Post

colword.std
colword.std
Show original
风险调整才是胜负手 夏普这栏最说明问题:$ETH -3.54 高过 $BTC -7.09,波动率 $ETH 52.5% vs $BTC 41.0%。翻译成人话:$ETH 每扛一份波动,换回的相对价值更高;$BTC 钝一点、稳一点,但也更没脾气。这轮 $ETH 的「效率」更胜一筹。 聪明钱站哪边 看费率。$BTC 整周稳稳 +0.0090%,多头一直老实交费;$ETH 更有戏——10/30、10/31 费率一度掉到 -0.0034% 和 -0.0072%,空头在倒贴,11/03 才转正回 +0.0093%。费率先负后正的走位,常是轧空剧本的群众基础,$ETH 这轮情绪反转的料比 $BTC 足。(注:本期 OI 持仓净流入接口采集不可用,只能比费率不比净流向。)
colword.std
colword.std
PK Day | Verdict: $ETH Narrow Win The referee reveals the cards first Don't talk to me about profits or losses over these 7 days — both are losing, it's about who loses more gently. Verdict: $ETH Narrow Win. It closed the 7 days at -3.21%, $BTC closed at -4.79%, losing 1.58 percentage points less; risk-adjusted Sharpe ratio $ETH -3.54 also beats $BTC's -7.09. Contract trading requires resilience; in the lesson of "taking fewer hits," $ETH scores this round. That said, $BTC's drawdown of 5.2% is shallower than $ETH's 6.0%, and its volatility at 41.0% is steadier than $ETH's 52.5% — $ETH bounces enthusiastically but falls hard, this "earning ability" comes at the cost of risk. Report card laid out first The two normalized curves on the chart both trend downward, crashing together on 10/29 and rallying together on 11/03, with $ETH's line always slightly above $BTC's. Data breakdown: 7-day returns $BTC -4.79% / $ETH -3.21%, maximum drawdown $BTC 5.2% / $ETH 6.0%. On the crash day, $ETH held up better and bounced back stronger — but it also fell deeper; each blade has its edge.

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!