Orbit Post Sitemap
Non-farm payrolls look good, but the working people's experience is worsening
Hourly wages increased by only 3.1% year-on-year, the slowest since 2021, mostly not keeping up with inflation. The number of people forced to take gig jobs due to economic reasons has jumped to a six-month high, and the median duration for the unemployed to find new jobs has stretched to 11.9 weeks. The unemployment rate is low, but money doesn't last, and finding jobs is getting harder. The Federal Reserve looks at the numbers, voters look at their bills, and the two sides see different things.#软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ 📊 In the early hours of November 6 Beijing time, the US stock market suddenly plunged: the Nasdaq Composite Index fell 5.52%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plummeted 12.25%, and about ¥21 trillion RMB evaporated overnight in the US stock market.
1️⃣ The direct trigger for this plunge was the Democratic Party winning control of both houses of Congress and multiple governorships, with some elected officials explicitly advocating restrictions on data center expansion. The newly elected Democratic governor of Texas proposed continuing to suspend approvals for new data centers until the state legislature establishes rules to protect local residents, also stating that residents should not bear the extra electricity costs generated by data centers and that tax incentives for such companies should be stopped.
2️⃣ If such restrictive policies are extended, the project approval and power connection cycles for data centers will be significantly lengthened, delaying the opening of server rooms, postponing revenue from computing power leasing, slowing subsequent expansion progress, and potentially pushing back or reducing planned chip procurement. The future revenue and profit expectations of chip and server manufacturers will need to be recalculated. There is already a real-world reference: according to Bloomberg, Microsoft has abandoned the option to further expand a data center project in Texas, and the power connection for that project is still awaiting approval.
3️⃣ Previously, related stocks had been betting on the rapid construction of server rooms, continuous increases in chip orders, and steady profit growth. Now that construction is stalled, the previously maintained high valuations are naturally hard to sustain. Manufacturers have not yet announced their next quarter earnings, but stock prices have already fallen ahead.These three coins, the better the K-line looks, the deeper the pit
Newbies look at the K-line, veterans look at the chips. The risk of some coins can't even be contained by the bearish candlesticks on the chart.
$ONE no longer pretends — cross-shard vulnerability led to the issuance of tens of trillions of tokens, the project team directly "pulled the plug" on the seven-year-old mainnet, migrating to Ethereum to focus on AI video. Coupled with the old debt of a $100 million cross-chain bridge hack, the market cap is only in the tens of millions. This is not a correction, it's endgame liquidation, liquidity can go to zero at any time.
$AKE's script is called "thin market slaughter." Total supply is 100 billion, only 22.8% circulating, 77 billion locked up hanging overhead. A single-day 50% pump is not a market, it's a trap. Low circulation and high control, dumping happens faster than pumping, retail investors entering are the last to get hit.
$PIEVERSE dies from narrative exhaustion. New coin hype supports the price, but depth is paper-thin. When the story ends, massive unlocking of early low-cost chips happens, and those wanting to exit can't find counterparties.
Technical analysis tells you "oversold," fundamentals tell you "stay away." For these three, newbies avoiding them is a win.
#美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% "This wave, the pain point is right above our heads"
$BTC's current market really has a bit of that "crazy beauty" vibe (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
The most eye-catching scene on the chart: the short liquidation volume is about 5 times that of the longs. In other words, once the market pushes upward, shorts are more easily harvested in large numbers. Below? Around $74K–$73K, there's only a small cluster of long liquidation liquidity left, like crumbs in a corner that haven't been swept clean; while the bigger "pain point" has quietly shifted upward (￣▽￣)~*
So don't be quick to make definitive calls in the short term. It's not impossible for the price to break below $75K again and sweep liquidity once more. But this move looks more like a final shakeout: first shaking off the undecided chips, then turning back to break upward to harvest the large liquidity stacked above our heads (｀・ω・´)
My bias is simple: limited space below, a stronger story above. The real play might not be a continued crash, but a surge upward after the shakeout. When the market goes crazy, don't be scared off by a single needle, and don't mistake a shakeout for the end.
Of course, the market always punishes arrogance, so position management still needs to be steady ( •̀ ω •́ )✧
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温
#BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 #伯克希尔巨额现金储备，财报将披露最新动向
Berkshire's Q3 earnings released: cash reserves reached a record high of $377.4 billion as of the end of September; single-quarter buybacks hit $9.6 billion, the highest this year, with a total of $14.4 billion repurchased in the first three quarters, accelerating from $235 million in Q1. However, operating profit was $12.7 billion, down 5.8% year-over-year, mainly dragged down by a 43% plunge in insurance underwriting profit.
Cash piled up to nearly 30% of total assets, yet buybacks are accelerating—this is not a contradiction, but a signal. In Abel's first full year as CEO, he is more willing to deploy cash than his predecessor, but the nearly $380 billion ammunition still points to the same judgment: quality acquisition targets meeting standards are scarce, so rather than buying indiscriminately, it's better to repurchase own shares. Against the backdrop of AI trading retreat and the S&P dropping 2.68% for the week, Berkshire's stock price rose 5% counter to the trend, showing the flow of defensive capital is quite honest.
BTC is currently around 76,000, also under pressure amid AI retreat and tightening liquidity. For positions, stop loss below 75,000; for no positions, wait for a pullback to 75,000-75,500 with volume contraction and stabilization before considering. Berkshire's $377.4 billion will not flow directly into the crypto space, but it tells you one thing: the most seasoned money is choosing to wait now, not chase highs. $BTC $ETH $SNDK Someone else asked: With the Middle East conflict escalating like this, Saudi Arabia conducting over a hundred airstrikes in 24 hours, shouldn't safe-haven funds be flowing into Bitcoin and gold?
This old script of "war boosts safe-haven assets" basically failed this time. The logic is clear if you follow it: Middle East escalation pushes oil prices up with a war premium, inflation expectations rise again, so central banks are even less willing to cut interest rates. The Bank of England just raised rates by 25 basis points this week, and the market now prices an 80% chance of a Fed rate hike in December.
So this round of war is priced by the market not as a safe-haven event, but as a "reason for rate hikes." The result is that gold and $BTC often fall together, rather than rise together. Stop using war as your bullish lifeline.#After the US stock market crash, tech stocks rebound, but the Nasdaq weekly chart still falls about 3.4%
On November 6, tech stocks rebounded from a sharp sell-off, with the Nasdaq closing up 1.09%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index soaring 4.2%, AMD rising over 11%, and Nvidia up nearly 3%. However, the Nasdaq still fell 3.4% for the week, the S&P 500 dropped 2.7%, and both the Nasdaq and S&P recorded their fourth consecutive week of declines. On Thursday, the "Seven Giants" lost $1 trillion in market value in a single day.
The core contradiction is that the data driving the rebound and suppressing the weekly performance is the same. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 165,000 in October, more than twice the expected 65,000, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%. Strong employment reinforced the narrative of a "soft landing" for the economy, supporting earnings resilience; but at the same time, the probability of a rate hike in December jumped from 67% to 80%, meaning the pressure of interest rates on overvalued tech stocks has not eased.
Invesco's chief strategist bluntly stated that compared to the midterm elections, rising interest rates are the biggest risk facing AI spending growth, and the adjustment may continue.
BTC is under pressure in tandem, currently around 76,000, with support at 75,500 and resistance at 78,000. Positions should set stop-losses below 75,000; those without positions should not mistake a single-day rebound for a reversal, wait for a pullback to 75,500 with reduced volume to stabilize before watching further. Strong nonfarm payrolls have tightened the door on rate cuts, and the valuation recovery of tech stocks cannot go far without macro liquidity support. $BTC $ETH $SNDK 🚨 The calmer the $BTC rebound, the more cautious I am about going long! The $72,000 target remains unchanged for now!
After last night's news, the market reaction was even calmer than I expected.
BTC dipped to around $74,800 before bouncing back. This level is quite special, coinciding with an important retracement low from the previous rally in September.
Looking at $ETH, it dipped to $2,207 at the lowest, without even breaking the previous low of $2,170.
On the surface, the bulls seem to be showing decent support.
But I have another layer of concern.
1️⃣ After the sharp drop, bottom-fishing funds are starting to concentrate their entry.
From BTC dropping from $88,000 to around $75,000, and ETH from $2,880 to near $2,200, many investors already feel the prices are cheap enough.
Whether it's spot buying or bottom-fishing in the futures market, some support may form around this area.
But the problem is: concentrated short-term buying does not mean the market has completed its bottom formation.
2️⃣ Why do I still look at $72,000?
My judgment is that the market may still lack sustained upward momentum in the next one or two months.
If a large amount of funds concentrate on bottom-fishing around $75,000–$76,000, then once that support breaks, some leveraged positions may be forced to exit, and the market could see another round of concentrated selling.
Of course, this is just my view on the market structureAMD surged about 11.04% on Friday to close at $449.04, partially recovering from the roughly 17.26% drop on Thursday that was initially caught by buyers halfway.
Thursday closed at 404.40, down about 17.26%; Friday opened near 444, peaked at 459.80, and closed at 449.04, a single-day gain of $44.64. On the same day, the Nasdaq rose about 1.09%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index about 4.2%, with Nvidia and Intel also rebounding somewhat, but AMD was the main focus.
During the sell-off, the market was mainly worried that the Democratic Party might tighten AI and data center regulations after the midterm elections, causing chip stocks to be collectively hit. The buying on Friday also repriced the very strong earnings report from November 4. Revenue was about $13.4 billion, up roughly 45% year-over-year, with data center revenue up about 97%. Analysts still project about 50% growth for the full year and about 79% growth by 2027.
Valuation is not cheap, with a price-to-earnings ratio around 98 times, which is expensive. In the short term, I am bullish on AMD's oversold rebound; the solid earnings numbers remain, and the buying momentum is more favorable on this side.Weekend review of last week's sharp rebound after the plunge, don't be fooled by appearances. On Friday, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index appeared to lead gains, rising more than four points, looking quite strong; but if you look at the breadth: the Dow actually closed down that day, and the VIX remained above 25 without dropping. The only leaders were a small group of chip stocks, most sectors didn't follow, this is called a low-volume rebound, not a trend reversal.
The semiconductor positions I hold at the bottom have recovered some losses on paper, but I haven't moved a single share or added any. The reason is simple: the market is pricing in nearly an 80% chance of a rate hike in December. In such an environment, rebounds are borrowed gains, not yours; when the time comes to pay back, you still have to pay.
With the rebound narrowing to this extent, patience is more valuable than itchy hands. Do you think this rebound has topped out?🚨 $SNDK Don't be scared off by short-term negative news! The AI restrictions are currently just proposals; the actual results have not been implemented yet.
Recently, the volatility of $SNDK has attracted a lot of attention, especially with news about the US restricting AI-related policies, which has affected market sentiment to some extent.
But one thing needs to be clear: a proposal is not the same as formal approval, and it certainly does not mean that related businesses have been substantively restricted.
My views mainly include three points:
1️⃣ Policy uncertainty remains
The related restrictions currently discussed in the market still require attention to subsequent legislative and regulatory developments. Before formal implementation, it is not appropriate to treat the worst-case scenario as fact.
2️⃣ AI storage demand is still worth watching
With the continuous development of AI data centers, the demand for NAND flash, high-performance storage, and enterprise-grade SSDs remains a key market focus. The long-term performance of $SNDK ultimately depends on actual orders, earnings, and industry demand.
3️⃣ No rush to bottom-fish; wait for trend reconfirmation
I won’t rush in just because the price has dropped, nor will I turn completely bearish based solely on one policy announcement.
Rather than guessing the lowest point, I prefer to wait for signs of price stabilization and renewed volume strength before considering phased entry.
To summarize:
I still maintain a certain medium- to long-term interest in $SNDK.
Short-term policy news may continue to affect market sentiment, but if the fundamentals have not materially deteriorated, there is still potential for revaluation later.
No need to rush to chase, nor to because #RocketLabQ3Neutron My take on $RKLB ahead of Q3 (Nov 9): revenue likely lands in the $250–265M guide, but GAAP EPS looks tight around -$0.07 to -$0.08.
The real story: Neutron (pushed to 2027) and the Iridium deal. The stock will likely move on guidance, not the print.
Not financial advice.#Pratinjau Laporan Keuangan RocketLab: Bagaimana Kemajuan Roket Neutron? $NKE Damn it! NKE's trend makes me shake my head. Purely technical movement like this, with no fundamental support, just a hard dump—clearly a manipulative washout by the big players. The daily level 38.6 resistance is tightly pressing down, volume is shrinking like squeezing toothpaste, exactly the same pattern as the fake breakout in August. Take my advice, short around 38.627, stop loss at 39.2, keep position at 20%, don't be greedy. This kind of low-volume slow decline is like a dull knife cutting flesh; smart money is moving down, so let's not fight the trend. Don't chase highs or bottom-fish, wait for it to drop to the right level before buying back 🧘♂️ If you want to follow the trade, check the detailed orders in the market card below 📉
The above is just my personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Contract leverage carries extremely high risk, please control your position size yourself, profits and losses are your own responsibility.
👇👇👇Position Daily Report: BTC Bottoming, ETH Under Pressure, SOL Avoiding the Spotlight
Today's position summary in one sentence: BTC is grinding in place, ETH faces heavy pressure, SOL is tangled in trouble.
· $BTC | Hovering around 75800: No clear direction, no panic, still consolidating sideways. Keep an eye on it mid-term, avoid chasing highs short-term.
· $ETH | Concentrated pressure: Spot ETFs are plummeting, BlackRock leads the sell-off, Fidelity shifts 27,000 ETH; Binance chain USDT shrinks while leverage soars. More strikingly, a whale closed longs for a 17.78 million profit then flipped to short 30,000 ETH, bears are strong. ETH is mainly on defense.
· $SOL | Significant trouble: sSea promotion halted by central bank investigation, Pump.fun frantically withdrawing tokens, co-founder Toly criticizes the foundation, Labs pushes Leap causing public outrage. Internal ecosystem conflicts combined with regulatory crackdown, avoid the spotlight short-term.
Strategy: Focus mid-term on BTC, ETH and SOL mainly defensive. Against the backdrop of US October non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations and rising bets on December rate hikes, don’t mistake the rebound for a reversal; manage your positions first.
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 Red market, but the contract isn't more expensive
MEGA spot at $0.05125, perpetual at $0.05114, Orbit is talking about a breakout, but I'm more concerned that the two quotes haven't aligned yet.
Don't rush to make up stories.
The price difference can't directly prove who's shorting; I'll keep these two order books for now.
$MEGA
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 ##AI巨头债券利差飙升：投资风险还是抄底良机 越跌越买，买的其实不是便宜，是把自己往墙角推 你有没有发现，有些单子越堆越厚，价格反而越走越轻？ 昨晚翻SNDK和MU的盘口，那种感觉很微妙——跌势里买单密密麻麻往上叠，卖单却薄薄一层，像在接一把还没落地的刀。这不是抄底，是仓位在替人做决定。 先看事实：这两只标的连续走弱，但多头挂单量是空头的数倍。价格每下一个台阶，加仓的人就多一批，成本线被反复摊低，止损位也跟着一降再降。听起来像纪律，其实是把退路一点点让出去。 市场在交易什么？不是价值，是"我不想认"。当一方不断接货、另一方持续出货，价格只能顺着阻力最小的方向滑。更关键的是，浮亏在加仓后不是线性增长，而是每再跌一档就成倍放大——仓位越重，容错越薄。 从趋势阶段看，这更像下跌中继里的分歧，不是启动，也不是健康的延续。真正的启动阶段，量价是配合的；而这里，买盘越堆越多、价格却越走越低，典型的派发后遗症。多头以为自己在摊薄成本，其实是在给空头递筹码。 传导到更大的画面：科技股财报后纳指周线仍跌约3.4%，风险偏好没有真正修复。这种单边下行里，BTC和ETH的联动会更偏向情绪面——不是资金主动回流，而是被动跟跌后的技术性反抽。山寨更敏感，一表面看是马斯克终于要给Cybertruck踩刹车，底下真正松动的却是另一层东西。 你猜市场在慌什么？ 特斯拉把德州工厂的产能让给Cybercab，2027年中逐步停产Cybertruck，这条消息听着像一次干脆的止损。毕竟原定年销25万辆，2025年美国实际只卖出约2万辆，落差摆在那儿。可股价先跌10.77%，第二天又弹回4.2%，收在358美元附近，这种来回本身就说明：大家不是在给车型投票，是在给叙事重新定价。✨ 我盯的不是车，是衍生品结构里的情绪温度。财报里三季度营收约280亿美元，营业利润却同比少了56%，汽车业务的利润压力已经写在台面上，而自动驾驶还要持续烧投入。于是资金对特斯拉的定价越来越像在交易一个远期故事，而不是当期现金流。这种状态下，期权端最容易出现两头押注：一边买看涨追叙事，一边买保护防数据落空，隐含波动率被反复拉扯，FOMO和犹豫挤在同一张桌上。 偏多的路径很清楚：砍掉慢销车型、把资源压向Cybercab，等于提前承认错误并换赛道，若后续城市运营数据陆续落地，风险偏好会重新回来，BTC和ETH这类高贝塔资产也容易跟着科技叙事的情绪走一段。山寨端更敏感，只要自动驾驶话$IMX
Gaming adoption requires more than blockchain integration. Players care about gameplay, ownership, accessibility, and entertainment before they care about the underlying technology. Immutable focuses on blockchain infrastructure for gaming, including digital asset ownership and game development tools. Its biggest challenge is helping games attract genuine audiences rather than relying primarily on token incentives and speculative interest.BTC and ETH stuck in a volatile squeeze: chips are lightened, but bulls are still holding on hard
$BTC
is repeatedly tugging between $75,000 and $78,000, while $ETH is consolidating narrowly around $2,200–$2,300. In October, both fell by 7.3% and 16.0% respectively, with market breadth sharply contracting. Price is just the surface; the core issue lies in the capital structure:
· Capital is withdrawing: Both BTC and ETH spot ETFs saw net outflows, with ETH alone experiencing a $1.6 billion monthly outflow, indicating institutional demand is shifting to tactical contraction.
· Leverage is reduced, but sentiment remains firm: Open interest across the market dropped to a 12-month low, leverage has basically cleared out, yet perpetual funding rates remain positive—chips have been washed out, but bulls unwilling to concede are still paying to hold on.
· The path likely dips before diverging: 10x Research believes BTC could still reach $90,000 by year-end, but only after first dropping to $77,000–$79,000 to complete the final shakeout; ETH is likely weaker than BTC due to value continuously flowing to Layer 2, resulting in insufficient returns for holders.
The key signal for a trend reversal is when funding rates turn negative, which would truly mean bulls have conceded and a bottom structure is established. Before that, rebounds are more likely repairs rather than reversals. Coupled with the US October non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations and rising bets on December rate hikes, short-term sentiment remains suppressed—fasten your seatbelt.#SoftBank's Heavy Bet on OpenAI: Can the Q2 Earnings Report Deliver Impressive Results?
Positive Highlights (Likely to Create "Impressive Paper Gains")
- OpenAI's valuation remains stable or is adjusted upward → resulting in substantial unrealized investment gains, boosting the group's net profit and net asset value (NAV) significantly;
- Arm's resilient performance and stable dividends serve as SoftBank's cash flow ballast, offsetting the high-risk AI investments;
- The Japanese joint venture SB OAI Japan is deploying OpenAI services for enterprises, opening local B2B commercialization opportunities, representing a new growth point in SoftBank's own operations.
Key Risks (Market's Main Concerns and Earnings Report Deductions)
- OpenAI is still burning huge amounts of cash, with revenue growth but even higher computing costs, sustaining large operating losses, no stable cash returns, and equity that cannot be liquidated at will—entirely paper wealth;
- SoftBank has pledged OpenAI equity to secure margin loans in the tens of billions, with additional collateral clauses; any downward adjustment in OpenAI's valuation would directly impact SoftBank's net worth and trigger debt risks. CDS spreads in the bond market have widened, and rating agencies are worried about exposure risks;
- Intensifying competition: Anthropic, Google, and others continue to catch up, with large model price wars squeezing gross margins; meanwhile, OpenAI's complex governance structure and uncertain IPO timing mean the exit window is far off;
- Funding pressure: substantial future investment payments still need to be made in batches, continuously draining SoftBank's cash and increasing capital expenditure pressure #软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？
Core Risks (Most Market Concerns and Deduction Points in the Financial Report)
- OpenAI is still burning huge amounts of cash, revenue is growing but computing power costs are even higher, resulting in sustained large operating losses, no stable cash returns, equity cannot be liquidated at any time, all just paper wealth;
- SoftBank has pledged OpenAI equity to obtain a hundred-billion-level margin loan, with additional collateral clauses; if OpenAI's valuation is downgraded, it will directly impact SoftBank's net worth and trigger debt risks, CDS in the bond market has already widened, rating agencies are worried about exposure risks;
- Intensified competition: Anthropic, Google, and others continue to catch up, large model price wars squeeze gross margins; meanwhile, OpenAI's governance structure is complex, IPO timing is uncertain, exit window is far off;
- Funding pressure: there are still large amounts of investment funds to be delivered in batches, continuously consuming SoftBank's cash, with high capital expenditure pressure.
. Financial Report Outlook
- Book profit: may look very good, provided OpenAI's current valuation remains unchanged or is raised; but profit quality is weak, it is fair value change gains, not main business cash flow;
- Conditions for exceeding expectations: Arm's profit exceeds expectations, management provides a clear OpenAI exit timetable, Stargate project progress is clear;
- Triggers for underperformance: OpenAI valuation downgrade, management admits expanded additional investment scale, leverage/liquidity guidance turns conservative Don't get excited yet: On November 5th, the U.S. Department of Labor sent the final rule "allowing 401(k) retirement plans to buy crypto assets" to the White House for final review. This is not a positive event being realized, but the start of the pipeline.
① How big is the pool? ICI data: U.S. 401(k) assets total $10.8 trillion, total U.S. retirement assets $51.2 trillion (Q2 2026).
② How slow is the pipeline? Experts estimate: White House final review takes up to 90 days, then about 60 days after publication to take effect, so a few options may appear in 2027, and widespread adoption in 2028; ETFs and funds will come first, not direct coin holdings.
③ Who can get in? The DOL's March proposal set six criteria: performance, fees, liquidity, valuation, benchmark, complexity. Lawyers put it bluntly: $BTC clearly passes, $ETH passes, others fail on performance records or benchmarks. The key question is "can you get a reliable daily quote from a regulated wrapper?"
So for small coins, this is a pseudo-positive — money will concentrate on the two or three assets with the best liquidity.
Reality check: In the same week, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $1.28 billion, the worst since June, turning negative for the first time in 2026; $BTC current price $75,800, down from $81,199 this week. $ETH spot ETFs had a net outflow of $193 million over two days.
Policy is a slow variable, not a buy signal.
This $10.8 trillion, do you see it as incremental buying power or just sentiment? #BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元
The US Bitcoin spot ETF has seen a cumulative net outflow of about $416 million this year, but this is a slight net negative after offsetting inflows and outflows, and should not be simply interpreted as a full institutional withdrawal. According to Farside data as of November 5, the total net inflow days this year amount to about $25.63 billion, while total net outflow days amount to about $26.05 billion, with a gap of only $416 million.
The marginal direction is more concerning: on November 6 alone, there was a $412 million outflow; over the past five trading days, the total outflow was about $1.282 billion; the cumulative net outflow in November is about $1.28 billion, with only one trading day of net inflow so far this month. The recent outflow speed and concentration clearly deviate from the annual average.
After a hotter-than-expected October nonfarm payroll, the December rate hike bet rose to about 80%, and US Treasury real yields increased, suppressing high-risk assets with zero cash flow; after the midterm elections, expectations for crypto-friendly policies cooled, prompting some funds to reduce exposure. Institutional differentiation is obvious: BlackRock's IBIT is the main source of recent outflows, with a net outflow of $1.209 billion in a single week in November, and about $403 million redeemed on November 6 alone; Fidelity's FBTC saw a counter-trend inflow of about $42.8 million, but it was insufficient to offset outflows. Price and funds form a negative feedback loop: Bitcoin fell below $75,000, ETF redemptions added extra selling pressure, and over $1.27 billion in crypto derivatives positions were liquidated simultaneously, with longs accounting for over $1.1 billion. The turning signal should be whether the ETF can return to sustained net inflows. $BTC L3 and AppChains once excited developers, claiming to give each application its own dedicated lane. But the reality is: the cars are built, but there are no cars on the road, and the funds are all fragmented into pieces.
Comparing these three projects:
$DYDX: The pioneer migrating from L2 to Cosmos AppChain. It gained highly customized performance at the cost of losing aggregated liquidity from the Ethereum mainnet. Due to a lack of deep market makers, trading volume has been heavily eroded by competitors like Hyperliquid, and the 75% buyback mechanism is useless due to revenue exhaustion.
$ZORA: An L2/L3 focused on the creator economy. It attracted many NFT and content creators, but on-chain assets are highly homogeneous. Lacking real DeFi lending depth, relying solely on internal PVP trading cannot accumulate large external funds, making protocol revenue extremely unstable.
$ARB: The king of L2. Why is it successful? Because it has a "liquidity network effect." Although its Orbit L3 chains are continuously launched, the underlying assets and settlements remain anchored on the Arbitrum mainnet, allowing funds to form a closed loop.
Conclusion:
DYDX is "highly customized but liquidity exhausted"; ZORA is "locally prosperous but hard to accumulate large funds"; ARB is "underlying aggregation with strong network effects." The biggest trap of L3 is using technical "sovereignty" to exchange for liquidity "islands." #Anthropic still plans November IPO, investors lower valuation expectations
Anthropic's plan for a November IPO has not been withdrawn, but control over valuation has clearly shifted to investors. At the beginning of October, the market once valued it at about $2 trillion, dropping to $1.4 trillion to $1.5 trillion by mid-October. After this week's tech stock sell-off, potential investors have further lowered the discussion range to $1.2 trillion to $1.3 trillion, with some even seeing around $1 trillion.
The company originally planned to start roadshows the week of November 9 and price the IPO the following week, but the probability of completing the IPO before November 30 on Kalshi has dropped from 84% to 60%. The valuation downgrade is driven by both macro and company-specific factors: the Nasdaq 100 plunged 6.4% in a single day, AI assets were heavily sold off, and market concerns about data center prospects and the return on massive AI expenditures have intensified; the prospectus shows revenue of $16.286 billion in the first half of 2026, GAAP net loss of $80.748 billion mainly due to non-cash items such as fair value changes of convertible notes caused by valuation increases, operating loss narrowed to $693 million, with a single quarter of operating profit in Q2, but a fixed cost pressure from a more than $430 billion compute procurement commitment over the next decade.
Insiders say that if AI assets continue to be under pressure, the company may delay the issuance; Morningstar believes accepting a slightly lower pricing to complete the listing may be more pragmatic. Essentially, the IPO window is still open, but its width is not determined solely by Anthropic. #马斯克预计SpaceX年底年化营收突破1000亿美元
$xSPCX Q4 revenue is expected to grow about 70% quarter-over-quarter to nearly $25 billion, achieving an annualized revenue exceeding $100 billion by December, with the statement "Unless a natural disaster occurs, we will reach that goal." He also set the 2027 year-end annualized revenue target at over $500 billion, considering $1 trillion "not impossible" with about a 2% probability. After the announcement, SpaceX's stock closed up 8.62% on Friday at $134.27, still below the $135 IPO price in June.
The source of growth has undergone a structural shift. Q3 revenue was $14.58 billion, up 161% year-over-year, equivalent to an annualized approximately $58 billion; among this, AI business revenue was $7.56 billion, soaring 830% year-over-year, accounting for 52% of total revenue, surpassing Starlink's 36% and launch business's 12% for the first time. Government contracts' share dropped from about 20% in 2025 to 16.6% in Q3, with Musk expecting it to fall below 10% this quarter.
In other words, the $100 billion annualized revenue is a short-term verifiable milestone, while the $500 billion essentially remains a management vision rather than a market pricing benchmark. The focus going forward should not be on the target number itself, but whether Q4 actual revenue can reach near $25 billion, and whether the renewal pace of AI computing power contracts can support the current growth rate.The non-farm impact has been fully digested, and the crypto market has entered a phase of low-volume tug-of-war.
The US added 165,000 non-farm jobs in October, significantly exceeding market expectations. The unemployment rate fell simultaneously, and wage growth picked up, indicating that the labor market remains resilient. After the data release, interest rate expectations were quickly revised, the dollar and US Treasury yields strengthened, and the crypto market first experienced a round of leverage liquidation. Long positions were concentratedly cleared in the short term, and macro negative factors followed.
Currently, sentiment has clearly cooled, mainstream coins' volatility has narrowed, and bullish and bearish forces are temporarily balanced, waiting for new directional signals. BTC is quoted at 75,922, with limited intraday amplitude, roughly trading between 74,800 and 76,400 over 24 hours. Resistance is at 76,172, support at 75,496, Bollinger Bands continue to contract, and volatility is suppressed.
ETH is currently around 2,241, repeatedly tugging around the middle band, with support at 2,221 and resistance at 2,244, showing no strong short-term trend. OKB is moving sideways with the broader market, currently priced at 105.5, above the short-term moving average, ranging between 103.26 and 107.36, performing relatively steadily.
The impact of macro news has temporarily paused, and the market has entered a news vacuum period. Lacking incremental funds to drive it, the market is more likely to clean leverage through upper and lower spikes, forming a grinding consolidation. In the short term, it is advisable to watch more and trade less, patiently waiting for an effective breakout before following.Apollo is spending $75 billion on AI chips — the AI buildout is now private-equity scale. 🟠
BTC at $75,845, holding $75,000. Support: $75,000. Resistance: $76,371, then $79,000.
Chips are the new oil — and the AI trade keeps pulling risk assets along.
My take: AI infra is the macro tide; BTC holds $75K until CPI tells it where to go.
Is AI spend the next bubble, or the next backbone? 👇
#Bitcoin #BTC #AI #TechStocks #OKXOrbit#SoftBank's Heavy Bet on OpenAI: Can Q2 Earnings Deliver Impressive Results? SoftBank has invested approximately $64.6 billion in OpenAI, holding about 13% equity, making it one of the largest single bets currently. This year, it completed three additional investments totaling $30 billion, with the final $10 billion tranche settled on October 1, partially funded by high-yield bonds with coupons close to 9.75%—this is not a small gamble but a bet with the balance sheet at stake.
The Q2 earnings report will be released on November 10. The market's main focus is not on traditional business but on how the fair value of OpenAI's equity is recognized, whether the LTV (loan-to-value ratio) remains controllable, and the structure of cash and debt. Previous quarters saw huge investment gains due to OpenAI's valuation surge, but recently the AI sector has cooled, OpenAI's financing targets have been lowered, and its valuation has retreated from higher expectations to around $1.25 trillion. Can the paper gains continue?
Masayoshi Son's style has always been "all in on the future." From Yahoo, Alibaba, to Arm, and now the full chain of OpenAI + computing power + robotics, he is betting on dominance in the AGI era. But this time the leverage is higher, the term longer, and the exit path more uncertain—OpenAI is not yet public, and data center and power investments have long cycles. Under high-interest financing, if valuations stagnate or decline, interest and market value fluctuations will squeeze simultaneously.
If Q2 delivers impressive results (continued upward revision of OpenAI's fair value, strong contribution from Arm), it could temporarily ease credit concerns. $OPENAI #OKXTraderVoices
If you are starting your journey in the world of cryptocurrencies today, remember this rule: never invest money you cannot afford to lose.$BTC
It sounds simple, but emotions drive people to break this rule every day. When the market moves fast, panic takes over. The best way to endure and succeed in the crypto world is to build your investment portfolio gradually.
Start by looking at established assets with high liquidity, instead of randomly chasing trending tokens.
Tell me in the comments: what is your number one rule for risk management Bitcoin core developer Cory Fields has proposed a novel mechanism to deter quantum computer attacks on Bitcoin: the "Quantum Mine" scheme. This scheme requires attackers who attempt to steal Bitcoin using quantum computers in the future to first stake an equivalent amount of Bitcoin as collateral. The original owner can pre-set a hidden proof of ownership and use this proof to reclaim their Bitcoin and confiscate the thief's collateral within a fund lock-up period (e.g., 30 days). Before paying the funds, the attacker cannot know which holdings have "mines" planted. This scheme only applies to owners who still hold the private keys and does not apply to lost Bitcoins. For inactive wallets, Fields also envisions an auction system: competitors can pre-stake hidden bids on vulnerable wallets, and if attacked by a quantum thief, the highest bidder's smart contract will automatically trigger, destroying the thief's target coins, confiscating their collateral, and awarding the bounty to the highest bidder. Industry Analysis and Impact This proposal highlights the cryptocurrency industry's growing concern over the long-term security of Bitcoin's elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA). Although practical quantum attacks may still take years or even decades to materialize, the theoretical risk has prompted researchers to explore proactive defense measures. Fields' scheme is quite clever from a game theory perspective: by making theft economically suicidal, it aims to kill attacks before they happen. However, the proposal also faces complex implementation challenges. It will likely require modifying the Bitcoin protocol through a soft fork or hard fork, and the hidden proof of ownership🚨 BREAKING: Bitcoin open interest has reached the exact levels where MAJOR SHORT SQUEEZES have historically occurred.
The last 3 times this happened, $BTC saw massive pumps.
#USJobsBeatExpectations #软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ SoftBank Group will release its FY2026 Q2 financial report on November 10, with the market focusing on the financial results of its AI sector bets. Through Vision Fund II, SoftBank has completed an additional $30 billion investment in OpenAI's third round, with a total cumulative investment of $64.6 billion, corresponding to about a 13% stake, making it one of OpenAI's most important investors.
The core highlights of this financial report focus on the Vision Fund's investment gains and losses, changes in the fair value of underlying assets, and the group's financing pressure. To complete this huge capital outlay, SoftBank arranged financing tools such as foreign currency senior notes, and the large capital investment will be directly reflected in liabilities and cash flow data. Fluctuations in OpenAI's valuation will directly affect the Vision Fund's book gains or impairments, impacting SoftBank's overall net asset performance.
The high volatility of AI investments is the biggest variable. If OpenAI's valuation continues to rise, it will continuously increase SoftBank's investment income; if the AI sector valuation corrects, the huge holdings may bring asset impairment risks. The market will use this financial report to judge the sustainability of SoftBank's continued AI funding and the ability of Masayoshi Son's AI investment strategy to deliver. $BTC $ETH $SNDK A rebound to 82,000 does not mean the market has reversed; what really matters is whether it can hold at that level. @张教主。 This judgment on $BTC is not blindly bullish, but rather to first acquire spot positions, then wait for the price to reach a critical point before distinguishing whether this is just a rebound or the start of a stronger trend. He repeatedly reminds: even if the direction is correct, contract positions may not survive until the payoff day. Separate the weekend sideways movement from the subsequent trend. Facing doubts about the rebound's weakness, he does not define a day's fluctuation as a failure but places the next confirmation on Monday: whether the current minor high can break through, and if it can hold after breaking through, then continue upward. Only with such strong performance will he raise expectations for the subsequent market. Until it breaks out, hope cannot replace confirmation. On a smaller scale, he keeps a scenario that makes contract bulls uncomfortable: the price may first drop to sweep liquidity again, then recover and continue to oscillate within the range. The previous false breakdown does not guarantee it won't happen again. For spot holders, this may just be volatility during holding; for those with stop losses near the lows and heavy positions, the same movement might first clear them out before continuing in the originally anticipated direction. When he mentions the stop loss near 74,300, the focus is not on deciding whether viewers should move it, but to remind that level may be swept again. This is not a reason to cancel stop losses, nor to bear losses indefinitely. On the contrary, the issue is whether this possibility was factored into the risk before opening the position.The market's last bullish hope did not survive the payrolls print. US jobs data came in far above expectations, reviving the case for tighter policy, and the dollar and Treasury yields rose together. $BTC could not even defend its psychological levels, sliding to 74,877 before stabilising near 75,700. That is the tell. Good macro data should have been a relief; instead it hardened rate expectations and squeezed the most rate-sensitive assets. Crypto is trading as a liquidity barometer, not a groTrump has been in business for decades, long handling issues of interest exchange, negotiation, and risk.
He cannot be unaware of the toughness of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, nor can he be unaware that Iran is not a country that would easily surrender after a few rounds of bombing.
Currently, Trump has deployed the U.S. Army's elite 82nd Airborne Division, the U.S. Marine Corps' 31st Expeditionary Unit, the U.S. Navy SEALs, and Army Rangers to the Middle East,
establishing a multi-layered military deployment including the Air Force, Navy (three carrier strike groups), Marine Corps (two amphibious landing groups), airborne troops, and special operations forces, totaling 60,000 troops!
Based on the current U.S. military deployment in the Middle East and the reinforcements being sent there, it is still insufficient to overthrow the Iranian regime, but it can completely shatter Iran's economic lifeline!
Oil price risks will persist for a long time, and the U.S. stock market will continue to be under pressure! If an energy shock and AI valuation adjustment happen simultaneously, that would be even more interesting!$BZ #SoftBank's Heavy Bet on OpenAI: Can Q2 Earnings Deliver Impressive Results? In a nutshell
SoftBank's Q2 performance heavily depends on the fair value appreciation of its OpenAI equity; the book profit has a good chance to be strong but is unrealized and not cash; Arm is the stable foundation, while the biggest risk lies in OpenAI's ongoing massive losses, large investment exposure, liquidity, and leverage risks, making it difficult to deliver solid, sustainable impressive results.
Key Points
1. Bet Overview
SoftBank has committed a total investment of about $64.6 billion in OpenAI, targeting approximately 13% ownership, making it the second-largest shareholder after Microsoft; this investment is held in Vision Fund 2, and is accounted for at the latest financing round valuation ($500 billion), with valuation changes directly determining SoftBank's current investment income and being the biggest variable in the financial report. At the same time, SoftBank co-develops the Stargate computing power project with OpenAI and Oracle, representing a heavy-asset, long-term AI layout.
2. Positive Highlights (likely to create "impressive book" results)
- Stable or upward OpenAI valuation → brings large unrealized investment gains, boosting group net profit and net asset value (NAV) significantly;
- Arm's resilient performance and stable dividends serve as SoftBank's cash flow ballast, hedging high-risk AI investments;
- The Japanese joint venture SB OAI Japan delivers OpenAI services to enterprises, opening local B2B commercialization leads, representing a new growth point in SoftBank's own operations.
3. Core Risks (market's main concern and financial report's deduction points)
- OpenAI is still burning huge cash, revenueRocket Lab ($RKLB) Q3 Earnings Forecast: I choose YES, leaning towards revenue beating expectations.
There are three main reasons:
① High certainty of growth in launch business. Q3 Electron completed 6 orbital launches, while Q2 had only 4 similar launches with revenue mainly recognized in the same quarter. Launch business revenue is expected to grow from $44.6 million in Q2 to about $59.8 million.
② Continuous expansion of satellite manufacturing business. Q2 space systems business revenue reached $189.5 million. The acquisitions of Mynaric and Motiv contributed full quarter revenue in Q3, combined with ongoing satellite manufacturing order deliveries, expected to push this business beyond $200 million.
③ Backlog provides support. At the end of Q2, backlog reached $2.36 billion, a 137% year-over-year increase. The company expects to recognize about 45.5% of this revenue in the next 12 months, providing strong support for future growth.
Currently, the market expects Q3 revenue around $257 million, with company guidance between $250 million and $265 million. I personally expect actual revenue near $260 million, slightly exceeding market expectations.
However, Q3 gross margin guidance is only 29% to 31%, with R&D investment still high, posing a risk of EPS falling short of expectations.
Overall judgment: choose YES, mainly optimistic about revenue beating expectations, confidence about 60%. A flat BTC is not a calm market. It is a deaf index.
Three free checks:
1) Funding: SOL 0.0046%, BTC 0.0067% - spot sells, not leverage.
2) ETH/BTC 0.0295, ETH the only green cap: rotation, not exit.
3) Turnover per 1%: ZEC $7.5M, PEPE $2.8M - 14x less money.
My read: rotation. I'd flip if funding passes 0.05%.
Rotation or distribution - which leg?
Crypto is high-risk. Personal observation only, not investment advice. DYOR.
$SOL $BTC $PEPE #Solana #OKXOrbit #Crypto #AltcoinsWhy is HYPE Treasury Company on Nasdaq applying for a US futures brokerage license?
Hyperliquid Strategies' subsidiary HypeStrat Markets is applying for an FCM license through the NFA/CFTC route: if approved, it can handle HIP-3 licensed perpetual accounts for US clients—the blockchain remains a neutral infrastructure, and compliance is layered on the account side. The application was submitted around August and is still pending; the company itself stated "the timing and outcome are uncertain."
A note from the quarterly report: revenue is about $13.3 million, with the majority of net profit still coming from HYPE unrealized gains—the application form and the ledger are two different things.
Confidence level: medium-high | company disclosure + media reports. Application ≠ approval, and certainly does not mean US users can open positions tomorrow. Are you more focused on the license progress or on whether anyone is actually deploying HIP-3? $BTC #RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？
#RocketLab财报前瞻：Neutron火箭进展如何？
$RKLB is getting closer to its post-market earnings report on November 9, and the feeling of holding your breath waiting for the landing is truly a unique experience for aerospace stocks 🚀
The topic views have surged to 404,800, and the attention is visibly rising, but market sentiment remains calm, even leaning pessimistic: only 27% of voters believe the earnings will beat expectations, while a full 73% expect it to miss; trading volume has reached 391,500, with intense long-short battles, yet the stock price is barely moving, up just +0.07%, almost flat.
After following RKLB for a while, you get this "tug-of-war without movement" feeling.
Electron launch business is a steady foundation, with revenue guidance pinned at 250–265 million, which everyone understands, making it hard to deliver big surprises. What everyone truly cares about is Neutron. Trading this stock has never been about current revenue, but betting on whether that reusable rocket can be delivered on time in the future.
The most frustrating experience is this: obviously everyone is discussing it and watching it, but the price remains stagnant. Everyone is holding their breath waiting for the earnings report moment. As soon as any good news about Neutron comes out, the calm market can instantly explode; but if progress is delayed, the already pessimistic market sentiment immediately weighs down the price. $BTC Market Analysis
Conclusion: Currently, there is insufficient strong rebound signal. The recovery after the main control line break is not straightforward. There are two response strategies for the weekend!
Scenario 1: Stabilize above 76360 in the next two days, bullish towards 77330-78420 (30 min / 1H MA250).
Scenario 2: Weak oscillation over the weekend fails to break through 76350, or dips to new lows at 73348-72680 (daily MA250) before rising again.ETH and SOL are also flowing out; is market risk spreading?
This time, it's not only BTC ETFs showing negative numbers; ETH and SOL products have not turned positive either. In the past two trading days, BTC spot ETFs have had a combined net outflow of about $842.1 million.
Let's first look at $ETH: around $2,243 at 12:00 UTC on November 7, 24h +0.03%; perpetual open interest across three exchanges is about $8.6 billion. The restrained price reminds us not to just listen to macro slogans.
Next, $SOL: about $89.93, 24h -0.47%; aggregated open interest daily change -5.2%. High elasticity has not been fully released.
Another comparison is $BTC: about $75,917, 24h -0.21%; perpetual open interest across three exchanges is about $15.2 billion. The market's support still needs spot trading confirmation.
Finally, putting them together, the cross-asset simultaneous outflow indicates institutional channels are cautious, but price elasticity and capital scale differ among coins.
If you could only wait for one signal, would you want BTC funds to stop bleeding, or all three types of funds to turn positive together?
#BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% In Q3 2026, $TRX processed 1.08 billion transactions, a year-on-year increase of 31.19%.
TRON's transaction volume in the third quarter continued to maintain historic highs.
• Total transaction volume in Q3 2026: 1.08 billion transactions, up 31.19% year-on-year
• Average processing speed this quarter reached 135.76 TPS
• The fourth quarter is expected to maintain this record, with 364.4 million transactions in the past 30 days.
The steady growth in transaction volume indicates effective utilization of the TRON network, especially in the stablecoin transfer sector. However, an increase in transaction volume does not necessarily mean a rise in TRX price, as Tron’s recent weekly purchases of TRX have been worth less than $50,000, indicating quite limited funding demand. I believe the TRX price is likely to remain sideways, following the overall market trend. I only see this as a positive signal for the platform itself, but I do not dare to assert that this will be a driver for price increases.
People wonder whether such a large user network is enough to push up the price of TRX, or if its price will still depend on BTC.“AI meme” has once again been pushed to the front by ACT, and I almost thought the entire Solana sentiment chain was heating up. But when I flipped to PUMP, I realized I was imagining things too quickly.
Let's first look at the prices. BTC is almost flat, SOL dropped 0.79%, while ACT rose 14.86%, with a volatility of 25.59%. However, it is still about 7.46% away from its high point, so this baton isn't held very steadily.
Next, let's look at the funds. ACT's trading volume is about 1.74 million USDT, PUMP's is about 6.33 million USDT, but the latter dropped 10.15%. More active trading doesn't mean stronger prices; even within the same ecosystem chain, they didn't move forward together.
Finally, the funds connect to that term: AI meme. For now, I lean towards it being "short-term noise," not because I find the term unattractive, but because ACT's performance alone isn't enough for me to treat this local anomaly as a narrative comeback. My brain that chases hot terms shouldn't rush to add drama.
Do you stand by "the keyword is still passing the baton," or "it's just short-term noise"? Leaving aside ACT's recent gains, how many more rounds of discussion can the term "AI meme" sustain? #OKX星球话题来啦 $ACT $PUMP Today I did a long-term return comparison between $XAU and $QQQ, and the results are really quite interesting!
Both are types of assets, but just different purchase times, and the final results differ so much!
The first chart shows holding QQQ continuously from its inception in 1999 until now:
Gold has accumulated an increase of about 1321%, QQQ about 1211%, surprisingly close, with gold slightly ahead!
The second chart, if unlucky, buying right at the 2000 internet bubble peak:
Gold rose about 1313%, but QQQ only 472%.
This time gold really left QQQ far behind!
The third chart, changing the time, buying from the top of gold’s previous bull market in 2011:
QQQ rose about 1135%, but gold only about 120%!
This time it’s completely reversed, QQQ left gold far behind.
After seeing these three charts, my biggest takeaway is: sometimes what you buy is important, but when you buy is equally important! Buying even the best assets at high valuations may require a long time to digest the bubble. Conversely, buying during market downturns can lead to completely different long-term returns.
Of course, these are just price appreciation comparisons on the charts, without uniformly accounting for dividend reinvestment and other factors. Both gold and QQQ have their own long-term investment value and have moments that make investors question their decisions.$XAUT is a gold token issued by Tether, with 1 token = 1 ounce of physical gold; OKX's gold perpetual is called $XAU. This week, gold has been the most stable asset overall.
What happened: The election results came in, the Republicans lost Congress, and the market bought into a "divided government" — the US dollar fell, yields dropped, and gold surged 2.8% on Wednesday alone, jumping from 3,945 straight to 4,056; on Thursday, it further climbed to 4,152, fueled by safe-haven demand amid the US stock market crash. $BTC struggled around 75,000 during the same period, with only gold fully playing the safe-haven role.
The cost was borne by the shorts: this week, short liquidations totaled about $66 million, while longs only saw $3 million; those who tried to top out were forced out. But leverage has mostly been burned off: positions have dropped by over 30%, funding rates are near zero, and now spot prices are setting the tone.
Currently, COMEX is closed for the weekend, and OKX's 4,077 price is just a shadow price, with less than a million traded in an hour, so don't interpret weekend fluctuations as signals.
The key verification point is Monday: how COMEX opens relative to 4,077 and where it closes in the first hour. Holding above 4,152 points to 4,200; if it first dips, 4,028 and 4,000 are the touchstones for this breakout—breaking below them would indicate the election rally is set to retrace.#BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元
$BTC The current market is basically a half-dead stalemate. The selling pressure has indeed been mostly exhausted, the short momentum is fading, but the big money off-exchange is completely dormant, with no sign of buying activity at all. Deleveraging is basically over, but the macro environment and institutional funds remain bearish, with no confidence to push the market up.
The strength contrast is very clear, $ETH is now a soft target, much weaker than BTC, and there is a cascading liquidation point hanging overhead. If that triggers, it will definitely cause a chain stampede.
Looking at structural data, the 30-day range is between 74,888 and 84,898, and the current price is stuck rubbing the lower boundary intensely. The most fatal signal is extremely low volume; Binance’s ten high-liquidity samples only traded just over 2.2 billion, shrinking nearly 40%; Ethereum is even worse, shrinking over 40%. What does this data mean? There are indeed fewer stop-loss cuts, but no one dares to step in to catch the falling knife.
Based on the current framework, the overall direction is still bearish, in a downtrend cycle. At times like this, total position size should definitely not exceed 30%, single trade risk strictly capped at 0.3%, and absolutely no adding long positions against the trend.
Low-volume slow decline is the most exhausting; don’t guess the bottom blindly, wait for right-side signals before making a move. Are you currently sitting out watching, or holding half your position and toughing it out?
#美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温
#美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #英伟达冲击千亿美元季度营收纪录
$NVDA Nvidia's earnings exceed expectations, but political discounts are rewriting valuation anchors
Nvidia's FY2027 Q3 revenue guidance midpoint is $108 billion, about 2.7% higher than Bloomberg's consensus estimate of $105.155 billion, and does not yet include China data center revenue, so the revenue side is indeed above expectations
However, the Non-GAAP gross margin guidance drops to 74%, with Q4 expected to further slide to a low range of 71%–72%. The signal of "revenue growth without profit growth" has already appeared, which is the key reason the market is not buying it
Where is Nvidia's bottom?
On November 5, it plunged 9.26% to close at $181.60, the lowest since April 2026, retreating more than 25% from the October high of $243.37
Technical support is around $175–180, while the 52-week low points to $160–165
The midterm elections have ended, with a big win for the Democrats. After the midterms, the Democrats took control of both houses, and senior officials quickly sent signals targeting data center construction and AI expansion
Texas, a key state accounting for 27% of the planned data center capacity in the US, also elected a Democratic governor, and Nvidia fell 8% that day
Morgan Stanley's optimistic scenario is $350, corresponding to about 22x PE in 2027, assuming regulation remains at the statement level, Rubin's ramp-up goes smoothly, and gross margin stabilizes
The pessimistic scenario is $160, corresponding to about 13x PE, roughly coinciding with the technical low of $165. Note the risks