Kithe
Kithe
加密爱好者｜全撸型选手 任何推文不做投资建议🫡
2KFollowing
1.9Kfollowers
Feed
Livestream
Feed
Pinned
A few days ago, brothers who were farming Fomopok really got unlucky this time.
The situation I heard is that many people's wallets on their phones were emptied. The scariest part isn't just ordinary phishing websites, but that they specifically made an iOS app, which you can even download directly from the store.
People used to think iPhone and iOS were relatively safe, so when they saw it on the App Store, they instinctively let their guard down. On top of that, the other side used a "5U promotion reward" to lure people into downloading it, making it easy to think: it's just a small bonus, it should be fine.
But it turned out to be a classic case of losing the big picture for a small gain.
Judging from this wave of spreading, I feel they were clearly targeting the Chinese-speaking users who farm small bonuses, picking the places where people are most likely to relax their vigilance.
Most of my friends around me were hit too, luckily the on-chain assets weren't much!
This time it’s a lesson for the brothers:
You can farm bonuses and make money, but when it comes to downloading unfamiliar apps, importing wallets, authorizing, signing, you really have to think twice.
Don’t expose your entire wallet just for a few U or tens of U rewards.
In this circle, there is no such thing as an "absolutely safe" platform, nor is there any "definitely safe" just because it’s downloaded from the Apple Store.
The real protection for your assets ultimately comes down to your own security awareness.
Safety first, always more important than farming bonuses!
$ETH has been hovering above 2050 for a few days, unable to break down or push up.
$ETH has returned to around 2090.
The news is all bearish, yet the price hasn't broken below 2050.
How this number is calculated:
2050 is the low point of these past few days, not just a random line drawn.
It tried to break down several times but was bought back each time.
What I did:
I didn't chase shorts, nor did I buy longs.
I just watched from the sidelines, waiting for a clear direction.
The lesson here:
Not falling doesn't mean it will rise.
It just means those willing to sell have temporarily sold out.
If it really breaks below 2050, the earlier batch of bottom buyers will be flushed out.
That will be the direction.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$ETH
-0.526
-60.36%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 23:00
U.S. stocks are rallying enthusiastically, but $ETH hasn't kept up
Tech stocks collectively rebounded last night, with the storage sector rising the most.
$ETH surged to around 2150, then was pushed back down.
What about this price level:
2090 is the current support level to hold, 2050 is the next line.
If 2050 doesn't hold, 2000 needs to be reconsidered.
Who's placing orders here:
On-chain, 134 whales are short, 118 are long.
More shorts than longs indicate big money hasn't joined this rebound.
What will happen next:
Price surged without volume, indicating no new money coming in.
A rebound without volume won't go far.
$ETH is most likely to remain in consolidation this round.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$ETH
-0.553
-63.43%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 22:27
ETF is selling, but the price hasn't crashed
$BTC Last night, US tech stocks rallied, yet it didn't even touch back to the whole number level.
Where is this money coming from: Last week, spot ETF net outflow was $1.282 billion, indicating continuous redemptions, not a one-time dump.
How is this number calculated: On a weekly basis, it equals over $200 million outflow per trading day, so the selling pressure is steady.
The trigger moment: The CPI reading pushed the December rate hike expectation above 80%, making the 75,000 level a betting point.
ETF redemptions follow the subscription/redemption mechanism, which is different from panic selling.
Steady selling pressure doesn't cause a crash, it just suppresses the rebound.
This is why $BTC can't rally.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$BTC
-0.529
-20.06%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 21:55
A 5.7% increase doesn't mean someone is rushing to buy
$SNDK rose 5.7% in one day, surged to 905.6 then dropped back down.
Outsiders see the rise, insiders see it’s still over 30% below the high.
How this number is calculated: current price 887.4, down 36.90% from the 4-hour high.
The rise is over 24 hours, the drop is the trend; both directions exist simultaneously.
Buy orders 923 vs sell orders 615, ratio 1.50.
There are buyers at the low level, but funding rate is zero, open interest 104,000, indicating no one is willing to pay for direction.
My guess is this rebound only recovers part of the previous decline.
The real direction setter isn’t the candlestick, but who dares to hold positions overnight before the CPI release.
The small support on the order book can’t withstand a piece of news.
#美国10月CPI今晚公布，加息预期能否改变？ $SNDK
Support is not the floor; it is the last buy order.
$PONS current price is 0.1512, with support written at 0.1509.
The difference between the two numbers is just three points; this is no coincidence.
What does this price level mean:
Support is where the order book is most densely packed.
When the price falls here, buy orders hold it, causing a pause.
Who places orders here:
If the buy orders can't hold, these orders will be eaten up all at once.
Once eaten, there are no buy orders below.
There is almost no gap between 0.1509 and 0.1512.
Breaking below 0.1509 means no buffer zone.
If pushed down further, the price will look for the next dense trading area.
That position has not yet formed.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$PONS
No one can figure out the valuation, but those who dare to buy are already lining up
Anthropic hasn't gone public yet, but the live stream room is already heated.
The topic is the same: how much are you willing to pay.
First, what others think: afraid of overpaying, even more afraid of missing out.
These two things are actually the same—both stem from fear of making the wrong judgment.
Now, my take: for something without a set price, discussing whether you dare to buy is meaningless.
The price is set by the market on the day of the IPO, not by discussion.
When that day comes, whether you dare to buy depends on how much money you have.
It doesn't depend on whose judgment you listened to.
The honest truth is, most people lining up to ask the price can't even clearly explain how it makes money.
#AI巨头融资观察：OpenAI完成110亿美元融资，科技企业发债潮持续
#$ETH
-0.523
-59.95%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 20:13
Missing a zero in the order placement, not a slip of the hand but miscalculated position size
Starting with 6000 principal to reach 160,000, withdrew 58,000.
The numbers look good, but the process was full of miscalculations.
What does this number mean: 160,000 is the account balance, not net profit.
After subtracting the 58,000 withdrawn, the remaining principal plus profit on the account should be viewed separately.
The balance increasing doesn’t mean every trade was correct.
What he actually did: $ETH planned 300U, but missed a zero in the order, making it 30U.
Position size was ten times smaller, even if the direction was right, the expected profit couldn’t be made.
AKE changed the low-price order to a high-price one before sleeping, the order got stuck without execution, missing the profit directly.
When the position size is high, the misjudged $PEPE and $ARB can only be held.
It’s not a misread, it’s that no more can be added.
Next time before placing an order, count the digits once, it’s more useful than reviewing the trades.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$ETH $PEPE
-0.523
-59.91%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 19:44
$BTC inflow over 50 million in six hours, but still a net outflow in 24 hours
Let's look at one number: $BTC net outflow of 18.15 million U in 24 hours.
In the same data, net inflow in 6 hours is 54.66 million U.
How is this number calculated:
Net inflow equals buying minus selling.
Positive in 6 hours means more buying in half a day.
Negative in 24 hours means selling still dominates over a longer period.
Who is connected:
$ETH is also positive in the short term, but negative in 12 and 24 hours.
$SOL is positive in all four time periods.
In other words, short-term inflow is real, and mid-term selling pressure is also real.
Both are not contradictory, just different time scales.
People watching 6 hours see a recovery, people watching 24 hours see selling.
Same chart, two conclusions.
A self-mock: this kind of divergence is the easiest to misread direction.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$BTC $ETH
-0.466
-17.67%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 19:16
Triple leveraged long, the drop is also triple
$SOXL rose to 56.15 in 24 hours, an increase of 22.5%.
What does this number mean: It tracks semiconductors, and it's triple leveraged long.
Triple leverage means if the underlying drops by one point, it drops by three points.
What was actually done: bought on the pullback at 54.32, stop loss at 51.87.
The stop loss is less than 8% away from the current price, amplified three times it hits first.
The intraday low was 41.35, down over 27% from the high.
Position size is 20%, exit if broken, this is the only part that can be clearly calculated.
Stop loss for leveraged products relies on execution, not judgment.
#美股三大指数集体上涨，标普500创7个月最大单日涨幅
#$SOXL
Dumped with ten times the volume, but the price didn't drop much
$ETH hit around 2088 on the 15-minute candle with volume ten times the average of the previous 20 candles.
How is this calculated: the tenfold volume is from selling pressure, not buying.
However, the close pulled back a bit, leaving a long lower shadow.
In plain terms: the sell orders were absorbed.
Market makers do only one thing at this level: absorb.
After absorbing, they watch two things: whether the price breaks below 2076 and how fast the rebound is.
This time, neither happened, so the bears are cut off.
Going further, such a large volume without a break means this batch of sell orders is exhausted.
Stop losses placed below 2076 have already been triggered.
#BTC与ETH现货ETF单周净流出超16亿美元
#$ETH
-0.516
-59.16%Snapshot at 10 Nov 2026, 18:14
