跌得更狠。
钱都往龙头跑，既说明市场认大饼的强势，也意味着大饼一旦短线回调，前期涨多的小币就是资金撤离的重灾区。$ZEC $SOL #Anthropic拟融资600亿美元，IPO迎考验 #MSCI新规冲击财库股，Strategy公开反对 The blueprints haven't even dried yet, and the load-bearing walls are already starting to crack. The Nasdaq 100 dropped 5.5% in a single week, marking the worst structural settlement since April 2025; the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index has fallen for eight consecutive sessions, bleeding a total of 15.7%. This isn't just ordinary facade peeling—it's the foundation piles of the entire tech stock building continuously shifting. I've seen too many scenes like this on construction sites—the exterior looks polished, but stress test data never lies.
What really alarms me is the relative resilience of the S&P 500 equal-weight ETF. What does this indicate? It means the selling pressure is highly concentrated on a few main load-bearing pillars of tech giants, rather than the entire market's foundation sinking evenly. This asymmetric stress distribution is precisely the most dangerous—once a main pillar destabilizes, the chain collapse happens far faster than in a dispersed structure. The Korean market dropped 7.57% that day and then rebounded, but foreign capital is still withdrawing. It's like the owner is patching cracks while quietly moving assets out; no matter how fast the repairs, they can't stop the capital flight.
Looking at the fundamental signals: U.S. inflation data is hot, AI financing costs are rising, yet return expectations are questionable. Even if TSMC's performance shines, it's only a single wafer meeting quality standards and can't change the fact that the concrete mix of the entire building is unbalanced. Financing costs are the rebar, return expectations are the floor load; as one rises and the other falls, the safety margin is squeezed from both sides. The linkage of U.S. stock token assets like $xORCL essentially serves as settlement monitoring for the same building—the on-chain price and off-chain valuation share the same foundation. If the chip stock pile softens, all derivative structures hanging above must be recalculated.
My biggest concern now is: can the chip stock pile hold steady? Can the upcoming tech earnings reports support both profit and valuation expectations? From a structural engineer's perspective, the answer is—short-term, earnings reports can paint over the facade, but stress release in the foundation takes time. Eight consecutive drops are not noise; they are cumulative signals of structural fatigue.
Once foundational settlement begins, no matter how lavish the upper structure's decoration, it only delays the collapse timetable. #nasdaq100weeklydrop5.5%雷达回波图上那道红得发紫的强对流核心——布伦特原油，昨夜直接顶到110美元/桶，收在109.86，单日拉升3.7%，这是自五月以来气压最高的一次锋面过境。而这次过境的触发点不在海湾上空，在朱拜勒港外：一艘油轮被不明飞行物击中，船员安全撤离，但航道乱流信号至今没有消散。
先看底层环流。霍尔木兹那道"海峡狭窄涡管"的周度流量，已较冲突前骤降约43%——这不是普通的风切变，这是水汽输送通道被实质性掐断。海峡本身就像一条地形逼仄的峡谷风道，一旦涡度异常维持，油价这张气压梯度表就会持续拉大，回波强度不会自己衰减。
而储备释放，本质上是人工增雨作业。美国计划从战略库存中弹射最高1700万桶，短期确实能让局地雨量回落、压制一下怒发冲冠的锋面。但增雨弹打的是云底水汽，补不了上游大气环流被截断的那块缺口；替代出口路线好比绕流，路径更长、输送更慢，等它们调整好风场，行情可能已经完成下一轮爬坡。
风险周期一旦进入上升通道，不是单一因素能扭转的——它需要连续三个时次的实况观测来确认系统移出。现在的问题是，航道会不会继续被击穿？局地会不会出现新的对流触发点？这些问题没有闭环之前，110不是终点站，只是气压梯度拉满的一个红色预警。
再看下游联动：美股Token标的$xQQQ的环流响应，属于典型的"平流层向下游传导"。能源成本是消费与利润的底边界，油价高企就像地表温度持续偏高，早晚要把热力传导进成长股的低层大气——风偏一旦转向，指数回波就会开始发散。
我的职业判定很干脆：本轮系统的核心扰动源在海上航道，不在库存表上；只要海峡流量这根气压曲线不回升，任何一次储备释放都只是把人影作业打出来的降水当成晴天，云团还在后头。 #brenttouches$110孙宇晨减持ETH的消息还没消化完，2400又岌岌可危！
这波反弹，到底是谁在接盘？
兄弟们，别光盯着那几根反弹阳线了！
$ETH 前面冲高到2492.97，转头就砸到2391.72，反弹到2430多又掉头向下。
看起来像要反转，结果连前面的压力位都没能收复，多头想翻身，恐怕没那么容易！
看15分钟K线，现价约2406，价格重新走弱，短线反弹力度不足。
现在重点不是猜底，而是看2400和2391能不能守住。
如果支撑失守，价格可能继续向下寻找支撑。
我的2689.29空单还在持有，收益率104.98%。
接下来我会重点观察2400附近的争夺，不盲目追空。
操作上，跌破2391后观察反抽能否站回。
反弹到2420—2435若再次受阻，再考虑空单机会。
若价格重新站稳2435上方，就要重新评估看空逻辑。
兄弟们，这次ETH究竟会跌破2391，还是在2400附近止跌反弹？
$BTC
$ZEC
#特斯拉发布新一代Roadster，行情走高 #NetflixQ3AdsAndMargins
It's not easy to compete with several huge companies that have all decided to prioritize their own streaming libraries, don't need to make a lot of dollars from those libraries, and have budgets that far exceed $NFLX. $ETH 上方悬着5.46亿空头“地雷”，谁在给谁挖坑？
过去24小时全网爆仓3.33亿，多单占2.22亿，满屏“多头被屠杀”。但清算热力图直接打脸：ETH上方两个空头清算簇合计5.46亿，下方多头仅1.87亿——上方火药量近三倍。
$BTC 跌破8.1万、ETH失守2400，导火索是布油冲110美元、核心CPI 2.6%超预期、加息押注升温、流动性抽离。ETF昨日净流出8241万，贝莱德IBIT跑7180万，但10月13日同批基金还净流入1.757亿——单日单产品流出，谈不上系统性撤退。恐慌贪婪指数25，极度恐慌。
关键信号在结构里：ETH未平仓从200亿缩到150亿，杠杆已洗过一轮；BTC 81000三次回踩守住。市场一边倒定价“多单爆完还要跌”，但数据说的是另一回事——多单在减，空头在加。
交易员别只盯8万破不破，看ETH 2500–2510：一旦站上，上方空头清算簇被触发，逼空脉冲会比下跌快得多。
说到底，空头以为自己在追趋势，其实正蹲在火药桶上划火柴——下一根针，搞不好就是从下往上扎的。
#美国CPI与PPI双超预期，年内能否再加息？ What fell was not the price, but the buy orders that withdrew first
$ETH dropped from 2807 to 2420.
At the same time, the spot ETF has had net outflows for nine consecutive trading days.
The rule states:
ETF funds are subscribed and redeemed by authorized institutions.
The redeemed shares must be sold, and the sell orders directly hit the spot market.
At the moment this is triggered:
The number of validators exiting the queue rose from 166,000 to 851,000.
More $ETH are lining up to exit, but the number of takers hasn't increased.
Looking further down, the rebound above 2450 likely still has sell orders waiting there.
#VanEck stops pushing Lido staked Ethereum ETF
#$ETH #TSMCQ3RecordProfit