Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
156美元的SPCX,追的是太空,还是马斯克的账单? 营收暴增161%,首次盈利44亿,股价却从166砸回156。自由现金流还是负的——这波是黄金坑,还是马斯克挖的陷阱? 表面看:财报炸裂,价格却怂了。 Q3营收146亿美元,同比+161%;净利润44亿,去年同期亏10.5亿,上市后首次季度盈利;调整后EBITDA约88亿。AI业务(SI,含xAI+Cursor)营收76亿,占总营收一半以上,同比+830%,还盈利;Starlink营收52.5亿,+69%,用户1360万;指引更狠:Q1 2027营收预期330-370亿,远超共识。 第一件事:首次盈利44亿,但Q4要烧350-400亿 Q3资本开支约196亿美元,Q4指引350-400亿,主要投AI算力。现金储备约900亿量级,但自由现金流是负的。 SpaceX现在赚钱了,但烧钱更猛。 AI业务营收76亿、同比+830%、还盈利,听起来无敌。但AI盈利是用资本开支砸出来的。Q4如果真烧350-400亿,自由现金流压力会把“盈利”打成纸面游戏。 Starlink养家,AI败家,火箭讲故事。 这就是SPCX现在的真实结构。 第二件事:它已经不是火箭公司,是“AI+连接+马斯克期权” 市场给SPCX 2.1万亿市值,不是按火箭给的,是按AI算力+Starlink现金流+马斯克生态给的。 Starlink是奶牛:52.5亿营收,1360万用户,高利润,稳定现金流。 AI是估值引擎,也是碎钞机:76亿营收,+830%,但capex爆炸。 火箭是故事机:Starship、轨道算力、全球扩张,长期叙事强,短期不贡献利润。 还有合并期权:马斯克确认SpaceX与Tesla已成立独立董事委员会探讨合并,称“是个好主意”,但强调不确定、需股东批准,自己因利益冲突不参与。 第三件事:贪婪和恐惧的中间收费站 从IPO后低点104-140反弹,财报后冲高166,现在回落156,典型获利回吐+消化。 支撑:150-152(重要),148更强。跌破150短线转弱。 阻力:160,163-166(近期高点)。突破166上方空间才打开。 多空对决,你自己看 一边是: Q3营收+161%,首次盈利44亿 AI营收+830%,占一半还盈利 Starlink+69%,1360万用户 Q1 2027指引330-370亿,远超共识 合并Tesla期权,分析师目标217-275 长期AI+连接+太空叙事最强之一 一边是: 自由现金流为负,Q4 capex 350-400亿 2.1万亿市值,估值铡刀高悬 正资金费率,多头每天付费 OI高位回落,获利回吐没完 美股开盘跳空风险 合并只是“探讨”,不是确定 宏观CPI 3.7%、美债5.1%,高估值成长股承压 操作策略 短线: 156是财报脉冲后的回落中段,直接追多风险高。优先等回调到150-153企稳,观察4H/日线支撑+成交量,再轻仓多。突破并站稳160-162可加仓。止损放148下方或更严格。仓位控制在总资金5-10%,高波动标的别上头。 中线/长期:逻辑强,但买点要抠。 AI算力+Starlink+太空叙事是当前最强之一,财报验证增长质量,合并预期是额外期权。但高估值+高capex+负自由现金流,要求你分批、等回调、别追脉冲。理想买点在150附近确认支撑,或突破166后确认趋势。 风控铁律: 正资金费率会侵蚀持仓,别长拿永续不动。 美股开盘前后波动加大,永续可能跳空。 关注Tesla财报、宏观数据、合并消息脉冲。 若快速跌破148且放量,短线转谨慎,等更低支撑或结构修复。 SpaceX的火箭能回收,你的本金不能。 Starlink养家,AI败家,火箭讲故事。财报盈利是会计的胜利,自由现金流才是照妖镜。$BTC $ETH $SPCX
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
UNI at $7.1, did you cut your losses? CME just launched UNI futures, the first DeFi token ever listed on CME, a16z holds 64 million tokens, protocol revenue hits record highs—but the price dropped from 10.9 to 7.1, down 35%. Is this the last shakeout before institutions enter, or is the DeFi leader completely done for? Let's look at the surface first: good news delivered, price fell instead. September peak was 10.9, now 7.1, down 35% in a month. Another 5-7% drop in 24 hours, intraday low touched 7.00. The candlestick chart tells you: broke below 7-day, 20-day, and 50-day moving averages; the 7.3-7.8 range turned from support into resistance; RSI at 42-46 is neutral to weak; MACD below zero line—all indicators shout one thing: short-term bearish, don’t rush to bottom-fish. But wait. CME launch, a16z heavy holding, buyback and burn—these positives are real, so why the price drop? First: CME launch, is it a positive or "good news fully priced in"? CME officially launched UNI futures, standard contract 10,000 UNI, micro contract 1,000 UNI. FalconX and GSR completed the first block trade. UNI became the first DeFi governance token listed on CME. What does this mean? Institutions now have compliant hedging tools and participation channels. This is a substantial institutional entry positive, not just hype. But the harsh truth is: The market already knew about CME launch. The launch day was the sell-the-news point. Retail investors always chase on the day good news lands; institutions always sell on that day. Second: Buyback and burn is real, but so is the growth budget. After UNIfication, the protocol fee switch was turned on, fees directly used for UNI buyback and burn. Over 113 million UNI burned cumulatively, recently about 30,000 UNI burned daily, annualized about 12 million UNI over 30 days, accounting for 2% of circulating supply. This is real cash buying. September protocol revenue hit a record $14.8 million, Uniswap remains the DEX leader, TVL $4.1 billion, 24-hour trading volume in the $2 billion range. But on the other side: Annual growth budget is 20 million UNI. Burn 12 million, mint 20 million—net issuance 8 million. In plain terms: buyback and burn is the face, issuance budget is the reality. The net effect is still inflation. Don’t be fooled by the word "burn," calculating net is the adult game. Third: Technicals have reached a point where a direction must be chosen. Daily chart broke all short-term moving averages, 7.3-7.8 turned into resistance zone. RSI 42-46, not oversold, still room to fall. Key levels: Support: 7.00 (psychological) → 6.88 (structural) → 6.64 (strong support) → 6.3-6.5 (Bollinger lower band) Resistance: 7.31 (pivot) → 7.50-7.55 → 7.73 (today’s high) → 7.8-8.5 (moving average recovery zone) But long-term signals are intact: Price still above 200-day moving average, macro uptrend unbroken. Exchange reserves continue to decline, spot buyers still absorbing. Short-term bearish, but 6.8-7.0 is a zone to watch for mid-term positioning. Break below 6.88 with daily close confirmation, next stop 6.64. Bull vs bear, you decide: On one side: CME launch, first DeFi governance token on CME a16z holds 64 million UNI (about 10% of circulating supply) Grayscale DeFi fund increasing holdings Buyback and burn is real buying, 30,000 UNI daily Exchange reserves declining, spot support present Long-term still above 200-day moving average On the other side: Dropped from 10.9 to 7.1, down 35% Broke all short-term moving averages, technicals bearish Net issuance 8 million UNI/year, burn insufficient to offset October activity cooling, protocol revenue down month-over-month Fed resumed rate hikes in September, 10-year US Treasury at 5.29% FOMC on October 27-28, rate hike expectations suppress risk assets Short-term (intraday to a few days): 7.1 below moving averages, neither chase shorts nor rush to bottom. Watch if 7.00-6.88 holds. Break below 6.88 with daily close confirmation, look for 6.64. Rebound to 7.3-7.5 faces resistance, a zone to reduce positions or short-term shorts. Leverage not to exceed 3x. Mid-term (weeks to months): If 6.8-7.0 stabilizes with volume, or funding rates remain neutral to slightly negative plus spot support, it’s a good mid-term buy zone. Targets first 7.8-8.5 (moving average recovery), then 9-10. CME and burn are mid-term support logic. Long-term: Leading DEX + real burn + institutional channel + tokenized asset track, UNI remains a core DeFi asset. But net accounting: burn 12 million vs mint 20 million, net inflation. Only when growth budget shrinks or revenue explodes will there be a real turning point. UNI now is like BNB in 2023— Everyone said "exchange tokens are done," but what happened? BNB went from 200 to 600. True institutional positives never cause a jump on launch day, but three months later, you realize the chips are no longer in retail hands. $BTC $ETH $UNI

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!