Orbit Post Sitemap
#奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 $12.86 billion, +12% year-over-year; +11% on a constant currency basis, market consensus: about $13 billion, market expectations are higher than the company's own guidance, with a slight risk of missing expectations. Company guidance: 33.2% (28.2% in the same period last year), the biggest highlight of this quarter; the company indicates Q2 is the peak growth period for 2026 content amortization, with content cost growth slowing in the second half of the year, supporting profit margins to remain high. Capital return: remaining $27.1 billion buyback quota, the market will pay attention to the buyback execution strength this quarter...#Netflix growth may slow, advertising business becomes new focus Among the 50 perpetual contracts in the entire market, only 12 have shorts paying fees.
ATOM ranks first, with -0.0204% every 8 hours.
Annualized -22%, meaning shorts pay two-tenths of their principal in a year.
The fee is settled every 8 hours.
A negative value means shorts pay longs; the platform takes no cut.
This money just moves between the two sides.
What’s interesting is the price.
ATOM dropped 17.34% over the past 7 trading days and is rebounding today.
Shorts paid fees but the price didn’t reward them.
With the same negative fee rate, STRK is different.
Its fee rate is -0.0158%, and it dropped 48.5% over these 7 trading days.
Shorts paid fees and also profited.
JUP’s fee rate is -0.0183%, it dropped 26.13% in 7 days, and rose 4% today.
Like ATOM, shorts paid fees but didn’t profit.
So the fee rate is not a directional signal.
It only tells you which side has more people.
When there are more shorts, the price doesn’t necessarily fall.
But shorts have to pay fees, so their holding cost increases day by day.
I think the real signal is not the fee rate itself.
It’s what the price is doing on the day the fee rate turns negative.
If the fee rate turns negative and the price is still rising, it means shorts are adding positions against the trend.
These positions are the most fragile because they lose both time and price.
$ATOM
#FundingRate#HBM4 mass production can it drive SK Hynix's profits to new highs? *HBM4 mass production is positive, but the key to "new highs" is not in HBM4 itself, but in the price cycle of general DRAM.**
1. **HBM4 has strong short-term certainty.** AI server demand is strong, SK Hynix has a first-mover and market share advantage in HBM, Q3 performance is very likely to continue high growth, new highs are not surprising.
2. **The market looks at "exceeding expectations," not just "new highs."** The view from "JinSe Finance" in the screenshot makes sense: stock price and P/B already reflect a lot of expectations, if the October 28 earnings report only meets expectations, the stock price may not rise, and might even "sell the news."
3. **Cycle risks cannot be ignored.** If prices of general DRAM and NAND fall, combined with Samsung and Micron's capacity expansions and competition, HBM profits alone may not sustain overall profitability.
4. **The delay in backend equipment orders is a signal.** It indicates that the expansion pace may be cautious, which is positive for supply (beneficial to prices), but a disturbance to industry chain expectations, needing confirmation in the earnings call.
**Key points to watch in the earnings report:** HBM4 shipment share and yield, HBM pricing situation in 2027 (price and share), capital expenditure guidance, and management's judgment on general DRAM prices.
Summary: **High probability of profit reaching new highs, but stock price reaction depends on guidance and expectation gaps.**High win rate does not equal survival: Why two large accounts went to zero
Seeing two large capital accounts both liquidated, the win rate was actually shockingly high, but the maximum drawdown was close to 100%.
The problem is not the win rate, but adding positions against the trend with martingale during losses. The position size keeps increasing, risk is unlimited, and a single trend can wipe out the profits of dozens of previous trades.
Essentially, it’s refusing to admit mistakes, wanting every trade to be profitable, unwilling to accept account-level stop loss, causing the hole to only get bigger and bigger.
A reminder to myself: Stop loss is a cost, not a failure. Don’t blindly add positions. Surviving longer is more important than having a high win rate. $BTCThe weekend crash was such a mess, yet the bulls are still crazily adding positions. Are they really treating the DOGE whales like charity cases?
$DOGE is currently priced at 0.0778, with a long-short ratio stubbornly hitting 3.66! Open interest is still rising, indicating that retail investors haven't fled despite the drop and are frantically bottom-fishing. But the daily chart keeps sliding down relentlessly. The bulls are holding on hard, but if it slips just below 0.075, a chain liquidation will be absolutely brutal.
Looking at $PEPE, currently at 0.000003839, the long-short ratio is also absurdly high at 3.16. Funding rates occasionally turn negative, meaning retail investors are not only trapped but also paying to beg the whales not to dump. The buying momentum is weak and entirely propped up by faith.
The wildest is $DNA, priced at 0.2615. I just checked the historical funding rate trend and thought it was negative, but after verifying the real-time order book, the current funding rate is actually positive at 0.0050%, though the basis remains negative. Open interest has surged, indicating bulls are paying shorts to hold on! Plus, the long-short ratio data is currently unavailable (highly controlled), so entering this blind box setup is just being cannon fodder.
My logic is simple: these are all bull traps. Retail investors are extremely crowded, and the whales are washing out positions accordingly. Catching a falling knife now is pure charity. My current stance is to hold fire, keep my bullets ready, and wait for this wave of high-leverage chips to be completely washed out and for market data to return to a healthy structure before considering entry.
#US CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, will there be another rate hike within the year? BTC在周末涨了0.43%，但这一周整体还是跌了2.63%。为什么周末的涨跌通常不能当真？ 先说新闻。周末的几个数字：BTC报81,696美元，24小时 +0.43%、近一周 -2.63%，20日区间79,775.1到87,238.3；美元指数101.84（-0.16%）；黄金4,181.1（+0.26%，现货4,166.10）；恐惧贪婪指数从55回落到53。需要说明的是：ETF在周末不进行申购赎回，最新单日数据仍是交易日（+1,630万），5日累计净流出3.241亿、10日净流出7.233亿；标普500的7,659.44（-1.09%）也是上一交易日收盘值。 再看资金影响。周末的定价有三个特点：第一，流动性低——同样的买卖盘会带来更大的价格波动；第二，缺少资金数据的验证——ETF、机构申赎都不更新；第三，参与者结构不同——做市商和机构大多休息，价格更容易被短线资金推动。所以周末的涨跌，信噪比最低，适合用来观察情绪，不适合用来判断趋势。 对BTC的含义：真正有信息量的信号通常出现在工作日的资金数据里——ETF净流入与流出、CME持仓、稳定币增发。周末的价格如果和工作日的资金数据方向一致The US stock market is still closed, but perpetual contracts related to chip stocks have already undergone a round of concentrated liquidation. According to CoinDesk citing CoinGlass data, about $51.6 million worth of positions were forcibly liquidated in Singapore between 05:22 and 05:32 on October 18.
This figure represents the scale of liquidated positions and does not equate to the evaporation of stock market value. The contracts traded track stock prices, and the spot market did not have synchronized transactions at that time to verify prices.
My judgment is that this round of volatility first exposed the pricing challenges of all-weather trading. Leveraged positions being forced to close will continue to affect contract prices; directly using these prices to predict Monday's chip stocks risks including liquidation pressure in company valuations.
When stocks resume trading, whether the price gap between contracts and spot can converge will help discern how much new pricing information this volatility contains. Trading hours have been extended, but price references have not necessarily been extended synchronously. #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 # Netflix Growth May Slow, Advertising Business Becomes New Focus
**Netflix Q3 Preview: 72% Will Beat Expectations, But Don't Rush to Bet Yes**
Earnings release after market close on October 20. The market has already priced in a 72¢ chance of a Yes, and beating expectations is indeed highly likely: Q3 guidance of $12.86 billion (+12%) is conservative, consensus has been revised down to $12.88 billion, almost on target, and Netflix has a history of "low guidance, over-delivery."
But beat ≠ stock rise: the stock has dropped 43% from its high, bad news is mostly priced in, and in Q2 it still fell despite "EPS beating expectations, revenue missing." The real game-changer is Q4 guidance and advertising fulfillment — ad monthly active users surpassing 250 million, this year's revenue target doubling to $3 billion, with $750 million per quarter as the passing line.
In terms of trading: $65 is the lifeline, only holding above $80 counts as recovery; 72¢ odds are average, be cautious chasing highs.
(Not investment advice)🔥 BTC stands above 82,500, but leveraged longs are still "paying to work"!
BTC current price is 82,522, up slightly 1.66% in 24h, and the 4-hour chart is above MA5/10/20, seemingly in a "weak recovery." However, derivatives data reveals a painful detail: futures open interest has dropped to $7.68 billion, and the funding rate remains positive (0.0035% every 8 hours), meaning longs are paying shorts to hold positions — the price hasn't risen much, but leveraged longs are continuously "bleeding."
The funding situation is more realistic: BTC spot ETFs have seen net outflows for two consecutive weeks, with another $228 million outflow last week; Galaxy Research head bluntly states that ETF net outflows combined with Treasury's weak coin purchases are the main reasons for price pressure in October.
What are the whales doing? Two long orders over $100 million: one $97.87 million 40x long liquidated at 79,828, just 1.5% below current price; another $110 million long stop loss at 80,500 was nearly triggered, with a risky liquidation loss of $3.26 million at dawn before switching to US stocks. Meanwhile, an ancient whale dormant for 12-13 years moved 416 BTC. $BTC
Ordinary people shouldn't rush to chase this "recovery." The first dense resistance is at 82,500-82,800 above, and the short-term defense zone is 80,700-81,100 below. Leveraged longs are paying, ETFs are retreating, who are you taking over from if you enter? Did you make a move today? Let's discuss in the comments👇#奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 What is the hardest asset in the world? It's Bitcoin.
Last Friday, despite the Nasdaq plunging 2.5% and the VIX soaring up to 40%, Bitcoin completely refused to drop. This is a typical bull market behavior, showing immunity to negative news.
Looking at last week's active sell volume, Binance, OKX, and Coinbase collectively sold 12,450 Bitcoins actively. This figure is relatively low and normal for August and September. In other words, despite the Nasdaq's sharp decline and the global asset sell-off, Bitcoin did not experience a large-scale panic sell-off. Holders showed considerable composure and patience.
Although the spot VD (active net buy difference) showed a net sell of 65.92 million, it remains at a relatively low level. Net inflows appeared on Saturday and Sunday. Everything is moving in a positive direction 【ZEC升级要动老隐私池了：两万多枚币，可能再也花不出去】
Zcash 的 NU7 升级有个容易被忽略的代价：Sprout 老隐私池里的$ZEC ，升级后可能永久无法支出。原因是提案拟禁用旧版 v4 交易，而 Sprout 只能靠它转账。社区资料显示，池内还剩约 2.2 万枚 ZEC，规模不算大，但对这一部分持币人的影响却很大。
这不是销毁代币，也不是所有 ZEC 都被冻结，矛头只对准 Sprout。开发者的理由是它早已被新隐私池取代，继续维护会增加协议复杂度和安全负担。
争议就在这里：网络想减负，少数持币者却可能付出永久失去支配权的代价。对 ZEC 价格而言，单看这点数量，对ZEC的影响也有限，后续值得看的是升级治理和隐私资产的信任成本。
如果 10 月 20 日开发团队确认按计划推进，11 月 5 日主网上线目标就更明确了。眼下最该关注的是升级是否如期落地，以及剩余资金能否及时迁出。ZEC 的短线涨跌，还得看实际买卖盘，不能光靠这条消息下注。Company guidance: $12.86 billion, up 12% year-over-year; currency-neutral basis up 11%. Market consensus: about $13 billion, market expectations are higher than the company's own guidance, with a slight risk of underperformance. Company guidance: 33.2% (28.2% in the same period last year), the biggest highlight of this quarter; the company indicates Q2 is the peak growth period for 2026 content amortization, with content cost growth slowing in the second half of the year, supporting profit margins to remain high. Capital return: remaining $27.1 billion buyback quota, the market will focus on the execution strength of buybacks this quarter; no large capital expenditures, cash flow quality overall stronger than heavy asset companies like Tesla #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 #Institutional funds weaken, who will see the first inflow, BTC or ETH?
Currently, the BTC market looks okay but is actually quite precarious. Over the weekend, Bitcoin briefly dropped to $80,694, then barely climbed back near 82,000; Ethereum was even more volatile on the evening of the 18th, plunging 1.1% in 15 minutes, falling from 2360 to 2332, with the 2400 level briefly breached. The technical outlook is also not good: Bitcoin's daily moving averages are still trending down, the weekly candle closed bearish, indicating short-term bearishness. Next, let's see if supports at 79,500 and 76,500 hold, while bears are defending around 83,500.
Market sentiment is also fragile. The Nasdaq dropped 2.1% the previous day, Middle East tensions pushed oil prices close to $110 per barrel, everyone is already in risk-off mode, and funds are still flowing out of crypto, combining multiple pressures.
Bitcoin is barely holding above 80,000, but ETF money keeps flowing out, Strategy's coin purchases have clearly slowed, and altcoins are falling harder, indicating weakening institutional buying power. Regulatory big bills are stuck, but the SEC and CFTC are still acting independently, and medium to long-term regulations have not stopped. The biggest short-term pressure is the chain of “high inflation → fear of rate hikes → risk assets under pressure,” with the FOMC meeting on October 28 as the next key event.
$BTC $ETH $SOL The decline of $PONS is like boiling a frog slowly, while the daily revenue scale of $PUMP is 30 times that of pons!
Let's first look at the latest data; the gap between the two is already very obvious.
$PONS: Fundamentals and price are weakening in sync. The price has dropped from a high of $0.90 to $0.26, a retracement of about 71%;
Daily protocol revenue is only about $36,000!!
Robinhood Chain's DEX trading volume yesterday was about $775 million, ranking fourth across the entire chain, but PONS's own trading volume was only about $32.7 million, basically flat compared to the previous day.
More critically, the buyback wallet has only about $430,000 of funds left to use; about 500,000 tokens were burned yesterday, bringing the cumulative burn ratio up to 32.59%. If revenue fails to recover soon, the buyback intensity may continue to decline.
$PUMP: Buyback firepower is stronger. As of October 16, PUMP's single-day buyback burn was about $979,200, burning about 212.7 million tokens;
Currently, the circulating supply is about 399.5 billion tokens, with a total supply of 1 trillion tokens. Although the price has retreated from recent highs, the protocol is still continuously investing real money in buybacks.
I think the risk for PONS is the combination of declining revenue and limited buyback fund pool; the advantage of PUMP is its larger buyback scale and sustainability, which is more worth observing. #奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点
Key Financial Expectations
1. Revenue
- Company guidance: $12.86 billion, +12% year-over-year; +11% on a currency-neutral basis
- Market consensus: about $13 billion, market expectations are higher than the company's own guidance, with a slight risk of underperformance
2. GAAP EPS
- Company guidance: $0.82 (net profit $3.45 billion)
- Analyst consensus: $0.84, with little divergence
3. Operating Margin
- Company guidance: 33.2% (28.2% in the same period last year), the biggest highlight this quarter; the company indicates Q2 is the peak growth period for content amortization until 2026, with content cost growth slowing in the second half of the year, supporting margin maintenance at a high level
4. Capital Return: Remaining $27.1 billion buyback quota, the market will focus on the execution strength of buybacks this quarter; no large capital expenditures, overall cash flow quality is stronger than heavy-asset companies like TeslaPrivate messages exploded, everyone is asking Pharaoh, Charles Schwab opens BTC transfers, Deutsche Bank is also going to do custody, these two traditional giants are acting together, is Bitcoin about to take off directly? Pharaoh directly said, not quite take off, but the "compliance expressway" has indeed been expanded by two more lanes. Let's first see what these two have done. Charles Schwab officially opens Bitcoin and Ethereum transfer functions to U.S. clients, allowing clients to freely transfer assets between Schwab accounts and external wallets or other exchanges, truly realizing "self-custody of private keys." Previously, Schwab only supported buying and selling crypto assets within the platform, without the ability to transfer out. Schwab manages over $11 trillion in client assets; opening this function is equivalent to building a "channel from traditional accounts to the on-chain world" for clients. Deutsche Bank's head of corporate banking confirmed plans to launch crypto asset custody services in 2026, initially covering Bitcoin and Ethereum, targeting 1,600 institutional clients. The technology partner is Bitpanda, just waiting for the EU MiCA license process to complete. What does this mean for Bitcoin? In the short term, it's a sentiment boost, not an engine. Schwab opening transfers lets clients freely withdraw assets, reducing concerns about "exchange runaways," but it won't bring large-scale incremental buying in the short term. Deutsche Bank custody won't launch until 2026, so there's still waiting. Bitcoin is currently stuck around 80,000, with short-term support at 79,800 and resistance at 82,000. In the long term, it strengthens the underlying foundation. Schwab has unlocked the "withdrawal" link, Deutsche Bank solves the "storage" issue.The post from Friday was pretty much on point
At that time, it was said "$BTC won't break 80,000, it will slowly climb over the weekend, BTC will hold steady at 82,000, $ETH has a chance to reach 2,500." Looking at today, BTC indeed stabilized around 82,000, but Ethereum is still some way off 2,500
Ethereum is definitely much weaker than BTC in this wave
The ETH/BTC rate is hovering at a low 0.0347, and the price is still below MA200 (2483) and EMA200 (2495)
Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of $320 million last week, while Bitcoin ETFs had an outflow of $228 million; the redemption pressure on Ethereum is even heavier than on BTC
But when weakness reaches a certain point, it actually gives a reason for a catch-up rally
ETH/BTC rate is stuck at a low level, and short positions on Ethereum are also accumulating
If BTC can hold steady above 82,000 without falling, Ethereum's catch-up rally often comes suddenly when "everyone thinks it’s not going to make it"
BTC first sets the stage and stabilizes, then we see if Ethereum follows
The current macroeconomic situation is not ideal, and various issues remain unresolved, so we can't look too high
#BTC ETH $OP
Layer-2 competition is becoming increasingly important for Ethereum's future. Optimism's ecosystem strategy should be evaluated through developer retention, application activity, and the ability of participating chains to attract real users. More chains do not automatically mean stronger token demand. Sustainable growth requires useful applications, competitive transaction costs, and an economic model that creates lasting value beyond ecosystem expansion.[UNITREE rose 11%, shorts paying fees, largest long position still underwater]
$UNITREE rose about 10.94% in 24 hours, but the funding rate has sharply turned negative for two consecutive rounds, totaling about −0.21%. This means shorts are paying longs, indicating the short side is more crowded. But don’t rush to call a short squeeze: a negative funding rate only shows an imbalance between longs and shorts in the contract, it doesn’t prove how strong the spot buying is.
The largest long still holds about $6.29 million in position, with an average price of $89.46, currently at an unrealized loss of about $1.72 million. The current price is about $69.8, nearly 22% away from breakeven. This large position cannot be taken as evidence that the whale will definitely push the price up.
The Physical AI conference provides a short-term speculation window, but UNITREE perpetual contracts are not the same as real stocks; the price is also affected by oracles and contract supply and demand. I will focus on whether the negative funding rate can persist, whether the price can recover the oracle discount, and whether trading volume keeps up during the rebound. If the price continues to rise and shorts keep paying fees, the short squeeze may continue; if the funding rate turns positive and the price weakens again, this rebound may just be a position game.After a sharp drop in the semiconductor sector, has there been a technical oversold rebound in the night session?
In this rebound, computing power, optical communication, and storage stocks are all rising, but this is more of an emotional recovery from the previous continuous decline and does not mean the overall trend has completely reversed.
This is actually a very typical oversold rebound in the data center industry chain. Instead of just looking at how much Nvidia $NVDA has risen, you can pay attention to the optical communication leaders $AAOI and $LUMN, as well as the storage giants $SKHY and Micron $MU following the rise.
The bottleneck of AI hardware has never been just the computing power chips themselves, but the transmission bandwidth and storage throughput capacity. Now, these supporting industry chains in the night session are moving faster than the main chips, indicating that capital is searching again for more cost-effective speculative targets in computing power cluster expansion.
The short-term expected oversold rebound sentiment may continue, but it will soon face the hard test of earnings season. Market doubts about the sustainability of big companies' AI capital expenditure (CAPEX) have not been completely dispelled.
If the upcoming earnings guidance fails to deliver data exceeding expectations, the current rebound can easily become a window for unloading funds trapped at high levels.
Market funds have not left the AI main theme but have become more selective and cautious, shifting from blindly speculating on concepts to a game of verifying concrete order fulfillment and performance.
DYORYesterday's short position has been closed, and the current price is near the starting point. CoinGlass current price BTC 82,630 (+1.04%), ETH 2,425 (+0.37%)
The funding rate is still positive, and positions are increasing along with the rebound. This is new long entry, not just short covering ending. Fear and Greed index at 60, BTC dominance at 60.2%. ETH's gain is only one-third of BTC's, relatively still weak.
Near-term liquidations: short positions are concentrated around 83,500 (about 42 million), then further up at 84,500 and 85,200; long positions are magnetized near $^_^79,300. So 83,500 is the level where this rebound is most easily absorbed and also most easily pushed back down.
Macro
The 10-year US Treasury yield is about 5.05% this morning, down from 5.31% on October 7, which is the direct reason for the rebound. September CPI is still 3.7% year-over-year, core at 2.6%, the data itself hasn't improved. The probability of a rate hike at the October 28 FOMC has dropped from about half when the data first came out to about 15%, with the market now betting on no change this month. This is a relief, not a new round of rally.
The short position from yesterday, those that should have been reduced near the low point have been reduced. If still holding at the rebound to 82,600, prioritize closing flat, do not add positions at the same level. 💥 Here's a painful truth: Last month when $ZEC surged to 1699, I was bullish all the way, but a fan secretly shorted behind my back and got liquidated with a $14,000 loss. Even now, thinking about it still hurts!
Why am I confident holding ZEC this time?
First, privacy is a hot trend this year, and ZEC is a truly decentralized project. It's one of the altcoins heavily held by Grayscale, and there are positive catalysts coming next month.
Second, a shakeout isn't a bad thing. Low-price chips have been sold off for almost a month. The position is too heavy to rally quickly; a healthy shakeout is necessary! I personally believe the 1050-1100 range in the short term is very likely the bottom.
Third, the daily chart already shows clear signs of stabilization and rebound. My approach is simple: build positions gradually in spot for mid-to-long term, hold contracts with low leverage for the long term, targeting 1700-2000.
Finally, a heartfelt word: In this market, many people pick the right direction, but even more die from leverage. That fan who got liquidated for $14,000 is a vivid example. I am optimistic about ZEC, but please hold only what you can afford to keep! Don't let a single shakeout wash you out.
【The above views are for personal reference only and do not constitute investment advice】
#Institutional funds weaken, who will see inflows first, BTC or ETH? $HYPE founder posted a hiking photo, three people.
I only know him. The other two I have never seen before, and I thought they probably aren't ordinary people either. After checking, I found they are all top experts.
One is named Alexandr Wang, Chinese name Wang Tao. He dropped out of MIT at 19 and founded Scale AI. Now 29 years old, he oversees all AI at Meta.
The other is Scott Wu, founder of Cognition. The product he made is called Devin—the first AI engineer that can write code by itself. The company is valued at $10.2 billion.
What surprised me most is how they know each other. Not through business cooperation. In 2014, all three interned at the quantitative giant HRT. That year, only 10 people were recruited nationwide. But actually, they knew each other since high school through informatics olympiads. Jeff and Scott both won gold medals. So this is not a colleague circle, but a competition circle.
In 2002, PayPal was acquired by eBay. Those who left later created Tesla, SpaceX, YouTube. People call them the PayPal Mafia.
And this group is now being compared to the PayPal Mafia—the HRT Mafia.Explosive! Even with fireworks blazing, it can't fill the cash flow hole—I'm betting on a "crash" for SpaceX's earnings report!
After the U.S. market closes on October 20, SpaceX will release its first full Q3 earnings report since going public. The market was just ignited by the "flying Roadster," with sentiment at a high, but my prediction for the betting odds is cold-blooded: buy Yes.
Don't get me wrong, flying cars are cool, but that's Tesla's narrative, not SpaceX's profit statement. Yet the capital market has already valued SpaceX at a price-to-sales ratio once exceeding 100 times. The problem is, looking back at the old accounts: Starlink is the only consistently profitable segment, Starship is still burning through R&D expenses, with quarterly EBITDA losses exceeding 100 million; and behind new stories like AI computing power, quarterly capital expenditures are expected to reach as high as $19.3 billion, with free cash flow potentially suffering over $10 billion in consumption.
The market expects Q3 revenue between $12.9 billion and $13.8 billion. At this stage of massive investment, achieving both high revenue growth and significant profit improvement is as difficult as making a rocket save money while flying.
Concept-driven momentum might push the stock price before the market opens, but fireworks of sentiment fear hard-core cash flow the most. As long as the earnings report shows even slightly conservative numbers on Starship progress or AI computing monetization, or operating losses exceed expectations, the pressure to pull back will immediately surface.
So I won't chase this wave of hype. A hundredfold price-to-sales ratio relies not on fireworks, but on solid financial realization. This time, I'm betting Yes. #SpaceXFirstFullQuarterlyReportSinceIPOWillBeRevealed $SPCX #TSMCQ3RecordProfit 积电Q3净利润超预期，盈利创历史新高 The earnings report is very impressive, with AI computing power demand continuously materializing, and 2nm successfully contributing to revenue; however, growth heavily depends on AI clients, and combined with the cost and geopolitical pressures from building factories in the US, the risks behind high growth cannot be ignored.#奈飞增长或放缓，广告业务成新看点 US September CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, but Walsh refused to preview a rate hike at the IMF annual meeting, lowering the probability of a rate hike in October to around 15%—the macro environment offers a breather, not a pivot, with year-end rate hike pricing still hanging at 90%.
Funds are not "running," they are "hiding": BTC market share surged to 59.92%, becoming the only red asset in the market. There is locked-in support above 81,000, selling pressure indicators have reached historical extremes, whales are accumulating, but daily trading volume has shrunk to $6.8 billion, the base is solid but there is no new fuel.
ETH fell below 2400, whales are redeeming stakes, sending 95,000 tokens to CEX at a loss, supply is looser than BTC; SOL broke below 103 relying on psychological support, ETF outflows hit a record 25.52 million in a single week; OKB retraced to 114, scarcity of supply does not constitute short-term buying pressure; RE dropped 4.6%, thin liquidity was crushed by sector beta.
The other four are all waiting for BTC to bring back trading volume. Don't reason in thin markets during low volume periods.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 宏观面：沃什的“留白”为市场赢得了喘息窗口
这是当前最重要的边际变化。美联储主席沃什在曼谷IMF年会上的讲话，没有释放任何10月加息的信号，并明确表示不会预判利率决策。市场对10月加息的预期概率应声从逾25%降至15%以下，美元指数随之走弱。
但需要清醒看待这一“利好”的性质：它更像是一次预期的“重置”，而非趋势的“转向”。10月FOMC维持利率不变的概率仍约为70%，但这一预期在近期已出现边际走弱的迹象。市场基准判断仍是：比特币短期将以8万美元为核心支撑继续筑底，在缺乏明显上行催化的情况下，更可能在8万至8.5万美元区间内震荡。
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #机构资金转弱，BTC与ETH谁先迎来回流？ Overnight BTC pulled back from 80,680 to 82,457 (+1.08%), with a 24-hour high of 82,538, just 60 dollars short of 82,600. Both levels held last night: 82,600 was untouched, validating the "no reversal" scenario; 80,800 was breached but recovered, and 80,000 remained unchallenged. Funding rates warmed up: BTC at 0.00635% (up from 0.0043% last night), ETH steady at 0.00883%, SOL turned positive from negative at 0.00499% and continued climbing. Open Interest stands at 30,075 contracts, about 2.48 billion USD, almost unchanged. The recovery is real, and the 0.01% "true entry" line remains untouched, which is also true. Off-exchange: Grayscale and Republic launched three funds, with UNI/AAVE/ONDO topping the charts; El Salvador's holdings surpassed 7,800 coins. Today, focus only on 82,600: if volume breaks and holds above it, the "no reversal" scenario is invalidated, and we admit the mistake at tomorrow morning's open, targeting 83,500; if it fails to hold, dropping below 82,000, consolidation continues, with 80,800 to be retested. That spike last night—were you on the ride or off? Comment below.Midday Review: Last night’s binary choice, the market played out both scenarios
Last night before bed, I left a question: Will it break 80,800 first to catch up on the drop, or will it push to 82,634 first to recover? The market didn’t play fair and did both.
Early morning fake drop: the low touched 80,621, 80,800 was pierced intraday, looking like a catch-up drop. But my rule last night was to watch the 4-hour close—at 04:00 it directly closed back at 82,116, so the breakout didn’t hold. I’ve seen this kind of fake break and close back many times in five years; it’s scary intraday but doesn’t count at close. After dawn, it steadily recovered, reaching a high of 82,817, now at 82,590, +0.9%, with 82,634 just overhead.
ETH followed but still lagged: now at 2,426, only +0.2%, the rebound high of 2,438 was briefly touched then fell back. Funding rate for ETH is about +0.0097%, hotter than BTC’s +0.0046%—those chasing recovery first crowded into ETH, so be cautious where it’s crowded.
Next, watch the US stock market open at 21:30 tonight. If BTC can hold above 82,634, the next target is the previous high at 82,940; if it’s pushed back below 82,300 again, this recovery is fake and the range will continue to grind.
Data speaks, mistakes are costly. Tonight, which side are you on: holding above 82,634 to move up, or getting pushed back into the range again? Netflix's advertising pre-sale commitments nearly doubled, which sounds great, but don't rush to include it in this quarter's revenue statement yet.
In August, the company announced that its US Upfront advertising sales commitments nearly doubled. The original text refers to commitments, meaning the amount corresponds to future scheduled ad placements, not ads that have already aired, confirmed revenue, and received cash.
I am optimistic about this change because advertisers' willingness to allocate budgets in advance indicates that Netflix is moving toward a more stable procurement plan. However, the significance of this progress lies in having more basis for future revenue; it cannot be used to demand an immediate proportional jump in advertising revenue for any single quarter.
The timing of different content releases and the actual delivery pace of ads will affect final recognition. Pre-sales are a leading indicator, not a report card. The real test is whether subsequent execution can keep up with the commitments. #机构资金转弱，BTC与ETH谁先迎来回流？ On the crypto side, the hero asset is $BTC.
The Nasdaq fell 2.14% on Friday, but Bitcoin rose nearly 1%: is decoupling really happening?
Here's what I saw:
On Friday, Nasdaq dropped 2.14%, the S&P fell 1.09%, the VIX surged 21.5% in one day to 19.99, and AI stocks CoreWeave, CrowdStrike, and Cloudflare were all hit hard.
At the same time, Bitcoin closed near $82,600, up nearly 1% in 24 hours, ETH also rose 3% back to 2420, money is flowing into large-cap assets.
This week also has Meta and Tesla earnings reports; whether the AI rally can continue depends on these few days.
My view:
This is not decoupling, it’s just not the turn yet. Bitcoin’s rise is on low volume, with 24-hour trading volume just over 1% of market cap, this kind of rise is unstable.
If decoupling is to happen, we need to see if it can hold above 83,000 this week; otherwise, it’s just a delayed follow-down.
What I’m doing:
Watching but not chasing, not catching falling knives. Will wait to see if 83,000 holds for three days, if it falls below 80,000 this rebound is invalid.
Do you think this is the start of decoupling, or just a bull trap?
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#Bitcoin #BofA survey reveals stock-bond divergence, BlackRock increases short-term bonds allocation early $QQQ dropped 2.5%, $BTC is still holding at 82,014. This mismatch itself indicates that funds haven't fled, but no one dares to add positions either. Whoever shows weakness first will dictate today's direction.
$BTC 82,014 +0.99% $ETH 2,406 +0.55%
$QQQ -2.50% $SPY -1.11% $IBIT -0.94%
$DXY +0.08% $GLD -0.18%
Crude oil and the Strait of Hormuz are still fueling inflation expectations, AI/semiconductors continue to hold the emotional switch of $QQQ, and Trump and tariff lines might cut the $SPY and $DXY markets at any second. There are many hidden risks; the market looks calm but is actually tense.
$ETH still hasn't caught up with $BTC; funds prefer hard assets over soft ones, the strength difference is clear at a glance.
$QQQ feels heavily defensive, it dropped without decent support—don't catch a falling knife.
$IBIT is even weaker than $BTC; ETFs are soft, so don't expect the spot market to be strong either.
$DXY's mere +0.08% is enough to make risk assets retreat; a bit more upward pressure would be even tougher.
$GLD's pullback indicates that safe-haven money hasn't increased, so it's not a panic sell-off for now.
Don't chase highs; whoever shows weakness first will set today's direction. I'm watching first.$HYPE actually has very little selling pressure; anyone who has truly studied it will come to this conclusion.
The rise of HYPE is based on the strong profit-making ability of derivatives, not some pump by manipulators.
The real circulating supply of HYPE is very low, only 100 million tokens, with actual circulation around 10%, the rest are locked, burned, or not yet released, extremely tightly controlled.
As I mentioned before about HYPE, the only solution is a price pump; the real circulating supply of HYPE is 8 billion, not 20 billion, nor the full circulation of 80 billion.
Many people confuse "total unlocked" with the real tradable circulating supply. The approximately 200 million shown on market platforms is just the unlocked amount, not the tokens available for selling.
A large portion of unlocked tokens are staked long-term by holders, locked on-chain, rarely reaching exchanges, so they don't create selling pressure; plus, the protocol continuously buys back and burns tokens, permanently removing them from circulation, which must be excluded. The team's share is released linearly over many years, with a very slow unlocking pace. AVGO has fallen for 94 trading days, hitting a six-month low on October 16.
The highest was 495 on June 3, and the intraday low was 328.58 on October 16.
-33.6%.
This is not a crash, but a downhill slide lasting four and a half months.
94 days, an average drop of 0.36% per day.
What’s really worth watching is the last 9 days.
SMH closed down for 9 consecutive days, but 3 of those days were bullish candles.
October 13 +1.75%, October 15 +2.38%.
Every day there are buyers trying to catch a rebound intraday, but the closing price is lower than the previous day every day.
On October 16, AVGO dropped 2.87%, with a volume of 29.7 million shares.
The 20-day average volume is 23 million shares, so volume expanded by 1.29 times.
Volume expanding to a new low indicates that sellers at this price level are more eager than buyers.
I think this kind of decline is more painful than a single-day crash.
On crash days, everyone is watching and some will cut positions.
A daily drop of 0.36% is ignored, and by the time people react, it has already fallen by a third.
Looking back, not a single decent panic has occurred.
This is also why I don’t think this is the bottom.
In 9 consecutive down days, 3 were bullish candles, indicating buying interest has been present.
But the closing price keeps hitting new lows, meaning those buyers are not enough.
$AVGO
#SlowDeclineSolana's on-chain data exploded, but the coin dropped from 122 to 105; the divergence will be clear the day after tomorrow.
RWA scale grew from $700 million to $4.3 billion in one year, a 6x increase, with its share of Ethereum rising from 4.5% to 26%.
In the past 30 days, application revenue reached $193 million, ranking first across all chains, nearly double that of the second place.
Yet SOL still fell from 122 at the end of September to 105 now, and the spot ETF has seen almost daily net outflows since late September.
I think the market isn’t foolish; this money is probably mostly supported by memes and launchpads, about 80% of revenue comes from consumer applications, while institutional US Treasury RWA remains on Ethereum.
The hype is real, but the substance is questionable.
On October 21, the day after tomorrow, the Alpenglow upgrade will finalize, cutting confirmation time from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds; it’s both a catalyst and a potential black swan for downtime.
I won’t bet early: only recognize a rebound if volume breaks above 113; if it falls below the 100 mark, watch 95, and never catch a falling knife.
Will you choose to buy the rebound or the dip? Will the upgrade lift SOL, or will the good news be fully priced in and push it down?
$SOL $ETH
#Solana #RWA Losing 36.85 million dollars and still not stopping? Seeing through the "fatal gambler's mentality" of contract players from Brother Maji's liquidation
Just checked the on-chain data, and Brother Maji has once again suffered the tragedy of a "full liquidation." His long position was forcibly closed, not only losing all the profits from the past year but also losing an additional 36.85 million USD.
Looking at his dense liquidation records really makes one gasp. Why do big players always stubbornly hold long positions and immediately open new ones after liquidation? Here are some fatal reasons worth warning everyone in the crypto community:
1️⃣ Path dependence and "E-Guard" faith: Previously made big money going long on $ETH and $HYPE, forming a fixed mindset. He has an almost religious belief in Ethereum, thinking "as long as I hold on, I will win."
2️⃣ The addiction to high leverage: Habitually using 25x leverage to roll positions. The temptation of high returns is too great; once tasted, it's hard to accept low leverage again.
3️⃣ Mental collapse after liquidation, with the mind full of "I must recover my losses," this psychological misconception makes him unable to stop. Looking at the data, just hours after liquidation, he immediately opened a 700 ETH long position near 2380. "High leverage + no stop loss," any 1%-2% adverse market movement can take you out directly!
In the contract market, position management always outweighs your market judgment. Currently, ETH is weak, with support at 2370-2400 and strong support at 2320-2360. Respect the market! $BTC $ETH BTC pulled back from 80659 to 82788, with 272 million liquidated in 24 hours, and short liquidations accounting for 96.3% in the last hour.
What changed? During the sharp drop on the 15th, 90.6% of longs were wiped out, but in the last hour the trend reversed, with shorts becoming the main ones liquidated.
Why is this worth noting? The funding rate remains positive (0.0035%), indicating longs are still paying to hold positions, and shorts are being squeezed during the rebound rather than new funds entering.
Currently, the observation supports a "short squeeze rebound" rather than a trend reversal. Next, focus on whether the 81600 support can hold, and whether spot buying can sustain after ETF outflows turn positive.
After this round of short liquidations, who will take over next, the whales or ETFs? Let's discuss in the comments. $BTC ETH pulled up from 2327 in a deep V to 2426, but the real suspense isn't in the gain, it's at 2419.
What changed? Last night at 11 PM, a whale shorted ETH at 2366, and this morning when it rebounded to 2409, $6.66 million was liquidated. The liquidation price of the remaining position is exactly stuck at 2419—only $7 away from the current price in the screenshot.
Why is this worth watching? This rebound wasn't driven by ETF buying; last week, ETH spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $320 million, more than BTC. The driver is a short squeeze after positions were overstretched, not fundamental improvement.
Currently, the observation that "this is a short squeeze rebound" is more supported. Next, it depends on whether the shorts above 2419 will continue to be swept out, and whether spot buying can hold after that. With a $7 scenario, which side are you betting on? Let's discuss in the comments. $ETH Sister Wood is out shouting again: South Korean semiconductor stocks have now entered the buy zone, still optimistic. I've heard this kind of talk too many times— the more it bleeds down, the more big influencers come out shouting "golden pit." My position is right here, standing on the opposite side.
The logic for trend trading is very simple: an asset's entire moving average line is pressing down on the head, foreign capital is continuously net selling, and the narrative relies on backward-looking data like "turning losses into profits" and "20x expected growth" to prop it up. I have no reason to catch the knife others are bottom-fishing. The key to low-frequency large bets is never guessing the bottom, but recognizing which side of the trend you stand on, then holding on. $BTC's current AI deleveraging cycle is not over yet.ETH Liquidation Style Suddenly Changes: Bulls Still Taking Hits in 24 Hours, 99.8% Shorts Buried in the Last Hour.
What changed? In the past 24 hours, ETH liquidations totaled $107 million, with bulls accounting for 91%; but in the last hour, out of $19.69 million liquidated, 99.8% were shorts, as ETH reclaimed above 2400, directly wiping out those chasing shorts.
Why is this noteworthy? This wave of short liquidations occurred amid two consecutive weeks of ETF net outflows and near-zero spot demand. It’s not a broad rally driven by new capital inflows, but rather a violent correction of position structure.
Currently, the observation favors a "short squeeze rebound" rather than a trend reversal. The key focus next is whether ETH can hold above 2400 and if spot buying can sustain after short covering cools down.
After this short squeeze, who will take the baton next? Let’s discuss in the comments. $ETH What is the core value of DeFi—"bringing the real world onto the blockchain" or "creating a financial system independent of the real world"?
Would DeFi still stand without tokenized stocks and RWAs?
The DeFi boom from 2019 to 2021 was almost entirely centered around crypto-native assets:
Using ETH, BTC, and stablecoins as collateral for lending
Trading with tokens
Yield farming with governance tokens
During that phase, there were almost no true RWAs or tokenized stocks, yet DeFi had already formed a complete financial loop: lending, trading, liquidation, leverage, derivatives. This shows that crypto-native assets alone are sufficient to support an independent financial system.
Simply put, RWAs are an extension of DeFi, not its foundation.
One viewpoint holds that without integrating real-world assets, DeFi is just a "closed-loop casino" lacking real value support. Another argues that precisely because it does not rely on real-world assets, DeFi retains the greatest experimental space and censorship resistance.
These two perspectives are not actually contradictory:
From the perspective of "whether it can operate independently": DeFi still has meaning without RWAs and tokenized stocks, and this was proven early on.
From the perspective of "whether it can grow bigger, become more stable, and attract more capital": RWAs and tokenized stocks can indeed significantly expand DeFi's ceiling, especially in providing stable returns and reducing overall volatility $BTC's weekly close is very precise, 820 still looks quite good. It holds the daily, 3-day, and weekly lines at a key position, signaling the main force's intention to maintain a bullish stance in the market. Quantitative traders won't mechanically dump; judging by the main force's choice, the possibility of shaking out bulls before a rebound has increased, as mentioned in the quote below—this is the first shakeout of bulls. Also, yesterday it tested down again from 80k to 805. It's clear that 80k is both an accumulation point and fiercely defended by the main force. If the main force doesn't choose to kill the bulls, I won't chase longs. I haven't taken any contract positions; the risk-reward ratio isn't high. I'll wait for an opportunity to short when it goes up. For spot, I also choose to wait and not add positions for now. Overall, the direction remains a wide-range consolidation, and a weekly-level correction is about to begin. This is basically set. At the end of October, there were 12 days, 10 trading days. In October, I added $UNI and $MSTR, which have made good progress but are still some distance from my 90% position target. I hope after this rebound ends, new opportunities will arise. The recent sharp drop in US stocks, which I called three times as a good opportunity, has already seen a strong rebound. I believe the pre-earnings season drop presents even greater opportunities and risks. During this period, I bought $MSTR, which may also rise with this rebound. BTC at a 10% discount is still very attractive. My next goal in US stocks is to increase the proportion of big tech and rotate into crypto stocks, which I plan to complete opportunistically in the next 1-3 months. I will take advantage of the AI big rebound to reduce positions and hold cash, waiting for better crypto opportunities to increase my cash ratio. This AI bottom-fishing in US stocks is at least a chance to bet on a big leap.The most fragile link has never been the price, but the "sense of security" built up by leverage. Before ETH's second dip breaks the previous low, can this be considered a true stabilization or just a pause for the bears? Watching the 4-hour chart these past two days, both ETH and SNDK have shown relatively clear bottom divergences. ETH's second test of the bottom did not break the previous low, and the support below is starting to show presence. My personal feeling is that the short-term bottom is likely close to completion, but this statement must be followed by a "but." What really makes me cautious is not the candlesticks, but the derivatives structure. Perpetual contract positions remain piled high, and the funding rate has not undergone a thorough washout, indicating that the bulls are not completely dead, nor have the bears fully relaxed. In this state, divergence can be either a reversal starting point or just a breather in a downtrend continuation. Bottom signals have appeared, but it is still too early to confirm. Another easily overlooked point: the longer the high-interest-rate environment drags on, the more mature the RWA and Wall Street BTC and ETH leverage tools become, the faster the capital switches, and the more aggressive the strategies. Simply interpreting rate hikes as bearish and rate cuts as bullish is no longer sufficient. What the market is actually trading now is how much the expectations have been priced in advance, not the events themselves. So, rhythm-wise, I am cautiously optimistic in the short term but remain somewhat vigilant in the mid-term. Going forward, I will only focus on two things: whether ETH's second bottom can hold and whether the 4-hour chart can truly break through the upper resistance. If it holds, risk appetite will first emerge in small caps and altcoins; if it doesn't, this divergence will be digested as a bull trap. The crowd psychology is quite subtle right now, F【GDP returns to 4.5%, China's economy has caught its breath, but the wallets of ordinary people haven't caught up yet】
China's Q3 GDP grew by 4.5% year-on-year, higher than Q2's 4.3% and also exceeding the market expectation of 4.4%. The economy has indeed warmed up, but this is only perceptible to a small portion of people. The main drivers of this growth are more on exports and manufacturing, while domestic demand has not truly taken over yet.
Industrial output in September grew by 5.5%, but retail sales only increased by 1.1%; real estate development investment in the first three quarters dropped by 20.6%. Factories are busy again, consumption recovery is slow, and real estate is still dragging behind. This set of data shows that the economy has resilience, but it doesn't mean everyone feels the recovery.
This also means that in the short term, policies may not rush to flood the market with liquidity, since growth has already returned to the target range. However, the higher the dependence on exports, the more vulnerable it is to overseas demand and trade friction shocks.
Compared to whether GDP can be a bit higher, I am more interested in seeing if consumption and private investment can truly pick up. If growth starts to be driven by domestic demand going forward, that would be a more solid recovery; if it continues to rely on exports to prop up the numbers, 4.5% looks good on paper, but the economy's foundation is still not strong enough.$BTC $ETH Big Brother Maji has once again faced a full liquidation. Why does he persistently stubbornly hold onto the longs?
This round of long positions was directly forcibly liquidated by the exchange, wiping out all the profits earned over the past year, with an additional loss of 36.85 million USD. Profit, liquidation, reinvestment to fight again—he has repeatedly gone through this cycle many times.
The reasons behind this can be summarized in four points: First, early large gains from going long on ETH and HYPE created a fixed trading path dependency; second, he has a strong faith in Ethereum, embodying a typical E-guard mentality; third, he inherently has a high-risk trading style, habitually using 25x leverage to roll positions, quickly re-entering after liquidation; fourth, he struggles to break free from psychological traps, as the high-leverage rebound profits are very tempting, combined with the sunk cost effect, making it hard to decisively stop.
Even if the overall bullish judgment is correct, without proper stop-loss under high leverage, small adverse market fluctuations are enough to trigger liquidation. In trading, position management is far more important than judging the direction of longs or shorts.
Currently, ETH’s trend is weak, with price running below short-term moving averages. Short-term support ranges from 2370-2400, strong support at 2320-2360; resistance at 2450-2500, with pressure zones above at 2550-2600. Market liquidity is low over the weekend, making price fluctuations easily amplified. Under 25x leverage, just a 1%-2% adverse move will approach the liquidation warning line. #机构资金转弱，BTC与ETH谁先迎来回流？ 🔥 Within one week, spot crypto ETFs have bled over $1.22 billion! The "nuclear power" that once drove the market rally has now become the biggest drag.
📊 【Institutional Retreat, Altcoins Bleeding Heavily】
🔴 Institutional buying has clearly cooled down, with $ETH outflows even exceeding those of $BTC.
🔴 Galaxy Research directly points out: ETF and corporate treasury buying can no longer absorb the chips sold by long-term holders. The supply-demand gap this year has reached -127,300 BTC!
🔴 Funding pressure is spreading; last week, 141 altcoins fell an average of 14%, and liquidity is rapidly drying up.
📈 【Price Bottom Card: Why Can't It Fall Further?】
Although BTC rebounded to 82,000 today, contract funding rates remain weak, and ETFs (such as IBIT) are still experiencing net outflows. The real warning signal is not how much is flowing out, but that funds are withdrawing while prices fail to hit new lows.
If BTC can hold the 80,000 level under this bloodletting, it indicates real buying is quietly accumulating below; once capital outflows combine with a break of key support, selling pressure will explode completely.
💡 Capital flows only reflect sentiment; price trends are the boss. On the macro side, inflationary pressure has not eased, and the 10-year US Treasury yield still looms overhead. We will talk about a major reversal when ETF funds turn positive.
#机构资金转弱，BTC与ETH谁先迎来回流？ #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓 Data as of 10-19 11:13 (Beijing Time). The overall market color has finally flipped: Bitcoin is back to 82,600, up 0.85% in 24 hours, Solana +0.9%, Chainlink +1.1%, Ripple +0.6%, only TRON remains green, down 0.2%. The strongest is Zcash, which has rebounded 20% from its low in 24 hours. Previous round review (04:39 batch, entry price → current price, checked by direction): - TRON Long 0.331700 → 0.332510 (+0.24% profit) | Take profit 0.332870 / Stop loss 0.330998, neither triggered ✓ Hit - Zcash Short 1,059.01 → 1,175.34 (-10.98% loss) | Stop loss 1,084.92 triggered ✗ Missed - Dogecoin Short 0.076380 → 0.079900 (-4.63% loss) | Stop loss 0.077428 triggered ✗ Missed The hit rate calculated by direction is 33%. But I don't want to gloss over this number: the TRON trade was sideways, earning 0.24%, while the other two were real cash short positions, both stop losses were hit, resulting in a real loss this round. If the direction is wrong, you have to admit it. Where was the mistake? I'll explain clearly. My previous logic was "each rebound is lower than the last, and after longs are forcibly liquidated, no one steps in to buy," which usually holds for a downtrend asset. But Zcash is not a straightforward asset: