Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
马斯克又扔了一颗炸弹:明年给全美每个孩子送一股SpaceX。 听起来像慈善。算完账你会发现,这是一笔人类商业史上最便宜的“政治保险”。 7200万儿童 × 146美元 ≈ 105亿美元。 听起来天文数字对吧?换个算法: SpaceX总市值1.92万亿美元,这批股票只占0.55%。马斯克个人净资产约9000亿美元,105亿只占他身家的1.2%。占他直接持有的SpaceX股份,约1.5%。 把全美下一代变成股东,他只掏了手里股票的零头。 今年7月,SpaceX总裁Shotwell已经通过“特朗普账户”计划,向超过200万名儿童各捐了一股。 马斯克这次做的事,是把范围从 “200万”扩大到“全美所有儿童” 。 量变引发质变。200万是慈善。7200万是基础设施。 任何想对SpaceX加税、反垄断、限制星链的政客,从今天开始都要面对一个噩梦般的标签:“抢孩子股票的人”。 105亿美元买一份永久性的政治免疫。对比一下:美国游说行业一年花多少钱?几十亿。而且游说是一次性的,这个是一劳永逸的。 用0.55%的股份,绑架了整个下一代的心智,和未来几十年的政策空间。 如果SpaceX证明“股权分发”比“代币分发”更能绑定用户、更能建立忠诚、更能形成政治护城河——Crypto的激励叙事,需不需要一次严肃的自我审视? 空投发币,用户领完就砸盘。SpaceX发股票,孩子长大后买特斯拉、用星链、甚至去火星,天然带着“我是股东”的归属感。 代币激励让人套现。股权激励让人留下。 这不是技术问题。这是人性问题。 马斯克在买下一代的忠诚,美联储在收这一代的流动性。比特币还在8.2万美元附近横盘震荡,市场在等28号美联储的决议。 $BTC $SPCX $TSLA #SpaceX上市后首份完整季度财报将揭晓
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
ETF outflowed $593 million, Coinbase premium turned negative, and longs liquidated $173 million. Three hard indicators simultaneously point to "no one is buying anymore." But BTC is still hovering around 82,000. Who is selling? Who is buying? Let's first look at a set of "fighting" data. Last week, the total net outflow of all digital asset ETFs was $593 million, with IBIT alone outflowing $228.6 million; the previous week was even worse at $681 million. The Coinbase premium index dropped to -0.141, the lowest since June 30, clearly showing insufficient US buy-side support. In the past 24 hours, long liquidations reached $173 million, accounting for more than half of total derivatives liquidations—leveraged gamblers are being taken out in batches. The sellers are clear: passive ETFs are withdrawing, and short-term leveraged longs are being liquidated. But BTC hasn't fallen below 80,000; it is even consolidating near 82,000. Who is buying? It's not "faith" that is buying, but two things: limit orders and hedging. Between 80,000 and 81,500 USD, there is a "buy wall" of limit orders that traders are watching closely as a price support zone. Meanwhile, on Deribit, open interest for the 80,000 USD strike options reaches $1.6 billion. Market makers must hedge their positive Gamma positions by buying when prices fall and selling when prices rise—they are "mechanically" supporting the price near 80,000, not because they are bullish, but because their positions force them to do so. Therefore, 80,000 is not the "market bottom." It is the "liquidity bottom." Limit orders can be withdrawn. Options will expire. Gamma hedging will disappear as open interest shifts away from the 80,000 strike. When that wall is eaten up and those contracts roll off, who will buy below 80,000? No one knows. GlassNode puts it bluntly: selling pressure has eased, but "there is not yet enough new buying power to fill the gap." ETF capital flows have not reversed, Coinbase premium has not turned positive, and real structural buying has not returned. Holding 80,000 does not mean 80,000 is the bottom. It only means someone has placed orders below 80,000. Limit orders can be withdrawn; the bottom cannot be defined by limit orders. $BTC $COIN $ETH #ETF持续流出,BTC反弹能否延续?

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!